HOME   GAZETTE
 + PHOTO'S
 ARCHIVE
  MATCHES 
FIXTURES
 INFO FOR   VISITORS
 inc. MAPS
 PLAYER
 PROFILES
&
Stats
 CONTACTS
 + LINKS 
  TOUR!
2019 Season
April 30th TWCC v Wisley CC
May 5th Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 12th TWCC v Greys
May 19th Lindfield v TWCC
May 26th TWCC v Westbourne CC
June 2nd TWCC v Southwick CC
June 9th TWCC v Xiles
June 16th TWCC v London Unity
June 23rd Jevington CC v TWCC Cancelled - arson!
June 27th-30th Tour - Wimborne
July 14th Staplefield v TWCC - Cancelled
July 21st TWCC v Billingshurst - Cancelled, no team (50 over World Cup)
July 28th TWCC Single Wicket Competition
August 4th TWCC v Cutter's Choice Cricket Club
August 11th TWCC v Warninglid CC

  
2018 Season
April 29th TWCC v Wisley - Match cancelled
May 6th Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 13th TWCC v Greys
May 20th Lindfield v TWCC
May 27th Bolney CC v TWCC
June 3rd Jevington CC v TWCC
June 10th Xiles v TWCC
June 17th TWCC v London Unity
June 28th - July 1st TWCC Tour to Wimborne Minster
July 22nd Headliners v TWCC
July 15th TWCC v Staplefield - Match cancelled
August 26th TWCC v Warninglid - Match cancelled
September 2nd Crescent CC v TWCC
September 9th Parham CC v TWCC
September 16th TWCC v Bolney CC
September 23rd TWCC v Streat and Westmeston Match cancelled - rained off
September 30th TWCC v Brighton Beamers
2018 Captain's Report

2017 Season
April 30th TWCC v Wisley CC
May 7th Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 14th TWCC v Greys
May 21st Lindfield CC v TWCC
May 28th Bolney CC v TWCC
June 4th Parham CC v TWCC
June 11th TWCC v Xiles
June 18th TWCC v London Unity
June 25th West Chiltington & Thakenham CC v TWCC
June 30th - July 2nd Tour to Oxfordshire
July 16th TWCC v Staplefield
July 23rd Warnham CC v TWCC No match, no opposition
August 12th Steve Rogers Memorial Game
August 20th TWCC v Rottingdean No match, not sure why
August 27th Nuthurst v TWCC
September 3rd Crescent CC v TWCC
September 10th Ashurst v TWCC
September 17th TWCC v Bolney CC
September 24th TWCC v Streat and Westmeston
In Praise of Old Scorebooks - Richard on finding buried treasure
Season Review

2016 Season
April 24th TWCC v Partridge Green (no play due to several circumstances principally a lack of PG players)
May 1st Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 8th TWCC v Greys
May 15th Lindfield v TWCC
May 22nd Bolney v TWCC
May 29th Parham CC v TWCC - Called off
June 5th West Chiltington v TWCC
June 12th TWCC v Rottingdean
June 19th TWCC v Malayalee
July 1st to 3rd Tour!
July 10th Staplefield v TWCC - Called off
July 17th TWCC v Wisley
July 24th Henfield v TWCC - Called off 
July 31st Partridge Green v - Called off
August 7th TWCC v Xiles - Called off; no Xiles present
August 14th Warnham CC v TWCC - Called off, not by us!
August 21st Warninglid CC v TWCC
August 28th Crescent CC v TWCC
September 4th Ashurst v TWCC
September 11th TWCC v Bolney CC
September 18th TWCC v Streat and Westmeston
September 25th TWCC v Brighton Beamers

2015 Season
April 26th Brunswick Village v TWCC
May 3rd Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 10th TWCC v Greys
May 17th Swans (Moulsecoomb Wanderers v TWCC)
May 24th Bolney CC v TWCC
May 31st Parham CC v TWCC (Rained off)
June 7th West Chiltington v TWCC
June 14th TWCC v London Unity
June 21st TWCC v Headliners
July 3rd-5th Tour - Bournemouth
July 12th TWCC v Staplefield
July 19th TWCC v Wisley CC
August 9th TWCC v Xiles
August 16th Warnham CC v TWCC
August 23rd TWCC v Streat and Westmeston CC
August 30th Crescent CC v TWCC
September 6th TWCC v Ashurst
September 13th TWCC v Bolney - Teamed off (us)
September 20th TWCC v Streat and Westmeston - Teamed off (us)
September 27th TWCC v Brighton Beamers
2015 Review - Richard Brock TWCC Captain

2014 Season
April 27th Brunswick Village v TWCC - Match Teamed Off
May 4th Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 11th TWCC v Greys
May 18th TWCC v Moulsecoomb Wanderers
May 25th Bolney v TWCC
June 1st Parham CC v TWCC 
June 8th TWCC v Twineham School 20:20 Good game, good fun, ran out of Harveys.
June 15th TWCC v London Unity
June 22nd TWCC v Headliners
July 13th Staplefield v TWCC
July 20th TWCC v Wisley
July 27th Henfield v TWCC
August 3rd Albourne and Sayers Common v TWCC Teamed off (not us!)
August 10th TWCC v Xiles
August 17th Warnham CC v TWCC Teamed off (them)
August 24th TWCC v Warninglid Teamed off (them)
August 24th TWCC v Henfield
August 31st Crescent CC v TWCC
September 7th Ashurst v TWCC Teamed off (them)
September 14th TWCC v Bolney CC
September 21st TWCC v Streat and Westmeston
September 28th TWCC v Brighton Beamers Cancelled due to low numbers

2013 Season
April 28th TWCC v Brunswick Village
May 5th Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 12th TWCC v Greys Rained Off/Teamed Off
May 19th TWCC v Moulsecoomb Wanderers
May 26th Bolney v TWCC
June 2nd Parham CC v TWCC
June 16th TWCC v London Unity
June 23rd TWCC v Headliners
June 30th Poynings v TWCC
July 5th - 7th Tour
July 14th TWCC v Staplefield
July 21st TWCC v Wisley
July 28th TWCC v Henfield
August 4th Warnham v TWCC
August 11th Moulsecoomb Wanderers v TWCC Rained Off/Teamed Off
August 18th Partridge Green v TWCC
Rained Off/Teamed Off
August 25th TWCC v Warninglid
September 1st Crescent v TWCC No Data, Rained Off or Cancelled
September 8th Ashurst v TWCC 
No Data, Rained Off or Cancelled
September 15th TWCC v Bolney No Data, Rained Off or Cancelled
September 22nd TWCC v Streat & Westmeston No Data, Rained Off or Cancelled
September 29th TWCC v Brighton Beamers No Data, Rained Off or Cancelled

2012 Season
April 29th Brunswick Village v TWCC Rained Off
May 6th Streat and Westmeston v TWCC Rained Off
May TWCC v Greys Rained Off
May 20th TWCC v Moulsecoomb Wanderers
May 27th Bolney CC v TWCC
June 3rd Parham Park v TWCC
June 10th TWCC v Xiles
June 17th TWCC v London Unity Rained Off
June 24th TWCC v Headliners Cancelled
July 1st Henfield v TWCC
July 6th - 8th TWCC Tour

July 15th Staplefield v TWCC Cancelled
July 22nd TWCC v Wisley
July 29th TWCC v Henfield
August 5th Albourne and Sayers Common v TWCC
August 26th Warninglid v TWCC
September 2nd TWCC v Crescent
September 9th TWCC v Ashurst
September 16th TWCC v Bolney CC


2011 Season
April 24th TWCC v Brunswick Village
May 1st Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 8th TWCC v Greys
May 15th TWCC v Moulsecoomb Wanderers
May 22nd Bolney v TWCC
May 29th TWCC v Xiles
June 5th Parham Park v TWCC
June 12th TWCC v London Unity Rained off.
June 19th TWCC v Headliners
June 26th Poynings v TWCC
July 3rd Wisley v TWCC
July 10th Tintern v TWCC
July 17th TWCC v Staplefield Rained off though the golf was on and lots of people thought it might be nicer to sit indoors watching it rather than get wet which we would have done if we'd played.
July 24th Henfield v TWCC 
July 31st Albourne and Sayers Common
August 7th Moulsecoomb Wanderers v TWCC
August 14th TWCC v Warninglid
August 21st Partridge Green v TWCC
August 28th TWCC v Crescent
September 4th TWCC v Ashurst Rained off
September 11th TWCC v Bolney CC
September 18th TWCC v Streat and Westmeston
September 25th TWCC v Brighton Beamers

2010 Season
April 25th TWCC v Brunswick Village
May 2nd Streat and Westmeston v TWCC rained off
May 9th TWCC v Greys
May 16th TWCC v Moulsecoomb Wanderers
May 23rd Bolney CC v TWCC
May 30th Parham Park v TWCC
June 6th TWCC v Xiles
June 13th TWCC v London Unity
June 20th TWCC v Headliners 
June 27th Poynings v TWCC - Poynings called it off because they prefer football to cricket
July 4th TWCC v Preston Park
July 11th Staplefield v TWCC
July 16th - 18th TWCC Tour to Dorset
July 25th TWCC v Henfield - Match cancelled due to shortfall of players. In numbers that is.
August 1st Albourne and Sayers Common v TWCC
August 8th Moulsecoomb Wanderers v TWCC
August 15th Warninglid v TWCC
August 29th TWCC v Crescent
September 5th TWCC v East Brighton
September 12th TWCC v Bolney
September 19th TWCC v Streat and Westmeston
September 26th TWCC v Brighton Beamers
October 3rd TWCC v Partridge Green - Match cancelled due to too much weather

2009 Season
April 26th TWCC v Brunswick Village
May 3rd Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 10th TWCC v Greys
May 17th Moulsecoomb Wanderers v TWCC rained off
May 24th Bolney v TWCC
May 31st Ashurst v TWCC
June 14th TWCC v London Unity
June 21st TWCC v Headliners
June 28th TWCC v Poynings
July 5th Wisley v TWCC
July 26th Henfield v TWCC
August 2nd TWCC v X-iles
August 9th TWCC v Moulsecoomb Wanderers
August 16th TWCC v Warninglid
September 6th Albourne and Sayers Common v TWCC
September 13th TWCC v Bolney
September 20th TWCC v Streat and Westmeston
September 27th TWCC v Brighton Beamers
October 4th TWCC v Partridge Green
2009 Season Review
2009 Statistics

2008 Season
 April 27th Brunswick Village v TWCC
 May 4th Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
 May 11th TWCC v Greys
 May 18th TWCC v Moulscombe Wanderers
 May 25th Bolney v TWCC
 June 1st Ashurst v TWCC
 June 8th Single Wicket Competition
 June 15th TWCC v London Unity
 June 20th to 22nd Tour to Suffolk
 June 29th Poynings v  TWCC
 July 6th TWCC v Wisley
 July 13th Staplefield v TWCC
 July 20th TWCC v Southern Cross and Hornblowers
 July 27th TWCC v Henfield
 August 3rd TWCC v President's XI
 August 10th Moulsecoomb v TWCC
 August 17th Warninglid v TWCC

 2007 Season

 April  29th Brunswick Village v TWCC
 May 6th Streat and Westmeston v TWCC  
 May 20th TWCC v Moulescomb Wanderers  
 June 10th Single Wicket 2007
 July 1st 2007 Twineham and Wineham v. Poynings
 July 22nd Southern Cross and Hornblowers
 July 29th Henfield v TWCC
 August 12th Moulescombe Wanderers v TWCC
 August 19th TWCC v Warninglid
 September 2nd TWCC v Worthing Foresters
 September 9th Albourne and Sayers Common v TWCC
 September 30th TWCC v Brighton Beamers
 

 2006 Season
 August 6th TWCC v President's XI
 August 13th Moulescombe Wanderers v TWCC
 August 20th Warninglid v TWCC
 17th September Bolney v TWCC
 24th September TWCC v Streat and Westmeston
 1st October TWCC v Brighton Beamers
 Season Retrospective

 
2004-2006 Season - In Praise of Old Scorebooks
Written by Richard Brock in 2017 - on the occasion of Nigel finally returning a scorebook!

Top
2019 Season

Top
TWCC v Warninglid CC August 11th 2019
After a week of gales and rain, bar a couple of light squalls the afternoon on game day was dry and bright. TWCC were up against a typically capable but only nine-strong Warninglid team, but although they were short in number they looked long enough, as always, on ability. Warninglid, with their characteristic sprinkling of league players are always a side to be reckoned with. And, look out! Warninglid's John Swinscoe arrived on a Moto Guzzi! What a player he must be!
Given the absence of several regular players, Skipper Panther had done well with assistance from all around, to draw together an excellent TWCC side including, for the first time this season, Jonathan R and President Jones. There was a brief chat between skippers in the middle, with tree explanations and vague boundaries no doubt part of it, and a sort of no-toss agreement that TWCC would bat first emerged. No problem.
Paul and Jim togged up and off they went, seeing off a sequence of bowlers and even scoring some runs. With Paul scoring a bit quicker than Jim - naturally, given their relative abilities - the runs built nicely as this athletic pair scampered many quick 1's and 2's as well as making the most of any poorer balls. Drinks at 20 overs came and went with the score on 106 for 0, and a good platform had been set.
Jim was the first to go to a swinging full-length ball; 49 his personal contribution to a first wicket partnership of 117, then Paul was caught on 65 shortly afterwards with the TWCC total on 125 for 2. This left a useful 14 overs for the TWCC collapse - but keen observers of this phenomenon were to be disappointed as, whilst batters did come and go, runs were accumulating all the time. Charlie swiped a cool 19, then Mikey -TWCC's very own Jason Roy - looked dominant but was undone somewhat by the strong southerly wind that stalled the ball into Reilly's capable grasp at long on; out for 14. But these runs all add up, and Jonathan's 9, Dave Jones' 2, and even George's single run might have proved to be important by the end of the day. But there's more; Joe had kept back plenty of power for the end of the allotted 40 overs, and his own 16 (three quick 4's), together with Tom's 10 and Ed's 16 added a powerful punch to the end of the TWCC innings that took the score up to an impressive 216 for 8. Five of those eight wickets fell to the excellent John Swinscoe, he of Moto Guzzi fame, who bowled a simple but clearly effective line and length that proved too tempting or too good in equal measures. Did I mention his Moto Guzzi?
Everything in Joe's master plan had worked out; TWCC's good base to the innings with wickets in hand had left an opportunity for the rest of the team to swing the bat - especially as the 40 overs played out, and Paul's (second) tea of the season probably tasted better to the home side than it did to the "'Lid."
TWCC's time to bowl and Joe had a plan for this too. A good plan, and that plan was to open the bowling with Phil. How good to see Phil back hurling the ball down from two paces, finding that length that is all his own. Did Warninglid's crack batters get on top of Phil's bowling? Of course not! And neither were they finding anything simple about facing Tom from his favoured Pavilion End. Phil's perfect awkward length gave Warninglid just 12 runs off his 6 overs, and Tom's in-swinging guided missiles in both his spells cost just 20 runs off an allotted 8 overs during which time he took 2 top order wickets. Tom's bowling, especially into the prevailing wind which seems only enhance the swinging penetration he achieves, is truly in a purple patch. Ed, held back until after Phil's excellent spell, also gave nothing away as is his wont which must have been a worrying surprise to the visitors, and his 8 overs for 28 with 3 wickets to his name (including his own running catch somewhere in the outfield off his own bowling and a sharply taken catch at mid-off from Phil) simply meant there was little hope for Warninglid unless something radical occurred. But all TWCC could offer in this vein was a few creaky overs from Jim followed by somewhat better-oiled offerings from Joe, Dave and George which did give the scorer something to do, but not enough to bring anything like hope to the visiting side. Great to see Dave getting a wicket thanks to a high-energy sprint to mid-wicket from Jonathan, and Tom's calmly taken but tricky catch in the deep also gave George something in the wicket's column. Mikey's one over of spin deserves a mention; more or less all the deliveries landed on the short stuff, and his 1 for 1 off 1 is now nothing short of a worry for the rest of the season.
Warninglid were all out in the 34th over, some 74 runs short of TWCC's 216.
A well-paced batting performance followed by some great bowling from TWCC's A-list with Ed and Tom removing 5 top order batters between them, canny skippering from Joe combined with excellent all round performances from the whole side sent us to the pub with little need for further cheer.

Scorecard
Toss negotiated due to Warninglid having 9 players, TWCC batted first. 40 overs game, no nice draws available. Some weird Last Man Stands thing was agreed. It did happen but nothing much came of it which is just as well as I've no idea what was going on but I know it wasn't cricket.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Ct Clarke Bld Blake 65; J Simon Bld Frankham 49; C Howes Ct Mackie Bld Swinscoe 19; M Pearce Ct Reilly Bld Swinscoe 14; J Rowland Ct Mackie Bld Swinscoe 9; D Jones Bld Swinscoe 2; J Panther Bld Swinscoe 16; G Howes Ct Blake Bld Parsons 1;
T Rydon Not Out 10; E Howes Not Out 16. DNB P Steinke. Extras 15 (B 6, LB 1, W 4, NB 4) Total 216 for 8, 40 overs.
Fall: 1-117; 2-125; 3-154; 4-166; 5-169; 6-174; 7-175; 8-192.
Warninglid Bowling: Blake 8-0-34-1; Acton 7-1-30-0; Clarke 6-0-46-0; Mackie 3-0-21-0; Frankham 8-2-26-1; Swinscoe 6-0-32-5; Parsons 2-0-18-1.
Warninglind Innings: J Reilly Ct C Howes Bld T Rydon 8; J Frankham-Eade Ct P Steinke Bld E Howes 21; M Nastys Bld T Rydon 0; C Mackie Ct & Bld E Howes 29; A Parsons Ct P Hunter Bld J Simon 9; R Clarke Bld E Howes 1; S Acton Ct J Rowland (Wk) Bld D Jones 35; M Blake Ct T Rydon Bld G Howes 20; J Swinscoe Bld M Pearce 3. Extras 15 (B 2, LB 3, W 10) Total 142 all out 33.5 overs.
Fall: 1-9; 2-11; 3-39; 4-50; 5-53; 6-78; 7-120; 8-127; 9-142.
TWCC Bowling: P Steinke6-1-12-0; T Rydon 8-2-20-2; E Howes 8-0-28-3; J Simon 4-0-16-1; J Panther 3-0-28-0; D Jones 2-0-16-1; G Howes 1.5-0-15-1; M Pearce 1-0-1-1.
TWCC win by 74 runs.

Top
TWCC v Cutter's Choice CC August 4th 2019
Every time I begin to write up a game I mean to be brief. But all too often, for my RSI and busy readers alike, TWCC games are so action-packed that it would be an injustice not to go through the afternoon's play in all it's exciting detail. On this occasion, however, this ambition of mine should be perfectly possible to achieve.
Cutter's Choice, or CCCC as it seems a shame not to refer to them as, are a side new to TWCC, but they assured us that their innoculations were up to date and were a very jolly and pleasant group of players with whom to share a somewhat grey Sunday, so on we went with CCCC batting first.
Ed and Tom R opened up, and whilst both were their usual ebullient selves, on this occasion it was Ed who got the maidens and Tom who took the wickets. I wasn't in a position to see quite what Ed was doing with the ball though it was clearly something good, but fielding in the slips was a perfect place to see how Tom's inswinging fast pitched-up deliveries were doing the damage. Jim dropped a sharpish chance in the slips, but Tom ploughed on and his reward was an LBW and a bowled 2 balls later. It looked to me as if facing either of these two was tricky indeed.
To return to my ambition; (I'm overdue a trip down the road to see Joffra again) notable other events are as follows:
Phil's return! Phil - he of the fast arm and reverse cap, back where he belongs in a TWCC shirt and in the wickets column. 5 overs for 14 and a bail-trimmer bowled wicket. Welcome back Phil!
Graham's catch! Out at long on, a high swirling catch that he judged perfectly and held on to in front of the pavilion (shed). What a goody.
That was it, really, as far as I can recall, and here we are at tea! Ed's tea; coronation chicken and Guinness cake - how good is that?
TWCC's batting can be dealt with even quicker; we had 187 to overhaul, a target somewhat larger than might have been possible if we'd bowled Ed and Tom for 20 overs each, but there it was on the scoreboard, large as life.
Edward at 4, stayed and scored - the only one of us who looked good for any length of time. Jim and Tom opened, and Tom stayed for long enough to be noticed, Jim and Brocky not so much. After that only Edward with 42 runs to his name made any headway against some perfectly respectable bowling from the CCCC bowling outfit. I don't think the bowling was such that we couldn't or shouldn't have made a worthier effort, but there it was; we weren't going to overhaul the target of 187 in spite of Edward's excellent performance, and it became clear that we needed to hold out for a draw which the TWCC middle and lower order contrived to do. Asstd. Howes' did their valiant best, backed up by Honse and Rob S, but it was Graham and lastly Phil who absorbed the last ball of CCCC's 42 overs to safely bring home a somewhat lose-y feelingy draw.
Cutter's Choice proved to be the better side on the day, and TWCC came somewhere near second place.

Scorecard
Scorebook does not record who won the toss, but Cutter's Choice batted first
Cutter's Choice CC Innings: Paul Bld Steinke 7; Nigel LBW Bld T Rydon 22;
Rajat Bld Rydon 0; Dave Ct & Bld Saunders 13; Paddy Ct Cuthbert Bld Karvay 36; Ian Bld C Howes 27; Abs not out 35; Saff not out 16. DNB Andy. Extras 31 (B 6, LB 2, W 22, NB 1) Total 187 for 6 (35 overs).
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 7-2-19-0; T Rydon 7-0-27-2; P Steinke 5-0-14-1; R Saunders 6-0-36-1; R Brock 4-0-28-0; H Karvay 2-0-15-1; C Howes 2-0-16-1; G Cuthbert 2-0-25-0.
TWCC Innings:  J Simon ct Ian Bld Andy 12; T Rydon LBW Saff 14; R Brock Bld Saff 5; E Bunn LBW Paddy 42; E Howes Bld Afzal 2; H Karvay Bld Afzal 4; R Saunders Bld Ian 2; C Howes Bld Rajat 7 G Cuthbert not out 3; G Howes Bld Rajat 0; P Steinke not out 3. Extras 22 (B3, LB1, W 18) Total 116 for 9.
Cutter's Choice Bowling: Andy 6-0-29-1; Saff 11-1-27-2; Afzal 8-3-12-2; Ian 10-4-26-1; Paddy 4-1-12-1; Rajat 3-1-5-2.
Match drawn.


Top
TWCC Single Wicket Competition July 28th 2019
It takes, on average, three to four years for TWCC to forget what playing a single-wicket competition is like. What madness! But what fun!
There were notable and much-missed absentees, but plenty of the usual suspects were present; Mikey Pearce, Honse, Graham, Brocky, George (Howes), Matt Edwards, Joe, Matt Brock, Tom Rydon, Tom Firth, Tony Pearce, and Ed. Twelve good men and true.
Brocky, who had clearly been lying awake for weeks (some say years) planning this event, had devised a new format for the competition, and, much to everyone's surprise, it was entirely successful. The play revolved around an initial league: 4 groups of 3 players, two of whom would go through to quarter-finals/knockout stages, and anyone unlucky enough to come last in the initial group stages would take part in the Plate Competition via semi-finals/final knockout rounds. 12 balls to be bowled by each bowler, no byes to the keeper allowed but you could run off a wide. One further, and ultimately decisive rule played its part; lose a wicket and you lose 6 runs, but stay in to fight on.
TWCC's very own tribute to the 50 over World Cup! Was Bet Tony interested?!?? Oh yes! Folding money was blowing about in the mid-summer breeze like confetti.

First round results
Grp. 1: Honse & Mikey through, Graham out.
Grp. 2: Brocky & George through, Matt E out.
Grp. 3: Matt B & Joe through, Tom R out.
Grp. 4: Tony & Ed through, Tom F out.
Well... Someone has to lose, and Matt E and both Toms being out twice proved decisive, whilst Graham was concentrating on the Plate Competition...
Quarter Finals
1. Brocky v George: Brocky scored a solid 13, showing even more commitment than normal by running a lot of quick runs, and George bowled a steady tight line without taking a wicket. T'other way round George, in spite of having top-scored in the first round, suffered an early wicket from which he didn't recover. Brocky through.
2. Ed v Tony: Both were out once, but Tony's the wiley one and chased down Ed's 10 by the 11th ball. Both were out once, which, in spite of tight performances from both players, proved a more challenging backwards step to overcome for Ed than it did to the old hand.
3. Mikey v Joe: It could be said that this was a tense match up, and, indeed, it proved to be a close-run thing. Mikey, one of our very best batters but who seems to have forgotten how to bowl up against Joe of the swinging bat and balls. Indeed it was ball 1 that Mikey contrived to hit straight to a fielder (no idea, now, who or how) and started on -6 with only 11 balls left. But he did come back. Straight back - second ball hit for 6! This was full-on modern cricket, and Mikey continued to build an innings over the next 10 balls, ending on a very respectable 25 runs. But Joe had a secret weapon; Mikey's bowling. With 5 wides and a no ball, Mikey gifted Joe 6 runs and bowled an extra over, and Joe's total climbed steadily until he needed a single off the last ball to go through. Just one run. Odds-on Mikey would bowl a wide, but he didn't, and Joe couldn't get a bat on the ball which went through to the keeper. No byes was the rule = no run. Mikey goes through. Just.
4. Honse v Matt B: Matt B continued his great form with the ball, taking Honse's wicket too often to allow an injured Honse any chance when it came to his turn to bowl. Matt needed less than no runs to win and did. A shame for Honse as his is just the sort of game that can do well in these tight and unpredictable situations.
Semi-Finals
1. Mikey v Brocky: Decided, in the end, by a catch. Mikey scored a very solid 21 without being out, with only two 4's in the mix thanks to Rich's brave use of the slower ball. He's a smart one, that Skip, and with Mikey's unpredictable bowling to come, he may well have been able to get into the final of his dreams... 15 off the first 6 balls, he was on course until a smack to Ed at short cover ended up in a remarkable catch which impressed us all tremendously, including Ed himself when he realised he had the ball in his hand. 13 runs for Rich to get off just five balls was just too much, especially as Mikey forgot to bowl any more wides. Mikey through.
2. Matt B v Tony: Nothing but Pearces and Brocks in the semi-finals; dynasty cricket. Exuberant youth versus the sagacity of experience. No, more than just sagacity; Tony is, of course, an excellent all round sportsman so Matt was up against it. But he was up for the challenge, scoring steadily, and with three 4's he ended up on 22. That was a strong challenge indeed, but Tony spun the cogs in his head and, in reply, of course came up with 23 runs in reply. Why wouldn't he? No wickets at all in this match, Matt bowled perfectly well, batted even better, and came up just short. Tony through; it would be a Pearce's name on the trophy. On Tony's trophy.
Playing out the Plate
In the remaining matches in the Plate, if you were out you were out, and thus, by extension, if you overhauled the desired total batting second, you won. Tom F faced all 12 balls of quality pace bowling from Matt E, ending on a very creditable 16, but it was Matt who stroked a four off Tom's 7th ball to play his way into the Plate final. Sadly for Graham, in the other semi-final, Tom's well-honed pacey skills resulted in his being bowled first ball, leaving Tom with the tricky business of surviving one ball from Graham to win. Tricky also, it would have been, for the count-backers to decide who would go through to the Plate final if Tom was also out first ball... but Tom's single off Graham's first ball earned him his place in the final and the back-room stat boys could relax.
Plate Final: Matt E v Tom R. Who'd have thought it - Matt and Tom, quality players both, in the plate at all? But such are the vagaries of the Single-Wicket Competition and here they were in what was to be, as with many match-ups on this day, a very close and interesting game. Matt batted first - don't forget when a wicket fell that was it; sudden death of the cruellest variety - and batted for all 12 of Tom's offerings, ending up with an impressive and challenging 18 runs to his name. Tom offered no wides or weirdnesses; he just bowled good, honest, tight balls which Matt did well to score off. Pads on, Tom had a tough task in front of him; score 19 runs, against Matt, and don't get out. Which is what he did! He needed a single off the last ball, and got it, just like that. Either could have won, both played well, but Tom it was whose name will be scribbled onto some sort of miscellaneous cracked crockery with a blunt felt pen sometime in the next few years.
Which brings us to the climax of the day... The Pub! Oh, apart from the final of the single-wicket competition.
Single Wicket Competition Final
A Pearce-off. Pundits would pay good money, surely, to see how Mikey's lifetime of intimidatory back garden experiences played out, and here we were, in the TWCC Single-Wicket final, witnessing the Pearce inter-generational throwdown showdown.
Mikey batted first, and with so much at stake, both Pearces were a little cagey. Tony bowled no wides, and Mikey declined to hit out until Tony's sixth ball went for four. Another 4 the next ball, but only another 8 runs in all to take Mikey to 21. And Mikey's bowling arm was not behaving as he'd like... Tony took his time, waiting for the wides, and a no ball, and then, in the conclusive meat of the game, balls 7, 8 and 9, were struck for three 4's in a row; bang bang bang, taking him to 27 (5 runs ahead of his target of 22) with three balls left. But this wasn't the Plate; if Tony was out he'd lose 6 runs. A dot ball, then on the penultimate ball, Tony stroked the decisive single that took him to 28 so that even if he was out on his last ball he'd be on 22 - one more than Mikey, who in spite of his heroic batting efforts, came second on the day.
Edward and James are previous serial winners of this much-cherished trophy, but it is Tony's name that appears most often in recent years, and it will be there again in 2019. Thanks to Brocky for coming up with the format and tea, and congratulations to all who took part and to Tony for showing, once again, that class will out.


Top
TWCC Tour to Wimborne Minster June 27th-30th 2019
For such a small cricket club, TWCC’s ability to tour year after year is truly astonishing – as are some of the events which unfold!  This year, in Rob’s memorable phrase, we dipped into the same river for a second time.  12 months on from our 125 tour to Wimbourne, we were back.  Joe was declared tour captain, a title he treasured and used (and frequently overused) in all available situations, though he  was very restrained when selecting himself in the batting order – he went as low as 5 against Bournemouth!
Dave and Joe set off from Brighton, Tom R and Ed from Wineham and Edward, Jim, Matt B and Richard from Twineham.  We were heading for an 11.30 round of golf and the weather was fantastic –warm and sunny.  The course – Queen’s Park in Bournemouth – was in the town’s outskirts.  By the time we actually got underway, the weather was yet hotter and more humid.  The `players` started off:  Jim, Tom, Ed and Joe.  The rest jumped into a pair of golf carts and began the humiliating process of teeing off in front of the clubhouse.  Fortunately, despite the quality of the course, nobody was on the balcony watching.  The course turned out to be a ball-eater.  There was nothing between the fairways and thick impenetrable rough and once a ball either rolled or was powered into any part, it was gone.  For most of the once a year hackers, the numbers of lost balls headed into double figures.  It was, for most, a dispiriting process.  Though the professionals were smacking the balls off the tee, the process of getting the ball into the hole was frequently interrupted by the infernal rough.  Jim was making the least heavy work of it, as Ed and Joe tried to chase him down.  In the other group,   the heat, the frequent waits for dog walkers and the general lack of regular golf all took their toll – and when the par 3 9th hove into view after 3 hours, it was decided it would be the last.  Edward won the inevitable betting on that hole and then it was into the buggies and off to a cold beer.  But the other group continued on – losing an exasperated Tom at the 15th.  Finally the group of 3 finished the course with Jim the victor.  Temperatures by mid afternoon were in the high 20s, and the beer slipped down a treat. 
With that the two groups headed to Wimbourne and the Kings Head Hotel.  We were greeted by the lovely Rachel, over whom Richard slavered rather too lasciviously and was duly fined.  We met up in the hotel bar and after a couple of beers, headed to the nearby Prezzo for dinner.  We then headed to Weatherspoons, were joined by Tom Firth and 8 became 9. 
The following day, after a hearty breakfast at the hotel, it was tennis on the nearby grass courts.  We had plenty of racquets, but were hampered by a lack of balls until the helpful coach supplied a few and we were off.  What he didn’t have that would have been handy was a lawnmower, but we decided to brave the jungle.  It soon became clear that the legendary `5 racquets` and Ed were the guys to beat.  They generally made fewer error than others-  but generally everyone had a good game, most won and lost occasionally and for an hour and a half we raced around the courts on another glorious day.  But it was like a swingers BBQ and such was the chopping and changing of partners that there were no official `winners` - so that title remains vacant.  At lunch, the boys decided to try a first visit to the legendary Rising Sun where they found beer at £1.95 a pint – which is a good start for any pub.  Apres beer, they purchased a set of boules and we all headed to the park.  These were not the metal boules beloved by the French – they were plastic and very bouncy and - when thrown around the parents and children at the end of school time – it made for a rather entertaining spectacle.  Boules went long and short, on the path, under tables, through the children.  Richard beat Ed in the singles, only to then lose his prize money to Joe in a one-off gamble.  Jim and Tom won the doubles.  Relief was offered by the shade of a lovely oak tree as temperatures hit the 30s. By the time we were done the school was empty and it was time to head back to the hotel, meet up with the newly arrived Rob and make our way to Bournemouth CC for our first game of cricket. 
And so to Bournemouth Cricket Club – the vast centre of cricketing power in Dorset.  It was a hot afternoon when we rolled up, by this time we were 11 with the VERY late arrival on tour of Matt E.  We were starved of cricket and we were ready to go - in a `pop into the bar first` sort of way.   Joe won the toss and elected to field.  Bournemouth had rallied around to pull together a team – including an out of sorts first teamer, a few coaches and others.  The first two batsmen looked young, lean and keen.  But with Rob tearing in from one end and Jim letting the ball weave its crazy flighted way down the wicket at the other, these guys found it hard to get away and failed to get the pinch-hitting score they were clearly hoping for.  In fact, with the regular two over rotation spells of the bowlers, it wasn’t until the third over that the first boundary was struck, and in the 4th over, with the score on a mere 16, TWCC made the breakthrough when a run out was exceptionally delivered – though the book does not say who was responsible.  4 overs later, the score had more than doubled as the powerful opener Luke Matthews got into his stride.  But Matt kept the pressure on at the other end with an LBW of their number 3 Palmer.  TWCC tails were up and – considering the heat and beer – the bowling and fielding was looking really impressive.  Tight bowling continued with Ed and Matt Brock – and another run out brought BCC to 72-3.  There was a dangerous looking combination as the dangerous Owen Jones joined Matthews – and it took the wily old timer Brock Snr to float down one of his slower balls to encourage Matthews to sweep and dink the ball to the keeper.  106-4.  After that, Bournemouth batted sensibly, another run out ensued, but they got to 132-5 after 20 overs.  Surely that could be overhauled….
Joe eschewed the previously tried and tested tour batting line up selection process – involving pulling names out of a pint pot – for something new and exciting.  He chose it himself.  Well that was never going to work!  Tom Rydon opened up with Richard and they never quite got onto the same wavelength.  Richard scooped the ball up in the air, within 6 feet of the crease, whereupon a scrum of fielders dived for it, but were prevented from catching it by the skilful shielding of the ball by said batsman.  Imagine his surprise then to turn back to his crease and see the young Rydon standing there, the only person to have engaged in anything slightly pursuant of progressing the match – namely, by taking a run.  Dave Rogers was next in – he also made 1, Tom Firth 2, Joe 2, Matt Edwards 9 and suddenly the score stood dangerously close to a wipeout on 36-5 – which became 36-6 when Tom surrendered his wicket for a valiant 17.  Not for the first time, Rob showed us the way to Respectability Road and the next 3 batsmen also joined the happy band of batsmen actually batting.  Rob smacked the ball to all parts for 25, Jim stroked it gracefully for 19 and Matt Brock clubbed it for 10.  Their combined effort took us to 93-8 and 115-9, though in truth they were assisted by the comedic bowling efforts by some of BCC’s bowlers keen to impersonate their peers and team-mates.  In the end, the defences buckled at 115 when Matt was clean bowled, leaving Ed wishing for more – surely he’d be higher up the order for Balcombe -and we lost by a gaping margin, which will go down in the book as 17 runs.
BCC were very good to us, a nice bunch of chaps with whom we socialised afterwards over beer and hot dogs. We laughed when one of them got hit on the head by an `incrediball` and we generally enjoyed sitting out at a huge and lovely ground on a gorgeous evening.  What we lost on the pitch we won back off it.  They tried to sign up a few of our star players – but the prospect of 120 overs in the searing heat of the day was less than enticing.  (Anyway they only actually wanted Rob and he was already prostituting himself elsewhere on the Saturday).  As the sun set it seemed like the right moment to take our leave.  We said our thanks to our great hosts, were invited back at anytime and left in excellent spirits.  

TWCC VS Bournemout Cricket Club 20/20 28th June 2019
TWCC won the toss and elected to bowl
BCC Innings: J Coombs Run Out 6; L Matthews Ct Keeper Bld R Brock 43; J Palmer LBW Bld Edwards 6; O Jones Run Out 48; D Rani Run Out 11; F Oldfield Not Out 8; B Thompson Not Out 2; TOTAL 132-5
FALL: 16-1, 38-3, 72-2, 106-5, 128-4
TWCC Bowling: R Rydon 2-1-11-0; J Simon 3-0-26-0; M Edwards 2-0-15-1; M Brock 3-0-18-0; E Howes 2-0-9-0; R Brock 2-0-10-1, J Panther 2-0-15-0, E Bunn 3-0-18-0.
TWCC Innings: R Brock Run Out 1; T Rydon Bld A Humber 17; D Rogers Bld N Pack 1; T Firth Ct Matthews Bld N Pack 3; J Panther Bld Jason 2; M Edwards Bld Jason 9; R Rydon Bld F Oldfield 25; E Bunn Bld J Coombes 6; J Simon Ct, Bld Thompson 19; M Brock Bld Palmer 10; E Howes Not Out 2.
TOTAL 115 all out
FALL: 3-2, 5-3, 17-4, 19-5, 36-1, 36-6, 69-8, 72-9
BCC Bowling: too many confusing impressions going on.
BCC win by 17 runs

Back at the hotel, we changed and headed out to the Rising Sun, to see if its legendary status as Wimbourne’s number 1 night-time venue was still valid.  Alas, it was not.  The pub had a live band but was relatively quiet.  So TWCC did what we do best.  We simply sat around a table, all 11 of us, and drank beer, chatted, laughed and enjoyed each other’s company.   Inevitably the evening got slightly more riotous the longer the night went on and more cheap beer was swilled.  Suddenly karaoke was the order of the table, led by Matt E – who took it worrying seriously - with the rest joining in.  The evening went on into the early hours when 8 of us piled into the local kebab shop on the way back to a sultry night in the hotel.
The following day promised to be the hottest of the weekend:  temperatures were threatening to reach 34 degrees.  Four brave golfers – Ed, Tom F, Matt and Joe – decided to hit the same golf course as Thursday.  Rob headed off for a 20/20 at Sherbourne.  The rest – Matt B, Edward, Dave, Tom R, Jim and Richard – went to the Bournemouth golf centre for a challenging 18 holes. 
The course was very different from that being faced by the fearsome 4.  While they were once again facing the dust, the rough, the noisy road and sirens of the Queen’s Park course, the 6 were surrounded by dinosaurs – with real dinosaur sounds – purple, green, red and yellow balls and excited toddlers as they were treated by Edward to a round in Bournemouth’s premier crazy golf course.  The challenges for both groups were substantial.  The grass boys faced searing heat and 6000 yards.  The dino boys faced a course where the obstacles included  a 2 foot water jump and a 3 year old girl wandering across the championship fairway.  Frankly, details of the grass boys` round are sketchy – other than Matt suffering from hay fever.  They turned up at dino park at lunchtime red and sweaty.  Once the waiter had thrown a club sandwich at them, they recovered and showed enthusiasm to take on the dino course.  Game on!  Teams of 3 were organised with a team prize and an individual title to fight for.  But interestingly, it wasn’t long before the team ethos kicked in.  According to the rules laid down by the TWCC golf rules committee, once a ball has been played in crazy golf, it can’t be picked up.  So if – during the course of your round – your ball sidles up to another, you are within your rights to thwack your opponents ball out of the way, as long as you hit your own first.    During the morning, this had been an important tactic, willingly employed by all, and frequently with great glee.  But as the `team ethos` kicked in during the afternoon, teams worked as one.  Joe’s careful reading of the carpet like fairway (well, actual carpet)  proved a boon for his team-mates.  Dave’s wily experience from a lifetime of golf helped – but only a little! Edward’s sage advice about how to jump the 2 foot ditch was listened to – though mostly ignored by the hapless players who accompanied him.  They opted to drive the 15 foot hole like they were on the first tee of their morning course and whilst the balls cleared the gap, they then ricocheted off the rocks protecting the hole and bounced into the nearby dino pond!  Joe fished out first one, then another, then another as team Bunn collapsed into a melt of testosterone.  The young guns team of `TomTomEd` were putting their golfing prowess to good use as they tiptoed their way carefully through the bumps, jumps and crafted curves of the dino course.  But this match was always going to be decided on the 17th – the fearsome hole which in the morning had seen Tom Rydon forced to retire after 15 shots because of the length of the queue building up on the tee behind him.   Team Bunn – and in particular their leader – displayed a previously unknown condition – dyscalculia.   As Edward missed the hole, went round the hole, left the course, got stuck in a gulley – all in rotation  - and his shot count tipped into the 20s – his condition seemed to make him unable to count above 13!  Finally we escaped the blazing sun and over a beer on the balcony, the scores were totalled.  The boys did well, Joe, Matt and Richard did less well but by 1 shot – the wooden spoon went to team Bunn, and they duly treated the rest to a pint. 
Back at the hotel Dave announced he had to leave early for family commitments.  Joe was convinced he’d left with his cricket bag in his car and got all silly and fretty.  Big mistake!  The wind up lasted 2 hours before Joe’s cricket gear – including his less than fragrant box – appeared in various decorative places in the hotel dining room.  In the meantime the boys played a few games of shoot, warming up for a proper cards sess later that night. 
The Saturday night provided us – and Wimbourne – with the spectacle of `shit shirt night`.  A very loud group – vocally and visually – gathered in the hotel reception. A picture paints a thousand words so hopefully the editor of the Gazette will get the hint.  There was a little kerfuffle about the curry which had been booked, Joe – tour captain and therefore God – insisting that Richard had broken a tour pledge by not booking RimJim.  It was one of a number of savage fines handed out during a fines session at the Rising Sun.  Others to suffer were Rob and Matt – late arrivals, Codgers – non attendance, and virtually anything that entered the minds of Joe and the fines manager Tom R.  The kitty was well stacked.  So too was Ellie, the manager of the Rising Sun who promised to judge our shit shirts.  But in the end she decided there was something more important than tickling the fancies of a collective Jackson Pollack painting so the honour of deciding the worst shirt went to some bloke in the pub, who very good naturedly played along, took the photos and decided Tom Rydon’s Arsenal shirt was worst.  Ed’s newly bought rose tinted shirt was judged the most wearable – a shame in itself on SSN.  It was a funny, chatty night, supping our cheap pints, the sort this club is best at.  The curry, when it happened, was excellent – a restaurant far excelling RimJim and almost empty apart from us.  We headed back to the Rising Sun – again struggling to regain its former glory – and after a few more beers, returned to the hotel.  A poker school ensued – 8 players with Rob having a suspiciously masterful knowledge of the rules.  Little good it did him – he was one of the first to go.  As the hours fell away, so did the players until by around 2am, Matt B, Tom R and Richard called it quits and agreed to pocket their winnings.   The following morning we packed up and left Wimbourne for Sussex.
We rolled up at The Victory in Staplefield on a baking summer lunchtime to enjoy the peace and tranquillity of one of Sussex’s most beautiful villages.  And we then bombarded – to Jim’s great concern – our fellow drinkers with live TV coverage on mobiles of England vs India in the CWC semi final.  Great fun!  We were joined by Honse before the short trip to a sun-baked Balcombe ground where Joe lost the toss and we were put in.  Joe, who by this time was suffering from captaincy fatigue and really making very little sense, tried and failed to explain the rules – but we can reveal that the match was a 40/40 `hybrid` which permitted a draw.
Joe decided to put himself as wicket-keeper.  He opened up Matt E and Tom R and in the first over Matt clean bowled their opener.  The pair of them then continued with the tidiest of spells that finished with them having conceded just 29 runs off 10 overs for the 1 wicket.  A double change brought Richard on up the hill - who enticed the second opener to lob a catch to Tom Rydon – and Ed down the hill, who continued with the miserly bowling, and during his 5 wicket spell took a clean bowled wicket of – wait for it – I Tremble - for just 10 runs.  Richard meanwhile got another fortunate catch and a clean bowled and Balcombe were in trouble at 58-5.  But Joe had in his control, bowling greatness – an array of talent only rarely available to TWCC captains.  Next on were the combination of Honse and Matt Brock.  Now Honse bowled well and tight and took a wicket.  But Matt was awesome.  Opting to go without a full run-up, the occasional and oft erratic young gun rifled the balls down the hill, with great accuracy and to devastating effect.  Over the next 6 overs, he clean bowled 4 Balcombe players, including the last 2 wickets, leaving him sitting on a hat-trick.  The Balcombe innings petered out to 109 with the scorebook showing the Brock surname 7 times in the bowling column. 
Tea was taken and very good it was too, with fresh fruit, cake, sausages and quiche.  Quite excellent. Jim and Tom Firth refused to overindulge because they were the chosen ones – the TWCC openers.  They were facing the bowling combo of T DeCastro and D Decastro.  Jim took his time, feeling his way into the innings, despatching any loose balls.  Tom however didn’t.  A fine batssman on his day he was clean bowled for what looks – and I’m sure he will confirm – like a golden duck by T DeCastreo, a talented but not unduly fearsome opening bowler.  His 0 in the scorebook has a suspicious dot in the middle of it!  Anyway no problem, Tony, the tour refusenik, had deigned to show his face and proposed to do the same with his undisputed talent.  However, after two dot balls, he too was clean bowled by the same bowler.   Possibly he was still reliving the Gladys night concert which had – outrageously – taken precedence over tour!  Thank God we had a tour captain who can whip the ball off his legs and send it whizzing to the short legside boundary.  But wait!  Two short overs passed and the OTHER DeCastro sent down a straight ball and Joe was traipsing off, also clean bowled for 0. The jubilant DeCastros were threatening to wipe out the whole team.  At 16-3, Edward went in to stop the rot.  He was given out shortly afterwards for LBW but refused to walk.  The umpire was in a difficult situation.  This was a small Sunday match, a friendly, and he had a man refusing to walk.  He relented and decided to accept that Edward had edged the ball – then gave him out for LBW shortly afterwards.  But the let off had gave Edward time to watch Jim play his strokes and start to restore respectability.  When Edward finally agreed to let the umpire retake control of the match, Matt Edwards made his way in with the game delicately poised on 62-4.  But the high drama ended there because through shots that were smooth and elegant Jim and Matt took the game away from Balcombe and brought it home.  No other wickets were to fall, sixes started to rain down including the final shot which won the match, a fine hit by Matt.  Tony managed a bit of last minute tour betting, depriving Jim of a pint of Guinness on the outcome of the CWC. Then we sat and enjoyed the Balcombe hospitality overlooking the beautiful Sussex countryside before taking our leave at the end of tour 2019.
It was a quieter tour than normal.  But it was fun – a lot of fun.  It’s great just being with a bunch of guys you really like and really get on with.  There was a huge amount of piss taking, fun being had, mischief being made and even some half decent cricket.  The shape of future tours was discussed, but one thing came out clearly – tours R Us – we do them well and will continue to do so. 

Balcombe vs TWCC, Sunday 1 July
BCC won the toss and opted to bat
Balcombe CC Innings: J Deansfield Bld M Edwards l0; G Deansfield Ct T Rydon Bld R Brock 16; M ElliottCt E HowesBld R Brock 20; N Rawbin Bld M Brock 18; I Tremble    Bld E Howes 0; D Decastro Bld M Brock 0; C Hurst Ct M Edwards Bld H Karvay 11; T DeCastro Bld M Brock 15; A Rawbin Bld M Brock 5; T Rawbin Not Out 0; C DeCastro Bld M Brock 0. TOTAL: 109 ALL OUT
FALL:  0, 35, 57, 57, 58, 69, 88, 102, 109, 109.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 5-2-8-1, T Rydon 5-1-21-0, E Howes 5-1-10-1, R Brock 5-0-13-3, H Karvay 5-0-26-1, M Brock 6-0-21-4.
TWCC Innings: J Simon Not Out 51; T Firth Bld T DeCastro 0; T Pearce Bld T DeCastro 0; J Panther Bld D DeCastro 0; E Bunn LBW Bld A Rawbin 8; M Edwards Not Out 31. DNB: R Brock, T Rydon, H Karvay, M Brock, E Howes. TOTAL: 115 – 4
FALL: 11-2, 11-3, 16-4, 62-5
Balcombe Bowling: D DeCastro 5-1-13-1; T DeCastro 5-1-16-2; A Rawbin 5.3-1-29-1; T Rawbin 2-0-16-0;  I Tremble 2-1-8-0; M Rawbin 4-1-11-0; N Elliott 5-1-14-0.
TWCC Win by 6 wickets


Top
TWCC v London Unity June 16th 2019
Rain for days... would the game be on? And rain all Sunday morning too, but the faith of Skipper Edwards, who at 09.00-o-clock-hundred-hours was buttering up his sandwiches and had a vested interest in showing faith in the forecast, was rewarded when with an hour to go the clouds parted, shadows began to appear and a strong wind began to dry off the grass. It would be a slow outfield, but game on!
Matt, found himself as leader of a remarkably and inspiringly youthful TWCC side, and when he won the toss he chose to bowl first. Matt himself and Tom R opened up the taps in great style, with Matt, at first, struggling for line running into the wind with a swinging ball and Tom flying in from the Downs End. Within two overs Tom, whose energy never flags, had his and TWCC's first wicket - another clean-bowled for Tom, and Matt piled in with three straight maidens, the last of which ended with a twotrick. None of the Unity batters were finding it at all easy to get the ball away, and skipper Edwards was able to keep a tight field in place with Unity on 19 for 3. Joe Driver did manage to both survive and score a few runs, but the wicket was pacy, the ball was swingy and the bowlers were swinging it. Reese was chipping in with some good leg-side takes and the overall fielding performance, undoubtedly helped by the youth of the home side, was restrictive and unforgiving.
First change brought Honse and Joe into the attack, and the situation was perfect for them; Unity were on the defensive having lost cheap early wickets, and the slower pace brought out the high-bounce of the artificial surface which conditions often provoke batters into unwise and elevated strokes (I should know, Ed). Joe's middle over of five was a wicket maiden as Pitcher failed to keep the ball down and Matt took the catch (covers?). Honse, whose first over was a maiden, followed that up by bowling a tight line with his deliveries bouncing at an awkward height that earned him a three-for; two caught (Matt again and Josh) and a clean-bowled. Unity were crumbling somewhat, not ever really recovering from the 8-over opening spells of Matt and Tom. The situation called for a calculating approach to batting in order to recover from a slow start, but the visitors found it hard to get the ball away without giving chances and taking risks. Joe Driver was approaching the game in the right way for the situation, but he found himself somewhat alone and was then out for a dogged 18, and it was left to McKenzie in at 9, when the bowling was less penetrative though still hard to score from, to knock up a quick 32 before being out, caught (Ollie), off the bowling of Josh. Unity all out for 104.
After an early tea Jim and Mikey P faced up to the in-ducking swing of Joe Driver, which was typically tight and difficult to score off, but, on the day, neither Driver took a wicket though both were, as always, economical. However, whereas the TWCC opening bowlers had the batters pinned down from both ends, Unity's Caulfield was, on the day, rather expensive and Jim and Mikey started off like trains; Jim's Pacer to Mikey's Bullet. Hitting four 4's and three 6's Mikey took TWCC to 56 (Jim on 10...) in the eighth over before he was out, stumped, hopping down the wicket to McKenzie's slow spin with a grand 46 to his name.
Chasing low totals has often been TWCC's downfall, largely because the first innings total may be low for a reason - in this case the slow outfield - but with this start in the bank it was going to be difficult for Unity from here. But Unity have played TWCC before and knew what to do; bowl slowly and watch the batters get themselves out. McKenzie was their man for the job and he delivered slow, awkward length often wide balls that need hitting and need hitting on the up and straight to fielders. That often does it.
Jim fell quickly, caught in the covers. Then Ollie. Then Tom F. TWCC 66 for 4. However, and happily for the home side, that was bad as it got as Josh and Reese set about the business in hand, and although Reese was out for a calm 10 the game was won soon enough. Josh was showing his cricketing pedigree with bat as well as ball, and Edward stood tall and cracked a couple of pulled fours for another not out score (average building nicely). To finish the game off Josh, who had a train to catch, gently leaned on a straight ball and stuck it into the Jones Stand over the toilet complex. Josh's 23 not out in quick time saw the home side to the win.
Unity were up against it this time; a fixture that is generally very closely fought and which, historically, Unity have often won. On this occasion, with Matt and Tom setting the bowling tone leaving the middle order subject to excellent extended spells from Joe, Honse and Edward, Unity never had enough runs. The fielding from the home side was excellent, and lots of catches, some simple, some hard (Honse's catch at mid-wicket and Ollie's at long-on stick in the mind and others probably should too but that depends on the mind in question more than the excellence of the catch), stopped any sort of total building from the combined bats of the Unity team. Mikey and Josh's runs took us over the line, though the line wasn't too far away in the first place.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and chose to field first.
London Untiy Innings: M Driver Bld M Edwards 1; Dean Bld T Rydon 7; J Driver Ct M Edwards Bld H Karvay 18; A Gane Ct H Karvay Bld M Edwards 0; A Pitcher Ct M Edwards Bld J Panther 3; J Caulfield Ct J Pieters Bld H Karvay 8; J Moore Bld E Bunn 11; Cockburn Bld H Karvay 2; D McKenzie Ct O Foulger Bld J Pieters 32; S Columbine C & Bld J Pieters; M Driver not out 0. Extras 18 (W7, NB3, B4, LB4) Total 104 all out (36.5 overs).
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 8-3-14-2; T Rydon 8-3-10-1; H Karvay 7-1-24-3; J Pieters 5-0-24-2; E Bunn 3-0-14-1.
TWCC Innings: J Simon Ct M Driver Bld McKenzie 11; M Pearce St, Bld McKenzie 46; O Foulger Ct M Driver Bld McKenzie 2; T Firth Ct J Driver Bld McKenzie 5; J Pieters not out 23; R Packham Ct, Bld McKenzie 10; E Bunn not out 8. DNB M Edwards, H Karvay, J Panther, T Rydon. Extras 5 (W3, NB2) Total 110 for 5 (20.1 overs).
TWCC win by 5 wickets.

Top
TWCC v Xiles June 9th 2019
No Brocky, no Matt - what were we to do? Call in the Panth of course! Fixture fixer, part of the future of TWCC - who better to steer us through another Sunday afternoon?
Joe took Xiles' skipper of their ten-man team out to the middle and, showing a full understanding of the best of TWCC traditions, lost the toss. TWCC were asked to bat first and thus it was that Jim and Edward walked out to see what was what.
What it was was pretty tight, that's what it was. Jim will freely admit that he often finds it as hard to score off good bowling as he does off any other sort, and, after a long hop outside leg which did go for four he found it difficult to do much other than keep the ball out. Edward, after generally playing straight and true and looking secure, scored 8 solid runs before playing a strong shot to a straight ball, missed it, and was bowled.
Tom Firth and Jim then went about survival mixed in with some stroke play, notably from Tom. Adopting a realists approach to the scoring rate they ran well and pushed the score on to 48 before Tom sent a catch out into the infield and was caught out for a fine 25. Xiles' openers were more plain accurate in length and line than they were penetrative, more economical than dangerous as long as TWCC were prepared to see them off and carry on from there. In that regard, of course, the bowlers did a fine job of restricting the score right from the off and a low first innings total looked likely. The outfield, greened up from recent rain, was slower than in recent games, and even well-struck balls were pulling up, hence there were many twos and even a well-run three off Tom's bat.
Xiles' first change bowlers were, on the day, more troubling than their openers. Tony's slow, turning balls were benefitting from the bounce that looping balls find on the artificial wicket, and this phenomenon took care of Reese, again falling short of his undeniable potential, as he forced an uppish shot that had him caught for just 1. Joe joined Jim and there was much running about and the total began to increase as Joe's true eye came good once again. Karthik, Xiles' best bowler on the day, came on from the Pavilion End and, with pace belied by a languid approach, his swing and good line made it even harder to get the ball away. Having successfully kept Karthik out, in the end Jim fell to the slow bowling of Tony as the need for acceleration became ever clearer, deploying a shot that on one previous occasion had resulted in a glorious towering six but which this time saw the ball evade all the physics going on and softly bump into his leg stump. 93 for 4, with three-quarters of an hour to build up a competitive total.
What we needed was someone like Rob Rydon to come in and show off his wares, but unfortunately although he looked like Rob, walked out like Rob and had Rob's bat, he was also a Rob suffering from a bout of some unmentionable virus that had, we gather, rather spoiled his weekend and had his underclothes running for cover. He was wan and clearly so ill that he started off with three fours, followed it up with a couple more and, oh, some sixes and quickly got himself up to another fifty at which point we all clapped exuberantly. He took the plaudits, succumbed finally to a good ball from Karthik who had been suffering from Rob's cultured onslaught as much as the next man, only to find that his half-century had controversially been revised down to a mere 47. What, though, was undeniable was that he had at least given TWCC a defendable total and a chance. Others did share centre stage with Rob, and their role of staying out there was more important than all the runs they didn't score. 152 on the board at half time... could go either way, a bit like Rob's cup of tea.
Now, TWCC have, even without Matt, a formidable bowling unit. Ed, himself feeling a bit UTW, ran in hard and shook 'em up. Rob Saunders, though, took the first considerable chunk out of the visitor's batting expectations by dismissing the evergreen Hooper, caught and bowled, courtesy of a leading edge. Xiles' No. 2, Stead, was the first of Ed's two victims as Rob (R) casually took a sharp catch in the slips, illustrating how many more wickets Rob himself might have taken for TWCC over the years if he'd been able to field in the slips off his own bowling. Rob caught another catch off Ed's bowling somewhere I can't recall as I must have been looking at something more important at the time. The game was moving on; Xiles' target wasn't high, but they were losing wickets at a healthy or unhealthy rate depending on your particular allegiance.
Xiles' No 3., Bailey, who had been excellent in the field, was even more potent with the bat, and he was completely un-phased by good and bad balls alike, hitting them hard to the boundary and, now and then, over it, but he wasn't being helped much by his batting partners as they came and went. TWCC's reliably excellent ground-fielding was keeping the scoring down by denying Bailey the strike as much as possible and, thanks to a smart run out from Honse at mid-wicket, the visitors' task began to look a little tougher as each over passed by. Reese behind the timbers was once again underlining how his availability has such an impact on the game as he dived about, stopping many byes and nudging balls into Rob's face.
Tom (R) , who replaced Rob (S), must have come as a surprise to the Xiles. One might expect, first change, to enjoy a bit of relief but, much like when Karthik came on for the Xiles, Tom's pace and general energy quickly showed the visitors that they weren't going to have an easy time of it. Bailey resisted for some time on his way to an excellent 55 (top score of the match) but in the end a fast yorker from Tom took him out of the mix and the balance shifted towards TWCC again. But, oh dear, here came TWCC's nemesis; Karthik! He looked every inch a cricketer whilst fielding and, particularly, bowling, and now he was confirming his all-round ability as he set about ticking off the runs required. If Karthik stayed in Xiles would win, unless TWCC cut the ground from under him by taking wickets at the other end.
Joe, replacing Ed, found his good length which Karthik only now and then got hold of, and Joe bowled Xiles' No.8 - another wicket down. Meanwhile Tom was still running in hard, and he followed up an unusually eccentric over of wides and no balls with some of his better stuff, and, with only a handful of runs required for Xiles to overcome their target of 144, he stuck a fast yorker in at the base of the stumps - another wicket down. Only one more wicket required for the TWCC win, only a few runs required for an Xiles win, only a few overs left. Karthik still in with Xiles' No.10; their last man.
With the game needing a positive move from the skipper, he took himself off. Karthik facing... dangerous, but this was Honse Time. Guile. Mystery. Prestidigita... oh! It's all over! Honse's first ball was top-edged by the in-form and calm Karthik to Rob (S) at square leg! Xiles all out for 134, Nine runs short.
What a good game. With all results possible until one suddenly occurred this was an exciting low-scoring match-up of two equal sides, both with strong performances popping up in unexpected places through the bowling and batting orders. Rob's gutsy runs got TWCC a total to work with, and the home side's bowlers and a general attention to fielding when all runs mattered won the game for TWCC.

Scorecard
Xiles won the toss and chose to field first.
TWCC Innings: J Simon Bld Tony 27; E Bunn Bld Luke 8; T Firth Ct Paul Bld Tony 25; R Packham Ct Luke Bld Tony 1; J Panther Ct Bailey Bld Karthik 27; R Rydon Bld Karthik 47; C Howes Bld Karthik 2; T Rydon Bld Dan 0; H Karvay LBW Karthik 1; R Saunders Ct Tony Bld Bailey 5; E Howes not out 0. Extras 10 (LB2, W7; NB1) Total 143 all out (38.3 overs)
Xiles Bowling: Luke 8-1-27-1; Claude 8-1-19-0; Tony 9-0-46-3; Karthik 11-0-37-4; Dan 2-0-22-1; Bailey 0.3-0-0-1.
Xiles Innings: Hooper C&Bld R Saunders 1; Stead Ct R Rydon Bld E Howes 0; Bailey Bld T Rydon 55; Hartley run out (H Karvay) 6; Hales Ct R Rydon Bld E Howes 1; Claude Bld T Rydon 8; Karthik Ct R Saunders Bld H Karvay 38; Luke Bld J Panther 2; Dan March Bld T Rydon 5; Tony not out 0. Extras 18 (B9, LB5, NB4) Total 134 all out (9 wkts) (30.1 overs)
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 10-2-24-2; R Suanders 7-1-39-1; T Rydon 8-1-37-3; J Panther 5-0-29-1; H Karvay 0.1-0-0-1.
TWCC win by 9 runs.


Top
TWCC v Southwick CC June 2nd 2019
Another new fixture for TWCC, and for Southwick too, presumably. Everyone arrived in good time, apart from TWCC. Skipper Edwards didn't win the toss, though he maintains he didn't lose it, but in any case the visitors ended up batting first on a bright and breezy early Summer's day with the outfield hard and fast. Any well-struck ball was likely to make it to the boundary.
Tom and Ed opened up the bowling for TWCC and Southwick's Hyde and Higgs certainly made the most of the conditions, though Higgs fell to what, from mid-on, looked like and unplayable in-cutting perfect length ball from Tom that nipped onto the top of the off stump. Ed's figures suffered somewhat from Hyde's free-swinging bat, with one over in particular going for five 4's, but he took a new aim and jammed the ball just short of a length into the batsman's body and, sure enough, Hyde chopped the ball down onto his stumps. The Southwick batters, in general, looked - and indeed were - more than capable and the TWCC pace of Tom, Ed and then Matt was being absorbed and reflected with some competence. However, although there were boundaries, our main three opening bowlers are so imposing and relentless that wickets fell, and the scoring slowed after having somewhat raced to 53 for 1 after 7 overs. Ed took a second wicket with a catch to Matt that may have been truly stupendous but which I'm afraid I can't recall, and Matt smartly bowled Southwick's No. 4 for a duck and, lo and behold, with a bit of manipulating of the field taking care of Crathern's potency, suddenly that was more or less it. Honse took care of Crathern with a high-bouncing slow ball that spooned up a chance to Mikey at short point which he made look easy because it was. Hyde's 31 and Crathern's 41 were Southwick's only scores of note and soon, after Honse's excellent two-wicket spell, Mikey and Edward were bowling in a Brockian mop-up operation. Edward took two for 4 in 7 balls, and Mikey, whose bowling analysis looks like someone dropped a kitten on to a Windings keyboard, also took a wicket with his modern approach to bowling. A few catches here and there and the visitors' innings was, having at one point looked like TWCC might be facing a large total, suddenly all done and dusted before the urn was hot enough for tea.
So, a quickish turn around and Jim and Joe squared up to Southwick's best on an empty stomach, and, miraculously, survived the awkward session before tea. As it was Joe's tea I guess it was the lure of the washing up that made him surrender his wicket so soon after the restart as he swished across the line to be plumb LBW. Such a shame because he clearly has a great eye and playing straight would truly sort him out and give him and TWCC lots of runs.
Jim was joined by Tony whose season is really only beginning, and we were treated to some vintage Pearce action. And, as it happened, to some contemporary though nonetheless classic stroke play from Pearce the Younger after Jim gloved a loopy catch to the keeper from a wide ball down the leg side. With the total on 46 for 2 Jim hit some solid shots including six 4's in his 27.
Time for the Pearces to do the business, and they did - all over the pitch. Mikey's 17 may not sound like much but the Gazette Shot of the Day epitomises their stand of 59 together, father and son. The shot in question wasn't either of their 6's (one each to long-on), nor one of their many 4's, but was Mikey's delayed gentle push for one, deliberately placed behind point, rotating the strike and producing a mature run off a good rising ball outside the off stump. A connoisseur's shot, just a single, but the two were happy to work for each other and play the proper cricket that won TWCC the game. Mikey's innings was ended in spectacular style by a caught-and-bowled from Hyde who clung on to a beautifully timed straight drive from Mikey's bat that, had it not been stopped, would have been a one bounce four if it was going to miss the umpire's head. Unlucky to get out for a thumpingly good shot, but it was a great catch so all aficionados were happy even if Mikey's innings was stopped in its tracks.
Rob (S) and Reese fell to the slow bowling of Walker but there was little to do after this other than for Tony to continue on his merry way, ending on 63 not out, and for the game to end with a four from Edward and a win for TWCC.
Another new fixture against a side who, at one stage, looked as if any score was possible, but it was the courageous bowling from TWCC's pacers that won the game as the visitors' middle order and tail were exposed early leaving Honse, Edward and Mikey to strut their stuff to good effect. It would have been a slightly different game had Southwick opened their bowling with their opening batsman, Hyde, for his pace and control when bowling was only brought into play late on in the day, but with Tony's 2019 form blossoming nicely and TWCC's notorious batting-depth, the result would most likely have been the same.

Scorecard
Southwick won the toss and chose to bat first.
Southwick Innings: J Hyde Bld E Howes 32; A Higgs Bld T Rydon 7; W Barber Ct M Edwards Bld E Howes8; D Noakes Bld M Edwards 0; L Crathern Ct M Pearce Bld H Karvay; T Preston LBW Bld M Pearce 16; G Manvell Ct R Packham (wk) Bld H Karvay 0; A Walker Ct T Rydon Bld E Bunn 5; M Johnson Ct T Pearce Bld M Pearce 2; L Smith Bld E Bunn 0; D Fields not out 0. Extras 17 (W13, NB4) Total 123 all out (32.1 overs).
TWCC Bowling: T Rydon 7-1-33-1; E Howes 9-1-56-2; M Edwards 5-1-12-1; H Karvay 5-2-10-2; M Pearce 4-1-12-2; E Bunn 1.1-0-4-2.
TWCC Innings: J Simon Ct Wk Bld L Crathern 27; J Panther LBW Bld L Smith 7; T Pearce not out 63; M Pearce Ct & Bld J Hyde 17; R Saunders Bld A Walker 6; R Packham St Bld A walker 0; E Bunn not out 5. DNB T Rydon, M Edwards, E Howes, H Karvay. Extras 4 (W4) Total 129 for 5 (25.5 overs).
Southwick Bowling: L Smith 4-1-21-1; L Crathern 6-0-29-1; D Fields 5-0-39-0; J Hyde 6-2-19-1; A Walker 3.5-0-18-2.
TWCC win by 5 wickets.


Top
TWCC v Westbourne CC May 26th 2019
A let down for all tea enthusiasts, Bolney couldn’t find enough people who wanted to play us, and so, once again, Joe found himself on Crinder and he came across Westbourne CC who were up for a game. It's always interesting when we play a team unknown to us as there could be a complete competence mismatch on the cards, but in this case the teams were well matched both in their abilities and in the way they chose to play the game.
In the absence of Skipper Brock (too much work or too much holiday or both) TWCC ran out for Skipper Edwards who had won the toss and chose to field first.
Matt opened with himself and Tom R and the game followed a familiar TWCC pattern; not many runs scored, with plenty of edges and some chances not being taken off a Rydon's bowling. A couple of catches (Joe and Rob) did go to hand off Matt's bowling, but Tom was, once again, unlucky in that several chances were dropped, hard, or fell safe.
After 17 overs the TWCC openers were taken off with the score on 64 for 2. The game could go either way from there, especially with Westbourne's Turner now swinging freely and connecting well.
Ed and Jim came on first change, and whilst Ed's pace kept a lid on the scoring Jim's slower deliveries found the middle of Turner's bat for a couple of big sixes to cow corner. Jim had the last word immediately after the second six when Turner dragged a cutting ball from outside off onto his stumps. After that the run rate was slowed again and not many runs were accumulating until, as the end of the game approached, Westbourne opened the taps and began to score off Joe and Honse. Harland-Jones was run out for 38 by Mikey taking advantage of some confusion, but this only brought Lucas Evans to the crease whose youthful true eye took a liking to the bowling. Honse took a wicket with his first ball of the game, but the visitors' middle order was fearless in attack and the runs flowed to the end of the innings, with 20 coming off the last over including a 6 to finish. 189 for 5. A total not too unapproachable in itself, but it was some 30 runs more than it could have been. We hadn't seen Rob bowl and Westbourne's bowling attack was unknown...
After a very good communally produced tea suddenly it was time for Paul and Jim to put on most of their protective equipment and see what was coming down the track.
Dean Kehagics (worryingly pronounced somewhat like Khawaja) opened with some strong, cannily varying, pace. The Twineham wicket was lively indeed as it had been all afternoon and playing forward was the way to go until the ball popped up and shot past at chest height. Magil, opening from the Pavilion End, was also lively though more consistent in pace and, for an over or seven matters progressed well. Paul, as ever the more competent batter, was taking advantage of the less good balls whilst Jim was pleased to see that at least someone was finding that there were any.
Jim fell, far too soon for his principle fan, to a remarkable catch from teenager Lucas Evans; the ball was slightly full and Jim drove it, poorly but with moderate contact, over the offside ring towards the empty spaces at deep-ish wide mid-off. Running from cover, Evans twisted and turned, writhed almost, to catch up with the ball as it fell towards the ground, and, diving full stretch and clinging on with just the tips of his outstretched right hand he came up with the ball. So remarkable was the catch that Jim joined in the rush to congratulate him on the catch. Oddly, Evans was unsure what a 6' 3" helmeted bat-wielding madman he had just caught out was doing chasing him around the outfield, but he seemed to recover well enough to bowl later. 30 for 1 (Jim 4...) (A good 4 mind you.)
Mikey, confident as ever, came and went which was a shame but it happens to the best of us, which brought Rob to the middle. Ahh... Paul and Rob. Time to relax and enjoy the glorious game. Good running, Paul stroking the ball well, Rob assessing the conditions whilst pushing ones and twos; this would show Westbourne what we had in our locker! Look! A calmly pulled 4 from the middle of Rob's blade. All the time in the world. Oh! Whilst it is gratifying to see that Rob's copy of "Jim Simon's Cricket for Dummies" is clearly still lingering in the Rydon's smallest room, perhaps it should have been made more clear that the chapter "Wafting outside the off stump" was intended as satire. Rob, uncharacteristically, went through with a shot to a ball that wasn't quite there and chipped a catch up into the covers which was, again, well taken. Oh deary me. Oh dear oh dear oh dear.
Edward. The 2019 Edward. Oh yes! The ball coming on, strong clunks for four - here we go. Paul meanwhile stroking 4's, 2's (I know!!) 1's  and soon, there he was, another 50 to his name! I don't know if Paul tweaked something when celebrating his 50, but in doing so he became aware that he was somewhat unprotected in the lower stomach/upper leg department but, after a dash to the pavilion and with order restored, he settled back into his rhythm of getting low, playing the ball right under his head and trying to shut Mikey up at Square leg.
Oh, look out Edward! Leg spin. Swish across the line. Swish across the line. I'm not sure if the umpire should try to pass on advice, but when the official in question is such an authority on batting it proved to be too hard to keep it to himself. In any case Edward was encouraged to play straight and, within reason, this is what happened and indeed it wasn't the leggy that did for him. 16 good runs from Edward but he was caught behind off Descir and TWCC were 106 for 4. Paul and Edward's partnership was a fine 56 and the game was finely balanced and, possibly, the WASP was moving in TWCC's favour.
Reese! Good old Reese. The swagger, the timing, the confidence to take guard and club his first ball out of the middle of the bat for a straight four over mid-on. What a way to start his 2019 season, and he and Paul carried on the good work. In general the required rate was beginning to climb a little; that flurry of runs at the end of the Westbourne innings were telling, and here came the visitors' secret weapon. Not only did Evans take 33 runs off Honse and Joe when he came in to bat, and not only did he stop Jim's maiden century with his crazy catch, but he ran in, did a Thommo flick and whizzed the ball down like a ... like a ... Oh I don't know. Something like a ... speedy thing.
Evans came on when the score was 126 for 4 with TWCC needing  64 off 13 overs - about 5 an over, but the outlook changed as he trapped the impressive Reese LBW and bowled the impressive Joe (ever-eagle-eyed pulling to leg). The outlook was looking less winny and more draw-losey all of a sudden, and with Kehagics returning for four overs Westbourne were pushing for victory. Kehagics it was who finally did for Paul, bowled just four runs short of a great century and just 2.3 overs from the end of the game. Paul often comes up with a disproportionate number of runs in any TWCC innings, and this was no exception. On this occasion he scored a wonderful and chanceless 96 (14 fours), batted for 41 overs and always seemed to be in control. He survived an early LBW appeal (the Gazette asked the umpire for an interview after the game but he had left early by the back gate) but it was noticeable how he got his nose down towards the ball and played it late, watching it all the way onto his bat. If there were any shots played in the air they were few, and Paul, instead, relied on not hitting on the up to stay in and on the slick outfield for his runs. Paul 96, the rest of his team 66.
With a win still a possibility, Skipper Edwards came in at No. 8 and, notwithstanding the pace of Evans and Kehagics, his correct technique saw him take the game forward, particularly with a straight-batted back-foot glance wide of gully for four, but he was out for 13, the third victim of the irrepressible Evans. To win TWCC needed 17 off the last 2.2 overs - but 8 wickets had fallen. A win was unlikely and so Honse's usual "You shall not pass!" batting style was called for and it was delivered. Ed's mission was to stay there at all costs as Tom, capable though he is, was a wounded man at No.11.
Ed faced up to Evans for the final over. Two dots. A wide. Another dot. "We didn't come all this way for a draw!" came the sledging, but Ed held out for another dot. Four balls bowled. Survive the fifth and a.... Doh! Bowled! One ball left, in came Tom with the pride of TWCC resting on his shoulders. Evans was all fired up and his aim was true but Tom survived the last ball and the game ended in a draw.
A balanced game between two well-matched sides, albeit that Westbourne didn't face the bowling of both Rydons. Let's hope we can tempt Westbourne back if a gap in the fixtures appears. After all, now that they are inoculated against our facilities, they have only to fear our cricket.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and elected to field first.
Westbourne Innings: J Malley Ct J Panther Bld M Edwards 9; S Malley Ct R Rydon Bld M Edwards 18; J Stockley not out 41; W Turner Bld J Simon 36; D Harland-Jones run out (M Pearce) 38; N Suckling Ct R Packham (Wk) Bld H Karvay 1; L Evans not out 33. DNB S Descir, D Kahagics, B Bently, M Magil. Extras 13 (B2, LB3, W7, NB1) Total 189 for 5 (36 overs).
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 9-1-27-1; T Rydon 8-1-35-0; E Howes 8-1-36-0; J Simon 5-0-31-1; J Panther 4-0-30-0; H Karvay 2-0-25-1.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Bld D Kehagics 96; J Simon Ct L Evans Bld D Kehagics 4; M Pearce Ct Turner Bld M Magil 0; R Rydon Ct Harland-Jones Bld M Magil 10; E Bunn Ct Wkt Bld S Desi 16; R Packham LBW L Evans 12; J Panther Bld L Evans 10; M Edwards Bld L Evans 13; H Karvay not out 0; E Howes Bld L Evans 1; T Rydon not out 0. Extras 13 (B4, LB2, W5, NB2) Total 176 for 9 (43 overs).
Westbourne Bowling: D Kehagics 13-2-38-2; M Magil 9-1-37-2; B Bently 9-1-34-0; S Desi 6-0-34-1; L Evans 7-0-27-4.
Match Drawn. 


Top
Lindfield v TWCC May 19th 2019
Here at the Gazette we remember with some embarrasment last year's Lindfield fixture, not because TWCC were all out for 77 but because that was the write up entrusted to their then intern, Pete Tong, who wrote such monumentally mis-judged tosh that the Gazette, I fear, is still recovering from the almost terminal drop of circulation.
This, however, is a new season; Pete's long gone to write for the Mail, and this report will have none of the pseudo-gothic flummery that did nothing to disguise the fact that last year TWCC, batting first, were 77 all out. Surely this year would be different?
-
Skipper Brock won the toss and decided that TWCC would field first.
TWCC are blessed with a fine selection of youthful opening bowlers. On this occasion Matt E and Tom R it was who opened up, and, well, the afternoon was largely going to be all about batsmen not scoring runs and getting out whilst they didn't. Matt's figures of 8 overs for 10 runs, including 6 maidens with a wicket (Ct & Bld)  in his fourth over says it all. From the other end Tom, in his first over, bowled Lindfield's No. 2 and he went on to take two further wickets in his spell; one sharply caught behind by budding wicket-keeper Panther and one safely gathered in by TWCC's specialist mid-off in the shape of Brocky. Both catches remarkable in their own way. Well - in the same way, as it happens.
Reeling at 4 for 20 it was with some relief that Lindfield welcomed the first bowling change as, with a spell of 6 overs 3 for 11, Tom was taken off so he could concentrate even more on throwing himself about in the field. Lindfield's Hopkins (No. 4) and Kalser (No. 6) possibly felt that the pressure might be coming off and that they could relax a little. But, oh no!, it was another opening bowler who came on in the shape of Ed, and Hopkins was soon out LBW and Kalser was clean-bowled (I just typed clean-bowelled which is quite a different thing and is, thankfully, now difficult to prove). Ed wasn't finished, and his third wicket was thanks to another catch by Tom R. Tom was everywhere on the field, leaping about. Both Toms, and a few Matts and, actually, all TWCC's fielders gave a fielding performance that was very good indeed including,  yes, hanging on to all the catches! Tom (R) would have it that he dropped a catch at third slip, but that he got a hand to it at all was remarkable as he was horizontal at an altitude of several feet and travelling towards point at the time.
Matt B, a rarity in the fold but always eager and energetic, bowled five smart overs with only a little rust creeping in whilst he was remembering how to do it, and 12 runs off his 5 overs was a great way to start his 2019 season.
Honse bowled his usual mystery balls for two wickets (more great figures Honse); one bowled and one a catch taken by Joe whose 0-15mph performance is surely second to none. Another good catch - and what do catches do? Catches make for early tea, though Jim, who was hit for 6, spurned TWCC's new found confidence in catching by bowling the culprit next ball and ending the Lindfield innings.
The ball both swung and moved off the pitch, particularly downhill on the sideways slope, so batting wasn't easy and Lindfield's 90, especially if regarded in the light of TWCC's 2018 performance, might not prove to be as easy to overhaul as some might think.
Thank you to Lindfield for their tea (and general hospitality), and, with grey skies looming the early tea meant TWCC could begin their reply before any poor weather might breeze in.
Batting on the Lindfield slope is quite tricky. The home side must be used to it, but add in a bit of movement in the air and a good length ball is a dangerous thing. Over- or under-pitched deliveries can be dealt with, but on a good length and line, well, maybe 90 was a pretty good total? Jim played back to a ball landing about 8" outside the off stump and which in his mind was about to be punched into the off side, but it jigged across inside his bat and onto his pads; plumb LBW. Lying awake at night Jim now plays forward to all balls like that. Over and over again...
With Jim gone someone else clearly had to occupy the crease without scoring and Skipper Brock set about this task with dogged determination and was almost completely successful through to the end of the game, only spoiling it right at the end by hitting a couple of fours and undoing all the good work.
Joe, who had been using his true eye to swipe balls to leg for three fours, rather hoiked one to mid-on and was caught, which brought Edward to the crease. Edward, fresh from an average-building not out the week before, looks more and more like the heyday Edward of yore; the Edward correct in defense, strong in attack is amongst us once more. Not that running is anasthma to Edward (there's always the opportunity for a quick single at the end of an over), but with ten 4's and a 6 to finish the game which took him to 53 not out, most of the running was done by the fielding side dashing off into the praries to get the ball back. Brocky and Edward, in a partnership of 72, took TWCC to victory. The Gazette's prized shot of the day award goes not to any of the big shots, but instead it goes to Edward's off-the-face-of-the-bat leg glance for a single to fine leg. It may have been the last ball of the over, but it was nonetheless a classy, crafted stroke. We do like a leg glance here at the Gazette, probably because no one in the office can play it.
Last year it was TWCC that didn't really compete, and this year it was Lindfield's turn. TWCC's bowling was especially mean, and the fielding backed it up, but it was difficult to gauge what total would prove to be a good target. The challenges of batting on a sideways slope are being more fully understood by TWCC on each visit and the feeling that both sides have is that the fixture is competitve, and is certainly enjoyable, so we look forward to seeing how the chips fall in 2020.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and Richard chose to field first.
Lindfield Innings: W Fuller C&Bld M Edwards 5; L Kaye Bld T Rydon 0; C Burton Ct R Brock Bld T Rydon 1; B Hopkins LBW E Howes 18; M Manwering Ct Panther (wk) Bld T Rydon 1; J Kalser Bld E Howes 12; T Richardson Bld H Karvay 14; J Armand Ct T Rydon Bld E Howes 4; M Cook Ct Panther (wk) Bld H Karvay 1; A Parsons Bld J Simon 18. DNB R Green. Extras 15 (B-9, LB-1, W-3, NB-2) Total 90 all out (32 overs).
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 8-6-10-1; T Rydon 6-1-11-3; E Howes 7-1-19-3; M Brock 5-0-12-0; H Karvay 3-1-9-2; J Simon 3-0-13-1.
TWCC Innings: J Simon LBW T Richardson 2; J Panther Ct, Bld R Green 17; R Brock not out 9; E Bunn not out 53. DNB T Firth, M Edwards, T Rydon, E Howes, H Karvay, M Brock. Extras 10 (B-5, W-4, NB-1) Total 91 for 2 (20 overs-ish).
Lindfield Bowling: R Green 9-2-26-1; T Richardson 4-1-21-1; M Manwering 2-1-10-0; L Kaye 3.1-0-24-0; J Armand 1-0-1-0.
TWCC win by 8 wkts.

Top
TWCC v Greys May 12th 2019
A warmer day than of late, some light cloud, bright low Sun at the end of play. Greys won the toss with Skipper Panther in charge of proceedings, and TWCC were invited to strap on the pads and prepare to face the music. Paul and Jim - becoming a regular and comfortable pairing - overcame pace, bounce and swing from the Downs End and something less life-threatening though accurate from the Pavilion End so even Paul's scoring was slow. The Greys' openers, however, remained wicketless until Paul let one through from Ashton bowling round the wicket; bowled for 16 with the score on 32 it was shame that Paul didn't himself benefit from the hard work of seeing off the opening bowlers. Tony, whose arrival did indeed coincide with a relaxation of intensity from Greys, capitalised in his usual nonchalant way, though, sadly, on this occasion not for as long as he or TWCC would have liked; three 4's and a 2 adding up to 14. However, our prudent skipper had a plan for this loss; if one Pearce happens to fall by the wayside, we had a spare! Mikey's first ball was a good straight one so he simply leaned forward, waited for the ball to get to him then presented the full face of his bat and the ball rocketed up to mid-on. A shiver ran through the fielding side. Mikey then settled to his task; timing, patience, good shot-selection, fast hands belying the ease of stroke, the ball was sent to into the long grass and down the road. There has been some recent thought in the TWCC boardroom concerning whether we could use chicken wire to reduce the time spent looking for balls, but the question now is; do they make chicken wire 20m high? Mikey was as at home picking up 6's as he was singles and Jim did his best to ensure Mikey had the strike; blocking the last ball of an over, nudging the first or second ball for a single leaving Mikey to keep up the scoring pressure. Greys, in true, honourable, Sunday style, allowed a total to build by holding back their, as it turned out, best bowler in the shape of Flynn (worryingly nicknamed Hat-trick), and Mikey's score passed fifty in no time. Jim, to no-one's surprise when Flynn did come on to bowl, was clean bowled with an unplayable (it says here) fast in-swinger that nicked the off bail. Out for 33, present for many more than that with the score on 154 for 3..
Mikey quickly followed Jim to the pavilion but with a tremendous 77 (six 6's and six 4's) appearing against his name - what a great performance, and a pleasure to watch from the middle as opposed to the lot of his team mates who had to admire it all from a selection of nearby fields whilst looking for balls.
Tom Firth enjoyed a brief visit to the middle but failed to keep a ball down - a victim of not having played any cricket yet this year, and out came Edward strutting like a man completely confident in his sandwiches. Mysteriously Edward seemed little-phased by the pacy swinging deliveries from Flynn, and Joe, too, looked to be in little trouble until Edward's quick single was quicker than Joe's; an exonerating similarity to a previous incident a couple of weeks before. Honse and Edward finished off the innings, with Honse keeping out the good balls of which there were plenty whilst Edward's keen eye saw him in little trouble on his way to a useful 14 not out.
TWCC were done on 186 for 6, possibly a few runs short, but with tight bowling..? Talking of needing a few more runs the next man due in, curiously, was Rob Rydon at No. 9 who would have surely obliged if he hadn't been overcome with modesty during the batting order parade.
Grey's opening bowlers, Ashton and Newland, kept it very tight for their first spells, and Flynn's late appearance was a master-stroke from the visitors as he put a brake on scoring at a time when TWCC may have thought they could power on to a decent total. Still, 186 has proved to be enough in the past (although is that only when it's TWCC that have to get them?).
Edward was keen that I should mention his tea and, indeed, his sandwiches, a tea's primary litmus test, were excellent and copious. However I believe he's set the bar worryingly high by making 4 loaves-worth and not the usual three. Mind you I didn't spot a couple of lavish three tier home-made sponge cakes... but maybe I held back too long and others got there first? Instead I found myself clutching a lemon finger which was also delicious.
What TWCC needed to do, when they took to the field, was to contain Greys much as the visitors' opening bowlers had TWCC. Enter Ed and Tom, our two young tearaways, and there we were; 15 overs in, not many runs on the board and Greys were falling behind. Flynn was clearly quite a player; never in trouble and it needed to be a good ball for him not to send the ball spinning to the boundary, but good balls were what he and Line were getting. Tom, it was, who took the wicket of Line courtesy of wicket keeper Tony Pearce. A fast rising ball, an audible click, and all of us, including Tony, watched the ball pass him by to his right. Then, as if it had been a trick all along, he quickly reached behind him and snaffled the ball in his right hand glove. All it needed was for him to quickly slip the ball into his pocket and look about as if mystified and we would all have thought it was what he had intended all along.
This left Flynn still at the crease where he was joined by a sequence of partners who might reasonably have thought that their opportunities to score would increase when Ed and Tom finished their spells, but little did they realise that TWCC still had tight bowling up their sleeves in the shape of Rob and Jim both of whom continued to tie the scoring down. Rob produced, as usual, several chances of varying difficulty, some spurned and some falling safe. In particular he was alternately passing the outside edge and pushing shorter balls up into the batsmen, and it was the rising ball catching the splice that produced the chances, but he was, on the day, wicketless albeit economical. Meanwhile Jim trundled in and managed to get some movement off the pitch and in the air and took three wickets for not much, and this first-change pair left affairs in a safe place; 88 for 4 after about 28 overs (the Grey's book is not clear on bowlers' spells), and one of those 4 was the dangerous Flynn who in the end let a straight one through.
Time for Edward and Joe to begin the wrapping up as 100 runs were still required by Greys and they were 4 down. Edward proved slightly expensive as he struggled to find his length, though he did take a wicket by cleverly endangering Jim at square leg who decided he ought to catch a ball rather than have it take his head off. 5 down, 5 to get. Joe took two of them, one bowled, one a catch from Tom at point, but that was it wicket-wise and a possible win was morphing into a likely draw. But then Mikey's one over was rather costly, and as the forceful Ashton (47 not out) and Newland (27 not out) got the taste for runs even a draw was becoming less and less likely as Joe and Honse's deliveries were knocked about a bit. In the end these same two batters saw Greys home with an over or two to spare even though Ed and Rob came back right at the thankless end.
Notes: The ball (Newbury) was somewhat bowler-friendly as it seemed to swing a lot (perhaps too much?) and this was something of a swing-bowler's day, with economy possible if sacrificed in the honourable pursuit of inclusion. Mikey's exuberant 77 was the TWCC innings of the day, backed up by Jim and Edward, and Flynn, Ashton and Newland it was who saw Greys home. Regardless of the result the game was played in the good spirit both sides enjoy and a result one way or the other was, perhaps, the best outcome as it allowed both graciousness and magnanimity. It was also nice to meet another Twineham resident who may be (easily?) persuaded to join us for the odd game during the season, and since we generally do play odd games Mark should fit right in.

Scorecard
Greys won the toss and chose to bowl first. Match format; traditional Sunday timed cricket.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Bld Ashton 16; J Simon Bld Flynn 33; T Pearce Bld Sewell; M Pearce Ct (long-on) Bld J Meek 77; T Firth Ct (point) Sewell; E Bunn not out 14; J Panther run out 8; H Karvay not out 2. DNB R Rydon, T Rydon, E Howes. Extras 19 (B7, LB1, W10, NB1) Total 186 for 6 (40 0vers).
Greys Bowling: Ashton 8-2-14-1; Newland 7-1-13-0; Burgess 6-0-38-0; Sewell 9-0-74-2; Flynn 7-2-21-1; J Meek 3-0-15-1.
Greys Innings: Line Ct T Pearce wk Bld T Rydon 11; Flynn Bld J Simon 43; J Meek Bld j Simon 4; Maxwell Bld J Simon 16; Fenton Bld Panther 12; Edwards Ct Simon Bld Bunn 4; Brasher Ct T Rydon Bld Panther 0; Ashton not out 47; Newland not out 27. DNB unrecorded. Extras 20 ( B6, LB2, W9, NB3) Total 189 for 7 (39 overs).
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 8-1-28-0; T Rydon 7-0-26-1; J Simon 7-0-18-3; R Rydon 6-1-21-0; E Bunn 3-0-25-1; J Panther  5-0-22-2; M Pearce 1-0-17-0; H Karvay 2-0-20-0.
Greys win by 3 wkts.


Top
Streat and Westmeston v TWCC May 5th 2019
Streat and Westmeston - we all like a bit of Streat; the friends we see twice a year regular as clockwork, the timeless majesty of the Downs that run across our Wealden Summer; this is just one of several games we enjoy playing in front of some of the most prestigious country houses belonging to Sussex's finest families; Streat itself, Parham House, Twineham.
On the day, the ground was hard, and the wicket - more central than in recent visits - was lighter and dryer than at any time in recent Mays. Streat and Westmeston won the toss and batted first. In our form (and standard) of cricket it is something of an advantage, it seems to us here at the Gazette, to field first as that allows a team a win without having to go through the difficulty of taking 10 wickets in the course of half an afternoon. Batting second a side are in control of either chasing a total, of holding out for an honourable draw, or of losing if that's what floats your boat. All possible results are in the hands of the side batting second, though in the end it comes down to Harvey's in any case, so nothing too serious is at stake unless the pub chills its beer.
Matt and Ed were given the lovely, shiny, glowing, pristine-seamed new ball (my Precioussss) and their performance set the tone and established the pattern of the day's play. Curiously, typically and unfairly neither of these two opening bowlers took a wicket. Curious and unfair? Curious because the wickets of Colin Mansfield and Matt Porter were certainly under threat, and unfair for the same reason as there was no lack of effort from Matt or the usual penetration we've seen from Ed. Typical? Well, the Gazette frequently notes that sometimes the better the bowling, the greater the care and respect that bowling receives. Higher order batters are often more concerned with seeing off the opening bowlers without getting out than with particularly doing anything about scoring runs; such is the subtle balance that is cricket. So it was on this occasion; Matt and Ed each bowled a straight 8 overs, with 4 maidens each, for a combined total of just 27 runs. Matt going for just 9 runs in this spell is truly outstanding, and both could probably have just carried on all afternoon, but Skipper Brock (welcome to Richard for his first game of the season) has a mighty arsenal at his disposal that includes the young firebrand Tom R.
Tom, ever hard-working and fully commited to enjoying his afternoon, charged in and if the Streat and Westmeston batters thought their afternoon was going to get any easier they had another think coming. Rob Saunders, in his second game, came on first change from the Downs End, and, though still a bit stiff early on, it was he who took TWCC's first wicket; the clear-headed Matt Porter missing a good ball of an awkward length and being bowled. Meanwhile Colin Mansfield was continuing with his trademark strong-minded innings, and he was joined by James Porter who, as with his brother, looked every inch a cricketer. However, you can't ignore the primeval force of Tom Rydon and he it was who quickly trapped James Porter LBW for a duck, and the somewhat uneven pace of this Streat wicket then began to manifest itself. Colin had demonstrated that the quality most desired by batters on the day was that of patience, and he continued to exhibit just that as he was joined first by John Hawkins who was run out, sadly for him, on 0, and Terry Garoghan who was clean bowled by Tom as he quickly took his second wicket of the day before being rewarded in the usual fashion by being taken off.
Joe and Honse took up the bowling duties, and both were destined to continue TWCC's excellent day with the ball. Both dropped on to a good length and line and were difficult to play as the slighlty slower-paced deliveries seemed to hold up on this early-season wicket. Joe's bowling, indeed, held up so that a sequence of extremely difficult chances were offered to mid-on where one of our best fielders was repeatedly just unable to cling on to the ball. In the end, however, Colin Mansfield, as he opened up the taps with tea approaching, skied the ball towards Jim at long-on who so totally misjudged a simple catch that he had to resort to a last second one-handed grab that ended, mysteriously, with the ball somehow sticking to the inside of his right hand. The end to a fine innings from Colin whose 41 was hard-won and extremely valuable in what was clearly going to be a low-scoring game. Not many further runs were added as Joe and Honse continued to be difficult to get away. Honse's variations, his guile and wiggly bowling, were a treat to witness and he ended with fine figures indeed of 5 overs, 2 maidens for just 4 runs at a time that the hosts were trying to hit out.
Streat and Westmeston restricted, then, to 94 off, as it happened, 37 overs.
Low-scoring matches can be tricky to win, as some experienced TWCC... err... observers (for a moment I was going to say "fans!") will know. A chasing side in these circumstances requires patience and application, which should, of course, be no problem for TWCC?
In the first over Paul was trapped LBW by a full length ball from Matt Porter's left arm over pacy bowling. It did pitch in line, straightened slightly down the slope and would have hit the stumps, so Umpire Howes (I think it was) gave it out and Paul walked off to face his disappointed fan-base and some tough interviews with the waiting press.
TWCC 0 for 1 - a sign of a tough journey ahead?
Jim, widely regarded as the team Number Two, after a few loose balls to score off found it progressively harder to get the ball away from Porter, though Hawkins' bowling was easier to survive and from which is was possible to safely nudge the odd single. Tony, in for his first game of the season, scored a couple of twos with his customary nonchalence, then was caught...in the gully? At point? He was caught anyway; TWCC rattling through towards their easy target were 2 for 16 but, well, another 79 runs would surely be no problem!
Joe, in at 4, did manage to push the score along a bit, and a nervous and clearly misguided air of calm settled over the ground when no TWCC batter had been out for some minutes on end. But then, in spite of appearing in his own head to be in little trouble, a slower Porter ball did for Jim who went through with a nothing shot and toe-ended it back to the bowler for a simple catch. TWCC 3 for 28 - but only another 67 needed! With all that batting to come! No problemo!
Enter Rob Saunders (surname mentioned to help analysts in years to come) who found it hard to ignore that little red ball hovering in the foreground but not actually... quite... getting to him... and he fell for 3.
TWCC 4 for 39. No problemarooni!
Joe and Matt - they'll bat well together! Joe's looking goo... 5 for 39. No problemaroonioso! Only 56 needed.
And then, believe it or not, as the bowling pressure was relaxed and conditions improved, the Sun came out, the wind dropped, the swallows began to sing and the wagtails pranced and scampered over the outfield and the pattern of play became all crickety and lovely. Matt and Honse started to push the ones and twos from the now less troublesome bowling, indeed there were a couple of boundaries as the score inexorably climbed towards the target total, and then, with his first really agressive stroke, Matt struck a four between gully and point to take TWCC to their second win of the season. Great, mature play from Matt and Honse; lots of twos, lots of singles, no trouble, no need for Ed to wander in and hit the winning runs.
Low scoring matches can be fun, though Streat and Westmeston were about 50 runs short of making it too tough for their visitors. TWCC, however, are more than capable of making any score over 70... 60...50... any score look tricky. There is generally a reason that a side doesn't get many runs, and in the case of Streat it was because TWCC's bowlers ran the day; the opening spells of Matt and Ed, followed up by Tom, Rob, Joe and Honse (plus Brocky's Bonus at the very end) denied the host's batsmen any sort of easy ride. Only Colin's 41 and Matt Porter's 19 really added much to the first innings total, and that was never going to be enough. Important innings from Colin Mansfield for Streat, and from Matt and Honse for TWCC were the batting highlights, but on the day the depth of TWCC's bowling ws the difference between the two sides.
TWCC look forward to seeing Streat at home - though not too soon as there's a whole season to enjoy in the meantime.

Scorecard
Streat and Westmeston won the toss and elected to bat first. Proper village cricket timed format!
S&W Innings: C Mansfield Ct J Simon Bld J Panther 41; M Porter Bld Suanders 19; J Porter LBW T Rydon 0; J Hawkins Run Out (Simon) 0; T Garroghan Bld T Rydon 0; W Baxter not out 8; L Maysey not out 8. DNB; I Anthony, C Marshall, R Griffiths, S Spiegel. Extras 18 (B10,LB2, W4,NB2) Total 94 for 5 (37 overs as it happened).
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 8-4-9-0; E Howes 8-4-18-0; T Rydon 6-1-20-2; R Saunders 5-0-17-1; J Panther 4-2-8-1; H Karvay 5-2-4-0; R Brock 1-0-6-0.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter LBW M Porter 0; J Simon Ct & Bld M Porter 11; T Pearce Ct J Porter 4; J Panther Ct & Bld J Porter 17; R Saunders Ct Baxter Bld Maysey 3; M Edwards not out 24; H Karvay not out 31. DNB E Howes, T Rydon, R Brock, E Bunn. Extras 6 (B1, LB2, W3) Total 96 for 5 (30.3 overs).
S&W Bowling: M Porter 7.3-2-16-3; J Hawkins 5-0-17-0; L Maysey 7-1-22-1; J Porter 5-3-9-1; I Anthony 3-0-13-0; S Spiegel 3-0-14-0.
TWCC win by 5 wkts.


Top
TWCC v Wisley CC April 28th 2019
Sunny, hot, rainy, cold, windy, calm. Grass good to moderate thanks to no rain for weeks, a Friday cut by the Council and a second cut by Edward on Saturday. Wisley's skipper and TWCC's own Skipper Edwards combined to agree to a limited overs format game of 40 overs per side.
Wisley's T Richards had been watching too much IPL and is obviously very good in the first place, and he took TWCC's first over of the season for a cool and somewhat dispiriting 23. That Ed then conceded only a further 4 runs in the next 4 overs is quite something. Tom, opening from the Pavilion End, had somewhat less of an immediate challenge in the form of Swan, and, together with excellent strike-management from Skipper Edwards and the TWCC side, the Richards first over onslaught was stifled very successfully. Tom and Ed finished their opening spells with very good figures indeed with Tom taking his first 2019 wicket. However the next three Wisley batters were all thoroughly capable, and TWCC's bowlers were consistently being deposited in the hedge for the whole of the remaining 40 overs. The ground really was running fast, and once a ball was past a fielder it was generally four. Joe and Matt took over from Ed and Tom to good effect with Matt taking one of the day's rare wickets thanks to a sharp catch by Paul at point. The Gazette should mention the welcome appearance of Rob Saunders whose first spell for TWCC was a welcome blend of pace and movement, and he was rewarded with an LBW. However, as Wisley opened their shoulders the runs began to flow and the total climbed. Jim and Honse, and then the returning Tom, bowled well, though the odd ball was sent to the boundary, the Wisley total cleared the 200 mark and ended, after the full 40 overs, on 212 for 3. Historically anything over 200 is a fine batting total at the Twineham ground, though the conditions were unusually fast for the time of year.
Thanks to Paul for tea - starting us off in fine style complete with CC sandwiches and labels. With a possible further 40 overs to play before it got dark Wisley quickly took to the field as Paul and Jim strapped on their pads and other assorted paraphenalia.
T Richards opened from the Downs End, some pace and the occasional yorker being served up, and Wilson from the Pavilion End contrived to present Paul with his perfect hitting balls as he pocketed 18 runs from his first over, and a further 14 from the second, the roadside hedge, and indeed the road, being his favoured target areas. He calmed down, and was then out to a good in-cutting ball from T Richards that snuck between bat and pad onto his leg stump. Jim ploughed on; the odd four, pushes for 2, quick singles... Oh dear; poor Joe. If the Gazette could offer an unbiased opinion on his run out it would. Joe sent a thick inside edge to square leg, Jim set off shouting "Run" and "Yes" and "Yes Joe" and "Run" as the fielder struggled to get the ball to hand, and for a difficult few moments Jim and Joe discussed this developing situation at the batting crease. Repeated analysis has shown that (a) it was a tight a call for a run, (b) it would have been a run if Joe had set off when the call came, (c) that it was Jim's fault that a run was attempted, (d) Joe's deserved appearance at No. 3 was too short-lived, and (e) Jim would have bought Joe a one-time-offer jug if he'd gone to the pub. Joe had looked very good in the nets and it is sad that he didn't get to bat in this game. (Sorry - Ed).
Jim, chastened though still sporadically suicidal in running terms, was joined by latecomer Ryan who, from the first, batted with confidence and energy. Boundaries galore, 6's galore, lost balls galore it was a galorathon. Never in trouble, pretty much always on strike as Jim's bat nudged the singles, Ryan rocketed to 50. Jim wasn't, as it turned out, ultimately given out by Umpire Panther but only because he was at square leg at the time - but he bat-toe-ended a lobby catch to leg slip off a wide ball down the leg side. Ryan continued his rocketing and, with 10 fours and 6 sixes, found himself with a century in the bank. He retired at that point, leaving TWCC with 42 to get. No problem, obviously. Not for TWCC!
Honse was caught off the bowling of Ramesh, and Edward's slim form was given out LBW having been mistaken for Jim by Umpire Panther. Tom provided a match-securing 21 at the right time, and though he perished before the end, Matt and Ed saw TWCC home.
A few welcome closed-season signings in Rob (great spell and excellent first ball of his TWCC career) and the Greens (Ryan's 100 and his Dad's cheery presence - sad he didn't get to bat or bowl) are good signs for the season. TWCC thank Wisley for making the trip over. It's always good to see them and to share in all that is cricket and we look forward to their visit again next year. The bat, in the hands of players from both sides, was the winner on the day, with Wisley showing the way and Ryan making the hay.

Scorecard
Wisley won the toss and opted to bat first. Agreed format 40 overs/side.
Wisley Innings: T Richard Bld T Rydon 32; L Swan LBW Saunders 16; Ramesh Ct P Hunter Bld Edwards 36; J Snelling not out 37; J Haddow not out 66. Extras 25 (B 13, LB 2, W 7, NB 3). Total 212 for 3 off 40 overs. DNB R Geer, Shiva, Kernigan, J Richards, C Wilson.
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 5-1-27-0; T Rydon 7-0-21,1; J Panther 5-0-23-0; M Edwards 8-2-22-1; R Saunders 8-1-53-1; J Simon 5-0-31-0; J Karvay 2-0-13-0.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Bld T Richards 38; J Simon Ct J Richards (or Rupert?) Bld Shiva 24; J Panther run out 1; R Green retired 100; J Karvay Ct, Bld Ramesh 3; E Bunn LBW Ramesh 4; T Rydon Ct J Richards Bld Wilson 21; M Edwards not out 3; E Howes not out 2. Extras 14 (B 6, W 8,). Total 213 for 6 (plus 1 retired) off 27 overs . DNB R Saunders, M Green.
Wisley Bowling: T Richards 7-0-32-1; Wilson 5-1-44-1; J Richards 5-0-38-0; R Geer 2-0-30-0; Shiva 3-0-29-1; Ramesh 3-0-16-1; Ellis 1-0-7-0; Swan 2-0-10-0.
TWCC win by ... How do you say it in limited overs cricket? 1 run? 3 remaining wickets?

Top
TWCC 2018 Season

Top
2018 Season's Report
PLAYED 14  WON 5 DRAWN 5 LOST 4  CALLED OFF 4 (2017 P 17, W 8, D3, L 6, called off 3)

It’s been a slimmed-down season in the life of TWCC.  2 years ago we scheduled around 22 matches a year.  We took this down partly because of our own struggles filling the team sheet in particular in the holiday period of late July, early August – and partly because other teams were facing difficulties raising teams to play us.  So last year  we scheduled 20 matches (played 17) but this year we dropped to scheduling 18 matches but ended up playing just 14.  Whilst we managed to field full sides on most days, it is – by common consent – too little cricket!  Once we’d toured, we played just one match in July and August.  Two of the matches fell victim to unfortunate rainstorms during an otherwise baking summer – the rest we had  removed from the schedule. It’s encouraging that this is a trend we can reverse.
Our numbers are better.  We are securing a greater number of players we can call on to play occasionally – and we have one or two in the wings who we hope will become more regular – namely Graham Cuthbert and Rob Saunders.  Our cricket continues to be highly competitive and hard fought, yet friendly and richly enjoyable – and that makes people want to play for us.  I’m convinced playing cricket for TWCC is a really good way of spending a Sunday afternoon – and I’m pleased to say that most times, most people get a bat or a bowl, which is crucial for full involvement. So with all this in mind, we will be aiming to increase the number of matches we play this coming season, particularly filling some of the gaps in July and August. 
And what a season it’s been – one of the most memorable in recent history for the number of highly exciting matches going right to the wire.  Greys, Bolney, Jevington, Exiles, Bournemouth, Balcombe – and a number of others highly competitive, with great performances.  A great tour – a really great tour – which marked our 125 anniversary  in suitable style – and a mostly glorious hot summer. 
I’d like to thank Matt for his excellence as vice captain.  He knows the club and the players and has the perfect touch on the tiller when he’s in charge.  I think he felt the strain in September when matches were on but numbers sparse but well done to him for getting teams out and turning out great team performances – not to mention some excellent individual bowling performances.  My thanks also to Joe who took to fixtures secretary like a fish takes to a hook:  it looks fun and attractive at first, but then you can’t escape it.  Well done Joe for taking it on and especially for those late matches you found us – Jevington and Headliners.  Thank you also to Paul for his excellence in keeping us in the black and looking after all things financial and to Jim for his brilliant website and write ups – I think I speak for all of us to say his reports are brilliantly entertaining for us and also for the away teams who also enjoy them.  Thanks also to our President Dave Jones for continuing to look for unlikely ways to finance a new pavilion and to our oldest and most revered player Dave Rogers without whom no tour would be complete. 
Congratulations to Jim for accepting the invitation to step up to opener, and making a huge success of it.  If TWCC had a player of the year, we’d look no further because his performances were magnificent for their `openingness`! We’ve also seen some great individual performances especially with the bat – Paul’s 100 vs Crescent a spectacular example – and some great partnerships – Jim and Rob’s 188 vs Bolney comes to mind.  The season was full of champagne moments – Matt Brock’s 4 to win the match vs Balcombe, the winning draw vs Exiles, beach cricket in Bournemouth….
I am sorry to report that Malcolm Woodall who turned out for us a couple of times has died – my condolences to his family. It was also a year when we lost Roger Hole, formerly the captain of Albourne and Sayers Common, well known to all.
Finally I’d like to say I continue to love captaining the side, I’m loving my cricket as much as I ever have and for that I have you all to thank:  a bunch of guys as diverse as you could ask for, cricket loving, fun loving, piss-taking, belly aching, whinge, whine, gloriously life on the line, one for all and all for one – you’re a great bunch.

Richard Brock – Captain, Twineham and Wineham Cricket Club.

SEASON HIGHLIGHTS – AND LOWLIGHTS
MAY
Early batting form for Tony as we draw with Streat, an exciting `anyone could win in the last over` draw vs Greys,  a closer defeat than we deserved at Lindfield,  followed by a 20 run win vs Bolney where Ed and Matt bowled us home.
JUNE/JULY
A bit of a hammering vs Jevington though their sportsmanship allowed us to get within 17 runs, a fantastic match vs Exiles which we put down as a winning draw – who can forget Paul’s extraordinary catch running in from the boundary in the last over.  A convincing win vs Unity took us to tour, which was all round brilliant.  Aside from great nights out, we had a last ball win vs Bournemouth CC and the cracking win vs Balcombe from Matt’s 4.  Our only other match in July was a good hiding from a revitalised Headliners team at baking Cuckfield. 
SEPTEMBER
A terrific win at Crescent thanks to Paul’s 100 and his great stand with Tom Firth contributing his fine 47, a cliff-hanging loss v Parham, and finally tight draws against Bolney and Beamers. 

Top

TWCC v Brighton Beamers September 30th 2018
A last sunny Sunday to see the season out, TWCC and the Beamers gathered once more to share the spoils of another encounter. This final fixture is often particularly enjoyable as the two sides are well matched in terms of ability and share an understanding of what cricket is about.
Beamers won the toss and chose to field first. Sadly, Siddo, a regular Beamers stalwart, pulled a calf muscle before the game even began, leaving him short of fun and the visitors short of a fielder not to mention a serious performer with bat and ball.
Skipper Brock, who, in the interests of giving as many players as possible a turn at something generally puts those who are less bowly in at the top of the batting order and vice versa, took the opportunity to mix things up. In TWCC’s case this policy makes less difference to the overall batting performance than many pundits might expect as we can all bat even if we can’t all bowl, so there was little risk and much to be gained by asking Tom Rydon and Joe to strap on the protectives and head out to the middle.
And, to coin one of those awful cross-pollinated knee-jerk phrases from elsewhere, what’s not to like? We know the yoof have good eyes and hand/eye co-ordination from somewhere north of 1990, so there was little to be surprised at in Tom and Joe’s flurry of boundaries and sporty runs. These are the sort of performances it’s easier to produce when there’s time to spend (if not to waste - Ed) in the middle, and it was a joy to see. A certain amount of comfortable lounging began to occur in the pavilion, and conversation began to range freely from not mentioning the Ryder Cup to definitely not mentioning the Ryder Cup, as Jonathan prepared his spread and steeled himself to wrestle with the cling film. A Wodehousian mellow peace and Indian Summer contentment reigned as Capt. Brock, no doubt subject to some sort of Pavlovian response to the comforting sound of rattling crockery, rang for Rowland and suggested an unscheduled tea all round from the comfort of his executive recliner.
Then Joe was out for a strong 21 comprising four 4’s and a lot of productive dashing about - good to see Joe given license with the bat and to have seen him scoring freely - a great start for TWCC; 35 for the first wicket. Ripping off the apron and revealing that he was fully padded up and probably had been since he got up, Jonathan strode to the middle and showed what he was about. He deftly defended using the middle of his bat, watchfully assessed each ball as it came down, was demonstrably completely solid in defence - and then missed one on its way to the stumps. 2018, for a man of Jonathan’s ability, has not, after a good start, been a vintage year for him with the bat. Never mind – at least he’s one of the young ones with plenty of time to shine in seasons to come. And he’s a great glove man.
Matt, as ever, showed he can bat, though Rigby’s slow leggy tennis-ball bounce was his early undoing as he contrived to play a shot to a wide ball down the leg side, take his bat away, then put it back, then take it away again, then turn it round in his hands and lift a dolly catch up from the back of the bat into the keeper’s gloves. One of those strange dismissals...
Tom R, meanwhile, was continuing to demonstrate that he's not just about bowling and fielding. Classic stroke play rose to the surface, the MCC coaching manual had clearly been his bedtime reading for much of his life. Cultured fours, quick singles, all fine stuff, ultimately undone by a catch somewhere, 27 runs his contribution to the TWCC total.
Honse, with a bit of time to bat, and then Graham wearing his new TWCC badges with pride, occupied the middle with clear intent, both producing boundaries and scampering through for singles, but Graham was out (5) caught and Honse was run out (8) with the score needing a bit of pepping up as maidens had too often begun to reward the Beamers’ bowlers.
Enter pepperer Ed – ever a star in the nets – who brought his swinging ways to the fore and upped the general air of intent. A quick-fire 25 was just what TWCC needed as the home side had become a bit bogged down, and then he mistimed (not sure about this; I just made that up – Ed) (but it might be true?) a ball to somewhere and someone caught it somewhere it says here.
Jim, then, quickly, Rob ambled and hobbled respectively to the middle with only one Captain’s instruction ringing in their ears; “Don’t faff about we need 175.” This was quite a tall order as there was not much time to go with just over 100 on the board. Needless to say this target was missed by some margin as one of the two batters in was Rob. Beamers, in the interests of helping their hosts up to something reasonable, had been generously providing balls to keep the TWCC middle order happy, and here was a number 9 with an injured leg – so they left the bowling alone; what could possibly go wrong?
4,6,4,4,4,1,1,6,4,6,3,1,2,4,1,3,6,6,4, 3 that’s what could go wrong. Now, although I had to retake my maths O-level all those years ago and that was when I could count, after several goes at the sum I make this 73 – not 67 as it says in the scorebook. Another instance of a poor batsman getting diddled by the scorers if you can call them scorers. I have altered this in the book, along with the total up by 6 to balance the books. Then I noticed that 23 extras had been summed up to 31... What’s going on? What was TWCC’s actual total? 206? 204? 212? We’ll never know without taking a look at Beamers’ book. Let’s hope the total they were chasing was correct.
In any case, Rob’s innings set the game alight. He played with the confines of the ground, endeavouring with each shot to gauge the drag of the grass or, in five cases, the height of the trees in order to get the boundaries without losing the ball. One six, a towering pull off his legs, was a perfect example of his miserly approach to ball-consumption as, instead of finding a field somewhere near Billingshurst, he contrived to catch the midriff of the poplar tree so that the ball benignly dropped back into the field of play so it could quickly be recycled in his blistering and chanceless innings. I truly believe this shot pleased him more than any other, and there were plenty to choose from.
Jim contributed in a small way by running about like Usain Bolt’s grandfather when he was told and giving Rob the strike when he could, and the 8th wicket partnership either approached or passed the century depending on whether you can add up or not. I can and I make it 103. Beamers could do little to stem the flow, even after they realised they had to deal with a proper batsman in the middle and chose bowlers to match. Brocky’s disappointment was clear to see as his No. 9 ignored his demands for 175 and helped the total over 200 and then some. Not sure how much by, but something like a few runs here or there. Or extras. Or, well, wha’ever.
For me, carrot cake wins the day. Yes, there were coronation chicken sandwiches which normally secure the coveted tea-time No 1 slot, to say nothing of the asstd. ham, cheese, and egg usual suspects, but when cake’s that good all else matters little. However I’m not sure I saw anyone go for a coprolite? But thanks to Jonathan for all the work.
So – something over 200 in the bag, the Beamers bat a bit like TWCC so it was certainly within reach, but TWCC do have a 3-fold youthful blistering pace attack. Matt and Ed lined up their respective off stumps and prepared to open fire, Jonathan changed gloves and hunkered down behind the timbers and the arc of incompetence settled down in the hope that it wouldn’t come to any of them. And for a while it didn’t, but pass the bat it did, pass the stumps it did, pass the boundary not so much, unless you count Matt’s opening loosener which was cut powerfully for 4 by the impressive Rigby. Ed also bowled really well from the Downs End, and both men were noticeably making a full effort, charging in hard and generating a lot of pace. The TWCC home wicket is, really, too bouncy for pace bowling as good length balls often lift over stump height, and deliveries that would catch the top of the stumps need to arrive at the batsman at  half-volley length. However, notwithstanding this caveat/excuse, it was Ed’s fourth over, a wicket maiden, that brought about the second demise of Briggs, the first having ended in a high reprieve. Brocky’s redemption came in the shape of a much more difficult low, hard chance at mid-off. The fast-travelling ball dipped to shin height to Richard’s left, he stuck out a couple of hands, and when the dust settled there it was, stuck fast. One of the best catches of the season so far, and the smile, morphing over the next two hours into a smirk, never left Brocky’s face for the rest of the day and it’s probably still there.
Matt, fruitless on the day, bowled really well as he always does, but as for wickets, that one for Ed was it for the Tornado Twosome. But TWCC have Typhoon Tom!
There’s something about Tom that strikes us here in the Gazette; he’s completely driven by the need to burn calories. He sprints about the place, he chases balls in the field like a collie getting round behind the sheep, he walks by running slowly as if in a dressage competition, and when all this energy finally gets focussed into bowling he charges in hard and truly winds up the pace. Which increases the shame felt by the more unreliable slip fielders... By Jim. He gets his hand to the ball, but, these days, that’s as far as it gets as the ball suddenly seems to have more of Newton’s apple about it than for other fielders. Surprisingly, given how gazelle-like he is in the outfield, Jim seems to find himself in the slip area quite often, but really he shouldn’t be there as Honse, Ed, Matt, Tom and many others will testify. Mid-wicket/mid-on, somewhere deep, that’s his natural position as long as the ball doesn’t come his way in the air. In his defence, and we often see things from his point of view here at the Gazette, he does say that he used to be a good catcher, but we can't deny that his faculties are no longer his strong point.
One wicket for Ed, none for Matt, none for Tom... all this pace and near-misses/drops... Time for (here comes another inexplicable American nonsense) a change up! Change up? Why up?
TWCC’s change, up, down and sideways came from Phil and Joe.
How good it is to have Phil back in the side, plying his wily trade along his own spartan corridor of uncertainty. He did for Rigby, still there on 60 and helping the Beamers towards their target of whatever it was, with a rising ball off a good length just outside the off stump finding the thinnest of edges that Jonathan, standing up, took cleanly in chest-high gloves. Beamers looked as if they might have needed Rigby to stay, but they still had the obvious prowess of Chaffey (another Chaffey?) on their side of the equation, and they only needed around 70 or 80 runs with plenty of time and wickets in hand.
But TWCC had the mercurial Panther – elevated into skipperdom as Skipper Brock had left for an early bath. Some days Joe seems to not easily find his line and length, but on this occasion the true JP showed up. Teasing length, tempting pace; that’s what undoes many batters, and it’s what did for the Beamers, starting with a truly outstanding catch by Matt in the covers. Fielding quite tight in order to pounce on anything like a single, Matt dived full length to his left to cling on to the lowest of catches in one hand. The ball had been struck hard and was heading to the turf, but Matt’s tall frame helped him to go forward and low and there it was, another one of the great catches of the season – two in one game; roughly equal to the number of great drops.
Not content with just one wicket, Joe took another in the next over by clean bowling Blackadder and then again in the next by having Esson caught behind by Jonathan. This brought Rob Nicholls out to the middle, a fine batter down the order, and with Chaffey still there on 53 the visitors’ ambitions still veered towards victory.
Honse replaced Phil for a few overs but at this point Beamers were really going for the runs and, through no fault of his own, the visitors’ total was beginning to rise too fast and so Phil returned as Joe’s partner to see if TWCC could guarantee a draw and maybe snatch a victory.
Six overs to go, Chaffey and Nicholls in the middle, about ten-per-over the required rate for the Beamers, and they were scoring at that rate as, by now TWCC only had 10 fielders to play with (as, indeed, it has to be said, the Beamers had had for the entire match). (Good point – Ed.)
TWCC needed to see the end of Chaffey’s innings as he powered along into the 70’s. And, lo, the scorebook says “Chaffey, Bld Panther, 72.” Bowled Panther; his fourth, a fine match-drawing performance. Phil took a last wicket as the Beamers’ inclination to reach 200-plus fell away and the match ended in a happy draw. Happy because it was a fair result, both teams had had fun unless your name is Siddens, we had seen a fine performance from TWCC’s No 9 (on this evidence he could possibly bat a little higher up the order?), Joe took 4 wickets, others all bowled/batted well, we’d seen some excellent examples of how to catch and all three results had been possible right up until near the end of the game.
The end of play has come in this TWCC’s 125th anniversary year. Now it’s time for Brocky to come up with some play-on-numbers that gives him top spot in something or other at the AGM, so see you all at the Oak.

Scorecard
Beamers won the toss and chose to field first.
TWCC Innings: T Rydon Ct Chaffery Bld Rigby 27; J Panther Ct Briggs Bld Renshaw 21; J Rowland Bld Chaffey 2; M Edwards Ct Wk Bld Rigby 5; H Karvay Run Out 8; G Cuthbert Ct Briggs Bld Eaton 5; E Howes Ct x Bld Eaton 25; J Simon Not Out 15; R Rydon Not Out 73. DNB P Steinke, R Brock. Extras 23 (or 31 depending on many imponderables) (B12, LB1, W6, NB4) Total 204, or 206 or 212 for 7.
Beamers' Bowling: M Renshaw 8-1-32-1; Chaffey 8-3-16-1;S Esson 5-3-5-0; R Rigby 6-3-8-2; Eaton 5-0-45-2; Blackadder 6-0-69-0; Briggs 2-0-18-0.
Beamers' Innings: Rigby Ct Rowland (Wk) Bld P Steinke 60; Briggs Ct Brock Bld Howes 15; Chaffey Bld Panther 72; Riches Ct Edwards Bld Panther 1; Blackadder Bld Panther 4; Esson Ct Rowland (Wk) Bld Panther 7; R Nicholls Bld Steinke 14; Richards Not OUt 0; Renshaw Not Out 0. DNB Eaton. Siddons. Extras 18 (B7, LB3, W5, NB3) Total 191 for 7.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 10-0-40-0; E Howes 8-0-20-1; T Rydon 6-0-40-0; P Steinke 8-1-21-2; J Panther 7-1-34-4; H Karvay 3-0-28-0.
Match drawn in the dark.


Top
TWCC v Bolney CC September 16th 2018
A lovely September day, the ground basking in warm sunshine, expertly cut by Edward in absence of the council – and a number of players suffering from the summer drought.  Not rain, but cricket, something that will be addressed next year.
So TWCC fresh from their last ball defeat at the hands of 9 man Parham, began how they meant to go on – they lost the toss.  Skipper Brock was asked to bat by Bolney, and decided that he and Jim were the ones to open proceedings.    Yet another decision that got away, as he chipped a ball back to Dave Chaffey in the 8th over.  Little were we to know that that was the only TWCC wicket we would see fall during the course of the afternoon.  Rob came in to join the sound and sensible Jim – and he batted, well, soundly and sensibly too.  With a minimum fuss, these two disciplined and talented batsmen stroked the ball around the ground, the scoreboard purring quietly.  It should be said the running was gentle in nature – if not languid – but Rob was coming back from a triple  ligament severance horror and Jim’s somewhat leisurely running  has long been the subject of discussion in this forum.  Anyway, not even tongue in cheek humour should be allowed to draw attention from the enormity of batting that was underway.  Two chanceless innings took the score to 60 after the first hour and continued at a run a minute through the welcome drinks interval and into the last hour.  It was then that the pair started to open up, yet do so without throwing caution to the wind.  Jim passed his 50 with a single, Rob with a 4 – but it was not our swashbuckling Blue who swatted away the game’s first 6, it was Jim.  With half an hour left, the score passed 150 and there was a heated argument on the sidelines about the adherence to that ancient TWCC tradition of not telling the batsmen their score.  Skipper Brock argued they should be told.  Vice Skipper Edwards argued against, and garnered the support of the majority of the feet-uppers in the pavilion.  So they continued.  Rob in fact displayed the remarkable ability to count his own score whilst going along – and was only out by 1.  He also told Jim he was in his 70s – something he helped to pass by with a quick single going for 4 overthrows.   As the last over  began, Rob was graciously trying to get Jim on strike, Jim was powering into the 90s – the score was above 200.  But centuries were not to be, Jim finished on a career best 93 not out, with Rob languishing on 83 not out.  The score was 209-1.  It felt a very secure platform.
Tea was provided mainly by Matt’s nan, and very nice it was too, homemade brownies and lemon drizzle cake, lovely….
And so it was as the clock approached 4pm, we took to the field determined to skittle out Bolney.  But before that we had to sort out one little problem:  who was to keep wicket?  Joe bravely volunteered – we will find out how bravely later.   Matt and Ed opened up, and looked good and fast.  In his second over, Matt flattened the middle stump of one of the openers, followed up in very similar fashion in his third over.  Ed followed up with a sharp ball which resulted in the batsman sending the ball high in the air.  If there was any calling it was quiet – and confused.  Joe’s name rang out but it was Ed who ran forward and completed a caught and bowled.   Bolney 28-3 – which became 28-4 after Ed bowled their number 4 next over.  But Bolney’s 5 and 6 – Elliott and Steve Bowles – settled in and looked secure straight away.  The openers had no joy over the next 6 overs and so Charlie Howes was brought on to see if he could weave through their defence.  He couldn’t.  Tom Rydon looked good, had a hard chance shelled in the slips (Sorry, Ed.) and was bowling fast.  Good job Joe had gloves on…. Oh.  Joe took a fast ball on the finger and rolled around, his face gnarled by the agony which surged through his hand.  He got up, manfully, only to receive another ball, this time on the end of his middle finger, in the same over.  That was it.  As his regularly used finger swelled up with blood under the nail, Joe called it a day and headed for A and E – where he was diagnosed with a fracture.    Matt took over and looked comfortable behind the stumps .
But none of this drama helped take wickets.  Honse was unlucky (sorry, Ed), the skipper had a hard skier dropped but otherwise bowled appallingly, and all the time, Bolney powered on.  With 20 overs left they were on 66-4.  Ten overs later they were on 133-4, following a rather expensive over of 16 by Edward, encouraged by the skipper to `lob it up` - but not that bloody much!!!  Anyway, the process of trying to take 6 wickets suddenly changed to one of not throwing away the match.  Bolney impressively brought the rate down to  below 8 an over with 6 overs left – so the openers were asked to return and save the day.  Which they did.  The scoring rate fell dramatically as Elliott and Bowles struggled to smack Matt and Ed away with the ease they had Richard and Edward.  With the reins tightened, Matt removed Elliott for 86 in the penultimate over and Bolney finished on 186-5 – match drawn.  We retired to the Oak with both teams satisfied. 

Scorecard   
Bolney won the toss and asked TWCC to bowl
TWCC Innings: J Simon Not out 93; R Brock Ct and Bld D Chaffey 6; R Rydon Not out 83. TOTAL 209-1
Fall 21-2
DNB: M Edwards, E Bunn, T Rydon, J Panther,  E Howes, H Karvay, C Howes, P Steinke.
Bolney Bowling: Patton: 8-0-27-0, Madden 5-0-33-0, Chaffey 7-3-16-1, Bowles 10-0-49-0, Lake 2-0-15-0, Garside 4-0-28-0, Clemonson 2-0-16-0, Martin 3-0-22-0.
Bolney Innings: L MartinBld Edwards 8; A Lake Bld Edwards 5; M Garside Ct & Bld Howes 8; B Clemonson Bld Howes 3; B Elliott Bld Edwards 86; S Bowles Not out 52; O Bridge Not out     0. TOTAL  186-5        
Fall: 9-1, 18-2, 28-3, 28-4, 184-5  
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 9-2-30-3, E Howes 10-4-28-2, C Howes 3-0-23-0, T Rydon 4-1-12-0, H Karvay 4-1-13-0, Brock 5-0-39-0, Bunn 3-0-30-0.
Match drawn.


Top

Parham CC v TWCC September 9th 2018
A breezy cloud-flickering late summer afternoon greeted TWCC for the customary late start over in Parham savannah country. We knew we didn't have 11, but we should have had 9, but where were we all? Eventually, well after time, eight of us arrived, a coin was tossed and Parham chose to field first, partly because we were still short by one Phil and they had a full nine. Nine plays eight - lots of gaps in the field to exploit.
Sadly, the first gap found was between the place where Paul thought a fast ball from left-armer Mark Williams should have been, and the top of the middle stump which is where it was. Unusually the ball had slightly plugged just outside leg, stood up a bit and jagged right, and then lobbed down on to the stumps. This was over No. 3, Paul having taken all the deliveries from Williams whilst Jim plotted a dull course through the less threatening but nonetheless tight bowling from the West End. Paul, and then Tony, manned up to deal with the pace and movement of Williams, who then, sadly for him, pulled up with an injury and he was out of the attack leaving both ends now safe for Jim. A pattern of play developed; Tony hitting runs and Jim was happy to take the odd bigger shot on but otherwise give the strike to Tony to make the most of the gaps in the field in a strong partnership of 76. Eventually a mis-timing occurred (from memory?) and Tony was caught off Forrest who cheered up a bit from that point on. We'd seen a quickfire 60 in true Tony style; fast hands and well-timed blows sending the ball scurrying for the safety of the rabbit holes. Jonathan! He of the careful late shot-making, an honours graduate from The Watchful Batting Academy of Thoughtful Crick... oh. How did that happen? Bowled P. Fraser who continued to present his constant mild-swinging deliveries (in the end for 16 straight overs!) His bowling was quite easy to hit, but also to miss as Matt, too, found out after a couple of great off-drives for four. Meanwhile Jim ploughed on playing the tortoise role to everyone's hares; not everyone's cup of tea, and more adventurous shot-making would be good, but at the same time we were only 8-strong and there was some merit in just staying there, and he was scoring as well as occupying - which brings us on to SCOREGATE (Groan... Not again...).
OK. Picture this; slow lobby bowling from the Parham House End, just the sort of bowling that one winds up to hit with an almighty swoosh of the bat, but it just doesn't get to you and then it rolls under where the bat was at one point in its arc and rolls on to hit the bottom of middle stump. We've all been there. So Jim was very very careful, pointedly placing his bat in line with the direction the ball was eventually going to come from if it was straight, and doing something unspeakable to it if it wasn't. Only on this one occasion he waited and waited for a ball that was straight and then quite gently swung through the line at more or less the right time and there the ball was in the long-on long grass. Indisputedly a 6. But, this 6 does not appear in the scorebook! Nor in Jim's batting analysis, in Mitchell's bowling analysis or, forensics assure me, in the scratch-and-sniff bit on the right-hand side of the scorebook! Come on!!! Where's Ed's sure touch? So, Da-DAHH, what was TWCC's score? Let's leave this for a moment and get on. It's unlikely to matter much in the end.
Joe, swiper of boundaries and runner of quick runs had time to do his thing, and he did for a bit, but then checked his stroke for a ball that, again, took its time to arrive, and he was caught at mid-off I think it was - a quickfire 9. But TWCC didn't really need quickfire so much as occupancy, which is where Jim comes in.
Talking of coming in - here's Mal. He can play. And he did, calmly not over-hitting the ball into the large gaps for fours, Jim giving  him the strike when he could and another fruitful partnership of 33 evolved, but Mal, eventually, fell for the slow bowling of Mitchell and lobbed a catch to mid-off. (Er... they can't all have been to mid-off, these catches, but, well, we're just not going to get too bothered by all that detail stuff here at the Gazette.)
Honse came in, ran three quickies with Jim and then it was time for tea. Jim heroically failed to make much of the last over, and even the last ball was un-troubled on its way through to the keeper but, here at the Gazette, we feel we understand that a certain fatigue had crept into Jim's frame and the power of his mind had become somewhat dulled over the previous two and a half hours, and it's not as if there was much there to start with.
TWCC all done, the last pair at the crease, the scorebook showing 182 for 6. But... was that right? Would it matter? Fine bowling from Williams (as ever), a huge spell of 16 overs from P Fraser, a wicket from the 9 overs of Forrest who clearly gives up his Sunday's with  joy in his heart as he loves the game so much, and all in all, probably quite a reasonable fielding performance considering the runs that the inevitable gaps in the field will yield with only seven outfielders to play with.
Great tea (thanks Parham); once there's coronation chicken sandwiches you can't go wrong - at least not until you're back home near the facilities. Sun out, sitting on the grass, the wind in your ha.. blowing about, tea to drink. That's a Sunday - and not many left now in 2108....
Back onto the field of play. Matt opened the bowling for TWCC in great style, whizzing the ball down, exploiting the variable bounce and stickingstoppiness, a performance that Joe backed up really well with some truly consistent bowling. Matt took two quick wickets, including that of Andy Wales the Parham skipper who normally stays around and scores lots of runs. Andy's departure brought Vander to the crease who came in swinging with great effect. Matt suffered most, and Joe not so much, and Joe finished his spell of tight bowling with his head held high.
Honse time. Here it was, at Parham, that Honse once brought out his full range of wizardry, but this time it somewhat eluded him, though he did get the wicket of the buckle-swashing Humphries in his 5 overs. Mal, he of the calculating bat, came on to see what he'd do with the ball when Matt finished his first spell of 2 for 44 off 10. And what he could do was more than hold up an end in this difficult period for TWCC as Parham's Williams had come in to join Vander in the middle. Two big-hitters in at the same time in a crucial phase of the match. 15 overs to go, TWCC had restricted Parham well to 100 for 3 off 22 overs. With only 8 fielders plus the occasional loaned fielder when circumstances allowed (thank you Parham), this was good bowling and fielding by the visiting side.
However, here we all were, two stroke-makers in the middle, 5.5 runs/over required. And TWCC only needed to take 4 more wickets to win. Could be exciting. Could be tight.
Talking of tight, Jim tried to bowl but another limb fell off, so Matt had come back on and he and Mal saw the game through. Matt took another wicket (Tony caught it somewhere) and Parham needed quite a lot of runs. Ten overs to go, over 6 an over needed. And we had Mal and Matt bowling. But - what's this, lots of 4's from the bat of Williams? Never mind, the Parham No. 6 wasn't finding it easy to score, so we could give the single away and close in when necessary. No problem.
Three overs to go, and Parham still needed 32 to win - this was a fine restrictive bowling and fielding performance from TWCC. No more wickets seemed likely, but a sacrificial run out proved critical in that whilst it took P. Fraser off the field it gave Williams the strike! Oh no! But Mals' bowling well, just 9 off his penultimate over, and Matt's last went for just 6, leaving 17 to get off the last. Exciting, but should be a draw. A four off the first ball, an extra (wide or no ball can't remember) no worries because Mal then bowled four dots! 12 to win off two balls. If Williams could bring that off then he and Parham deserve to win because that's just pretty good. And it was. Williams smote the first ball off a good length and line over Honse at long off, and the next ball went into the field over long on. 12 scored, Parham win by one run off the last ball! No one was too upset because it had been fun.
But - hang on? SCOREGATE!!!! Was the TWCC total 182? Or had Jim been given a four in the book instead of a 6 in which case the TWCC score should have been 184? Or was the 6 simply missed off altogether which makes the TWCC total 188? And forget the triviality of the result; most importantly here at the Gazette we wonder if Jim scored 53, 55 or 59?
Who knows... and once again the importance of accurate book-keeping is clear. It looks like it might have been a draw as it's hard to believe that the total was correct given that it wasn't, but on the day Parham were chasing 183 to win and they did it, and very exciting it was too.

Scorecard
Parham CC won the toss and elceted to field first
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Bld Williams 0; J Simon not out 53*; T Pearce Ct, Bld Forrest 60;
J Rowland Bld P Fraser 0; M Edwards Bld P Fraser 15; J Panther Ct, Bld Mitchell 9; M Davis Ct, Bld Mitchell 21; H Karvay not out 3. Extras 21 (B10,LB1,W4,NB6) Total 182* for 6.
Parham CC Bowling: M Williams 4-2-10-1; P Fraser 16-1-56-2; Forrest 9-2-33-1; Mitchell 7-0-46-2; Humphries 4-1-11-0; J Fraser 2-0-14-0.
Parham CC Innings: A Wales Bld Edwards 16; T Higginson Bld Edwards 3; A Vander Ct Pearce Bld Edwards 62; R Humphries Bld Karvay 27; M Williams not out 62; P Fraser Run Out 0; S Forrest not out 0. DNB J Fraser, J Mitchell. Extras 8 (B1,LB3,W1,NB3) Total 183 for 5.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 14-2-60-3; J Panther 8-0-23-0; H Karvay 5-0-39-1; M Davis 9-2-50-0; J Simon 1-0-7-0.
Parham CC win* by 4 wickets.

* Scoregate...


Top
Crescent CC v TWCC September 2nd 2018
Horsdean Amphitheatre, historically difficult to find for some of us, home to the pudding wicket and, in recent seasons, monsoons. On this occasion though the game was played on one of those wonderful early September days with warmth in the Sun but a tinge of Autumn unease in the shade lending a tingle of tension to the air. TWCC’s opponents, Crescent CC, are a hospitable and likeable team who enjoy their cricket just as much as TWCC. Good matches often arise, and wins ebb and flow between the well-matched sides on a regular basis.
In the absence of Skipper Brock, TWCC were led by Skipper Edwards who waffled through his excuses about the toss-fudge, but it all seemed like a good idea to him which was fine; TWCC shook out their aches and pains and took to the field.
The first of the problems facing Matt was that TWCC only had 10 players, and it was only through his dogged persistence that we had enough players to take on the fixture at all. It has been some time since any cricket was played by TWCC so those who could make it were especially grateful for his refusal to give up on conscription. Also thanks must go to those who made that special effort to be there, particularly Tom Firth who could have done with some settling-in time as he’d only moved into a new flat the day before. We were also joined by a couple of stalwarts who have graced the side over the years, namely Il Presidente Jones and the legend that is Phil, plus Mal Davis who is new to the Gazette though he may have played for us before. In any case, welcome to him (let’s hope he’s up for more as he clearly wasn’t new to the game) and thanks to all for turning up.
The game: Ed and Matt to open the bowling for TWCC, and a great job they did. TWCC were also pleased to give Paul the gloves, and that role proved to be no problem at all for him.
Ed ran in from the Sea End and had little luck though the fact that he bowled three maidens in his spell of 8 overs for 22 illustrates that there wasn’t much wrong with his efforts. Matt, on the day more fruitful than Ed, ran in especially hard extracting some genuine pace from himself and even from the stodgy wicket, and took 4 for 24 off 10 overs. There was some variable bounce, but there was nothing wrong with the results. As Joe pointed out, full of admiration for Matt’s efforts, “Wow, look; you’ve sent the off stump cartwheeling out of the ground!” And indeed he had. And he proceeded to take a further three wickets in a great spell that reduced the home side’s expectations at an early stage.
Jim, having passed a late fitness inspection in 1994, replaced Ed and soon found a reasonable length and line, and, following on from Ed and Matts excellent work, the score continued to be held in check to the point where, with some canny field placing, the batters appeared to become slightly frustrated. Even though the boundaries were short the scoreboard was only gently ticking over as the overs passed by. Jim took two wickets despite his knees, one of which was a first for him in his entire career, namely a stumping achieved as a result of some excellent work from Paul who took to the gloves like a fish to a fishing net. Matt took himself off just before he became liable, and Joe took over and his one wicket, again involving Paul who took a sharp catch behind, was the last that TWCC were destined to take. From this point the shortness of the boundaries, the proximity to the end of the innings, and the late order capabilities of Newcombe and Hirmanshu combined to cause a certain ruffling of numbers on the scoreboard. TWCC’s performance in the field was excellent throughout, and although Crescent's rate of scoring did climb towards the end, the increase started quite late and from a low point. Newcombe (59 NO) and Hirmanshu (35 NO), batting at 8 and 9 respectively, certainly did the business as the innings reached the end of the 42nd over giving TWCC a total of 161 to chase – very competitive.
As mentioned the Crescent batting highlights came towards the end of their innings, although the opening series of batters showed plenty of ability albeit they faced some really quite tight bowling which limited their scores. 10-man TWCC fielding highlights were spread wide, with plenty of charging about from the youth and some more-or-less directional falling over from higher up the age-scale (although Jonty Jones at cover point skipped about like a 60-year-old). Paul's wicket-keeping was well-nigh faultless, and with the ball keeping as low as it did to only let four byes through (which was a single event) was remarkable. Star of the bowling was undeniably Matt with his 4 for 24, though all played their part particularly Honse, Phil and Mal who had to bowl their overs to set and capable batsmen as the innings closed. How good it was to see Phil back, let's hope his return led to no injuries and that we see him once more as the regular he should be.
Crescent's signature delicious tea was gratefully consumed, although the visitors’ appetite was somewhat compromised as they digested the 161 scored by the home side. That was going to be difficult to overcome...
Paul and Jim padded up first, though Jim needn't have bothered - his only contribution to the TWCC innings being that he made sure Paul got to the middle in one piece. A leg-glance was Jim’s downfall as, instead of a tip-and-run single to fine-leg, he found the thinnest of edges giving a leg-side catch to the keeper. Bustling in at three came Joe, deservedly up the order and who ran well and even played some classic defensive shots albeit after the opportunity to play the actual stroke had passed him by, but on this day his innings wasn’t to last and TWCC were 16 for 2.
Paul needed a proper batter with whom to share a partnership. But this was TWCC. Proper batter? Unlikely, the crowd thought, but there was one lurking modestly at number 4 in the athletic form of Tom Firth. Just as well; nearly 5 runs an over required for the remaining 32 overs – quite a challenge.
But, oh what a joy it is to report on such an excellent period of play; judicious stroke-play even broke out for some balls at a time as the two TWCC scamperers mixed quick runs with boundary hits. And they just kept going. And going. They even survived three overs of the kind of high-altitude leg-spin from Wood to which we often succumb! Paul passed his 50 with 8 fours and a six behind him, while Tom wasn’t shy of forcing the ball to the boundary either, and they kept going. And going.
Crescent’s bowlers, far from being inaccurate, were nonetheless going for lots of singles, a 4 here and there, and even the odd 6 from Paul as the partnership continued to flourish and the TWCC score passed the half-way point to the required total, and then the hundred, and TWCC dared to dream as all they needed to do was to keep going with just a little acceleration. Dangerous thought, to try to hit out and disturb the natural pace of the innings, but Paul and Tom took it in their stride as the bowling side tired and they themselves began to think the visitors might do it. 12 overs left with 62 to win was, however, no mean target, but more quick running brought more quick runs. Could they?
6 overs passed, 6 overs to go, 23 still to get, and Ed made his big mistake. He mentioned that Tom was on 47. How daft was that? Scorer’s curse; Tom played across a straight ball from Gatford and was bowled! Disaster! But what an innings; 7 fours, the rest all singles – what a testament to application as well as skill in keeping the good ball out and scoring when he could. I hope Tom was glad he’d made the effort to travel down; I know the rest of the team were.
Paul was still out there, getting his second wind as the evening progressed and the temperature fell, but TWCC still needed this dratted 23 runs to win. But never fear, Honse’s here. Oh. Never fear Matt’s here... oh; run out. Never mind, let’s call it a sacrifice to give Paul the strike and ask Dave to go in and hit a glorious four all along the ground to the mid-on boundary and push a quick single to give Paul the strike before being stumped off the bowling of Gatford. 5 immense runs in the context of the game from the President.
Crescent weren’t holding back, but Paul was still there, full of beans, with Mal to see TWCC home. Mal duly played out the end of an over to leave Paul on strike for the 38th and last over, TWCC needing just 3 runs for the win...
The field spread once more; just two in on the single. Paul could do nothing with the first ball. Or the second; he played it dead back to the bowler, biding his time. 4 balls left, field unchanged.
Ball three; Paul stroked the ball out to deep mid-off, an easy single, but a real push for two! A fumble, and Paul was back on strike! Three balls left, scores tied! Field all in; stop the single...
What single? Paul must have known he was on 96! A pull for 4! A win! Paul’s 100!!! Jubilation from the TWCC ranks, and with congratulations from the Crescent lads for Paul (and Tom’s) efforts a memorable game came to a close.
What a win. A proper game and a great return to cricket after such a long Summer lay off. A century from Paul, coming in the last over after hours of concentration and application, with a confident patience even as the balls left were running out in the last over. And he had kept wicket too – a real testament to his fitness, especially as Tom and Paul ran 48 singles between them.
It probably doesn’t do to analyse the scorecard too heavily... but it can’t be ignored that Tom and Paul scored 147 of TWCC’s 165 between them, extras chipped in with 12, and Dave and Joe added the other 7. No one else scored anything, though Mal, Ed and Phil no doubt could have if called upon. However, a win’s a win and it may have been because of the length of the truly great 3rd wicket partnership of 123 from Tom and Paul that others were denied something of an opportunity to join in, but, well, it’s all history now, and worthy history at that. A great day’s play, good spirits all round, and on we march to the next game.

Scorecard
No one won the toss and TWCC bowled first.
Crescent Innings: Morris Bld Edwards 19; Eastwood LBW Edwards 7; Kidman Bld Simon 15; Bousfield Bld Edwards 14; Gatford Ct & Bld Edwards 1; Pomfrett Ct P Hunter (Wk) Bld Panther 1; Will St (P Hunter) Bld Simon 3; Newcombe not out 59; Hirmanshu not out 35. DNB Lawson, Wood. Extras 9 (B4, W5) Total 161 for 7 off 42 overs.
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 8-3-22-0; M Edwards 10-3-24-4; J Simon 8-1-18-2; J Panther 5-0-32-1; H Karvay 4-0-23-0; P Steinke 5-0-22-0; M Davis 2-0-17-0.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter not out 100; J Simon Ct Kidman (Wk) Bld Lawson 0; J Panther Bld Lawson 2; T Firth Bld Gatford 47; H Karvay LBW Gatford 0; M Edwards run out 0; D Jones St (Kidman) Bld Gatford 5, M Davis not out 0. DNB E Howes, P Steinke. Extras 12 (B2, LB1, W9) Total 165 for 6 from 37.4 overs.
Crescent Bowling: Hirmanshu 7-1-33-0; Lawson 7-1-25-2; Wood 3-0-13-0; Newcombe 7-1-32-0; Morris 8.4-1-37-0; Gatford 5-1-22-3.
TWCC win by 4 wickets, or 3 if you think having only 10 players deserves mentioning.

Top
Headliners v TWCC July 22nd 2018
Well... Another day in the life of TWCC...

Scorecard

TWCC won the toss and chose to bat first.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter ct McAteer Bld Islam 26; J Simon Bld Riz 37; T Pearce Ct S Medhurst Bld McAteer 53; J Rowland Ct O'Reilly Bld Riz 4; J Panther Bld Reg 15; M Edwards Bld Reg 0; T Rydon Ct S Hollis Bld Riz 9; E Howes Ct S Medhurst Bld Riz 0; G Cuthbert Bld Riz 0; C Howes Not Out 4; R Brock Ct Barnett Bld Reg 13. Extras 25, Total 191 all out (31 overs).
Fall: 1-48; 2-119, 3-136; 4-136; 5;165; 6-166; 7-166; 8-173; 9-177; 10-191.
Headliner's Bowling: Islam 6-0-48-1; Lynch 5-0-29-0; McAteer 5-1-36-1; Riz 8-1-33-5; Reg 6-2-22-3; O'Reilly 2-0-10-0.
Headliner's Innings: Barnett Bld Panther 49; Holles Ct T Rydon Bld C Howes 78; McAteer Bld T Rydon 9; Collins Not Out 35; Lynch Not Out 4. Extras 18 (B2, LB 4, W 4, NB 8) Total 193 for 3.
Fall: 1-100; 2-119; 3-182.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 6-0-22-0; E Howes 7-0-40-0; T Rydon 8-0-38-1; J Panther 7-0-37-1; R Brock 3-0-16-0; J Simon 3-0-13-0; G Cuthbert 2-0-12-0; C Howes 1-0-6-1.
Headliners win by 7 wickets.

Top

TWCC tour to Wimborne Minster June 28th-July 1st 2018
125 years ago, in the 1893 cricket season, the cricketers of Twineham CC and those of Wineham CC had concerns about squad numbers and the number of matches they were able to play.  At the end of the season, they got together and the decision was taken to amalgamate.  Twineham and Wineham Cricket Club was born.  Later that year, on Thursday 7th December 1893, members of the Twineham Men’s Club met and were informed of the decision, before celebrating with songs and recitations with Mr  R W McKergow as President and Miss Hunt, with her sister, entertaining the guests with a piano duet.   The members of the two teams met at the Royal Oak that same month and celebrated with much beer and wassailing.
Spool forward 125 years – and the present day club members  were determined to celebrate that decision and their club’s very existence.  The highlight was to be an extended club tour with the destination being Dorset:  and to be more specific – Wimborne Minster.  A four day tour, 14 club members, two games of cricket, two rounds of golf, one big match and – as it turned out – a couple of half decent nights out with plenty of wassailing, though sadly no piano duets.
The weather wasn’t merely set fair:  it was on a 4 day bake.  Even as the cars gathered around Sussex from 8am, temperatures were in the 70s and going up.  Edward, Jim, Matt and Richard set off from Twineham, Tom and Ed from Wineham, Tony, Dave and Mikey from Rottingdean, Matt, Joe and Reese from Brighton.  Rob set off to London promising to meet us for the big match, Tom Firth was already in Dorset, meeting the missus.  The destination was Ferndown golf club (no not `that` Ferndown golf club, the other one…) which Joe had cunningly convinced to accept us at the bargain bucket rate of £15. What could possibly be wrong?  Ed picked up the tour’s first fine by turning up at the other Ferndown Golf Club – wishful thinking.  Beers were sunk before the yard arm passed ten am, handicaps were the subject of considerable controversy and argument before finally we were off.   Or were we?  Hang on, wasn’t this dustbowl the warm up par 3 course?  Joe?  Joe????  “F*** off, what do you expect for £15?” came the explanation.  The tour’s second fine was sealed.
Despite the yardage shortage, we managed to drag the round out for a mind numbing 5 hours before falling onto the balcony of the welcoming clubhouse.  Tom Firth, a tour virgin but clearly aware of the tactic to shamefully understate your ability, walked away as winner, just ahead of Jim.  A quick beer, more harsh words for Joe, then we departed for our hotel.
Just 20 minutes away from the course was the pretty market town of Wimborne Minster, our base for the next 4 days.  Given the divergence of views on last year’s luxury riverside hotel in Oxfordshire, reputations were on the line here.  As we drove into the hotel car park, which accommodated all vehicles, and rooms and beds appeared to match numbers, things looked good.  We arranged to meet in the bar – and things were good!  The hotel was clean, welcoming, had a lovely pub bar, served decent beer and didn’t expel Reese or Joe.  It ticked all the boxes.
The centrepiece of our extra day on tour was set for the evening:  England Vs Belgium in the World Cup.  We made our way to the highly recommended and aptly named Cricketers Arms where the front row of seats facing the big screen was already taken.
We eagerly nabbed the second row and started ordering vast quantities of ale as the pub gradually filled and became increasingly noisy.  A couple of the lads began the first of what would be a series of attempts at dabbling with the local women  - before a sweepstake on the first England goalscorer.  Both events would prove equally fruitless.  Because try as we might, shouting encouragement from the back row, England repeated their tactic which has seen them through so many previous world cups – they didn’t score any goals.   But as things turned out, as Edward pointed out, this was to be interpreted as good news!  So when Belgium scored, there were no tears among the TWCC fans.   Indeed when Rob finally arrived on tour, around half time, it was to find a remarkably chipper bunch.  You wouldn’t believe we’d spent the day on a crap golf course ahead of watching a woeful England display  - we were on tour, the football team manipulated their way into the best half of the draw and we were rocking.  The beer flowed, the shoulders were shrugged and at the end of the match we headed back to our hotel which happily offered to feed us.
There followed the first fines session.  Ed, obviously, turning up at the wrong golf  course.  Joe, for booking the wrong golf course – a mighty fine, a jug of beer.  Rob, a cardinal and unforgiveable sin: turning up late on tour.   At the end of the meal, the bill arrived and Rob did no more than pick up the whole tab.  A great gesture and guess what – his sin was forgiven, especially as he explained why he was late in latin.
So what to do in Wimborne Minster on a quiet Thursday night?  We went out to a `Spoons` and basked in Mikey’s celebrity, with both barmaids recognising our online star.  Tony did his usual trick with the slot machine – racing ahead winning copious amounts of money from a fiver, before pumping it all back.  Joe, Matt, a barmaid, a window and a plaster all became jointly involved in a project which sadly falls within the WGOTSOT guidelines.  It had been a long day, it wasn’t a late night.

The following morning, what do we find?  Edward Bunn at breakfast, in full praise of the hotel.  The food, the rooms, the staff, the location…last year’s critical hotel inspector was awarding 5 stars to the King’s Head.  And yes, breakfast was good.  Full English, eggs Benedict, fruit salad, cereals, pastries….the only thing it didn’t provide was milkshakes, but fortunately Edward found a shop in the pretty market square which managed to double its output and thus keep up with his insatiable demand.  So what to do on a boiling Friday 8 miles from Bournemouth?  It was never in doubt.  Towels were packed, budgies were smuggled…we were on our way to Bournemouth seafront.
OMG:  little did we know what embarrassment awaited as we sauntered towards the end of the rather sparsely facilitated pier.  TWCC’s finest strong arms took on the `knock a can off a shelf` game.  From two yards, Matt Edwards missed with his first two balls.  From 5 attempts, the greatest feat of the TWCC mighty was to remove two of the 5 cans from the shelf.  It was a warm up for the greater humiliation to follow.  The challenge was a simple one.  Hang onto a pole with your feet off the ground for two minutes, win £20. A quiver of excitement ran through the youngsters,  a collective ripple of tanning muscles – the boys couldn’t believe their luck, it was a cash giveaway.  The following is an approximate outline of what happened (rounded to the nearest second)
Matt Edwards:  Stayed on:  1 second
Joe Panther:  Stayed on:  1 second
Mikey Pearce:  stayed on: 1 second
Reese Packham:  Stayed on: 3 seconds
Tony Pearce: Stayed on: 4 seconds
Matt Brock:  Stayed on: 14 seconds
My apologies if any is under or over-represented by a second or so,  it’s from memory, but the story it tells is accurate.  As the young guns of Twineham sloped off, the stallholder could be seen to shed a small tear – never had trading been so profitable, so quickly, so simply.
Next stop the beach.  Bournemouth’s beautiful sandy beach, full of lovelies (once we’d arrived), enough space for a bit of beach cricket with first Tony then Brocky sending tennis balls in  all directions, with young cricketers diving after them.  Particularly impressive was Tony’s `catch behind the back`.  And the sea was wonderful: warm, clean and the perfect place for a game of slip catching, won by Matt Brock. 
We spent about 4 hours by the sea and it was fab:  admiring the sights of Bournemouth – of which there were many – before heading to Harry Ramsden’s for a fish and chip lunch.  As we headed back, some of the boys diverted to crazy golf, whilst Reese and Joe offered to take fans’ selfies during Mikey’s celebrity walk in the town.  Unhappily for the recipients, they flicked the reverse camera on:  so the star-struck youngsters got home to see the gurning mugs of Joe and Reese contaminating their phones.
Back to the hotel, turn round, out to cricket and we arrived at 5.30 at Bournemouth CC `one of the biggest cricket club’s in the country` (BCC website).  And big it was.  Two huge grounds, we were directed to the `second` clubhouse which was large, had a bar, balcony etc.  For the match, BCC pulled together a team of mostly youngsters, peppered with varying degrees of talent, led by Rob Pack, a first team bowler.
The role of skipper for this match had been decided at Harry Ramsdens.  5 put their names forward:  names were put in a hat, pulled out by Dave.   Mikey was to be vice captain but it was Tom Firth whose name was pulled out and who led a team sadly devoid of Reese, who stayed at the hotel as a protest against the voting procedure.  His absence gave Richard a match and happily Jim offered to play for BCC who were one short – so all those who wished had a game on a beautiful hot evening.
Skipper Firth won the toss and opted to bat.  Looking back through the scorebook he saw a shard of light:  Joe’s big weapon!  So Joe it was who went in with Tony to open  the batting against an attack still on cricket’s steep learning curve, but clearly with much potential.
Tony was bowled with the score on 36 while Joe kept thumping the fours.  It was a good start.  Rob limped out to the middle, as close to fitness as we are to a new pavilion.  He smacked a couple of fours but his limited movement meant he was LBW for just 9.  In strode Mikey, a young man so full of batting talent that sometimes he convinces us to believe it.  And this was just such a moment.  Mikey joined Joe in taking the attack to BCC.  His 50 was near flawless – apart from a couple of drops.  As Joe was bowed out for a splendid 28, and Edward for just 1, Tom F joined Mikey and the pair of them powered forward, spraying fours to all areas of the ground.  The score went from 56 to 145 in the 10 overs they were together.  Mikey retired on 50,  Tom was out for 34 but Matt Edwards and Tom Rydon belted a few at the end to leave us on a respectable 158-6.  The BCC bowling was variable, with a couple of the spinners in particular getting great grip and causing real problems. 
Any weaknesses in BCC’s bowling were made up for by their highly competent batting – something that only became obvious after the first over, during which Edward took the two wickets of their openers.  BCC’s strong middle order kicked in and it was the two Brocks who both took a bit of punishment.  But Brock senior got a lucky edge from an appallingly wide ball and Brock junior followed up with a proper wicket, caught and bowled.  Batsmen Markham and Jones, who’d put on more than 50 between them, both out.  But we were far from home and dry.  As their skipper Rob Pack came in, he started to spray the ball at TWCC’s numerous walking wounded, especially Rob, who was to be seen hobbling after the ball to and fro at mid on with painful regularity.  During this period, BCC kept absolutely to the required 8 an over.  At 117-4 from 15 overs, they needed 42 from 5.  The next over – a huge boost.  Joe’s repositioning to mid on led to him catching Rob Pack off Tom Firth the very next ball.  Good overs from Ed and Tom R left BCC needing 20 from the last two overs, then 12 from the last Ed Howes over.  A four and a wide were not a great start – but Ed kept his cool – just – and got through his first 5 balls for 10.  1 for a TWCC win, 2 for a tie, 3 for a BCC win.  A good ball and a scrambled single – we won by one run.  A game played in great spirit and afterwards,  BCC put on beer, burgers and cakes for us, which were most welcome.  We stayed for a good hour enjoying their company, they were a really good bunch and we’d like to thank them very much for their hospitality and spirit – notably Mark Smith who’d offered us the match in the first place.  It was a great tour evening.  

Scorecard  
Friday 29th June 2018
TWCC vs Bournemouth CC
TWCC won the toss and opted to bat
T Pearce               Bowled                 J Palmer               10
J Panther             Stumped              C Smith                 28
R Rydon               LBW                       A Humber           9
M Pearce             Retired                                                 50         
E Bunn                  LBW                       C Smith                 1
T Firth                   Ct C Smith           Bld A Humber    34                         
M Edwards         LBW                       C Smith                 4
T Rydon                Not                        out                         6
TOTAL:  158-6  (20 OVERS)
FALL: 36-1, 46-3, 54-2, 56-5, 146-7, 158-6
DNB:  R Brock, E Howes, M Brock
 
BOURNEMOUTH CRICKET CLUB
N Groves             Ct R Brock            Bld E Bunn           0
A Deem                Bowled                                 E Bunn                  4
J Markham          Ct WK (M Edwards) Bld R Brock 28
O Jones                Ct and Bowled   M Brock               17
J Palmer               Not        out                                         32
R Pack                   Ct  J Panther       Bld T Firth            46
J Gray                    Bowled                                 E Howes               8
C Smith                 Run                        out                         7
TOTAL 157-7 (20 OVERS)
TWCC Bowling: E Bunn 3-0-18-2; E Howes 4-0-32-1; M Brock 2-0-20-1; R Brock 2-0-20-1; M Pearce 2-0-14-0; T Pearce 2-0-23-0; T Rydon 3-0-18-0; T Firth 2-0-20-1.
FALL:  1-0, 2-4, 52-4, 57-3, 118-6, 146-7, 157-6
TWCC WIN BY 1 RUN

We arrived back at the hotel to find Reese in good spirits.  He’d been on his own little spree around Wimborne and discovered a place called The Rising Sun, what he told us was a happening place.  We considered poker and we considered The Rising Sun.  No contest.  As we squeezed inside, the heady mix of sweat, perfume and pheromones, combined with the lively dance music from across the generations with a little bit of World Cuppery thrown in made for a fantastic night.  The shots lined up again and again, the boys – and one or two of the old gits – took the dance floor and it just brilliant fun.  By 1’O clock we were on the road outside, chatting away before the short walk past Wimborne Minster back to the hotel.  A merry bunch.

Saturday morning in Wimborne.  Edward in the milkshake shop, a market in the town centre, the chaps enjoying breakfast.  Golf was lined up for 2pm – so the perfect time for the TWCC tennis tournament.  The tour’s existing champion of many years – Skipper Brock – was under serious threat from Tom `5 racquets` Firth.  Remarkably, two days before Wimbledon, we were offered two excellent grass courts a short walk from the hotel.  Teams:   Tony and Richard, Tom and Tom, Matt B and Ed, Matt E and Reese.  Argumentative umpires:  Mikey and Joe.  It was a baking morning, serving into the sun was tricky, some shed their shirts, others their shoes.  But however it looked, it was competitive.  Edwards clearly miffed with Packham, Panther helping none at all, Mikey central to all  disputes…boys on tour!  The senior Pearce/Brock partnership took a while to get into gear before dispatching Edwards/Packham, whilst Tom and 5 racquets breezed past Matt and Ed and then the argumentative pair of Matt and Reese.  The showdown was saved to the last match.  Tom selected the finest of the 5, TWCC’s youthful youngsters stepping onto court to trounce the old gits.  It was over sooner than anyone believed.  A 3-0 whitewash – and for Tom and Tom - the scalding walk back to the hotel to reflect on where it all went wrong and possibly the need to bring a couple of extra racquets next year.
We set off early to the golf course for lunch – a proper golf course.  Dudsbury, a golf resort with nice everything.  It was baking, France Argentina beckoned and Brock senior shockingly contemplated staying in the clubhouse to watch.  HEFTY FINE ADMINISTERED LATER!  Breaking up the group activities is one of the most heinous crimes on tour and as author of the report, I humbly apologise.
The golf course was lovely.  Long, green and wet.  Rather too wet for some, and lots of balls were lost to the numerous marshes, ponds, lakes, streams etc.  The first two groups raced ahead but the Brock/Brock/Bunn/Rogers group had on its tail a tournament of juniors, and an incredibly annoying twerp in a golf buggy managing them.  Letting them through wasn’t a problem – letting them through and then waiting whilst they lost their balls, faffed around and waited for the ones ahead was.  After 3 and a quarter hours, the group reached the 9th green – and headed to the bar.  The other groups made good time on a lovely course before we headed at various intervals back to the hotel for SHIT SHIRT NIGHT.
SSN is a new concept for tour.  The requirement was to wear what it says on the tin.
Matt Edwards showed a particularly queasy coloured garment, Richard’s bow tie effort plucked from the 80s, Dave’s paisley truly gross, reeking of new Romanticism.  Ed was sent back to his room to find something worse, a particularly poor effort from Edward who wore a shirt he’d already worn on tour a day earlier – but Jim’s was surely worst of all, with the appearance of a pyjama jacket combined with a car rug – really quite ghastly.  Unsurprisingly, as we gathered in the bar of the hotel, our shirts caused more than a little comment from others trying to enjoy their evening.  One particular lady and her partner were so amused that they agreed to be the judges in the SSN competition.  Rob’s faded pink Hawaii shirt received a highly commended, as did Dave’s effort.  The absolute loser was judged to be Edward whose shirt was capable of being worn almost without humiliation – but the winner by a country mile was Jim’s pyjamas.  We sank a lot of beer in that short hour, before buying our judges drinks and heading out to Rim Jim.
RimJim, it should be explained, was Wimborne’s finest Indian restaurant, as well as an amusing concept for someone like Joe.  I’m afraid the tour report here goes a little hazy because the speed of consumption of the Abbott Ale gave the author a `missing hour`.  Safe to say, it was a meal enjoyed by all, especially the team’s vegetarian Matt B who finished Edward’s chicken tikka masala.  The bill payment was confusing but once that was sorted, there was only one place to be:  the Rising Sun.  The fines payments were lined up on the bar and swiftly despatched, along with many other drinks.  Mikey’s only defence against a particularly clingy fan was to insist his girlfriend would be cross – severe loss of street cred I fear.  And whilst the pub didn’t feature the numbers of the night before it did provide one of the greatest tour moments of all time.  Imperilling the WGOTSOT creed, the following story needs to be told.  Joe was chasing a birthday girl, clearly marked by a large badge reading 30 dangling from her chest.  At one stage they seemed close.  Moments later it was all over, Joe had moved on.  As she ran out in tears, concerned club goers followed her out.  What had transpired was that they fell out over something trivial  – and as she tearfully said `I’ve been out with footballers, rugby players – and tonight  “I thought I’d give the fat bloke a chance!”` A new club motto is born.
As we spilled out onto the road at the end of another great evening, it was to find a bare chested Dave swapping his paisley shirt with another clubber who loved what he was wearing.  It was that sort of crazy night, with plenty more incidents falling under the WGOTSOT ruling.
5 days before the tour, Puddletown, the opponents for our second match in Dorset had pulled out.   Richard frantically trawled 3 counties for a new fixture:  Dorset, Hampshire, West Sussex.  The only takers were…Balcombe, some 5 miles north of Twineham!  And so it was that on Sunday morning, around 10.30, we checked out from the excellent hotel and headed for our match – in Sussex.  Tony dropped Mikey off at a train station, turning round to rescue his car keys 10 miles later!!  We reached the Half Moon pub in Balcombe – still very much on tour – at around 12.30 – unless like Matt and Joe you went via the M25???  Drinks were ordered and served to the table – individually and with great regularity  – almost as if the attractive young barmaid was being called out again and again….
At 1.40pm we made the 400 yard drive from the pub to the ground down a dusty track.  A new ground to us, despite the proximity to TWCC.  It was small, narrow, but set in a beautiful background of the North Downs, really spectacular.  It has a long modern pavilion made up of sectional modules which housed plenty of room for changing, tea, a bar and even a TV for those enjoying the World Cup.  An excellent venue.  Reese had been asked to be skipper and he was offered the choice to bat or bowl.  He chose to bowl, and we went out for a sweltering long hot afternoon in a timed match of 2 hours 20 minutes and an hour and 20 overs.
Balcombe started briskly.  Tom R and Ed bowled well but the short boundaries and the parched ground were creating quick scoring opportunities.  Balcombe’s number 2, a young Colt called Ollie Hine was particularly impressive, clipping the ball to the onside boundary regularly, and a number of byes also raced to the boundary.  Balcombe were past 50 when Matt Edwards was brought on and took a vital wicket, the opener Ward nicked behind to Reese behind the stumps for 15.  Richard came on the other end and working in tandem with Matt, these two slowed the scoring rate considerably.  Richard got an LBW awarded without question by Joe, who’d been given a chance to be umpire, and then a clean bowled.  With the game back in control, and Balcombe struggling to find the boundaries, the skipper showed his sporting side and called on Edward and Tony to bowl.  This might be seen to have tilted the match back towards Balcombe, as the pair conceded 56 in 7 overs – though in fairness Tony appeared to have got a clear nick from young Mr Hine, which everybody heard but Joe the umpire!  But the young man batted well, before running himself out on 87, dashing to keep strike and make his century.  Finally, it was great to see Jim come off his full run for 3 overs at the end, and working in tandem with Matt Brock, they took a wicket a-piece leaving the final score on 177-6.  On our day, our bowling line up looks really rather fearsome.
Tea was described by Tony as the greatest ever cricket tea!  A quintessential English Cricket Tea, light, bright and delicious.  And so suitably fed and watered, it was the combination of Jim and Richard who led the TWCC batting attack.  Richard departed swiftly but Jim and Tony moving forward purposefully taking the score to 75 before Jim was run out for 28. At 91-2 we were looking good.  Tony retired confidently for an excellent 75. But Balcombe saved two useful bowlers to the end.  Dave made 4, Edward 12 and Reese 12.  145-5, wickets falling...
33 needed, 4 wickets in hand (we had decided that come what may, Tony should not pick up his innings.)  Matt fell without scoring.  Tom helped the score to 174 - 8.  174-9 as Tom R went for 1.  4 to win and the last batsman was Matt Brock, not renowned for his batting greatness.  He faced up – the game would be won or lost on the next few balls.  Crack!  First ball Matt creamed through the covers to the boundary – the day was ours and we raced onto the pitch to congratulate Matt and shake hands with our excellent opponents and hosts.  Another cracking match to add to a season of brilliant finishes.

Scorecard
Sunday 1st July 2018
TWCC vs Balcombe CC
TWCC were given the choice and opted to bowl
BALCOMBE INNINGS
A Ward                 Ct WK (Packham)             Bld M Edwards  15
O Hine                  Run out (Packham)                                          87
G Botting             LBW                                       Bld R Brock         2
M Rawbin            Bowled                 R Brock                                 1
A botting             Ct….                       Bld M Brock                        27
R Mitchell            Bowled                                 J Simon                                 9
A Rewitt               not                         out                                         5
K Mitchell            not                         out                                         1
TOTAL 177- 6
Fall:  51-1, 67-3, 74-4, 139-5, 1692, 176-6
BOWLING:  T Rydon:  5-0-18-0, E Howes 5-0-20-0, M Edwards 6-1-16-1, R Brock 7-1-13-2, E Bunn 4-0-38-0, T Pearce 3-0-18-0, M Brock 3-0-16-1, J Simon 3-0-19-1
TWCC INNINGS
J Simon                 Run                        out                         28
R Brock                 Ct  T Rawbin Bld R Mitchell           9
T Pearce               Retired                                                75
D Rogers              Run                        out                        4
E Bunn                  Bowled                                 M Rawbin            12
R Packham          Ct G Botting        Bld M Rawbin    12
M Edwards         Ct T Rawbin        Bld O Hine           0
T Firth                   Bld O Hine                                           10
T Rydon                Ct A Botting        Bld M Rawbin    1
E Howes               not                         out                         1
M Brock               not                         out                         4
TOTAL:  178-8
Balcombe bowling:  Mitchell 4-2-6-1, M Sargil 4-0-20-0, C Botting 4-0-16-0, A Botting 2-0-25-0, A Trevett 3-0-33-0, G Botting 3-0-26-0, M Rawbin 6-0-20-3, O Hine 4.2-1-11-2
FALL: 11-2, 75-1, 95-4, (137-3), 137-5, 145-7, 160-6, 174-8, 174-9
TWCC win by 1 (2) wicket(s)

As we chatted with Balcombe’s players after and joked among ourselves, it was the perfect end to an absolutely brilliant tour.  To do 4 days was a risk but it paid off – just this once.  We are a very close-knit club, we love each other’s company and we love our tours.  This really was one of the greats.  Great hotel, cracking matches, two great finishes, wonderful weather and most of all a great mix of players.   Fantastic to see Dave back on tour, to see Tom tour for the first time, and for Rob to also come along for the first time.  Everyone adds something to tour, be it an action, a suggestion, an idea, a piece of brilliance or craziness.  And the camaraderie is phenomenal.
Back in 1893, I doubt they toured – but as the records show, they really enjoyed each others` company.  That has not changed 125 years later – and at this club, I’m confident it never will.
Thank you all for touring, you are a fantastic bunch.
Richard Brock
Captain TWCC. 

Top
TWCC v London Unity June 17th 2018
If cricket were always as exciting as the match against Exiles, half the team would have dropped dead from heart failure some time   It’s not.  Like a well built innings, a cricketing life is filled with moments of high excitement, periods of defining mediocrity, devastating lows balanced by occasional  flashes of inspirational brilliance. So it was we arrived, still pumped, for our match against London Unity, a team who have beaten us regularly in recent years.  Unity called and lost the toss and Skipper Brock opted to field.  The day was overcast and dry, but any logic in the decision was to give Matt and Tom the benefit of the new ball.  Tom – building on the previous week’s performance – started well at the far end, Matt his usual dangerous self from the pavilion end.  And it was Matt who made the first breakthrough, a nick through to Edward in the slips.  Proper cricket.  Matt picked up another snapped up by Jonathan behind the stumps and might have had another had it not have been for a moment of comedic inadequacy by the skipper in dropping a rather straightforward though well hit chance at mid off.  Fortunately that was followed by the champagne moment – a laser guided throw, hard and low from the boundary by Tom Rydon ran out their opening bat who was greedily trying for two.  Things were going well, but in the meantime, Unity were scoring well and fast – up towards 60 after an hour.  Tom chipped in with a fourth wicket but Unity had at the crease two good batsmen, who hit the ball firmly and hard and could have wreaked havoc given the chance.  So the openers were kept going until drinks – ten overs each.  And in his last over, Tom took two wickets, a just reward for his good spell.  At drinks Unity were suddenly 6 down.  Honse came on from the pavilion end and bowled very nicely, tight, on the stumps.  The skipper did the same the other end and the scoring rate slowed to a near complete stop for 5 or 6 overs.  Finally Unity came out of their shells – a six off Richard evidence of such.  Fortunately Jim caught nicely in the gulley off Richard, that was followed next ball by a clean bowled.  The hat-trick ball didn’t happen but then a nick off Unity’s number 10 flew to Tony at slip and he showed he’s still got the lightning reactions of old to snap it up one handed.  10 man Unity all out for 94, 25 minutes before tea.
Tea was good, two home made cakes!  Recipe cards available to all wives/partners.  And so out we went to bat, with an hour and forty minutes plus 20 overs:  time wasn’t going to be a problem.   Unity’s captain, Joe Driver was fast and accurate from the far end  - but Paul and Jim looked very good, Paul pulling well around the corner, Jim’s firm shots through the covers making excellent watching.  They put together a stand of 48 before Jim played a drive firmly back to Joe Driver, but Tony kept up the pace when he joined Paul.  Paul tweaked his hamstring, bravely made it through to 52 poor love, then hobbled off to protect his average.  He left it to Jonathan and Tony to see us home, which they did with style.  The dressing room had none of the effervescence of the previous week, merely a quiet satisfaction of a well earned victory, spiced with whispered unhappiness from the opposition about the skipper keeping the openers on too long.  Well that’s as may be, it was a cricket match against a usually strong opposition, we were out to win and win we did.  The only downside was that 3 players neither batted nor bowled.  That’s very unusual and my apologies to them.  Sometimes the matches dictate events.  Next:  TOUR.      

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and opted to field.
London Unity Innings: J Burke Run out T Rydon 12; M Cockburn Ct Bunn Bld Edwards 11; J Moore Bld T Rydon 3; A Eane Ct Rowland (Wk) Bld Edwards 28; J Driver Ct J Simon Bld Brock 16; S Columbine Bld T Rydon 1; R Cachan Ct Karvay Bld T Rydon 0; M Driver Not out 18; J Caulfield Bld Brock 0; J Williams Bld Brock 0. Total: 94 all out.
TWCC bowling: M Edwards 10-2-31-2; T Rydon 10-3-29-3; Karvay 6-2-20-0; R Brock 5.3-2-13-3.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Ret’d hurt 52; J Simon Ct & Bld J Driver 14; T Pearce not out 27; J Rowland not out 3.
DNB E Bunn, R Packham, J Panther, H Karvay, T Rydon, M Edwards, R Brock.
FALL: 48-2.
Unity Bowling: Caulfield: 4-0-28-0; J Driver 9.1-2-35-1, Williams 6-0-33-0.
TWCC Win by 9 Wickets.

Top
TWCC v Xiles June 10th 2018
Sometimes words are not enough to describe extraordinary events – especially in this age of visual stimulation so enjoyed by some of TWCC’s younger members. This is one such occasion. But words are all we have. If it helps, bring to mind one of Joe’s most voluptuous `swipe rights` and you will be in the type of stimulation zone required to appreciate this match. For the first time this season the skipper won the toss on a beautiful afternoon for cricket. He opted to bat, despite slight concerns that his regular opening bowlers Matt and Ed were absent. In keeping with his recent excellent form, Jim was selected to accompany Paul as opener. And he didn’t disappoint, studiously setting about his task of cementing the innings together, leaving what excitement there was to the variety of batsmen occupying the other end. Paul wafted at a wide ball and was caught behind for 4, Reese continued his unhappy recent form with another duck but that brought young George Hunter to the crease for his first TWCC innings of the season. Tall, lean and muscular, George started as he meant to go on. The first ball saw a huge swoosh of the bat, the sound like air passing the blade of a giant wind turbine, sadly uninterrupted by a crack of leather on willow. It took until the 3rd ball for contact to be made, a mere 2, before a six cleared the boundary in brutal fashion. That’s how George plays, and it was how this innings unfolded. That six imperilled the cars, thought to have been safely tucked away at the entrance to the ground.  His second flew far into the neighbouring field.  Finally, after an innings unencumbered by defensive shots, George sent a ball off the edge of the bat high into the air for a catch that ended a brief but important innings of 31, a much needed boost to a flagging total. The next notable contribution came from Edward, who played with attacking verve, up on his toes forcing the ball all around the field, running ones and twos, full of self belief. But with his demise on 36, and that of Graham (who’s Graham ???) Honse came to the wicket and played the innings of his life for a team still short of enough runs to defend. Honse and Jim played sensibly for a team 6 down. They nudged singles, Honse occasionally sweeping the ball handsomely to the boundary. Finally the score passed 100. With 20 minutes until tea, we approached 120, and the boundary-siders began yelling encouraging support along the lines of `step it up`. Jim and Honse did indeed step it up, suddenly finding extra runs and boundaries in an urgent push for added runs. Jim paid the price for this riskier brand of cricket, but his marathon innings of 36 in 2 hours 20 minutes was the backbone of the batting. A late flurry by Tom Rydon and Honse, and the score stood at 158-8.
Tea was excellent, Jim swiftly replacing his batting pads with an apron to good effect. The feeling at tea was that we had enough – comfortably enough. (I blame the bread - Ed.)
Tom and Joe launched the bowling offensive. Tom a little wild, Joe reasonable if not on top form. But Joe it was who made the breakthrough, a smart one handed slip catch from Edward seeing off the opener and then clean bowling the number 3. But this brought to the wicket D Bailey, who teamed up rather nicely with the remaining opener D Hooper – and this pair quickly started piling on the runs. Fours were being sent to all parts of the boundary with consumate ease and it suddenly became obvious that they were taking the match away from TWCC. Paul failed to find the breakthrough despite 2 good overs in a 3 over bowling spell. They had reached 71, with still 20 minutes to go until 20 overs. The skipper brought himself and Honse on to try to slow the scoring rate. It worked, but even so, at 20 overs, Exiles were left requiring 80, just 4 runs an over and 8 wickets left.
The two batsmen were undeniably in charge. They were careful, for example sizing up Paul and Edward, before deciding it was worth attacking them: Paul’s last over went for 15, Edward’s for 16. They played sensibly and with ten overs left, they needed 32 to win – still 8 wickets in hand. In the eyes of some – including the captain – the game was up. It was time for one last roll of the dice. Back on from the far end came Tom Rydon. Having largely ignored the skipper’s request to warm up properly, he required another loosening over. An experimental over from George also failed to breakthrough. The first two balls of Tom’s next over went for  6, 2. The hundred partnership was up. 17 runs required off 7.3 overs. 8 wickets left. Hope was a flickering candle in a hurricane. Then Tom came to the party. A wonder ball clean bowled Bailey for a hard hitting 60. Celebrations were muted, but the skipper decided he’d pick up at the other end. It worked. 2 runs conceded, one clean bowled wicket. Tom’s next over: a fierce maiden, the young Rydon full of adrenaline and confidence. The skipper trundled in for another 2 runs and another batsman bowled. The post wicket huddle at last shimmered with a little bit of belief. 15 still needed, 5 wickets in hand, 5 overs left.  Tom was bowling fast and accurately.  His next over offered just one run and crucially his fifth ball shattered the stumps of the number 7 batsman.  Everything had now changed.  The field was constantly changing to allow a single to the still firing Hooper, now in the 70s. 3 overs left, fielders pumped, the skipper bowled a straight ball to Karthik at number 8 – a big appeal and the finger was up. Every run was crucial. Hooper hooked Tom towards the boundary – Graham dived for it, only for the ball to hit a divot and leap over his prone body and into the hedge. A roar from Xiles players on the boundary. Tom came back, a beauty, edged to Reese, who parried it upwards with lightning reactions and Edward plucked it from the air. 8 wickets down, 6 to win from the last Brock over. 2 off the first ball. 4 from 5. Dot, dot, single. Hooper facing. He launched the skipper high into the air towards deep midwicket. Paul was on the boundary, too far to come. But he raced in, eyes on the ball and then threw himself forward and hung on for a remarkable catch, breathtaking. One ball left, 3 runs for Exiles to win, two to tie, one to draw, one wicket for TWCC to win. Everyone was put on the boundary. We’d come so far in this remarkable match that perhaps the skipper overlooked the hope of victory didn’t even think of close catchers. Stop a boundary! In the event, the last ball was tidy, the batsmen scrambled a single, the match was drawn – but we celebrated it like a win. Tom Rydon crossed a threshold of belief in this match, his bowling filling the team with hope and driving us forward. 7 wickets fell in the last 8 overs, for 15 runs. It was a remarkable finish to a great game, in which everyone played a part. Match Drawn. PHEW.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and opted to bat
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Ct WK Bld Luke 4; J Simon Bld Luke 36; R Packham    LBW Bld Luke 0; G Hunter Ct WK Bld Luke    31; T Firth Bld Luke 4; E Bunn WK Bld Karthik 36; G Cuthbert Bld Manda 1; H Karvay Run out 25; T Rydon Not out 10. DNB: J Panther, R Brock. Total 158 for 8.
FALL: 7-1, 8-3, 42-4, 48-5, 97-6, 98-7, 130-2, 158-8.   
Xiles Bowling: Pitt; 10-3-36-0; Luke 10-0-42-5; Manda 9-1-26-1; Karthik 9-3-7-1; Claude 6-0-28-0; other 3-0-18-0.
Xiles Batting: Mick Ct Bunn Bld Panther 4; D Hooper Ct Hunter Bld R Brock 78; Claude Bld Panther 7; D Bailey Bld T Rydon 60; P Stead Bld R Brock 2; Deleep Bld R Brock 0; Hannant Bld T Rydon 2; James LBW Bld R Brock 0; Karthik Ct Bunn Bld T Rydon 0; Pete Not out 0; Luke Not out 1. Total: 157-9
Fall: 18-1, 41-3, 142-4, 146-5, 146-6, 147-7, 148-8, 149-9, 156-2.
TWCC Bowling: T Rydon 11-1-44-3; J Panther 9-2-23-2; P Hunter 3-2-15-0; R Brock 12-1-32-4; H Karvay 5-1-12-0; Bunn 3-0-22-0; G Hunter 1-0-6-0.
MATCH DRAWN

Top
Jevington CC v TWCC June 3rd 2018
Many thanks to Joe for arranging this fill-in fixture at late notice, and for providing TWCC with a day which had all the ingredients of a mini tour; a lengthy drive to an unfamiliar ground in the hot sunshine, new breweries to discover, and the prospect of losing to new opponents of unknown pedigree.
Nestling in a verdant bowl in the Downs, Jevington CC’s  ground was set off nicely by a pavilion in which TWCC felt right at home, complete with a similar Business Class toilet complex to rival our own.
The toss was won by the home side, and, with an eye to avoiding fielding in the heat of the day and, no doubt, also to the difficulty that would be experienced by late batters as they faced the low evening sun, they elected to bat first.
Well, never mind; we can bowl, well, most of us anyway... so bowl we did, with the trusty pace pairing of Matt and Ed. Matt, using his experience of running down the hill at Bolney the previous week, found his form straight away, as did Ed who took a wicket (caught Brocky) with his very first ball. A veritable rout! However, the outfield was fast, and although the wicket was set in the middle of a bowl, in every direction the ball ran it appeared, Escher-like, to be rolling downhill, so, although the bowling was tight, once through the infield the ball tended to run all the way for four.
In Shaw, Swansborough, S Fielder and Hobson, not to mention the six-hitting L Page, Jevington had plenty of batting firepower. Not that TWCC were without deterrent counter measures; Matt and Ed both finished with a wicket each, and Honse and Tom R took over from the opening bowlers with great effect; Tom surviving being attacked by a fiercely struck drive and then hanging on to a less life-threatening opportunity for a caught and bowled. Honse gets a sentence or two all to himself, of course, as once again his Eastern mystery flummoxed even the established batters as he dropped on to a good length and line. 8 overs 1 maiden 2 for 17 are great figures given the hitting out that was occurring, and in 2018 his bowling truly seems to have come of age. Rather like Jim’s knees, come to think of it, but the youthful Tom Firth gave us four good overs in the difficult times of aggressive no-holds-barred attack from the energetic Jevingtoners.
However, as Skipper Brock sensed a total building that it would be hard to overtake, it was time for Edward and Richard himself to see out the overs before tea. Both bowled exceptionally well, Edward taking 1 for 11 off four overs ending, indeed, with a maiden, and Brocky starting off his four overs with two wicket maidens, the two wickets in question ending the problematical swashbuckling of S Fielder and S Hobson. After that we only had a monster 6 from Page to enjoy off Richard’s bowling and then it was tea.
Tea; this is a difficult one, for it was not tea that was laid out before us, it was lunch, tea and supper combined. Not for Jevington CC a couple of light sandwiches and a small piece of cake, rather a whole roast ox stuffed with stuffed swan with all the trimmings. Half-time in a Sumo contest and this sort of  repast would be the norm, but it was difficult to do justice to the wonderful offerings when in the midst of a tight game of cricket. But (sigh) we did our best... Thank you Jevington Catering Team!
On with the cricket. It was Matt and Jim who strapped on their gear (extra notch on the belt) to face up to the unknown powers of the Jevington bowling attack. With recent – let’s not mince our words here – catastrophic batting displays, some comfort must be taken from the fact that neither Matt, or even Jim, immediately got out. They did their best on occasion to flap their bats about and lob the ball here and there, but get out they did not. They even scored respectable runs with the odd nice shot, but not getting out in the face of tight, accurate bowling on a pitch of variable bounce, clearly comes at a price, and the price was that after 19 overs they’d only scored at just 2.8 runs per over and the total was a solid, respectable but possibly inadequate 54. Was this 54 a good platform, or had it left too much for the other 9 batters to work with? In hindsight there was a bit of both; to win TWCC would need to score at roughly twice the rate that Matt and Jim had managed, but the bowlers were tired, less threatening bowlers were likely to be tried, and with 9 wickets in hand and with the batters TWCC had, it was an inviting prospect. The Gazette feels it might be worth mentioning here the chosen format; usually Sunday games comprise, in the second innings, 1 hour plus anything up to 20 minutes before a final 20 overs’ countdown begins. For some reason this was shortened to just one hour then 20 overs, which, in the end, proved significant in that more haste was required before the 20 over threshold than was the norm. With three or four more overs before drinks and then a further 20 overs, with, say, another 10-15 runs on the board, that would have made a lot of difference. But, it is what it is, and it has to be admitted that, in spite of early and direct orders from the dug out to get on with it, Matt and Jim’s resilience at the crease was not producing much in the runs column. In their defence it was difficult to both score and survive, but more of that below...
Exit Jim, yorked, then Matt who may have been unlucky trapping the ball under his bat which went through to the keeper as caught, though it may well have been a bump ball. One of those awkward moments; he could hardly overly protest in the face of the umpire’s finger pointing to the sky, but the Gazette don’t believe he was out.
90 or so runs from 18 overs required by TWCC for the win.
Tony and Reese were at the crease. Oh... Tony and Broc... Oh... Tony and Tom Rydon were at the crease – this is what was required; Tom and Tony, upping the rate, putting the fielding side under pressure! Tom, of course, whilst Tony was turning puce, was barely idling as singles were turned into twos and twos into threes, and threes into... oh, ok. Fours were fours and there were plenty of them in the timely partnership of 41 before Tom was caught; but the chase was on with 43 to get and 7 overs or so left! Yes, the sun was directly in the eyes of the batsmen at the Tea End, but we still had Edw... Oh... we still had Joe! Joe and Ton... oh... Joe and Ed! And Joe was turning it on; anything bowled in roughly the direction of his bat seemed to meet with its middle, and the ball found the hedge. This was Joe of the Nuthurst game, the Joe of true eye and firm club. Joe and Ed, and Ed can ba... oh. Tom Firth – he’s a pl... oh. 21 to get, Joe’s batting really well there are still 20 balls left, and Honse can stay wi... Oh.
And there it was. A loss, but not a bad loss; as in the previous week either side could have won, a draw could have been the result, and in the end does the result of a good game matter that much? Sitting in the late sun at the Eight Bells with a pint of Long Man it would be a sad and angry person who begrudged Jevington their victory, for hadn’t we all, in taking part, been equally lucky in our day?
What and who has the Gazette failed to mention this week...? Who knows (but we'll be told later...) There was the low grubbing bounce in the middle, the good bowling of most TWCC and all Jevington players, Edward and Richard’s bowling in the face of innings-end belligerence, Tony’s full steam innings and awareness of runs to be had in his punchy 39, Joe’s fighting spirit and his execution of difficult shots, Tom R’s swift 14 - all written down here.
Anything negative? Matt and Jim did keep the ball out in their opening stand of 56 thus conserving the later batting, but which then demanded of that batting a scoring rate of 5 an over which was as hard later as it had been from the start of the innings. On some days this would be no problem, on this day it was. There were some catches missed, but not many as spectacular as Brocky’s at deep mid-off. Ridicule, of course, rang round the ground like a mocking Mexican wave, but it was no simple chance and I doubt if many would have held on to it.
The game could have gone either way, it went the way it did. Thank you Jevington CC for having us over.

Scorecard
Jevington CC won the toss and chose to bat first. Sunday rules. Jevington 10 men.
Jevington CC Batting: R Fielder Ct R Brock Bld E Howes 0; S Page Ct T Firth Bld M Edwards 5; J Shaw Ct & Bld T Rydon 40; A Swansborough CT J Simon Bld H Karvay 26; M Page Ct E Bunn Bld H Karvay 1; S Fielder Bld R Brock 26; S Hobson LBW Bld R Brock 28; B Taylor LBW E Bunn 0; L Page not out 9; A Fielder run out (M Edwards) 5. Extras 13 (B3, LB1, W3, NB5) Total 153 (39 overs).
Fall: 1/5 - 2/23 - 3/76 - 4/83 - 5/? - 6/134 - 7 139 - 8/139 - 9/153.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 7-2-21-1; E Howes 6-1-37-1; H Karvay 8-1-17-2; T Rydon 6-1-21-1; T Firth 4-0-23-0; J Simon 1-0-9-0; E Bunn 4-1-11-1; R Brock 4-2-13-2.
TWCC Innings: M Edwards Ct Swansborough (wk) Bld J Shaw 29; J Simon Bld R Fielder 23; T Pearce Bld L Page 39; R Packham Bld J Shaw 0; R Brock Bld S Page 0; T Rydon Ct S Hopson Bld S Fielder 14; E Bunn Bld S Fielder 0; J Panther not out 14; E Howes Bld L Pge 2; T Firth Ct Swansborough (wk) Bld L Page 0; H Karvay LBW S Fielder 0. Extras 15 (B1, LB3, W10, NB1) Total 136 all out (36.4 overs).
Fall: 1/56 - 2/62 - 3/64 - 4/70 - 5/111 - 6/111 - 7/123 - 8/135 - 9/135 - 10/136.
Jevington CC Bowling: S Fielder 11.4-1-47-3; L Page 8-2-26-3; R Fielder 7-1-20-1; J Shaw 6-1-13-2; S Page 4-0-26-1.
Jevington Win by  17 runs.

Top
Bolney CC v TWCC May 27th 2018
Bolney won the toss on a very hot day, and, happily, from a TWCC hydration point of view, decided they’d bowl first. Open to the home side, therefore, was the option of batting out for a draw should the need arise – a tactic which has met with some success in previous runnings of this local derby as Bolney do have a number of excellent exponents in the art of Boycotting (not a criticism in case the Gazette’s circulation extends up the road to Bolney); it’s all part of this great game. Today’s canvas, however, was broader than either side realised at the beginning of play, and TWCC’s skipper’s failure at the toss was to prove just the first influence he was to have on the day’s play and on the ultimate result.
Here we were living the dream of a Blandings Sunday; the larks high in the sky, Jeeves in the pantry mixing up a gin sling; what could be more pleasant? And so thought first Paul, then Matt E, then Mikey, then Reese, then Edward, then Tom R – what could be nicer than sitting in the pavilion? They followed their inclinations and TWCC were all too soon wondering if the previous week's total of 77 all out might, after all, not prove to have been as bad a score as they thought at the time.
The trouble was that whilst the scoring rate was pretty good, we needed about 24 players in order not to run out of team before tea. Everyone who batted looked as if they could score plenty of runs, and then they got out to straight ones or played with indiscretion. The scorebook shows, with the tally of boundaries against the TWCC batters, that everyone in the team could bat; it’s just that on this occasion they didn’t do so for very long.
Bolney church clock had yet to strike three-o-clock when Jim walked out to the middle, when and where, after a couple more wickets, he was joined by Skipper Brock. There was an hour and a half to go before the scheduled time for tea, and, whilst Richard executed some scoring shots along the way, the decision was necessarily taken to not get out. This unlikely resolve persisted with some success; one maiden over after another, the odd run here and there, Paul could dream about weeding his flower beds, Mikey and Reese even managed to catch up on some much needed sleep. All was at peace as the total climbed, ever so slowly, but pleasingly inexorably, towards the 150.
However, as Chaucer wrote: “But at the laste, as every thing hath ende, She took hir leve, and nedes wolde wende.”
So Brocky did that, out for a patient 43, but only when he and Jim had endured in the blistering heat for an hour and a half and it was time to tip the balance once again towards scoring a few more runs. A quick look at a glossary of terms suggests a “hoik” is “an unrefined shot played to the leg side usually across the line of the ball” and it was this in mind that Richard found his stumps berattled and he was on his way back to the pavilion, just an over or two before tea. Jim survived to the end, sacrificing poor Honse in the greedy pursuit of two runs with just three balls left unbowled, having accumulated 31 runs of the measliest sort.

To balance the report, Bolney’s openers, though clearly successful, were not the least faceable of opponents, and the change bowlers were also fairly straightforward to keep out if scoring runs ceased to be an objective, so lengthy innings were there to be had once the Boycott spirit was invoked. The bowling was, from Paton and Garside in particular, never far away from being a good length and line, but, as long as the luxury of hoiks was forgone, the pace was such that an untroubled dead bat was always an option.
In a 9th wicket partnership of 70 Rich’s 43 and Jim’s 31 were just what was required to give the visitors some sort of a chance from an unfortunate (and unnecessary?) 74 for 8 to a workable 153 all out on the stroke of tea.
Bolney tea – much has been written about the delights of Bolney teas, and rightly so. I could do so again, but on this occasion it would be wrong to highlight this diversion because in the interests of maintaining peak fitness the elite sportsmen of TWCC declined the scones and cream, the delicate sandwiches and hunks of cake, sticking to just lightly milked tea.
So; the Bolney reply. Was the wicket tricky? Would Bolney overhaul a meagre 153? Could TWCC take 10 wickets – something they often fail easily to do?
Oh – here we go – Matt E storming down the hill, Ed rampaging up it, Tom Rydon in the wings; how blessed are TWCC with this youthful briskness! It took all of four balls for Matt to catch the gloves of Steve Bowles and for Reese to take another caught-behind wicket. Proper 12-cylinder cricket.
Bolney then failed to score much or to get out for a while, though the ball was often snicked through the gesticulation of slip-fielders which unfairly robbed the bowlers of wickets and penalised them with runs against. Having seen the method Rob employs in similar circumstances, the two openers decided to just bowl at the stumps and their true reward came their way, though more of this anon.
Bolney, as TWCC know, are no pushovers, and all the time the odd wicket was falling here and there, the run rate was sufficient to overtake TWCC’s somewhat modest total. Joe took the wicket of Adby (30) thanks to a nice low catch in the covers from Ed, and, at drinks with 20 overs to go the required rate was around 5 an over. As the overs ticked down this rate was consistently being achieved, and a Bolney win was ever on the cards. J Hay, in particular, made light of the bowling, and with Garside disdainfully striding down the wicket the home win was definitely on. Enter the Skip’s taunting length and true line from the South End, and Honse from the North End with his mystery bowling and just in the nick of time the run rate climbed as these two took a wicket each. The Bolney win appeared to be slipping away, though it was always possible especially with May still at the crease jocularly flicking fours and sixes hither and thither. Searching for victory, all the more keenly so following on from the Lindfield rout, Brocky demanded second spells from the opening pacers, and did they deliver! With just two or three overs to go (I’m making this up as the book transfer is no help here...) May was cleaned up by Ed for an excellent and combative 31. Bolney might have given up on the win but they were more than capable of holding out for a draw as TWCC still needed 3 wickets to win.
Matt, running in hard once again, bowled Hughes (10) for his fourth wicket and Ed had Moore caught behind and Bolney were 9 down, and the game went into the last over to be bowled by Ed up the hill. Six deliveries for Madden to survive and force a draw – another period of excitement that would not have been there if this had been a limited over match. One wide of the stumps. Reload. A block by Madden – edgy, but a block. Reload. Four balls left or it’s a draw...
You guessed it; fast, full, true, a clatter of stumps and Ed, too, had his fourth wicket in a classic proper game of cricket. Bolney, all out for 133, 20 runs short, with just three balls left in the match. Matt finished with 4 for 33 and Ed 4 for 13!
What an exciting game, and with all three results possible right up to the last very few overs, this was a good game to take part in, whoever it was that ended up winning. Two much-needed innings from Richard and Jim made something other than a loss possible for TWCC, and then two great bowling performances from Matt and Ed secured the victory. Hooray for cricket!

     Postscript
James is missed, not only for the runs he scored, but he was discerning of opportunity in his play, and exuded patience and gravitas at the wicket – a presence that it is going to take the post-Trollope TWCC a little while to learn to do without, but learn they must. Patience appears to be as precious an attribute as is ball-striking ability. Split-second decision-making is the essence of cricket, and, perhaps our default batting thought should more often be to not get out rather than first look for boundaries and work back from there? And, surely, we can all learn to deploy a little patience, so the outlook ought to be perfectly wonderful and rosy indeed.

Scorecard
Bolney CC won the toss and elected to bowl first.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Ct Paton Bld Hughes 8; M Edwards Ct Bowles Bld Hughes 17; M Pearce Bld Paton 2; R Packham Bld Paton 14; E Bunn Ct & Bld Hughes 18; T Rydon Bld Hughes 0; J Simon not out 31; J Panther Ct Hay Bld Hughes 0; E Howes Ct Elliott Bd Paton 2; R Brock Bld Hay 43; H Karvay run out 0. Extras 18 (LB2, W11, NB5) Total 153 all out (44.3 overs).
Fall of wickets: 1/17 2/28 3/44 4/50 5/52 6/70 7/70 8/74 9/144 10/153.
Bolney CC Bowling: T Paton 11.3-3-36-3; T Hughes 8-1-41-5; Madden 7-0-32-0; Garside 7-4-12-0; Hay 7-2-11-1; Bowles 4-0-17-0.
Bolney CC Innings: S Bowles Ct Packham (wk) Bld Edwards 2; S Adby Ct Howes Bld Panther 30; J Elliott Bld Edwards 9; D Bridge Bld Edwards 0; R Clemenson Bld Howes 0; J Hay Bld Howes 31; M Garside Bld Karvay 16; T Hughes Bld Edwards 10; J Moore Ct Packham (Wk) Bld Howes 0; T Paton not out 4; M Madden Bld Howes 0. Extras 30 (B10, LB4, W12, NB4) Total 133 all out (39.3 overs).
TWCC win by 20 runs.


Top
Lindfield v TWCC May 20th 2018
Here at the Gazette we have had a sleepless night trying to put TWCC’s latest game into some sort of bigger context in the hope that this will provide solace, and it has become clear that, amongst other things, Americans are rubbish at billions. A proper billion is 1,000,000,000,000, or a million million. But, over there, where they get excited by big rounders and gob a lot, not to mention electing an orange candy-floss-head for President, they think a billion is 1,000,000,000 or a thousand million. Their reasoning is that “it’s still a mighty big number and is only 999,000,000,000 out so it’s close enough for heaven’s sakes” (note the gratuitous and incorrect extra “s”). And now here we are in the UK, inexplicably driven by wannabe Disneyland lust, having to adopt their stupid system which, as the Editor searches for perspective and having done the conversion, places the Big Bang at about 13,800,000,000 years ago. Matter is miraculous, deep time is unfathomable, the universe is unimaginably big and to overcome the challenge of life at all is so improbable that it is almost an impossibility. And yet here we are. But, as TWCC found themselves thinking on Sunday last, why are we here?
In his bestselling popular book “A brief history of cricket” Richard Dawkins argues that from the Big Bang singularity - from that moment when unimaginable pure energy spontaneously burst into existence - initial forces were simply colossal, but after a few minutes the temperature of the plasma-that-was-all-things dropped to a mere 1,000,000,000 K (or around 12°F as Americans would have it), sub-atomic particles began to combine and matter began to coalesce into, ultimately, though thankfully not exclusively, the Twineham and Wineham Cricket team.
After his team’s last game the Editor of the TWCC Gazette, looking somewhat vacant and dazed, returned late to the office and, searching for deep truths onto which to cling if not for a mere distraction, he decided to hold an impromptu séance. He turned off the lights and spun his bat about on the floor in the East Wing for a bit, and sat down to wait. Sure enough, after a minute or two the temperature suddenly dropped and a mysterious mist descended from the ceiling. Strange rumblings began to be heard emanating from the ether.
The Editor froze on his sofa. What diabolical potent forces had he conjured up from the dark side?
He steeled himself, and spoke in a querulous voice that could hardly be heard in the thick air;
“Is there anyone there?”
These words seemed to provoke a multitude of sibilant whispers, distant at first and which then seemed to come ever closer, when suddenly a manic single mocking laugh rang out loud in the room followed by raucous cackling from left and right, near and far, from on high and from beneath the floorboards.
The Editor had to shout to be heard;
“Who’s there?” he asked the room, but he wasn’t sure he wanted to know.
The whisperings and laughter abruptly ceased, and an awful heavy silence fill the room. A silence that contained no noise at all, but which was full of dread and menace. A prolonged tension developed into which the Editor dared not intrude.
“We’re all here!” The words suddenly appeared to be uttered not more than six inches in front of the Editor’s face (or about 12 miles away in the US). Deep words from a single voice. Solid words. Cumberbatch words.
“All? All who?” asked the Ed.
There was no reply, but - hold; there was breath in the room. An assembly of constant expiration from all around. There was presence.
“Who are you?” The Editor shakily repeated his demand. “Who are... all of you?”
All breath stopped. Then, from across the room a slightly higher-pitched man’s voice said;
“77 isn’t very much, is it?”
There were half-concealed sniggers. Titters. Then outright laughter. More laughter developed fast into outright hysteria.
“Stop! Stop! Please stop!” The Editor was shouting above the howling cacophony. “It was a difficult wicket!”
The laughter rose to a new peak and then rose again, as if it was its own force with intent to render to dust the room and the trembling Editor within. However, gradually, with ebbs and flows, the great tide of mockery began to subside, and the air again became pregnant with anticipation.
The void was filled by a small, accented voice.
“Matter has coalesced into stars, those stars have endured for billions of years and then they have, in turn, exploded in order to create the atoms which all have intricate physical properties that allow you to play your stupid game!” The voice was elderly, but sounded authoritative. “What a waste!”
This was too much for our Editor.
“Oh yes? Who are you, Albert Einstein?”
There was a short pause, then a simple;
“Yes.”
“Oh.”
“Yes. Oh.”  Albert wasn’t happy.
There was a silence once again. Then a sad sigh from the right side of the room.
“I’m going to have to rethink all my theories now.”
“Theories, Charles?” asked another voice close by.
“Yes. Life has been developing now for, what -  almost 4 billion years now, and to see –“
“Is that four billion or 12?” asked an American voice from behind the Editor’s head.
“Four billion years,” the Charles voice continued resolutely, “during which time life has progressed from the simplest of bacteria to Twineham and Wineham Cricket team, and you were all out for 77. You’re supposed to be better than that.” It wasn’t an accusation, it was a disappointment.
“12 years? That’s not that long.” The American had decided he’d stick with 12 – it was close enough.
There was a collective sigh of disapproval. The Editor, hoping to share some of the accustions hanging in the room, began to warm to the American. But then he went on; “But 77 isn’t very much either. Is it? Or is it? I dunno.”
“Hey, Feynman!” Another American voice from across the room to the right; “You sure as hell ought to be better at this number-crunching you know. I mean have you forgotten our days playing for Los Alamos?”
“Hey, no way, Bob. Oppenheimer and Feynman, 1 and 2. We racked up billions of runs before that LBW crap.”
“Oh, don’t talk to me about LBW! No one knows what that’s all about! I mean, is there an actual rule? Jesus H...”
“I keep telling you there’s no H!”
A clear voice had spoken. It seemed as if came from inside the Editor’s head. Effortlessly heard the speaker sounded more tired than peeved.
“Oh, Hi JC,” said Feynman, conversationally, brash and completely immune to rank. “You hear about that 77 game? That’s not a lot is it? Err... or is it?”
“Yea, we watched the game, me and my Dad,” said this JC. He spoke a little slowly as if earthly time were of no concern. He sounded a little sad.
“I watched it too.” A new voice. A low voice. A voice of authority. A voice of wisden through the ages.
“Is that you, WG?” Feynman asked. “Don’t tell me you saw it too? Hey, I’d like to hear this from a real pro like you!”
“I did see it, yes.” This new so-called “expert” sounded guarded. Maybe, the Editor hoped, he wasn’t in total agreement with the rest of the crowd now seeming to occupy the Gazette office?
“And...?” prompted Einstein.
“Well. I have to say the pitch was dead. Dead as a Dodo, if you’ll pardon the analogy, Charles.”
“No prob, WG.”
”'No Prob?'” Einstein was shocked, “'No prob?' That doesn’t sound like your style, Charles,”
“I believe everything evolves, Albert. Including language,” Charles countered. “So: no problemo it is! Yo WG, hit me with... nice dreads by the way... OK; Shoot!”
There was the briefest of titters from the American camp, and something of a sigh from JC, but after a pause, WG continued with his calculated assessment of the recent day’s play at Lindfield.
“As I was saying, the wicket was quite disarming, and it was this local knowledge that prompted Lindfield to open with slow bowling. They were confident that the low bounce and the pronounced slope might work to their advantage, and it surely did. It’s not as if Twineham and Wineham Cricket Club don’t have people who can hit the ball, is it? Young Packham, for one, can clearly play, and any of them on another day could have done better than they did.”
“And,” added one of the Americans, Oppenheimer possibly, “Lindfield might well have hit the skids too!”
“True,” confirmed WG, in full match report mode (thank goodness! Ed.). “It was a closer game than the scorecard might indicate. With just 77 to defend the Twineham and Wineham bowlers were up against it and they could ill afford those dropped catches, particularly off young Bunn. Take those early wickets and, well, who knows what might have happened? The visitors did get six wickets and no batsmen from either side ever really looked in on that surface. Indeed there was a hat-trick on at one point when Brock had the ball. And Karvay – well, he did seem to have the ball on a string as they say nowadays. No, a few breaks here and there and it could have gone either way. That’s my assessment”
“It’s nice of you to be so generous with regard to Twineham and Wineham, Mr. Grace,” said this JC bloke, which the Editor thought was nice, until, after a perfect comic pause he went on; “My Dad thought they were crap.”
No one seemed to know how to take this and silence deadened the room once more.
And into this extraordinary gathering of minds, dear readers, into this intimidating conclave of luminaries, into this miasmic fog, your Editor, the Gazette’s own, spoke out clearly and loud;
“Well, It might not have been much to you lot,” he bravely said, “But we did our best.”
There was a moment’s silence. It turned into a little too long a moment. Then a stifled snigger came out from one of the group as someone finally cracked, then the whole room was once more engulfed in hysteria.
“Oh, oh oh... my sides!” Einstein.
“Stop it! It hurts! That’s sick!” Darwin.
“HA HA HA HA HA HA!” Americans.
“Yes, well it is rather amusing!” Grace.
“I don’t see what’s so funny.” Editor.
JC spoke softly, but again his words, although quiet, sounded clear and distinct;
“My Dad and I have thought about this. Hard. We know something has to change, and we know just what we’re going to do about it.”
The room hushed. When JC spoke they all listened. The Editor’s legs turned to jelly, and he found he could hardly breathe.
“We decided...”
“Yes?” asked Einstein, who liked nothing better than a tricky problem. “You have an idea that might help?”
“Yes. We decided...”
“Yes?”
“That next weekend...”
“...next weekend, yes...?”
“What? For Chrissakes shut up Albert”
“We decided that next weekend ... we’d make certain to ... watch something else!”
There was a shocked silence for half a second, and then the whole room erupted once more in raucous laughter, louder than ever.
“Oh... Bloody hell!” the Editor shouted as he got up from the sofa, picked up his bat and swung it around a couple of times in the vain hope he might catch one of his spectral tormentors on the side of the head, stormed out of the room and went upstairs to bed, leaving behind the continuing sound of hysterical, mocking laughter ringing through the fabric of time itself.

No Americans were harmed during the writing of this piece.
The Gazette acknowledges that there are intelligent Americans. Just not enough of them – a bit like us.
Bloody brexit.

Scorecard
Format: 40 overs available per side, draws remain a possibility. No (apparent) limit on number of overs per bowler.
Lindfield won the toss and chose to field first.
TWCC Batting: P Hunter Bld Storer 4; R Packham LBW Bld Storer; T Pearce Bld Stoner 10; T Rydon Ct Wk (Toby) Bld Stoner 7; E Bunn Ct Hewitt Bld Storer 8; J Simon Ct Wk (Toby) Bld Green 0; M Edwards Bld Green 5; H Karvay Bld Jones 2; R Brock Bld Jones 6; E Howes run out 7; O Foulger not out 0. Estras 11 (B2, LB2, W7) Total 77 all out (26.5 overs).
Lindfield bowling: Storer 1-3-34-5; Green 10-3-30-2; Jones 4-1-8-2; Richardson 3-0-5-0.
Lindfield Innings: Fricker Ct Edwards Bld Brock 7; Kaye Bld Brock 11; Hewitt Bld Bunn 11, Toby run out (Edwards); James Bld Howes 8; Osbourne Bld Karvay 17; Parker not out 17; Richardson not out 1. 3 DNB. Extras unrecorded but maths indicates 7 extras. Total 79 for 6.
TWCC Bowling: R Brock 5-0-23-2; E Bunn 7-1-31-1; E Howes 3-0-10-1; M Edwards 1.5-0-9-0; H Karvay 1-0-1-1.
Lindfield win by 4 wickets.
 

Top
Streat and Westmeston v TWCC May 6th 2018
In these difficult days when everyone's too busy to spend the odd fourteen hours bashing out match reports that no one reads, the Gazette has had to rely on the Associated Press for the comment on this game and on Wisden for the scorecard. AP states "TWCC batted first, scored plenty, but couldn't bowl Streat and Westmeston out."  Somewhat bald (appropriately), compared to the house style, but there you go. Disappointed readers can but hope for better things as they read into the scorecard to see that TWCC batters had a very good day, by and large, with the top 5 scoring 197 runs. Only Reese missed out as he waits for his new season form to catch up with his ability, and Mikey and Tony really came good for the Pearces, with Tony's 73 the highest score in the game and a great omen for the season. Likewise Mikey and Jonathan are clearly ones to watch as the weeks tick by. J Pieters, on debut, opened with Mikey to great effect, and Pieters' 38 with lots of boundaries clearly shows this is a cricketer to be reckoned with.
From Streat's point of view the long spell of 15 overs from Hartfield was impressive, and that of Mansfield at the end helped to keep the score to a mere 231.
Regular Streat & W performers with the bat were present and correct, and TWCC's inability to bowl their opponents out confirms the home side's reputation for being a tough team to beat. Joe's 4 wicket haul was the pick of the bowling, and with 3 maidens in there too he was clarly a handful, Edward and Tom taking the only other wickets to fall, with Tom only coming on for two overs at the end of proceedings.

Scorecard
TWCC won the Toss and batted first. TWCC Captain M Edwards
TWCC Innings: J Pieters Bld Hartfield 38; M Pearce Ct M Wise Bld Hartfield 45; T Pearce Ct x Bld Mansfield 73; R Packham Ct M Wise Bld P Wise 0; J Rowland Bld Mansfield 41; T Rydon Ct M Wise Bld Hartfield 10; M Edwards Bld Mansfield 2; E Bunn not out 5; J Panther not out 0. DNB H Karvay, E Howes. Extras 14 (2B, 10LB, 2W) Total 231 for 7. (40 overs).
Streat and Westmeston bowling: Hartfield 15-1-60-3; M Lee 7-1-51-0; P Wise 7-1-39-1; M Wise 4-0-17-0;  Spiegel 3-0-30-0; Mansfield 4-0-22-3.
Streat and Westmeston innings: C Mansfield Ct & Bld Karvay 22; D Porter Ct & Bld Panther; M Wise Ct. T Pearce Bld Panther 0; C Marshall Ct & BLd Bunn 36; S Barrs Bld Panther 46; P Wise not out 39; B Baxter Bld T Rydon 0; M Lea Bld Panther 2; C Smith not out 1. DNB M Hartfield, S Spiegel. Extras 26 (B 10, LB2, W 12, NB2) Total 187 for 8 (40 overs).
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 6-1-21-0; J Panther 10-3-37-4; E Howes 5-0-22-0; H Karvay 4-1-9-1; M Pearce 6-0-34-0; E Bunn 6-0-34-1; T Pearce 1-0-12-0; T Rydon 2-0-6-1.
Match drawn. 

Top
TWCC v Greys May 13th 2018
So much to say, so little inclination for anyone to read it... Such is the lot of the Gazette wordsmiths beating out words as thin as they can go in the heat of the TWCC back office. Between you and me, dear reader, there is a move afoot to double the wages of the entire Gazette creative team. However, whilst the ombudsmen sort this one out, it's time to crack on with the latest report.
Richard lost the toss - or, as Rob pointed out in his glass half full way, Greys won the toss - and chose to bat first. A brief consultation with 221B Baker Street revealed that TWCC should loosen up and prepare to bowl.
Ed Howes opened from the Downs end, and Matt E from the Pavilion End, and though threatening on many occasions, it wasn't until the 10th over that Matt had Flynn caught behind - a proper cricket wicket; fast rising ball, top/outside edge, capably snaffled behind by Reese. Score 33 for 1. Notwithstanding this success, there was a tendency for runs to keep ticking onto the scoreboard, and in particular plenty of twos were taken as the struck ball ran to empty corners of the field and there stopped in the tacky surface.
Rob came on, replacing an economical though unrewarded Ed, and immediately, as one might expect, had everyone in trouble including the slip fielders. Rob bowls not just with pace, but with control, and following the drop in the slips, he controlled one or two short into the higher midriff of the unfortunate Greys batters. No serious injury, we trust, and Rob took the usual way out of just bowling at the stumps. 5 overs, 3 maidens, 5 runs and a wicket - not bad. Better than that; really rather good.
Joe, hoping to build on his four-fer the previous weeks (hang on -I don't have to use the dreadul "x-fer" do I?) ... hoping to build on his four wickets in the previous match, didn't drop onto a good length all the time, and served up the odd six ball (in which he was not alone...) but also took a caught and bowled. Tom R, in a longer spell than against Streat, took two wickets for 28 off 6 overs; figures revealing the trend in the Greys' batters to begin to hit out. Honse again bowled really well, getting the ball to duck into the right handers, and his 2 for 12 off 5 overs was also a fine performance. But a rush of runs there was, and not just, we like to think here at the Gazette, because Jim came on for a couple of overs, but also because Mendis, brought in by Honse's wicket-taking, came in and simply swung across the line to great effect. A true eye, and a smooth swing and there the ball was; in the trees. Ashton, too, for the Greys, added to the flurry, for flurry it undeniably was. Brocky as well as Jim, though he did meet with success in the form of Mendis' wicket, suffered a little at this late rush of activity, but there we go; Greys a very useful-looking 167.
It must be mentioned here that the TWCC over rate was pretty poor. The odd lost ball, certainly, and an invasion of misc. dogs, provide some excuse here, but in two-and-a-half hours Greys are entitled to expect at least a couple more than 37 overs from which to score. However, in the event, it's hard to say what difference this might have made, but it is a point to bear in mind.
Edward and Julia kicked off the home tea season in fine style, with, to my mind, the star being the little ginger shortbread. Thank you to them both.
In the absence of Paul, and with no James for the first whole season for many years, what TWCC needed was three opening batsmen. Edward, our No. 1 batsman, took his guard, surveyed the field, settled in his stance and looked up as the bowler ran in for his first ball. All good, solid, opening batsman stuff so far. But... a slow long-hop, half-pulled off his chest, dollied to mid-wicket. Out. First ball of the match. Unsurprisingly I, too, have been the cause of that same look on Skipper Brock's face... Edward, along with many battters before and yet to come, couldn't believe what he'd done, but in this sometimes cruel game you don't get a second chance and off he trudged. So, second ball of the innings, in comes Rob, who, with Richard, calmed the nerves and settled the game down.
The pitch was a little lively, but true, and this second wicket pair prospered. Of note, and a sight to gladden the eye, were Rob's leg-glances for calm ones and twos, mixed with the occasional heavier blow from both batsmen, including a fine square back-foot drive from Richard for four into the long grass at the foot of the iconic oak(!) and a smooth 6 over long on from Rob off the bowling of Mendis. The running was tight and eager and the score rolled on to 70 before Richard failed to keep down a shot off the bowling of Mendis and he was out caught for 22. Reese clicked into gear with a well-timed solid exploratory block to mid off, and followed this with a soft-handed guide of the ball into the right hand of a diving first slip. Out for 0, the second duck of the day. Matt E faired little better, though he was in for longer before being caught in the midfield, and all the time Rob was continuing on in his calm, reassuringly calculating way. Joined by Tom, with the words "run out" whispering through the crowd, father and son shared a partnership of 13 before Rob, accelerating all the time, failed to clear a 3/4 deep mid-on and was out, caught well, for 53.
A hard 53 to get, with the grass being longer than on many a field thus disadvantaging a player who plays so well along the ground, but a classy example of application and good shot-selection, it was to prove to be the highest score of the day.
Tom R continued on, joined by Tom F (good to see him back) and then Joe.
And here we go; Tom and Joe nearly pulled it off. TWCC were on a total of 100, 67 behind, 68 to win, when Joe joined Tom. Both these players can bat, we know that, but the demand here was edging towards a need to stay in and avoid losing the game rather than to chasing down a win. History doesn't recall (or record, sadly) the time left at this point, but when the two began their partnership TWCC were on 100 for 6. In order to help their cause, understandably, Greys reverted to their opening bowlers but this did them little good as both Tom and Joe, and later on, Ed, have true eyes and nerves and hamstrings of steel and the scoring sped up nicely until under 10 were needed off the last over, and, with Ed being run out after a vital contribution of 8 at the right time, TWCC needed just four off the last ball to win! How cool was that? Luckily it was Joe on strike and not Jim, who togged up in case of wides/no-balls/miracles, and so a boundary was a distinct possibility.
However, it wasn't to be, match drawn and maybe, given the over-rate during the first innings it was the correct result. Tom was eventually bowled for a spirited 24, and Joe survived through with his wicket intact with 25 to his name from, amongst other shots, well-timed clips off his legs once again showing a sign of a good eye.
Greys batted well in the face of some lively bowling and 167 looked like enough for much of the game. Rob and richard set up the TWCC reply, and TWCC did bat deep, with Ed at 9 for goodness' sake, and so an attempt at the total set by Greys was always on, but for long time it looked as if survival might be the order of the day. In the end it was exciting indeed, with all three results possible into the last over. Greys' bowling was consistent throughout, with one of the best bowlers being held back and slowing the home side's reply at just the right time for their cause. And here endeth the first home game of the season.

Scorecard
Greys won the toss and batted first. TWCC Captain R Brock.
Greys Innings: Flynn Ct Packham (Wk) Bld M Edwards 5; Line Bld R Rydon; Brasher Ct & Bld Panther 10; Meek Ct & Bld T Rydon 39; Fenton Bld T Rydon; Edwards Bld H Karvay 2; Ashton not out 20; Gallagher LBW H Karvay 2; Mendis Ct T Rydon Bld R Brock 20; Burgess not out 0. DNB Newland.  Extras 30 (B6,LB2,W18,NB4) Total 167 for 8 (37 overs).
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 5-1-14-0; M Edwards 7-0-25-1; R Rydon 5-3-5-1; J Panther 4-0-30-1; T Rydon 6-0-28-2; H Karvay 5-1-12-2; R Brock 3-0-20-1; J Simon 2-0-22-0.
TWCC Innings: E Bunn Ct, Bld Newland 0; R Brock Ct, Bld Mendis 22; R Rydon Ct Flynn Bld Meek 53; R Packham Ct, Bld Mendis 0; M Edwards Ct Mendis Bld Burgess 0; T Rydon Bld Ashton 24; T Firth Bld Meek 2; J Panther not out 25; E Howes run out (Newland) 8; J Simon not out 0. DNB H Karvay. Extras 28 (B11, LB1, W11,NB3) Total 164 for 8.
Match drawn. 


Top
TWCC 2017 Season
Top
Season Review
Richard Brock - Captain
PLAYED 17  WON 8 DRAWN 3 LOST 6  CALLED OFF 3 (2016 P 16, W 7, D2, L7 called off 6)

2017 could hardly have started worse.  The news that Steve had died in January brought our players together for his funeral at Cuckfield.  It was the saddest of occasions. Steve was a central figure in our club.  We mourned for him then, we miss him now. When the season started, we were able – with our friends from Wisley – to remember him with a minute’s applause before the start of the match, with Dave in attendance. And then the season highlight – a chance to celebrate Steve’s life and his love of cricket.  A wonderful TWCC day on 12 August, when former players, members of Steve’s family and friends, and other friends of the club all joined together in beautiful weather to play cricket in a memorial match for Steve.  Dave had bought a young oak tree and together we chose the most suitable place for it – and it was Dave himself who planted it. On that day, Karen added the last soil for the planting and we played cricket in memory of Steve.  It was followed by a barbeque – a wonderful TWCC barbeque with lots of wives, families and friends – made possible by the generosity of some of our own players.  It was simply a wonderful day.  A day when a small club, hurt by what had happened, did what it does best by coming together.  Steve’s plaque was commented on by many of the teams which visited us.  It reads:

`In memory of Steve Rogers. Batsman, wicket-keeper and great friend to all at TWCC. 1962 -2017`

TWCC is the beating heart of traditionalism.  We play friendly cricket because we love it, we enjoy the level of competitiveness it offers, we enjoy the camaraderie of our team mates.  We are all good friends.  If there is a drawback to this, it’s been in introducing new players to our club, perhaps because of the `clubbiness` of it all though more likely because there are so few of us. Put together with the much greater problem in recent seasons of the struggle for players at the level of village and local cricket, it’s a huge challenge – probably the the over-riding threat to our Sunday afternoon sport in the years ahead.
But this season something changed.  This year, more than ever before, more players made it their business to find people who could play for us – normally, in fairness, to make up the numbers – but important nonetheless.  So be it brothers, friends, dads, uncles whatever, it has enabled us to get out teams on all Sundays – bar the last.  It’s the sort of spirit we have and I believe it’s what we will need to continue to do in the years ahead.  We need to pull together and whilst maintaining our core players, we need to embrace those players who may only want - or be able - to play 2 or 3 times a season.   On a number of occasions this year, these players have enabled the rest of us to get our Sunday fix of cricket.  The other notable thing is that a few past players have turned out for us again, frequently enabling us to get games on and occasionally turning in match winning performances. 
The mid season break worked.  We had only 3 games callthis season – Warnham and Rottingdean both pulled out and we couldn’t raise a team the last match of the season vs Brighton Beamers.  And it’s been a pretty good season – won 8, drawn 3 lost 6.  Some really close matches, one or two we should have won but many really good games of cricket.  There have been some fantastic individual performances – especially in batting – but our bowlers too have performed really well, with a good spread of wickets across a number of bowlers.  And it’s been great to welcome Ed Howes to our team – he’s immediately risen to be the top wicket taker but more than that, a great club man.  He’s fitted in extraordinarily well and has become a valued team mate and also a friend.  The tour also presented two really good matches, a couple of great evenings with opposition and amongst ourselves and a really good weekend – aside from the hotel (so I’m told). 
This season, after around 30 seasons with TWCC James announced his retirement from the game.  He’ll be missed, he’s been one of our best and most regular players over all that time, opening the batting every innings and frequently topping the batting averages.  His bowling was also deceptively good in his prime.  And then there’s those catches – a long arm reaching down to pluck from the air a speeding ball that already seemed past him.  We’ve all loved playing with James, he’s got the perfect TWCC attitude, his mischievous chatter has been a highlight of many teas and I speak for all the team when I wish him the happiest of retirements.
I have enjoyed a really good cricket season as your captain.  It remains a great honour and I’m very grateful to have your support.  Sorry for all the crap decisions, but thanks for the very occasional pat on the back moments when I do get it right.  It’s been great to see Matt continue as vice captain and also to see Joe enjoy his tour captaincy.  These two guys remain crucial to the long term future of the club. 
But next year we celebrate the past because TWCC is 125 years old.  I would like us to make the most of this – and have a really special day, probably in the midsummer break. Maybe a single wicket with a few extras and possibly if we can, an extended tour.  And I’m up for any other ideas people have.  I would also like us to get some 125 shirts – our centenary shirts are looking a little threadbare!  We need to mark these occasions because in the 2043 season I may only be playing part time. So let’s have a great season, continue to encourage new players and enjoy what we have because it’s special.


SEASON HIGHLIGHTSAND LOWLIGHTS...

MAY
Thumping victories over Wisley, Streat and Greys, a hattrick for the skipper vs Greys but a big defeat vs Lindfield

JUNE/JULY
Good wins against Parham and Exiles – with a great 97 from Tony, a gut wrenching defeat vs Unity despite 89 from Reese, and our usual high scoring defeat by West Chiltington where Sam Simon scored a whopping 117.  We then had a great tour to Oxfordshire losing the 20/20 but winning the main Sunday match.  On our only other match in July, a storming 126 not out from Mikey Pearce helped us demolish Staplefield.

AUGUST
The wonderful memorial match for Steve put TWCC vs the Presidents XI.  A great match, played of course in a wonderful spirit, with Steve’s family and friends and former players coming along to pay tribute to Steve.  Also in August at Nuthurst was the extraordinary two triple wicket maidens for messrs Bunn and Rydon (R) in our victory.

SEPTEMBER
A narrow loss to Crescent, a rained off half game draw vs Ashurst, defeat by Bolney’s first XI… and a final draw in our last match vs Streat.

Richard Brock – Captain, Twineham and Wineham Cricket Club







Top
TWCC v Streat and Westmeston
September 24th 2017
TWCC and Streat and Westmeston were, upon arrival at the Twineham Oval, greeted by a degree of mowing hitherto unseen during the entire 2017 season. Just in time, you might think. Skippers Brock and Spiegel wandered to the middle, no longer tripping up over bales of hay (though the molehills can catch you out), to toss. Richard won and...er... Stan lost. TWCC were to bat first.
The search for an opening partner for Paul continues, with Paul given the choice by a skipper clearly full of the end of term feeling. With such an array of batting talent in the TWCC ranks it must have been a difficult challenge for Paul to pick a player out, but in the end he went for someone who happened to be sitting next to him.
Paul 1 and Jim 2, and, oddly, these weren't their ultimate scores, but they did rather make the bowling look a little better than it might have been. But in their defense Frank Brand was, actually, quite nippy though only the odd ball needed playing, and the line and length of Hancock was commendable. So, for a few overs, the plan was to not get out, and then to get out.
With batters galore this modest opening partnership of 42 mattered little, for in at 3 was Tony "The Bat" Pearce and, at 4, Tom "The Batandball" Rydon, and they grabbed the game by the scruff of its neck and took the score rollicking along from 48 to 137.
Proper cricket; boundaries that had totally evaded the openers were frequent, and balls were lost and mostly found. Tony, at one point with four successive 4's off the first four balls in an over, couldn't quite see his way through to a jug (unlike Tom... er.... Tom? Was I late?) and was out for 41, but it was the old Tony, the Tony we love, the Tony we generally need so desperately who turned up on this occasion when we didn't need him so badly. And at the other end there was Tom, with his natural gift of standing tall and stroking the ball about as well as forcing through his shots when playing off the front foot. Tom's batting has been a joy to see this season, and he top-scored with 60 - a fine knock, and, hooray! finally Rob got to share an enduring partnership with one of his children, for Rob it was who came in when Tony went in after being out. Watchful to begin with, becoming freer as the occasion demanded and allowed, Rob's class inevitably showed through as even the returning F Brand was grist to his run-mill. Rob's blistering 45, including a monster 6 over the oak tree in the playground, was also remarkable for containing an all-run 3 with Edward! We were all there and saw it, and there it is in the book. A tribute to Edward's re-discovered fitness, as is his batting as a whole which is peaking nicely at the wrong end of a season - so we look forward to 2018. Rob was out on the stroke of tea, and TWCC had a commendable 214 for 5.
There was some issue to do with dual cake-analysis, but both were equally delicious offerings and only proved that Brocky could cook cakes as well as he can the books, and then it was time, from TWCC's point of view, to set about taking 10 wickets.
Ed (H) roared in as usual, and was soon amongst the wickets again, and Honse, too bowled well from the other end. Around this time, in an attempt to cement his position in the batting order by appearing to be even more like Chris Gayle, Jim pulled his hamstring and wobbled off, missing some key fielding moments. Apparently there was a truly astounding catch and another one and another one, or that's what Edward said anyway, and the match was turned away from Streat from hereon in. Ed H and Ed B were both involved in knocking over the Streat openers, and, certainly, the wicket that the Gazette did see was a fast ball from Ed H on a good length that the batsman had to play but couldn't quite get across to, and the thin outside edge flew hard and true into Edward B's chest-high hands.
From this point on Streat and Westmeston were in survival mode, and Graham Cuthbert (nice to see him back) and George Howes (nice to see him for the first time) offered more wicket-taking options for the home side.
And here we do have to talk about a great catch. George Howes put the ball just short of a length and Forster smacked the ball behind gully, to the left of a crouching Ed Howes. Ed dived over and caught a very sharp low catch in two hands - yet another wonderful bit of high-class catching that Ed has graced us with this year.
However, as we have seen in the past and as articulated by Paul, if not fully demonstrated by Jim, if a batter is not trying to score it is actually relatively easy on our artificial wicket to not get out, and this proved to be true in the case of the lower order Streat batsmen. And so it was that Brocky, whose bedtime reading came back to him in the failing light, decided to unleash the Rydons.
Happily no permanent damage was done and, though there was clearly no actual intent to bowl dangerously short from Tom or Rob, the lifting ball did bring wickets; two for Rob in a double-wicket maiden in his first over, and then more for Tom with 3 for 10 in 5 overs including two wicket maidens on the trot. However, in all honesty, the light was, by now, poor and it became difficult to continue with the attack that would bring the last wicket. Maybe it was the right outcome, in the circumstances, that Stan at 11 and the No. 8 Baxter survived and the match was drawn.
It's always good to see Streat and Westmeston - familiar faces and the perfect match for TWCC in terms of either side being as likely to win lose or draw as each other. Now that's a suitably convoluted signature sentence with which to end the Gazette's season, for having totted up at tea how many TWCC players would be available for the last scheduled game, it became clear that this match v Streat and Westmeston would be TWCC's last of the year.
There will be a season's review from our skipper, to whom the Gazette sends its thanks for the work on and off the field that he has done on our behalf. In the meantime your faithful Gazette signs off for 2017, a season of ups and downs, new faces, old faces, lost faces.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and chose to bat first.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter St,  Bld Hawkins 19; J Simon Bld Hawkins 13; T Pearce Ct A Brand Bld Maysey 41; T Rydon Ct F Brand Bld Lea 60; R Rydon Ct F Forster Bld F Brand 45; E Bunn not out 13. Extras 23 (B7, LB5, W9, NB2) Total 214 for 5 (43 overs). Fall: 1/42 - 2/48 - 3/137 - 4/162 - 5/214. DNB R Brock, E Howes, H Karvay; G Howes, G Cuthbert.
S&W Bowling: F Brand 8-0-17-0; Hancock 4-0-17-0; Hawkins 9-1-28-2; Fullerton 9-1-28-0; Forster 3-0-28-0; Maisie 3-0-22-1; Lea 5-0-36-1; A Brand 2-0-25-1.
S&W Innings: C Mansfield Ct & Bld Bunn 7; F Brand Ct Bunn Bld E Howes 8; C Foulerton Ct Bunn Bld E Howes 4; S Forster Ct E Howes Bld G Howes 8; M Lea Ct T Pearce (Wk) Bld R Rydon 21; J Hawkins LBW T Rydon 8; L Maysey Ct Hunter Bld R Rydon 0; W Baxter not out 4; S Hancock Ct Pearce (Wk) Bld T Rydon 0; A Brand Ct Cuthbert Bld T Rydon 0; S Spiegel not out 1. Extras 22 (B2, LB3, W12, NB5) Total 83 for 9 (44 overs). Fall: 1/19 - 2/23 - 3/23 - 4/52 - 5/59 - 6/59 - 7/71 - 8/79 - 9/unrecorded.
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 9-4-13-2; H Karvay 4-0-9-0; E Bunn6-3-7-1; G Howes 6-1-14-1; G Cuthbert 4-0-15-0; R Brock 4-0-5-0; R Rydon 3-1-3-2; T Rydon 5-3-10-3; P Hunter 4-3-1-0.
Match drawn.


Top
TWCC v Bolney CC
September 17th 2017
The end of another cricketing Sunday. It’s mid-September. Two lamps lazily flick on to illuminate a corner of the “Royal Oak” sign and the autumn sun chooses to spend its last efforts on a shallow wooden table, picking out a hunched row of TWCC figures interspersed with unwarranted jugs of Harvey’s. The beer glows a sulphurous deep red in the low rays; suddenly not so much high summer as Halloween.
There is the occasional word, sometimes followed by a laugh, cut short, for the threat of the Gazette promising to be “brutally honest” hangs over the gathering.
“We field well” I say.
A brief, slight murmur. I take this as agreement, and, emboldened, continue;
“And we bowl ok.”
Nothing. Just the rattle of the rising wind in the walnut tree.
“And...” but no words come out. There are no words to say.
Batting is its own examination. Less coursework, more Oxbridge. It demands drilled responses to tough questions that have to be answered without recourse to Google in front of the telly with supper on the go and a drink to hand. Bowlers have second and third chances and can be helped by others along the way, achieving, perhaps, higher marks than they might actually deserve. But the questions on a batting paper need answering in a split-second and to be answered correctly each and every time with no help from well-wishers, and this is why batters are rare. You can tell a batter – there is a test; if you find an unexposed section of a batter and rub gently with a soft cloth, after no more than a few minutes an old gold glow will begin to show through. Try a bit of Silvo, and, soon enough, you will see that beneath the surface all good batters are shiny. They catch the light just so and their quick-wittedness spirals off their tight assured quiffs as they progress through the establishment. Not so with bowlers, who, even with wire wool and Swarfega, show no promise of anything much below the surface. Not for bowlers a quiet word with the Dean who might mention he knows someone in the Foreign Office – “How would it be if you came to dinner and met my friend Askwith? I’ve been keeping an eye on you for him and he feels there’s much to discuss about what you might do after Cambridge?” Take the Editor of the Gazette, for example; yes, he was taken to one side for a quiet word at school, but there was no mention of Oxbridge. “Jim. May I ask you something? Why are you doing English?” And who asked this? The English teacher! Clearly no batter there or dreaming spires on the horizon, but there’s nothing wrong with Colchester Tech. Or Colne University as it probably is now. I doubt it even has a cricket team.
So, good batters are rare, and nowhere is this more obvious than in the ranks of TWCC. We have many who can “hold a bat” as the saying goes, but not many of them seem to hold them for very long, and such was the case in this, the latest match between TWCC and Bolney.
Skipper Brock won the toss and elected for the 10 men of TWCC to field first. Here at the Gazette we’re a little tired of describing how bad the pitch is; many letters have been sent to the Council but no improvement in mowing or de-moling has occurred. It’s almost as if the Council pay little attention to the might that is the TWCC Gazette! Suffice to say the grass was long and the molehills high – more pasture than playing field - and it was into the long grass that we waded out to bowl. What would be a good score? Well, 54, as it turned out, though as the Bolney opening batsmen set about not being out enough, neither side knew how many runs were par. Ed’s bowling, with 13 excellent overs, deserves a special mention and he ended his long spell having taken 3 good wickets from the Downs End. Jonathan, as always right on his game behind the timbers, held on to 2 fine edges, and Ed decided to clean bowl his last victim. Jim, generally unremarkable though happy, trundled off his 7 overs well enough from the Pavilion End before Tom Firth, his last game before academia gathers him in once more, took over, and, after him, Tom Rydon. These last three all wicketless on the day. The Bolney openers were still present and correct for much of this time as Ed's spell continued at the other end, one slightly more correct than the other, and a fine 50 was duly knocked off by Elliott before Honse beguiled him with his quirky line and length and simply bowled him. His partner, left-hander Kingsley Morris, incidentally passed a club record for the number of runs scored in a season on his way to 41. Brocky, following Honse's fine example, decided that bowling better was the way forward, and he, too, took a late wicket. Bolney, at tea, 147 for 6. A good fielding performance, aided by the long grass, so probably a better batting one, with the aforementioned Elliott and his partner Morris doing prolonged damage to the scoreboard up front. A late entrant, down the order, complete with that tell-tale gilt edge; Gilchrist, looked like he would have taken the score by the scruff of its neck and stretched it out further, had tea not go in the way, thank goodness.
And Jonathan’s tea deserves a special mention, for the yielding succulence of the Rowland sandwiches and the lovely carrot cake (for which the credit, apparently, has to go to Tilly H). Once again Coronation Chicken features in a cricket tea – let’s hope it becomes as prevalent as egg and egg.
However, we had to put all these cosy niceties to one side and stir our stumps. Time for yet another trial opening pair of batsmen – a duo with much promise in the opinion of the Gazette. You can’t go wrong with a Rydon, and Tom it was who presented arms and took the opening delivery, watched by Edward at the non-striker’s end. Edward did strike it eventually, for one, and then was caught trying for another one. Edward, out for 1, and Jonathan strode to the middle where he and Tom (R) looked confident and assured. Tom’s calm late glide to third man for a single particularly caught the eye of this old appreciator of finer things batting; what a lovely shot, a great opener’s way to rotate the strike and not get out. Then he was out.
So – Mikey Pearce. Jonathan and Mikey. To quote TWCC’s skipper “Ah... This pair might well see us through to a hundred.” They might have, but they didn’t. The bowling was tight, particularly from the well-grooved and groovy Chaffey, and soon TWCC were less occupied by keeping the score on the board up to date than by altering the number of wickets to have fallen. The only batsman to actually bat was Jonathan, because he’s a batsman with that gentle understated glow of substance. The rest of us didn't bat like batsmen. Is this because we are not batsmen, or did we just not bat on the day? I know the answer to this in my own case, and leave it to others to, maybe, try a dab of Silvo on a quiet evening by the fireside and see if anything comes up bright. Mikey, I think, would buff up nicely, as might some others, but too many of us are maybe not made for higher things.
Bolney’s bowling was all good, the scorebook shows that. What it doesn’t show is the great pace of Gilchrist, which proved the final undoing of the TWCC innings and which wrapped up the game for Bolney.
Once again a single player's innings scored well over half TWCC’s runs, the problem being that on this occasion Jonathan’s contribution was that innings and he scored 28. The rest of us scored 19. Ed can hold his not-out head up high, and Joe can bask in the glory of a golden duck. Poor Joe, pulled up with a knee injury when fielding and therefore not bowling, batting last presumably, again, because of his knee, getting a golden duck, and, just to add salt to his wound, having Mikey to turn to for sympathy.
Who hasn’t had a mention who deserves one? Honse and Richard bowled well, and Brocky’s skippering was, as usual, inclusive and on the ball. Jonathan’s keeping and batting was, as mentioned, top notch, and Ed’s bowling of 3 for 33 off 13 overs deserved more support from his team-mates. Other performances? It’s hard to pick one from so many.
So what next for TWCC? Will we up our game and show some batting form? With just two games left the Gazette looks forward to being able to report on a game in which TWCC are at least competitive and, hopefully at some point, victorious once more. Harvey’s in any circumstances tastes fine, and winning's not the fundamental reason we like to play, but beer would taste even better if we hadn’t just been thrashed.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and chose to field first
Bolney Innings: J Elliott Bld Karvay 55; K Morris Ct Rowland (Wk) Bld Howes 41; A Lake Ct Rowland (Wk) Bld Howes 9; B Clemondson Bld Howes 0; D Bridge Bld Brock 11; M Garside Run Out (Bunn) 11; G Gilchrist Not Out 7; J Moore Not Out 1. Extras unrecorded – a few byes, no balls the odd wide. Total 147 for 6. DNB S Bowles, T Patton, D Chaffey.
Fall: 1/65, 2/83, 3/83, 4/106, 5/137, 6/137.
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 13-1-33-3; J Simon 7-1-23-0; T Firth 4-0-31-0; T Rydon 6-0-25-0; R Brock 6-2-15-1; H Karvay 3-0-15-1.
TWCC Innings: T Rydon Ct Garside Bld Patton 7; E Bunn Ct Clemondson Bld Patton 1; J Rowland Ct Patton Bld Bowles 28; M Pearce Ct Gilchrist Bld Patton 1; R Brock LBW Bowles 4; J Simon LBW Bowles 2; T Firth Bld G Gilchrist 0; E Howes Not Out 2; H Karvay Ct Wk Bld G Gilchrist 2; J Panther Ct (Slip) Bld G Gilchrist 0. Extras 6 (B2, LB1, W2, NB1) Total 53 for 9 (all out).
Fall: 1/9, 2/17, 3/20, 4/41, 5/46, 6/46, 7/47, 8/53, 9/53.
Bolney Bowling: T Patton 9-1-28-2;D Chaffey 9-4-8-1; G Gilchrist 4.3-1-5-3; S Bowles 4-1-9-3.
Bolney win by ... it’s confusing this... 3 or 4 wickets? 94 runs? Er... I should know this – perhaps someone could have a quiet word with the Gazette and set me right.

Top
Ashurst v TWCC September 10th 2017
Gloomy forecast, match on, 30 overs/side agreed in view of the weather, started promptly. Whew - brevity's tough... Especially when there's so much to describe! Firstly, in a line-up of such batting strength (again), in this post-James era it is absolutely clear that TWCC can not be accused of not trying everyone as a partner for Paul. This time, on a stodgy wet wicket surrounded by a stodgy wet outfield, Paul was asked to try his luck with Jim as his opening partner and they found the ball stopping and lifting and the bowling straight. Some progress was made, with Jim finally getting the idea of running between the wickets a bit better, when Paul was out played-on as the overs were passing by with no real scoreboard progress to report. Paul out for 9, which probably rather dented his average, whilst Jim was out for 12 which probably helped with his. Mikey and Matt in at 3 and 4 respectively did up the ante considerably, with two 6's apiece and the score jumped from 2 for 35 to 4 for 71 with 11 overs still to go. Lots more batting to come; Tom Firth, Edward (3 x 4's), Ed, Tom Rydon and Joe all blitzed through, no one finding the wicket easy, but all playing to good effect. Lots of eager running, good ball-striking, wickets falling - it was always just going to be a bit of a dash with the end of the agreed 30 overs looming.
We did have to applaud a reverse paddle from Joe - hats off to him for that - and then the 30 overs were up and we had 116 runs; not enough. Probably the slow start didn't help here (sorry, Ed (not Ed; Editor)), but in the past we have all been out inside 20 overs when we try to force things, so there you go. As the saying goes, it was what it was.
Ashurst bowling was tight to start with - really difficult and pretty impossible to get away at all, don't you agree Paul? - then it became dominated by the slow bowling of Isaac who ended with 3 for 16.
Quick turnaround to avoid as much of the impending rain as we could, and off we went, with Matt  and Ed opening the TWCC bowling attack. The wicket continued to be stoppy and stodgy, but the TWCC firebrands kept the host's openers honest enough, though Isaac did rather seem to make batting look a little less difficult than one might have hoped. A visit to the pavilion for shelter and tea.
The writing was on the weather-man's wall really, but we did go out again in a gap in the rain to see Jim once again fail to find his line-and-length (wet ball) and Richard to find his (different ball? better towell?). Somehow Richard got the unhelpful ball to weave about, and with the length he was bowling, just a bit pace-off, he was very effective ending with great figures which we'll no doubt be regailed with at the end of season... Oh, go on then; 2 for 3 off 3 overs.
A fine innings from Isaac (he of the bowling prowess) of 48 was cut short not by a wicket but by the deluge. We walked off, tried again, and then walked off for good. No result, though independent observers may have felt that the moral victory was Ashurst's. Shame about the rain, which did produce a no-result for the visitors in the face of a likely loss, but which also denied Brocky more wickets, and who knows what might have transpired if the match had continued? There was still bowling to come, and with a wicket here or there the game might have been closer in the end than many pundits felt at the time.
Of note - how good it is to have our group of TWCC lads-of-all-ages charging about and how cheery a team we are. It's just such fun being part of a supportive and humourous bunch. Also the fielding of this incarnation of TWCC is by and large very good.  As far as being of note re. the broader match is concerned, the day was Isaac's with his effective bowling and sure-batted play, and, by extrapolation, were one to have flown over the flooded land later in the day, the team safely gathered together on the moral high ground waving their scorebook to attract the attention of the Wisden helicopter would have been Ashurst. Never be afraid of crazy metaphor, the more mixed the better!

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and batted first.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Bld M 9; J Simon Bld Lee 12; M Pearce Ct, Bld Saunders 21; M Edwards Ct, Bld Isaac 20; T Firth Ct, Bld Isaac 3; E Bunn Ct, Bld Isaac 15; E Howes Run out 10; T Rydon Not out 9; J Panther Not out 9. DNB R Brock. Extras 8 (B3, LB1, W4) Total 116 for 8 (30 overs)
Ashurst bowling: Damu 4-0-9-0; M 4-0-7-1; D Saunders 5-0-21-1; J Lee 4-0-32-1; Murphy 4-0-10-0; Isaac 6-1-16-3; Teddy 3-0-16-0.
Ashurst innings: Isaac Not out 48; Barnard LBW R Brock 8; Damu Bld R Brock 1; M Fischel Not out 8. DNB D Saunders, W Hay, D Fischel, R Murphy, S Glass, E Barnard, J Lee. Extras 4 (B3, LB1) Total 68 for 2 (16 overs)
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 5-0-17-0; E Howes 5-0-14-0; J Simon 3-0-23-0; R Brock 3-0-9-2.
No result. If Mr/Mrs Duckworth or Lewis had been totting things up it's clear that Ashurst would have won the day.

Top
Crescent CC v TWCC
September 3rd 2017
TWCC's budding young reporter, R Rydon, has yet to get to grips with the house style, suggesting the report should simply read something like "Exciting game, though wet." Afficianados of this kind of Red Bull journalism might like to start their own online news outlet in which the letters used in the headline outnumber those used in the report itself, but we at your Gazette get literally one or two... no, one...well, moving on... message every few years or so which clearly support the "why use one word when three would do" approach so loved by our reader. How else, the clientelle we have long cultivated might ask, are those awkwardly long lunchbreaks in the City to filled, or is the mowing of the lawns at their country estates to be put off until it rains, if not by taking to the armchair with a cup of tea and the latest TWCC Gazette? So, we plough on, doling out words free at the point of use as if there was no tomorrow.
The Gazette's Weather Correspondent, when asked for the definition of rain, said that you have to be able to see drops falling into puddles. This seems a little lightweight, if you ask me, for it might, say, be tipping it down in the Sahara sufficiently hard to spoil a game of cricket, but in the sand there would be no puddles for a century or two so play would have to continue. As, indeed, it did for TWCC's visit to the Horsdean Bowl for the latest match in this up and down season. It was raining when we turned up. It was raining when play started. It rained during tea. It rained after tea, and it was still raining when we all drove home in our opaque cars. Were we downhearted? Well, let's put the weather to one side for a moment and think about the match.
Crescent, with whom TWCC have had some close games in the past, were, according to TWCC's deputised Deputy Captain Pearce, purportedly "under-strength." This is a common-enough opening gambit by an opposition's skipper, to which the usual response from a more experienced campaigner than dDC Pearce might have been something like; "Oh, I know - us too. We've had to draft in a few people who barely know how to hold a bat" which if it came to it would, let's be fair, probably stand up well enough in the High Court. However, rather giving away the high ground in this negotiation at the start, Tony returned to the pavilion with some story about no coin having being involved. He seemed to have been rolled over in a Brexit-like fudge and, we think, might have agreed that TWCC would lose at some point.
TWCC batted first, though "batted" may be too strong a word as TWCC were soon 3 for 10 as the top three batsmen were caught off the bowling of Brown. Gentle catching practice for Crescent. When you have a crisis what you need is a man who is good in one, and that man is often Jonathan who, sure enough, steadied the ship with first a partnership of 29 alongside the solid and capable Tom Firth and then with a partnership of 44 with the Rydon of the Day as Tom powered on with his delayed-start season. Jonathan was eventually out LBW three times in a row to Morgan, more or less walking in the end as Tony's finger was reluctant to move out of his pocket, for a match-winn... er... for 38 valuable runs. If Jonathan played regularly we'd surely stand more chance of losing less badly more often. Anyway, with Tom still standing in the middle it was time for Rob to join his son for some familial bonding in the middle. All Rob has ever wanted is to share a partnership with one of his lovely boys out in the middle of a muddy field in the rain, and today it wasn't going to be Alex as he was already through the system. So, Tom it was to be.
I don't know - maybe Christmases in the Rydon household haven't been up to that much lately, or, perhaps, a birthday's been missed here and there - whatever it was that did it, Tom set off for a quick run, knowing his poor old Dad was struggling with a life-threatening gardening injury, then, after a while, when half way down the track he called "yes." Rob was sitting back on his bad foot and the next thing we knew there was a run out and the second Rydon duck of the day was in the bag. (The Gazette's Creative Team has been somewhat in charge of this wicket as the entire staff were in the toilet at the time all this occurred, but we're prepared to bet this is more or less what happened.)
Matt came in to pick up the pieces (my how TWCC were blessed with talent low down the order) and this he did putting on another 21 with Tom R before Tom fell to the pacey Rahaman. Tom R was finally forced to wander obliquely towards the pavilion to face the music, out for a match-winn... er... a fine 22. Matt E and Ollie kept the ball rolling across the swamp, Matt finally out for a match-w.. er.. for 24 great runs, and Ollie showing how much he's learned with every game. Cricket is still new to Ollie but he was making the regulars look like chumps, playing with a straight bat and waiting on the ball, and 12 runs in these conditions was truly excellent. Jim didn't get in the way too much, and then Ed comes in at 11 would you believe? Matt E at 8, Ed at 11! Crazy, but with the batting lineup TWCC had on the day; Paul, Tony, lots of Rydons, Jonathan, a few Toms an Ed a Matt and an Ollie; well who could argue that TWCC had probably posted a match-winni... er... a reasonable total on the board? Crescent's bowling was pretty tight, by and large, with Brown and Brooks at the start giving nothing away, but once again the host's Skipper was generous where he could be, before wrapping up the TWCC effort just on the stroke of tea-o-clock with the visitors on135 all out.
Great tea - thank you Team Crescent, and it was time to get the oilskins on and for TWCC to take to the field.
Ed and Jim opened, and all went swimmingly, with Ed in particular running in hard, hitting the spot and getting his due reward, while Jim missed the spot and got his. Ed really does bowl well we think here at the Gazette, and his 8 overs 2 for 11 really set the tone. Then Tom R, fresh from his batting successes, replaced Jim to good effect and, well it all went very well. The ball was completely hopeless by this point, and was difficult to bowl with and harder to catch - apparently - but after a while, with Tom R and Matt keeping it tight and taking more wickets, the home side were at 56 for 7, 80 behind, with just 3 wickets required and 17 overs in which to get them for TWCC to take home a win. TWCC bowlers had surely set up a great match-winni... er... TWCC would surely win from here, and there was still plenty of bowling to come for goodness' sake.
Well... There were a couple of match-winning performances, and they came from Crescent's J Gatford and N Hollands. From 56 for 7, and facing the excellent bowling of Matt, Alex and then Rob, they helped the total to rise at just the right rate as the overs passed, until, just after cracking a Rob short ball to square leg for 4, Hollands was out for a very worthy 36 off Alex's bowling to a fine, high, catch taken by Tom Firth blinking up into the rain. A shame for Hollands that he didn't see his innings through to the end of the match. To continue, there had been other catches and stuff; a few good bits of this and that here and there, but, to do the right thing by a mug of tea that has just arrived here in the Gazette office, it's time to get to the end. Gatford was on strike with 3 required off 3 balls, Alex bowling. A scrambled single left the new bat, J Hall, on strike, needing 2 from 2. Field tight in; no runs here! A bye, yes. So Gatford found himself facing Alex, 1 run required, 1 ball left, scores tied! Gatford swung through, connected well as he had all afternoon, if you can call it an afternoon, the ball went through a gap, and he ran through to win the game for Crescent, ending on 45 not out; the innings of the day.
Good game, good game, we all said and, actually, it was. It was wet. And cool, but a close game which could have gone either way.
Impartial analysis would say that TWCC didn't bat well, especially early on, and that Crescent found two players who did. That was it; both sides fielded very well, and bowled ok with a soapy ball, but 135 wasn't enough though at one stage it looked as if it might be. Crescent's two batters, Gatford and Hollands, showed the way and their performances deserved to secure the win for their team.
Spare a thought for Rob; he didn't have a very good day. First of all he was attacked in his garden by a malevolent triffid, then he got cold umpiring, then he was run out by his son for 0, then he was hit for 15 for 0 off four overs late on in the piece, then Jim nicked his bat at the end of the game and put it on eBay while he was in the bath. Oh well, it must be this sort of experience that keeps him coming back for more, that and the desire to enjoy a partnership with his children. Or anyone.

Scorecard
TWCC batted first after a coinless agreement based on rumours of weakness here and there
TWCC Innings: P Hunter ct, bld Brown 4; A Rydon ct, Bld Brown 0; T Pearce ct, Bld Brown 3; J Rowland LBW Morgan 38; T Rydon Bld Morgan 22; T Firth ct, Bld Morgan 15; R Rydon Run out! 0; M Edwards Bld Rahaman 24; O Foulger Bld Brooks 12; J Simon Bld Brooks 1; E Howes Not out 4. Extras 12 (B2, W9, NB1) Total 135 all out (41.2 overs).
Fall: 1-4, 2-4, 3-10, 4-39, 5-83, 6- 84, 7-105, 8-125, 9-130, 10-135.
Crescent CC Bowling: Brown 8-1-22-3; Hall 6-3-10-0; Brooks 8.2-1-30-2; Morgan 9-0-39-3; Gatfold 6-0-18-0; Rahaman 4-0-15-0.
Crescent CC Innings: S Wood Bld E Howes 7; B Pomfrett Ct T Rydon Bld J Simon 6; D Morgan Ct M Edwards Bld T Rydon 11; D Rahaman LBW E Howes 10; H Bailey run out (E Howes) 6; J Brooks Bld M Edwards 2; J Gatford not out 45; M Wood Ct A Rydon Bld M Edwards 7; N Hollands Ct T Firth Bld A Rydon 36; J Hall not out 0. DNB M Brown. Extras 6 (B4, W2) Total 136 for 9.
Fall: 1-10,2-14, 3-28, 4-38, 5-47, 6-47, 7-56, 8-133.
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 8-2-11-2; J Simon 6-0-18-1; T Rydon 6-1-23-1; M Edwards 7-0-24-2; A Rydon 7-0-36-1; R Rydon 4-0-20-0.
Crescent CC win by 1 run or 1 wicket or whatever it is.

Top
Nuthurst CC v TWCC
August 27th 2017
This was an intersting game for a number of reasons, some whimsical, some more stat-fact. First of all, with Walkgate wounds healed, for Nuthurst CC and TWCC this was a re-opening of friendly relations - marked, we at the Gazette are happy to report, by the playing of a proper "friendly" game of cricket as opposed to some sort of limitied overs nonsense. So, yes, interesting because there was little knowledge of either side's squad or of the way a team plays the game or of the wicket. In order; as it turns out the squads were well-matched - a similar mix of ability and age (not that the two are related), the approach to the game was clearly the same for both sides with fun for all playing and fair play carrying more import than any thought about who might be going to win or lose, and the wicket...ah. The wicket. We'll come on to that.
Secondly, for the Gazette staff at least, there was a sense of England past as Nuthurst CC play on what was clearly the old common. This was the sort of once-remote village through which knights of old, traders, monks, drovers and shepherds would have passed on their way between London and the south coast and to and from grazing areas on the Downs. Later, and not really, first Sherlock Homes and then Miss Marple might have travelled to just such a community as Nuthurst when intrigued by an out-of-London quirk, and here are still the leafy gardens surrounding red-brick and stone houses into which we were discouraged from hitting the ball on pain of, first, a deleted score, then fines, followed by prison and ultimately execution at the hands of the Parish Council.
Once all the protective netting around the ground was installed, designed to save local residents from the fun of living next to a cricket ground, Skipper Brock and Nuthurst's Skipper Singh compared notes in the middle and tossed the coin which fell Brocky's way and he decided TWCC would bat first.
No Paul. No James. So a new opening pair of Alex and Edward walked confidently to write the first chapter of this new fixture. The nuthurst skipper, Raggy Singh, opened the bowling downhill from the Don't-hit-it-in-my-garden Cottage End, and he was soon exploiting both his natural pace and the uneven bounce of the wicket. However, notwithstanding Singh's prowess, Alex and Edward looked like nothing so much as competent batsmen as they calmly dealt with everything that came their way, and both found the boundary with ease. The slower bowling of James from the Don't-hit-it-into-the-playground End was an easier proposition to face, but the variable bounce was equally destructive from either end.
It might already be too late, but in case Gazette readers (risking the plural) are thinking of abandoning this lengthening report and, instead, of reaching for the lighter option of their hitherto untouched copy of Ulysses, it is time to up the tempo and to get on with it. Singh was bowling fast and true but Alex and Edward, secure and confident, took TWCC to 29 before Alex played on (inside edge as ball kept low) with 16 runs to his name, and then Edward was caught at slip for 19 which included four 4's - putting his name right up there in the mix.
Talking of confident performances, who did TWCC have coming in at three but John Riley - someone who can score centuries everything being equal, and he did indeed look capable of a long-term innings as he set out his stall for the long haul. However, up popped a ball and his beligerent occupancy, albeit valuable in itself, was over with just 2 to his name. Honse got a lifter, a shame as he had forced the selectors to push him up the order, and TWCC were 51 for 4. Hey ho - TWCC had Rydons to spare.
Rob and Tom settled the dressing roo...er..the barn... as they just did the Rydon thing. Rob, with so many run-scoring options charging around in his head, calmly set about scoring the first 17 of this, his next hundred, when up popped the ball off a full length to catch his glove and he was caught behind. No failure of technique, just one of those things. Nuthurst's skipper, being a friendly chap and all, was minded to help his visitors along to a reasonable score and he took off the bowlers who might have seen TWCC all out for 80, and Tom was finding the boundary regularly, including a perfectly regulated 6 over the long-off boundary that just went far enough but not so far as to bring out an irate cricket-hating resident, amusing though that might have been.
Matt E and then Jim failed to do much, though whilst the Gazette can not now recall how Matt's stumps came to be disturbed, Jim did receive a real grubber. Grub grub grub grubber. Grub grub. Grub. Not that he's bitter or anything, and he has just noticed that he did share a partnership of 19. Talking of Tom's batting, he was still going strong and Jim's wicket falling did at least bring a real batter in to join him in the shape of Skipper Brock. Another period of relative calm descended over the visitors' dug out, even after Raggy Singh brought himself and the other opening bowler James back on as the TWCC score began to look more than useful on this questionable wicket. At some point Tom was out caught in the covers, for a fine 23 with three 4's and a 6 to his name, and this brought TWCC's last man in to join his skipper in the middle.
Would the 10-man visiting side on 92 for 8 be all out for under a hundred? Would someone wearing lady's pants around his knees be able to bat all? The answer is that Joe had come in to show us he could bat.
TWCC had survived until just about tea, and, with the ackowledged assistance of their Skipper's Sunday best approach to this friendly game, Nuthurst were in danger of the game getting away from them. To be clear, at this point the bowling was not generous, but this was nothing to Joe, and to Richard too, of course. Not many high-tarrif shots were played into the off side, but anything remotely straight, of whatever length, was regularly met by Joe who showed a remarkable ability to clip the ball strongly off his pads towards the square-leg boundary. What could go wrong now? the pundits thought, as the total climbed and climbed. Those with long memories, such as exist here in the Gazette offices and in Riley Towers, might have predicted what it was that might possibly go wrong, and so it was that Richard called for a run too many and was run out. However, aggressive running was one of the keys to this last-wicket partnership's success, so it is not for those with bitterness in their hearts to dwell on the past, but to rather get excited about the 62 runs that Richard and Joe did put on as the team total bottomed out at 154 all out. A fine partnership, with Richard ending on 15 with a four in there somewhere, and Joe with 36 not out, only four runs of which were not 4's. What an afternoon in the Nuthurst late summer heat.
As is the way of these TWCC-orientated write-ups, somewhat less effort goes into the reporting of the opposition's individual performances as a desire for balance might demand, so as well as reporting the Nuthurst skipper's fine and generous approach to the game, we must mention that he did also bowl very well as did Grimwood who had 3 wickets in two overs but who was rather a victim of his own success as he was removed to save the game being all over in Nuthurst's favour. Others, too, bowled with some impact, though much of that success was as much to do with the variable bounce as with mastery of line and length.
Tea on the kerbside, Miss Marple's coronation chicken sandwiches and all, and TWCC may have enjoyed them rather more than the home side - though this is nothing so much as a platitude as everyone seemed to be enjoying life.
So, moving on, how would Nuthurst go about the business of scoring more runs than their visitors? Matt and Jim opened up the bowling, Matt with more success than Jim, and after 10 overs Matt had two wickets and Jim none, but the score wasn't too high at 34 for 2. A tailor-made situation for Honse, making his last appearance before his summer retreat, as he can exploit a tight situation as batters try to up the rate. To begin with he was luckless but he did secure a bowled wicket before the end of the game, and if I seem to be rushing somewhat here, it is because there is quite a lot still to come.
Matt was taken off after 7 overs, and it was time for some Rob. How much damage could he do?
Predictably the answer was a lot. Sensibly Rob ignored the array of four slips; he knows better than to rely on catching occurring, so, instead, he simply bowled straight at the stumps. With limited bounce from the Nuthurst dust the full-length balls scudded through and after an over he had 1 for 1. This was the last run scored off his bowling, and after the next over he had 4 for 1 - a triple-wicket maiden. Richard had little choice but to limit the impact of Rob's excellence, and so, returning the spirit-of-the-game generosity of Nuthurst, Rob was taken off with figures of 2 overs, 4 for 1. Time for something less obviously life-threatening, maybe some slow bowling would do the trick - after all one triple-wicket maiden was enough. Edward's first over duly went for six runs, and Nuthurst still had wickets in hand, but his second over was - a triple-wicket maiden! All proper wickets; one stumped with the assistance of a suicidal batter and the glove-work of Alex, the next a good low catch safely gathered in by John in the slips, and the third clean-bowled, Nuthurst all out for 72. Two triple-wicket maidens in one match. It was clear, with the hindsight that only comes after both sides have batted, that with the up and down nature of the wicket the TWCC score of 154 was a good score and was likely to be enough, and whilst the wicket did detract somewhat from a full normal game being played out, it did lead to an exciting day's play.
So TWCC win a good game, a fun game, a cheery game, a shared afternoon of cricketiness and pubbing afterwards. It is to be hoped that TWCC v Nuthurst or Nuthurst v TWCC is seen again in the clubs' respective fixture lists.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and chose to bat first
TWCC Innings: A Rydon bld Singh 16; E Bunn ct (slip) bld James 19; J Riley ct (wk) bld Grimwood 1; H Karvay ct (slip) bld Singh 0; R Rydon ct (wk) bld Grimwood 17; T Rydon ct (cover) bld Furber 23; M Edwards bld Grimwood0; J Simon Bld Furber 2; R Brock run out 15; J Panther not out 36. Extras 19 (B 7, LB 1, W 5, NB 6), total 154 all out (44 overs).
Nuthurst CC Bowling: Singh 10-2-23-2; James 12-2-41-1; Shepherd 5-0-21-0; Grimwood 2-0-5-3; Furber 7-3-12-2; Peckover 4-2-7-0; Prior 4-0-31-0.
Nuthurst Innings: J Willis Ct (wk A Rydon) bld M Edwards 1; S Prior bld M Edwards 10;D Goothan bld R Rydon 29; K Greenwood bld R Rydon 10; H Peckover not out 6; O Prior bld R Rydon 0; R Singh bld R Rydon 0; P Shepherd bld H Karvay 0; J James st (A Rydon) bld E Bunn 2; S Furber ct J Riley (slip) bld E Bunn 0; N Williams bld E Bunn 0. Extras 12 (B 7, LB 4, W 1), total 72 all out.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 7-2-25-2; J Simon 5-1-11-0; H Karvay 5-0-19-1; R Rydon 2-1-1-4; E Bunn 2-1-6-3.
TWCC win by 82 runs.


Top
Steve Rogers Memorial Game August 12th 2017
This was the day the club came together, the way it does best, to celebrate Steve’s life. Steve Rogers, our dashing opening batsman, our safe pair of hands behind the stumps, our man in the middle of everything. One of us.  A club member through and through, a player, a tourer, one of the guys who was always there, a great friend to all.  Taken from us in January, this was our chance to pay tribute to him and celebrate his life the way we do, the way he’d have enjoyed:  by playing cricket and eating and drinking with his family and friends.
The day had been some weeks in the planning – led by Dave Jones and of course by Steve’s dad Dave Rogers.  Meetings by necessity had taken place at the Oak – where else – and the day fell into place seamlessly.  We’d invite former players, friends of Steve, his family and our own families.  A competitive match followed by a BBQ.
Earlier that week Dave had bought a sapling, a young oak tree.  We’d agreed a suitable spot would be close to the pavilion – and Dave himself came up and dug the hole and planted it.
The Saturday came and the sun shone.  Of course it did.  This was Steve’s day.  Among the first to arrive were Steve and Karen Taylor, with James and Jonathan – all the way from Wales. Karen is Steve’s sister, Steve played for us in the 90s and James toured with us this year.  Then we were delighted to see Karen, Charlotte, Alex and Francesca, Sheila, Steve’s mum and Tracey, Steve’s other sister. We all know just how much Steve loved his cricket – and it was really special to see his family with us on this day.
Among the former players to join us were Nigel Ingram and John Pearce – legendary bowlers who’d played many times with Steve and Mike Tucker and Mark Newman – great friends of Steve.  Dave Peck, another great friend of Steve also donned his whites.
When all the players were changed into their whites and all friends and family had arrived, we gathered around the young Oak.  Karen said a few words of thanks, put the final spade of soil on the base and unveiled the plaque which the club had commissioned.
Dave Rogers, one of the joint captains of the Presidents/Vice Presidents XI, won the toss and put Richard's Captain's X1 into bat.  A 35 overs match had been agreed, retire at 25.  A good crowd gathered round Edward’s picnic tables and the sun was warm.  A beautiful TWCC day.
The never-before-tested opening pair of John Pearce and Ed Howes walked to the middle – and meted out suitable punishment to Paul `five wides` Hunter before a rusty Matt Brock found his line and John was caught by James Taylor for a stylish 12.  The score was 32.  Sam Simon took over from Paul and after 3 dot balls he bowled first Ed then – first ball – Steve Taylor.  The journey from Wales may not have been quite as long as the walk back to the pavilion.  The score remained stubbornly on 32.  When it moved on it was only to 35 before Mike Tucker was caught neatly behind the stumps by Jonathan from El Presidente Jones, slipping effortlessly back into that easy bowling rhythm.  It brought Tony to the crease at an unfamiliar 6, but he soon restored some respectability to the innings, sharing stands with Andrew Smerdon – Jim’s brother in law – Nigel and Jim himself.  Nothing huge but the score crept through the 50s, 60s and 70s until Jim’s spirited knock of 13 ended on 86.  Not bad for a man 60 years and 3 days old, swishing his bat in front of his admiring family.  Richard came in and helped the score past 100 before Tony had to retire and useful partnerships with Lawrence and then between Mark and Lawrence took TWCC to 143 from our 35 overs.  The wickets had been shared nicely between 6 bowlers, out of a total of 11 P/VP bowlers used including VP Rogers.  Everyone on the TWCC team had also batted – one of the few favourable things that can be said of the batting effort. 
Tea was basic sandwiches and cake because a BBQ was but an innings away.  Then out strode the retiring opener J Trollope to open for the P/VP team, along with non-retiring opener P Hunter.  Neither was in retiring form.  James stroking a series of graceful shots which is his hallmark – while Paul punished wayward bowling – which is his.  Together they put on 29 for the first wicket when Paul was undone by the delightful and ageless combination: Bowled N Ingram, Caught J Pearce.  James powered on to retirement – this innings, this game of cricket.  Any hopes the TWCC team had of breaking through were dealt a firm blow – in fact several firm blows – by the new pair of Jon Rowland and James Taylor.  Their batting was impressive and powerful and the various bowling combinations of Simon, Howes, Woodhams, Pearce, Smerdon, Newman, Brock and Taylor could not force another wicket as both batted out to retirement.  It has to be said however that it was as though John had never been away, he slipped straight back into his groove at the far end and beat the bat countless times.  The same was true of Nigel after he’d shaken off his 10 years of cobwebs – that unmistakable action and those mean figures.  But it was left to another old boy – Mike Tucker – to finally make the second breakthrough as his slow drifters round the wicket floated through Honse’s guard and the stumps rattled.  Sam came in to bat to accompany Jonathan Taylor with the P/VP XI on 142.  He was immediately called back by El Presidente for a strategic team talk.  Next ball he struck for one and the pair tucked their bats under their arms and shook hands.  The match was declared a draw.  A fitting end to a competitive match.
The evening was one of the great TWCC social occasions.  One big family enjoying each others' company, sharing a calm evening alongside Steve's tree with the air full of easy conversation. The sort of evening Steve would have loved.

Scorecard
TWCC President & Vice-President's XI v TWCC Captain's XI
TWCC President and Vice Presidents' X1: Dave Rogers [C], Dave Jones [C],  James Trollope, Dave Peck, Edward Bunn, Paul Hunter, Matt Brock, Honse Karvay, Jonathan Rowland, Sam Simon, James Taylor, Jonathan Taylor.

TWCC Captain's X1: Richard Brock [C], Steve Taylor, Mike Tucker, Lawrence Woodhams, Ed Howes, Nigel Ingram, Mark Newman, John Pearce, Tony Pearce, Andrew Smerdon, Jim Simon.

P/VP won the toss and asked the Captain's X1 to bat.

TWCC Captain's X1 Batting: J Pearce Ct Ja Taylor Bld M Brock    12; E Howes Bld S Simon 15; A Smerdon Ct & Bld E Bunn 5; S Taylor Bld (GD) S Simon 0; M Tucker    Ct WK J Rowland Bld D Jones 2; T Pearce Retired 28; N Ingram Ct P Hunter Bld Jon Taylor 4; J Simon Bld Ja Taylor 13; R Brock Retired 28; L Woodhams Not Out 6; M Newman Not Out 5. TOTAL 143-7 from 35 overs.
Fall: 32-1, 32-2, 32-4, 35-5….62-7, 86-8.
TWCC P/VP's X1 Bowling: P Hunter 3-0-20-0; M Brock 5-0-19-1; S Simon 2-0-9-2; D Jones 4-0-17-1; J Trollope 2-0-10-0; E Bunn 3-1-12-1; Jon Taylor 5-1-15-1; D  Peck 3-0-15-0; Ja Taylor 3-0-8-1; H Karvay 3-1-7-0; D Rogers 1-0-12-0.
TWCC P/VP XI Batting: J Trollope Retired!!! 27; P Hunter Ct J Pearce Bld N Ingram 21; J Rowland Retired 28; James Taylor Retired 28; E Bunn Retired 19; Jo Taylor Not out 13; H Karvay Bld M Tucker 0; S Simon Not Out 1. TOTAL 143 from 29.1 overs.
FALL: 29/2, 142/7.
TWCC Captain's X1 Bowling: J Simon 3-2-10-0; E Howes 3-0-13-0; N Ingram 3-0-11-1; L Woodhams 2-0-20-0; J Pearce 5-0-9-0; A Smerdon 4-0-20-0; M Newman 2-0-12-0; R Brock 3-0-17-0; S Taylor 3-0-12-0; M Tucker 1.1-0-15-1

Match honourably drawn

Top
TWCC v Staplefield
July 16th 2017
No preamble or flummery, no scene-setting or weather report; let's just plough right on into the land of fantasy and mixed metaphor that is a Gazette report.
Staplefield won the toss and chose to bowl first.
In the continued absence of James and with several other regulars finding Sunday opportunities elsewhere, Edward found himself all padded up and raring to go at No. 2, and, with Paul at No. 1 TWCC settled down to the task of finding out what this incarnation of Staplefield were all about. Both TWCC openers were up to the considerable task of surviving, and scoring off, some excellent pacey swing bowling. Paul's lunging injury was clearly a thing of the past, and Edward seemed to be in control of affairs. However, after 6 overs of good cricket from both teams, trouble reared as did the ball, and soon TWCC were three wickets down, all falling in very similar circumstances; pitched slightly short, the ball was lifting considerably and the top three batters (yes, alas, Tony too) were caught behind. Paul, of the first three TWCC batters, survived longest, and though he, too, fell to a high glove-under-the-chin moment, he left the field with a fine, stabilising, 33 to his name. Of note, to those who care about such things as, indeed, I feel we all do, is the fact that all three of the opening batters, having gloved or minutely edged the ball on the way through to the keeper, walked immediatley and there was no need for the umpire to get involved at all. Which was just as well as the umpire, I have it upon good authority, was not at all certain that any of the three appeals were justified.
So, we come to the main feature of the day's play. Who should walk in at 4, swinging his bat and looking all crickety, but the once-regular and now, sadly, less so TWCC favourite-of-the-crowd Mikey Pearce. Always correct in style and capable, but prone hitherto to lapses in concentration, this was a new Mikey Pearce who bided his time, cared about his wicket, placed his shots for singles, drove the ball to the boundary when he could, took runs when they were there, and blocked the ball when they were not. In short, a batsman was amongst us, and the slightly wobbly TWCC start was looking less catastrophic as the tens of runs rolled by and the scoreboard tins were rattling about in fine style.
The words "middle-order" are often, in TWCC match reports, followed by the word "collapse," but in this report the Gazette is pleased - nay, thrilled - to be able to say that what followed was glorious cricket. Mikey continued to play a truly excellent innings, yes, but it was the partnerships he founded with first Sam and then Matt that lifted the TWCC total out of the dangerous quicksands of 3-for-56, up through the foothills of respectability and on to the high plateau found at 200+. A rarified atmosphere indeed is to be found at these altitudes, but much of the enjoyment was missed by all but the laziest as many were ferreting about in the neighbouring undergrowth looking for balls. Sam carried on his new-found batting form and mixed up some unlikely defensive play with his characteristic strong-arm tactics (three 6's in a total of 37 - I'd love to see Sam and George sharing a partnership!), and Matt, after Sam's demise, carried on the good work of rotating the strike most productlively with Mikey. Matt, too, soon lost balls in the pursuit of an ever-higher total.
Golden times in this promised land indeed backoned, and Jim might have been the man to prosper after Matt was caught behind (one 6 in a total of 22), but, instead, he meekly alllowed a (rare) straight ball to pass gently beneath his bat and onto the stumps. Golden times? Golden duck... By now, however, these petty details mattered little, and Joe, with a couple of bludgeoning fours, and Ed saw the innings to a close with Mikey not out on 126 and with TWCC's total on 254 for 7. That's a heady total, and Mikey's innings was largely responsible for delivering it. There have been some truly excellent innings' this season and this was right up there with the best of them. The bowling, about which little has been written here, was by no means poor and Mikey's pushing on through the overs with plenty of boundaries and the quick running of 2's and singles as well as forceful shots off the full face of the bat allowed the total to build almost as if TWCC were playing proper cricket. Strike rotation was a feature of the TWCC innings; no maidens at all were bowled by Staplefield, and there's nothing like a constant nibbling away into a fielding side's efforts for tiring the bowling and building a total. Over 250! Now there's a fine thing and TWCC settled down to Joe's excellent tea with some appetite and an equally healthy anticipation of having runs to play with.
Staplefield's innings in reply would have to be long and strong, but neither of the visiting side's openers got to grips with the opening two over spells of Matt and Jim. Jim's figures prospered temporarily due to a played-on, but with the thought that much of the batting was tactically being held back by the Staplefield skipper, Matt decided to mix up the bowling attack. Joe and Honse stepped up and both had some success. The removal by an awkwardly bouncing too-close ball from Joe to the Staplefield No. 3 was the first nail in the coffin of the visiting side's ambitons; Maj, fresh from 150 the day before, looked like he meant business, and then he just looked cross when he found himself undone and on his way back to a subdued pavilionful of Staplefield players. Honse, in his first spell of, again, just two overs, removed the opener Bull with Ed's help who took a fine running catch. Joe then took his second wicket and Staplefield were 4 for 14.
Now, however, we were into the meat of Staplefield's batting reply. J Martin and, then, particularly G Russell decided to see what would happen if they swung their bats, and what happened was that the scoreboard began to race along. Matt and Jim, returning, caught the begining of the onslaught, then Sam and Ed bore the brunt of it. Sam was unlucky in clean-bowling the fast-scoring Dray with, yes a full toss, but no, not a no-ball as called by the square leg umpire; it hit the stumps two thirds of the way up having passed the batsman just on the knee-roll of his pads. Enough said. Sam was taken off because he was bowling out of an area in the hedge which made it dangerous for the batsman... and that meant that Honse was brought back on. Be careful what you wish for!
Ed, in the meantime, was gamely charging in and bowling perfectly good balls to batsmen who had their eyes well and truly in. Fours and sixes continued to evade fielders arranged in a row of four and sometimes five men around the cow-corner boundaries, but when Matt caught Russell out and Edward caught out Dray, both, happily in terms of just reward, off Ed's persistent bowling, the game was run. Sad to say, largely due to age, the entire Gazette staff can not remember any details about Matt's catch, but Edward's one-handed grasp of the ball alongside the road hedge whilst at the same time fending off Sam was remarkable. It would have gone for six, but instead the dangerman was out and Edward was grinning from ear to ear for the rest of the day. He probably still is.
Honse it was who did the mopping up with his loopy offerings and changes of pace. The later batters took to pushing at the ball on the rise and giving catching practice and the game was over with about 10 overs to spare and Honse ended on great figures of four for 12 off 4.1 overs!
A fun game, we thought, notable for excellent batting from many, including from three of the Staplefield side, from Paul, Matt and Sam for TWCC, and mostly from Mikey Pearce with his fine century who should now, surely, want to make himself available for more games because he had fun, we had fun, and the rabbits had fun.
Did I not mention the rabbits?

Scorecard
Toss won by Staplefield, who chose to field first. 40:40 format game agreed.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Ct Wk Bld Dray 33; E Bunn Ct Wk Bld Russell 11; T Pearce Ct Wk Bld Russell 4; M Pearce not out 126; S Simon Ct Aiden Bld Paul 37; M Edwards Ct Wk Bld Martin 22; J Simon Bld Humphrey 0; J Panther CT Wk Bld Martin 10; E Howes not out 3. DNB O Foulger, H Karvay. Extras 8 (LB1, W5, NB2)
Total 254 for 7.
Fall: 1/22, 2/28, 3/56, 4/115, 5/217, 6/221, 7/223.
Staplefield Bowling: G Russell 8-0-26-2; D Dray 8-0-40-1; R Hutchins 6-0-52-0; P Bull 8-0-41-1; Martin 6-0-41-2; A Humphrey 4-0-43-1.
Staplefield Innings: J Ellis Bld J Simon 6; R Bull Ct E Howes Bld H Karvay 3; M Raja Ct Wk (T Pearce) Bld J Panther 1; J Martin Ct & Bld S Simon 26; J Gaynor Bld J Panther 0; G Russell Ct M Edwards Bld E Howes 49; P Johnston Ct & Bld Karvay; D Dray Ct E Bunn Bld E Howes 40; A Humphreys Ct J Simon Bld H Karvay 0; C Turner Ct P Hunter Bld H Karvay 0; R Huthings not out 0. Extras 9 (B1, W6, NB2).
Total 135 all out.
Fall: 1/7, 2/8, 3/12, 4/14, 5/80, 6/92, 7/128, 8/129, 9/135, 10/135.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 6-2-19-0; J Simon 6-0-28-1; J Panther 3-1-15-2; H Karvay 4.1-0-12-4; S Simon 4-0-18-1; E Howes 6-0-43-2.
TWCC win by 119 runs.


Top
Tour to Oxfordshire June 30th - July 2nd
So the lengthy tradition of TWCC tours which stretches back to Goldenbollocks at Sidmouth in the 1980s and takes in the legendary John Pearce 6 at Arnside, the lesbian in Ibiza, the world’s second fastest white bowler breaking our bail in Lancashire – I could go on – prepared for departure from Sussex on Friday 30th June.  With a fair number of youngsters, the tour was guaranteed a spirited atmosphere – and so it proved. 
Let down badly late on by squad members, the tour was grateful to Tony for his attendance thus denying Jan an Adele concert, and to Ollie for being willing to come to Oxfordshire, drink lots of beer and play golf and cricket.  At the risk of upsetting Adele fans, It’s hard to believe that either really had a difficult decision to make.
So Tony, Ollie, Matt and Joe set off from Brighton, Edward, Honse, Jim and Ed from Twineham, Richard and Matt from Horsham – and James Taylor – an excellent addition - from Wales.  The first impression of Oxfordshire was that it’s too close to London and has too much traffic for its narrow roads.  But the deeper you venture, the more pleasant and less frenetic it becomes.  Though it does seem to have a lot of lycra-clad people determined to do fit-type things in their leisure time.  We were not about to increase those numbers however.
So at some stage, this tour report has to arrive at the hotel.  The Shillingford Bridge Hotel sits in a glorious location on the River Thames. It owns the grassy picnic banks leading down to the water’s edge.  Across the bridge road, is the hotel swimming pool.  Its glossy website makes proud claims that – among its many other attractive features – that this is the number 1 venue for gay weddings in Oxfordshire.  All in all, this looked to be the perfect tour hotel at just £50pppn.    Edward was first to complain.  His room was `Victorian`, too small, poor view, too much else to mention.  Over the weekend, others would take the flame of his dissatisfaction and run with it, until by the time we checked out, we had an inferno of unhappiness.
But TWCC on tour is who we are - and nothing was going to prevent us from having a good time – because it’s what we do.  James was first to arrive, followed an hour later by Tony, then Richard and finally Edward.   Beers were consumed overlooking the Thames, with the sun breaking through the clouds, glinting gently off the green puddle of slime which covered the hotel’s otherwise empty swimming pool. The fines captain Matt B outlined his 10 commandments of the tour -which included gems like no noughts, no dropped catches, no women and no leaving the party early.  Rules – as we will discover – are there to be broken.  Anyway, and all too soon, it was time to head for our first game of cricket at Britwell Salome.  The village was about 15 minutes away – set in pretty countryside.  The clubhouse itself was peppered with several older cricketers, many of whom were enjoying a pint.  The atmosphere was relaxed.  Step forward tour captain Joe Panther who lost the toss and we found ourselves batting in a 20/20 with a grass wicket which had little life so few surprises.  All in all a very pleasant Friday evening.
Unfortunately the scorer used a system which made it difficult to discover whether opening batt Matt Edwards was out second or fourth ball – but the score is not in dispute and the first commandment was broken.  Honse followed for 4, as did James Taylor, and Tony for 12.  27-4 is not good even in a friendly Friday evening 20/20.  Ollie helped a little with 5, Edward with 12 – but at 50-6 off 12 overs, it was not looking good.  Enter the arena Jim, who tends to enjoy his tour batting.  He started sweetly and moved on swiftly, stroking 6 fours off the face of his bat.  He moved on effortlessly to 28 when events took a turn.  The author of this report appears to have a different interpretation of events to most other players – backed only, then quickly denied - by Tony Pearce.  Richard hit the ball firmly to a cover fielder and took off for a run.  Jim - according to the disputed Pearce words was `rocking on his heels` and failed to make it home before the bails were removed in a sharp run out.  However the report must record that all other players – and that is ALL the other players (including the rapidly recanting Tony Pearce) – believed Richard to be at fault for a ridiculous call.  Jim left forlornly on 93-7 – and the record should note that Jim very rarely leaves forlornly so he clearly felt most aggrieved.  But a spirited knock of 11 not out from Skipper Panther helped patch things up, even if Ed and Matt Brock both added to the noughts count, the latter run out straining for a run off the last ball, so out not actually facing a ball.
So we ended with a score of 114 all out.  We changed round quickly as the light started to fade.  Unfortunately despite the efforts of Joe and James Taylor opening the bowling, Britwell Salome dominated the attack.  They had experienced and confident openers, one of whom – Herrington - hit the ball firmly, straight and with great authority and the other who dragged everything from off to the long on boundary.  It was a happy recipe for success which took them past 50 before Jim recovered from the mortification of his batting departure to snap up the first wicket. Ed clean-bowled their number 3 but their next batsman settled in with the stylish Mr Herrington and saw them home comfortably.  Joe’s late and worthwhile throw of the dice – to see if Edward could cajole a wicket - was rather brutally brushed aside and we suffered a defeat in the 18th over by 8 wickets.

Scorecard
TWCC v Britwell Salome 30th June. 20/20 format.
Britwell Salome won the toss and chose to field
TWCC Innings: M Edwards Bld Ali 0; H Harvay Bld Ali 4; T Pearce Ct, Bld Joyner 12; J Taylor Bld Ali 4; O Foulger Bld Joiner 12; E Bunn Ct, Bld Lawrence 12; J Simon run out 28; R Brock Ct, Bld Ball 15; J Panther not out 11; E Howes Ct, Bld Strong 0; M Brock run out 0.
Total 114 all out 20 overs.
Fall 0-1, 5-2, 18-4, 27-5, 42-3, 50-6, 93-7, 101-8, 114-9, 114-10, 114-10.
Britwell Salome bowling: Ali 3-2-4-3; Strong 4-0-22-1; Joyner 3-0-17-2; Lawrence 3-0-6-1; Hussan 4-0-22-0; Ball 3-0-32-1.
Britwell Salome Innings: A Herrington not out 36; N Joyner Ct ?, Bld J Simon 33; A Khushi Bld E Howes 6; Joyner not out 30.
Total enough.
TWCC Bowling: J Panther 3-0-14-0; J Taylor 3-0-10-0; J Simon 2-0-22-1; R Brock 3-0-24-0; E Howes 2.5-0-7-1; E Bunn 3-0-24-0; M Brock 1-0-4-0.
Britwell Salome won by 8 wickets.

The match was played in a great spirit and afterwards, BS laid on chips, pizzas and sandwiches – and if that sounds like a weird combination, it was extremely welcome after 3 hours of cricket.  It was washed down with gallons of really well kept beer from the club’s own bar and the post-match festivities continued until darkness fell.  Our huge thanks to BS for their hospitality – and to James who made the trip for this match and stayed overnight – fantastic effort and great to see him.
We had a fines session:  the 3 noughts paid up, as did Richard for a dropped catch and a double hit for the run out and Joe of course for losing as skipper.  With the business all sorted it was back to the hotel where strangely (for such an allegedly terrible hotel) the bar stayed open, they had no problem with us playing poker as long as we wanted and the night porter was happy to top up drinks as late as we like.  Hmmm….maybe it wasn’t the horror some were determined it was.  So play we did – everyone.  £10 in, big things, little things, rivers, floats, ups and downs. By 1am there were 4 left – Honse, Ollie, Richard and Matt B.  They took the cowards option of splitting the pot and each walking away with a profit from the game.  By 3am all were in bed.  Unfortunately not all were asleep.  Matt B was rooming with Joe who snores at the level of a low flying jet loaded with 54 active pneumatic drills and subsequently Matt slept for minutes rather than hours.
The morning brought early risers and a fresh torrent of criticism of the hotel – despite the fact that it laid on both a continental breakfast, pastries, cereals, fruit and a buffet full English.  This time the complaints centred on the allegation that `the sausages weren’t local`!!!  GAFL!  Anyway, the rugby fans headed off to the nearby town of Wallingford (5 minutes away – far too far, blah blah blah) to watch the Lions take on New Zealand.  This we did on the outside screen of the Town Arms and what a match it was.  The late risers arrived for a pulsating second half – unfortunately missed by Matt B, who was trying to catch up on some missed sleep in the back of a car outside the pub.  A little money was won as the Lions fought to win the game – but far more was lost by those who backed the All Blacks – so that serves them right really.
We were back to the hotel by 11 and in the unremitting tradition of TWCC tours, left again 15 minutes later, with golf clubs on board.  
The course was called Hadden Hill, some 7 miles from the hotel.  Edward nabbed the only available buggy and we set off on a beautiful day from noon.  There was some hard bargaining and frankly some dodgy claims for handicaps.  When Tony, Ollie, Matt and Joe all hit screechingly good shots off the first tee, the rest felt themselves stitched up.  But class will out and that group couldn’t keep their form.  Edward started brightly – belying his 26 handicap – but a wretched back 9 put paid to him, while Jim picked up an already solid game, creamed the back half and scooped the pot.  The course was not the most challenging – a bit up and down, or there and back.  Whether it deserved the `s**t` criticism from Tony is another thing, but it was only £25 for the round which several club members seemed happy with.
After a post-game beer on the balcony with the red kites sweeping low – a wonderful feature of our time in Oxfordshire – it was back to the hotel for just about the only free hour of the tour – and that is why we love touring – it’s non-stop.
By 6.30pm we were on the road again to the faraway town of Wallingford and we had a fantastic team beer – great bantz, great fun, good beer – team spirit at 100%.  Matt B promised a land of milk and honey (WGOTSOT)  but before that it was curry time – another wonderful tour tradition.  We bypassed our first choice of curry house because of the waiting time and went to another quieter one down the road.  And it was a good choice – everything we needed and decent value for money.  Richard was – curiously – given a rousing welcome of `happy birthday` upon entering – not just by the team but by the whole restaurant – not bad for someone who’s birthday was 6 weeks earlier.  Apparently there was a cake at the discarded restaurant!!  At curry’s end, the old gits headed for the hotel, leaving the young guns to fight it out over who should have the best seat in the pub – the one furthest away from the singer, who sounded nothing like Anthony Kiedis (and thus somewhat scuppered the Red Hot Chilli Peppers tribute band ’s pretence).  Another seat also seemed to be in demand with Joe and Honse slugging it out and finally allowing Ed to slip in – but that’s another story.  It was the wee small hours before the vanquished Joe and Honse along with Ollie opted to walk back to the hotel, leaving Matt B and Ed to lord it in a cab.  Ed also fancied a walk a little later so he popped out along the riverbank.
The following morning, breakfast was once again included in the price of the room.  The strawberries were very pleasant, so too the bacon but of course the rest of it was terrible, because that was now the accepted norm from those who’ve never organised a tour before….
We checked out by 10.30 and followed Edward for a bit of boating on the Thames.  Unfortunately Mr Bunn had not booked a boat and - on a riverbank choking with cyclists, sun worshippers and tourists - there was no way we were going to get one. So we headed on to Stokenchurch and had coffee at the world’s greatest hotel – oh if only it had been ours.  The fact that the façade was crumbling, they couldn’t get the coffee orders right, the food started at £9.50 for a sandwich and the background was dominated by the drone of the M40 mattered not. 
We moved over the road where the boys played darts and then we all had a game of killer pool at a local pub – won by Honse.  And Richard took Tony for a tenner when he pinned it to the dartboard in the 3 dart challenge.
Stokenchurch’s ground was literally round the corner – and very pleasant it was too.  A smart clubhouse, a smattering of spectators – all in all, quite a grown-up cricket club.  Geographically this is the highest cricket ground in Buckinghamshire – just atop a hill with spectacular views across the Cotswolds.  The ground itself was something of a shallow bowl – surrounded by high walled homes and gentle sloping banks which kept the heat in the centre of the ground.  And heat there was – the clouds cleared to a clear blue and sunny sky and the temperature shot up to the upper 20s.  And at one point, there were 8 red kites gliding lazily above – the locals said that if you offer them food, you can attract 70 in one go!
Skipper Joe won the toss and opted to bowl in a 35 over match.  We were warned they had a couple of first teamers in including the first team skipper who’d made 44 from 20 balls the previous day – a man made for limited overs cricket.  We strode out determined to finish the tour with a win…
It was a scorched wicket to match the heat of the day.  Ed began bowling down the hill, getting a good pace, whilst Jim came up the hill and found some movement.  After just 10 runs Jim struck, clean bowling their opener.  Ed bowled their number 3 shortly afterwards before Jim had a ball struck back at pace over his head towards the substitute fielder Stokenchurch had sportingly provided us with.  The young man reached out and made an excellent catch and immediately rolled his eyes as if realising what sort of stick he’d get back in his own dressing room.  Nevertheless at 31-3 we were in fine fettle.  However this brought C North – aforementioned first team captain - to the crease and he had a penchant for scoring quickly, and especially enjoyed boundaries.  The bowling he found most desirous was Richard’s.  One over consisted of a clipped six and two bludgeoned fours.  Whether the skipper thought of removing the hapless Brock from the attack is unknown but as so often in this game, fortunes can change in an instant.  The magic moment in this case was provided by the pair of Matts.  Matt Edwards bowled Mr North a ball which he clubbed towards the pavilion – where – thanks to excellent captaincy – there lay in wait Matt Brock, who took a clean catch just inside the boundary and suddenly the match turned.  The score then was 77 – and Brock senior capitalised on his son’s excellence by doing what he does best - scooping up a few outrageously cheap wickets, aided by catches from Jim and Matt E.  Honse joined the party, Matt E added another wicket and it was left to Matt Brock – off his long run – to shatter the stumps of the unfortunate number 11 who may have thought that our sixth bowler would offer little more than dolly-droppers, not the furiously fast ball he actually received.  Stokenchurch had gone from 77-2 to 126 all out.  The door was open – could TWCC walk through it without tripping over their own feet
There should be a meritous mention made here of tea, which was one of the best we have ever been offered.  Smoked salmon rolls, waiter service scones and cream and so much more spread out for us that we were tempted to forget our innings and just eat.  Hopefully somebody will have taken a photo for James.  Many thanks to Stokenchurch for the magnificent spread – or was it normal?  Could it be they eat like that every week?  Envy….
Anyway, Joe was struggling with the batting order – the old TWCC quandary that you want to ensure everyone plays a part – but you also want to get that win.  He opted to put in Tony at number 1 and Richard at no 2.  Time wasn’t an issue, nor overs – it was all about sensible batting.   The pitch was occasionally keeping low but not misbehaving otherwise,  so the pair of them set about their business with steadfast determination.  Tony was unusually restrained, but regularly hit bad balls to the relatively short cover boundary for 4, skilfully finding the gaps between the fielders.  Richard did little else but talk to Tony between overs.  But the combination worked and the pair moved along at 3-4 an over to 50.  The bowling was quite friendly, but when Stokenchurch brought on a young zippy bowler that was enough to see off Richard for 15.  Tony carried on now joined by Matt E who was far more purposeful and between them they raced past 100, Tony taking Matt’s cue to play in the style he most enjoys.  Tony offered to retire and when this was turned down he instead started charging 5 yards down the pitch and so was inevitably caught for a match winning 64.  Matt’s fine knock of 35 came to an end to enable our erstwhile tour skipper to march out to the middle and hit the winning runs – TWCC’s victory by 6 wickets.  We had beaten a team which plays at the highest level in Buckinghamshire!

Scorecard
TWCC VS Stokenchurch CC 2ND JULY 2017. Proper cricket.
TWCC won the toss and opted to field.
Stokenchurch Innings: I Wilton Bld J Simon 5; M Taylor LBW Bld R Brock 31; I Hunt Bld E Howes 7; C Fardell Ct Sub Bld J Simon 2; C North Ct M Brock Bld M Edwards 37; C Taylor Ct M Edwards Bld R Brock    0; S Springett Bld M Edwards 5; S Leppard Ct J Simon Bld R Brock 5; M Leppard Bld M Brock 14; C Lees Bld H Karvay 6; S Avery not out 0.
Fall 10-1, 25-2, 31-3, 77-4, 77-5, 91-6, 104-8, 106-2, 126-10.
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 6-0-17-1; J Simon 7-1-28-2; Edwards 5-0-27-2; R Brock 4-1-26-3; Karvay 2-0-17-1; M Brock 1.1-0-3-1.
TWCC Innings: T Pearce Ct A Hunt Bld C Lees 64; R Brock Bld C Fardell 15; M Edwards Bld C Fardell 35; J Panther    not out 5; E Bunn not out 0.
TOTAL 123-3 (29 OVERS)
DNB: J Simon, O Foulger, E Howes, H Karvay, M Brock.
No bowling figures for Stokenchurch
TWCC won by 6 wickets.

Beer was enjoyed at the clubhouse but the distant hum of the motorway reminded us that we had somewhere to be and even tours have to finish at some time. With thanks to our hosts we departed. My thanks to all those who toured – it wouldn’t be possible without you all and it’s part of the heartbeat of our club. A TWCC tradition which must continue. Next year is our 125. Now that sounds like a very special tour....


Top
West Chiltington & Thakenham CC v TWCC June 25th 2017
Ahh... the glory that is West Chiltington. Or West Chiltington and Thakenham CC as the club is more properly called; home to a suite of capacious tea rooms complete with lace doylies and frilly maids all in a row, a well-stocked bar, multiple changing rooms, an electronic scoreboard, sumptious teas cooked, not just assembled, in a commercial kitchen, and, the holy grail of cricket pavilions - imagine this? - a toilet!!! How the other 99.9% live... Not that the TWCC team should be jealous, for with this high-living come expectations, and we can do without those!
Phil, West Chilt. skipper on the day, good-natured and completely in sync with the nature and conventions of Sunday cricket, was not to blame for the complete superiority of his side. A mismatch of squad, little old TWCC with its minnow resources was up against the top predator in our fixture list. But were we intending to simply bend over and invite a beating? Not a bit of it!
West Chiltington won the toss in this 40 overs/side game and, probably, just as well as it would have been awkward for us to be on our way home before tea, chose to bat first. Also, to explain, West Chiltington had, through arrangement with TWCC's skipper, Matt, provided the visitors with Andy Atkins to get their numbers up to 11, and within moments Andy felt like a regular for us. Big thanks to him for playing for us and to Phil for setting it up.
Ed and Jim opened up the TWCC bowling, and it was soon clear that TWCC were going to find it difficult to contain the exuberant strokeplay of the home side. It was a big ground, but close-mown and hard and any ball struck or glanced, that didn't go direct to a fielder, was a boundary. However, after radars were locked on, Ed and Jim found good areas and the run rate was dragged back quite nicely. Jim dropped a caught and bowled opportunity that could be said to have cost about 60 runs, but the Gazette hasn't got time to dwell on that. Jim did take a wicket as the West Chiltington No. 2 followed a slidey ball just outside the off stump and Tony (keeper for the day) took a sharp one-handed high catch in front of first slip. Matt and Sam took over the bowling and suffered from the fact that the batters were by now well in and balls ran out to the boundary with worrying frequency. Indeed, one of the batsmen was so worried by this phenomena that he took himself off to avoid the issue. The bowling wasn't bad, but the score was becoming rather a worry. "Time for Honse" the crowd called, and on he came for a fine spell. A bit of pace off, some Honse Wobble, and he had, after three overs, figures of 1 for 6 which in the context of the game was remarkable. Tom Firth - and a welcome return for Tom - also impressed with a wicket, but for all the bowlers, notwithstanding the good balls, boundaries were keeping the scoreboard humming along. Wickets helped, but the batting order was clearly packed with talent all the way down and if one young gun fell another popped up and carried on.
There's little to say other than at the 40 over half way point West Chiltington were on 231 for 5. That's a lot of runs.
Which brings us onto tea.
Firstly I have to report that here at The Gazette we have a sacking to report; hoping to pre-empt a directive from a soon-to-be-published Press Complaints Commission's investigation there is now a vacancy in the food-writing section. For here at the Gazette we pride ourselves on our fairness and like to think we retain our readers with honest unbiased reportage, but the section in last week's Gazette which sank to making fun of James' perfectly nice and tasty tea just for the sake of trying to raise a few cheap laughs with uncalled for cruel turns of phrase went beyond an acceptable level of banter and verged on taking advantage of the power of the press. The Editor should have been tougher on his staff and the piece which might well have caused offence should not have made it to publication. The Gazette owes James an apology for stooping low and for mindlessly following the tone of the local gutter press, especially since, as has been said, we actually all had a very nice tea.
Nothing like the tea at West Chiltington though!!!! Wow!! Now that's what I call a tea! Hot dogs, spicy chicken wings, (I'm not making this up!) a rainbow display of sandwiches of every hue, fruits and cakes to delight and tickle the fancy. A Bacchanalian treat indeed.
And so to our batting.
Yes. Well. I think at this point it might be simpler to concentrate on their bowling. It all started so well, with Tony taking it to them as his natural talent made light of the problems others were so soon to face. The score rattled on to 31, and Tony had four 4's and a 6 to his name when disaster struck and he was controversially given out LBW. Oh no! Tony was walking off even though he had been in no trouble and had been scoring more than freely, a disaster eclipsed only by that of seeing Jim walking in at 3. Clearly, the rubberneckers thought, there was something wrong. And they were right of course. Matt did, at least, hold his bat the right way up and managed a fine 6 at some point which was remarkable for what TWCC were facing was pace. Accurate, jiggy-jaggy up-around-your-arm-pit or on-the-stumps pace. No two ways about it, West Chilters were mullering us. Matt fell to a ball only a little less unplayable than the one that snipped off Jim's off bail before he'd begun to think about moving his bat about a bit, and then Reece... And then Tom... And then Ed... from 31 for 0 TWCC were 36 for 6. What was required was a combination of generosity from West Chiltington - and Phil did indeed take off his opening bowlers - and a miracle from TWCC.
And the name of the miracle was Sam, for, verily, it was he who was given the ball to hit and he hitteth it. A lotteth. Lotth and lotth and lotth. George hunter-esque, only I think we might have seen a defensive shot or two. Well, three. Probably. But the miracle involved others too, for it is easy to get out when hitting the ball, and Malcolm, Honse and Andy (not Charlie, who unfortunately missed out on his birthday) stayed in and all contributed in what became a remarkable afternoon's play. As already stated, the bowlers who inflicted the early damage were removed from the fray, and others were found who would give us a bit more of a chance, but that's not to say these were part-time bowlers - not at all. Ben Lucking and M Singh (West Chiltington's 2017 overseas professional) bowled pacy leg spin that turned far and jumped high, and Atkins, Boom, and Tatchell all put the ball on the spot, but when it got there more often than not it met Sam's bat and then the hedge. Yes, Sam did the damage, and got to 50 and beyond, but the other tail-enders contributed mightily; Malcolm with two 4's and Honse also with a cracking off-side boundary. But it was Sam who kept much of the strike and struck it.
Then we were 142 for 9! Oh woe. Would Sam get an extraordinary century? Unlikely, not only because it was just unlikely, but because TWCC were 9 down. Enter Andy, our supply cricketer. What a nice chap he is, and he could bat. Understandably West Chiltington thought they ought to wrap this up in their favour, so on came the opening bowlers again. That would be it, surely? But no. Not so. Andy, with four 4's and some other stuff, helped Sam up to 95. Would he nervously nudge and nurdle to a century? Oh no; a crashing 6 over long-off from the bowling of the opening bowler soon dealt with the nervous 95's. All at the ground cheered, and the home side were cheering the loudest! Not since George Hunter's remarkable innings v Wisley had anyone seen the like. And the 10th wicket partnership didn't stop there; Andy's absorbancy of the real pace man was great to watch, and staying in allowed both him and Sam to push the total on so that a remarkable win for TWCC was suddenly possible. TWCC needed 32 from the last 2 overs, and the opening bowlers were, by now, bowled out. The first ball of the 39th over was, indeed, smashed over square leg for a 6! Game on, but there followed two dots... 26 needed off the last 9 balls. Another 6 required. Big cracking hook to square leg where...oh no!... there lurked a fielder who reached up over his head and pulled in a great catch. Game over, no fairy tale ending, with TWCC on 206 all out, Andy on 23 not out and Sam with 117. A shame, of course, but it felt right. We'd seen a great innings, there were smiles all round, it had been a great catch, and Phil's generosity hadn't been too great from the home side's point of view. Given Tony's early and costly demise (and it is a shame for him and for TWCC's cause that he missed out) TWCC could have been all out for 50, but instead all players from both sides had had fun for a whole afternoon.
A lot of clapping, high fives, handshakes, smiles leading to a beer and the possibility that the minnows might be invited back after all. Thanks to Phil, Andy and West Chiltington &TCC - we hope to see you again next year.

Scorecard
West Chiltington and Thakeham CC won the toss and chose to bat first
WC&TCC Innings: I Haggart Retired 57; A Tatchell Ct wk (T Pearce) Bld J Simon 12; R Taylor Ct J Simon Bld Karvay 76; C Room Bld T Firth 0; M Singh Bld E Howes 40; B Fryer Ct J Simon Bld M Edwards 1; A Kay not out 11; D Abbott not out 22. DNB unrecorded. Extras 16 (B3, LB5, W3, NB5) Total 231 for 5.
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 8-0-30-1; J Simon 8-0-30-1; M Edwards 8-0-54-1; S Simon 7-0-52-0; H Karvay 5-0-27-1; T Firth 4-0-30-1.
TWCC Innings: T Pearce LBW R Taylor 23; M Edwards Bld D Abbott 10; J Simon Bld D Abbott 1; R Packham Bld R Taylor 0; T Firth Bld D Abbott 1; E Howes Ct, Bld O Atkins 0; S Simon Ct, Bld Singh 117; M Gasson Ct, Bld Tatchell 12; H Karvay Ct Bld Singh 5; C Howes Bld Lucking 0; A Atkins not out 23. DNB - most of the top order. Extras 14 (B4, LB4, W3, NB3) Total 206 all out.
WC&TCC Bowling: D Abbott 8-3-17-3; R Taylor 7-1-48-2; O Atkins 4-0-22-1; C Room 3-0-33-0; B Lucking 8-1-27-1; A Tatchell 3-0-21-1; M Singh 5.4-0-29-2.
WC&TCC win by 25 runs.

Top

TWCC v London Unity June 18th 2017
It was with much anticipation that TWCC rolled up to their home ground to take on their old foes on this, the hottest day of the year so far, and London Unity certainly came well prepared for life in the sun with their usual comprehensive range of beverages. Skipper Brock won the toss and, with the possibility that it might have been a concern for the comfort of his team in the hottest part of the day, he opted to bat first. This would mean that to win TWCC would need to score plenty of runs and then take 10 wickets against a side who, certainly in recent times, have proved themselves to be a hard team to beat - a euphemism for saying that the Gazette can find no record of TWCC having beaten them in the past.
So, TWCC batting first. Joe Driver opened up the bowling for Unity with some pacey and temptingly wide deliveries from the Downs End, which Paul dutifully followed and snicked past the close fielders to open his innings in a productive fashion. But the A team of Paul and James was halted in its tracks by a mystery hip/leg-strain which meant that Paul had to hobble off, retired hurt for 18. Richard and James ploughed on, though James' mind was clearly on matters catering, and his lengthy but ultimately unproductive stay at the crease came to an end when he under-edged a too-tight cut through to the keeper. This brought Reese to the middle, who, with Richard in a supportive role, began to prise open a crack in Unity's hitherto tight bowling attack. This was proper cricket: confident nurdling for easy ones and twos rather than the all or nothing approach that sometimes creeps into the TWCC game (or is it just me? Ed.) (That's "Ed." as in Editor, not "Ed" as in Ed), and, soon, with Reese providing boundaries often enough, TWCC began to dominate the game. Great timing was, as ever the hallmark of Reese's innings, and the pavilion settled down to enjoy a bout of real no probs cricket. A hot sunny day, a crowd to please (for The Unity's Barmy Army had shown up in force), who could wish for anything more? This excellent partnership ended with the total on 92 when Richard was caught off the ever reliable Mark Driver. The TWCC skipper was a little frustrated by his own lack of runs, but the point is, as far as the Gazette is concerned, that this was a steady and needed partnership and it is important to recognise the value of rotation of strike and of simply not getting out.
However, yes, in the end Richard was out and Matt Edwards came in to take over from where Richard left off by keeping the scoreboard ticking and allowing Reese the strike. Together this youthful pairing, with Reese flying ever higher, took the total on to 146 at which point, with the threat of tea looming, the batters decided to take it to the bowlers more decisively. Matt was out for a classy 15 having decided it was time to make a few runs, Edward missed the late inswing of Mark Driver and was bowled, Jim was run out, but all the time Reese was still there and was, though mysteriously still tired after his lie-in, really getting stuck in. Then, alas, the innings of the day was over; Reese, hitting out, was caught for 89, just 11 short of a century - a landmark that will surely come soon - a great innings, classy in its patience and pace.
Ed (towering shot over long-off for 4) and Sam (cracking flat-batted flat 6 over, or rather through, long-on) showed the depth of TWCC's batting talent as the innings closed on 170 for 7.
James' tea probably deserves an article all to itself given the hype surrounding this notorious annual event. And, controversially, the Gazette is coming out in full support of the Trollope approach to tea. The Gazette's food writer found, in the slimline brown sandwiches, the very essence of simple flavours that were allowed to speak for themselves. Complexity; a drizzle here and a jus there, is often overplayed but inside the deceptively lightweight Trollope carrier bag there was delight aplenty for the connoisseur - what is an egg sandwich if not two bits of bread with close-tolerance egg in the middle? You want tuna and sweetcorn? No problem - and a recognition of the fact that tuna is an endangered species should not go unnoticed - and it may well be that there isn't the sweetcorn about that there used to be. You want parma ham with mozarella and a dressed rocket and walnut salad sandwich? Go to Italy. This is Britain, or what remains of it, where in these days of austerity one cake is surely enough, for, after all, many these days are counting calories. Not only that, but following a recent survey the venerable Hickstead tea table was shown to have some structural weaknesses, and it is to James' credit that he had the forethought to keep the loading light. It has to be reported that there were some mutterings about quantity (the quality speaks for itself), but The Gazette holds that it is immoral to waste food and James' tea seemed to go round about 35 people with some to spare.
However, gastronomy aside, there was a cricket match to lose. Which, for long enough, TWCC seemed that they might fail to do. Matt Edwards and Ed were the chosen opening pair, and whilst both delivered a troubling ball it was Ed who had the success on this occasion. The first wicket, LBW to a full length ball from Ed, changed the game in an unlikely way as it brought to the middle a batter who not only must have watched and learned from every 20:20 game since the format began, but who also, given his evident energy, unlikely as it may seem might well have secured a slice of James' cake. Mr J Moore threw the bat at anything that came his way, and at plenty that didn't but he connected anyway. This beligerent and effective approach threw Matt off his length and Ed, too, began to suffer. Jim replaced Matt and was soon bowling around the wicket in an attempt to get the ball to swing into this heavy-hitting left-hander and cramp him up a bit. Moore did, indeed, begin to mis-time his swings, and then heaved at one that caught the edge of his bat and the ball skied high over Sam's head at long off. Undaunted by his initial lack of triangulation Sam simply took off and grabbed the ball with both hands high over his head and some feet off the ground; a great catch, and one which allowed TWCC to regain some of the ground lost to the swashbuckler. Ed, still bowling well, took another wicket with a catch to Richard, and Jim took another two and the grass was once again about equal in its greenness whichever side of the fence caught your eye. Sam Simon replaced Ed from the Downs End, and with a hop, skip and a jump he was soon operating on a good length and a stump was duly knocked over. However, The Unity bat deep... Archie Gane and Mark Driver settled into the bowling and saw off a tired Jim and a still sprightly Sam and began to find runs from all-comers. Honse, Joe and Richard bowled well, but the writing was on the wall and it read "Unity are going to win quite easily". And so it proved as, with three or five overs to go, the inadequate 170 was overhauled and it was hot handshakes all round.
As a rule TWCC bowl and field well enough to contain and then attack a side chasing a par score, but we didn't get the par score. There is a worrying trend building; in the last three games more than half the total runs for TWCC have been scored by one player; first Rob at Parham, then Tony against Xiles, and now Reese v Unity. More runs are needed from more players. The loss of Paul didn't help in this game, but TWCC have the players and the talent to get more runs on the board and, with a little more application, the future's fine.
The Unity deserved the win; Joe Driver, with his four overs, was a proper Sunday cricketer in his approach to the game and Mark Driver bowled for ages and then did well to see the Unity home with the bat. On the big plus side for TWCC we were treated to a fine innings from Reese, whose contribution wasn't matched elsewhere in the TWCC innings, and, most importantly, we all played cricket and whatever lies ahead in these troubled times, we can all still do that. More or less.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and batted first.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter retired hurt 18; J Trollope Ct wk Bld Columbine 2; R Brock CT, Bld M Driver 14; R Packham Ct Cockburn Bld J Clarke 89; M Edwards Ct Cockburn Bld J Clarke 15; E Bunn Bld M Driver 1; J Simon run out 0; E Howes not out 6; S Simon LBW Bld M Driver 12. DNB J Panther, H Karvay. Extras 11 (LB2, W9) Total 170 for 7.
London Unity Bowling: J Driver 4-0-7-0; S Columbine 7-2-14-1; J Williams 7-0-36-0; M Driver 12-1-48-3; D Page 5-0-48-0; J Clarke 3-0-20-2.
London Unity Innings: J Burke LBW Howes 6; Cockburn Ct R Brock Bld E Howes 14; Moore Ct S Simon Bld J Simon 27; Page Bld S Simon 12; Gane not out 71; Pitcher Bld J Simon 0; J Driver Ct E Howes Bld J Simon 2; M Driver not out 26. Extras 13 (B6, LB4, W3) Total 171 for 6.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 4-1-17-0; E Howes 8-2-29-2; J Simon 9-1-34-3; S Simon 5-0-20-1; J Panther 2-0-17-0; H Karvay 5-0-17-0; R Brock 3-0-24-0.
London Unity win by 4 wickets.

Top

TWCC v Xiles June 11th 2017
In the absence of either regular captain, Joe Panther stepped up to the mark, taking on not only the on-field captaincy but also the task of raising a side of eleven players. This brought old acquaintances Mark and Malcolm back into the game and also a new player to us, Ed's brother, Charlie. Experience and youth, what could go wrong? Taking his duties seriously, TWCC's debut skipper started off by winning the toss - a knack which Skipper Brock might do well to pick up.
Ed, pride of TWCC, steamed in from the Downs End, but on this occasion the cricket muse was not with him. He was unlucky in that an edge wasn't safely gathered in, but though no batter found him an easy proposition, he was on this occasion slightly expensive and ended a lengthy 10 over spell with a big fat zero in the wickets column. A good job, then, that TWCC had Honse with his Zen wobblies to shore up the attack from the Pavilion End. However Honse, too, was not on the same form as he had shown on his previous outing in Parham. Rather wide and of unsure length, Honse's bowling was not, on this occasion, the way forward, so Joe turned to Jim hoping to regain some control. This, after a loose ball or two, he was able to do, and scoring slowed whereupon Ed, too, at the Downs end, relaxed and bowled more like his old self - a demonstration of the value of the bowlers working well in tandem from both ends. Bowling, at its most successful, is a partnership, and relative freedom at one end rubs off on the batters' and bowler's approach at the other (let's hope the grammar held up there... Ed.). The Xiles' opening batsmen began to get a little frustrated and with that came wickets and a growing understanding that the visitors had not brought perhaps their strongest side. A flurry of wickets and TWCC were on top. Jo, replaced Ed, and although inconsistent at first he soon had three wickets to his name - including finding himself bowling for a hat-trick. We all duly gathered round, but it wasn't to be. Charlie Howes, on his debut, struggled probably because he hadn't played cricket for two years, but he did home in on the stumps and showed he's a cricketer at heart in his three allotted overs. Edward had a couple of overs, during which Jim dropped a square cut cleverly aimed by the batsman straight at his left thumb rather than into the palm of his hands, so he ended his spell wicketless, as did Mark Panther who decided to show us all his variations during his one over. Time for tea - Xiles closed their innings on 169 for 7; a target for TWCC somewhat voluntarily elevated, but about right in the interests of providing a challenge of the right magnitude. The general fielding of TWCC deserves a mention too - compared to many of our opposition the home side's energy and commitment is well above average.
Maybe the slight absence of depth in their batting was going to be explained by the visitors having a side packed with demon bowlers? There was, indeed, plenty of youth about, but the dead bat of James Trollope and flashing blade of Tony Pearce soon had the measure of the Xiles' opening bowlers. James, never in trouble until the moment he decided not to play his natural game, provided the perfect foil for Tony's aggression. It may on the face of it have been, for James, disappointing to have been on single figures when Tony passed 50, but the whole point is that the partnership was working. Tony would maybe be facing at the start of an over, and he was finding boundaries. Then, at some point, there'd be a single, and though James would do what he could to make runs, if he failed to score there Tony would be at the start of the next over to set about the bowling once again. Frustrating for James, and frustration in the end was his undoing, but for TWCC their partnership was pretty much perfect. Tony was, happily not literally, on fire. The match was, even with TWCC's notorious ability to collapse, in the bag by the time Tony was caught off the bowling of Raj (some compensation for his golden duck) on 97 -
fifteen 4's, three 6's - just three runs short of a century. Unsurprisingly this was the match-winning performance for when Tony was out the total was 162 and TWCC only needed eight more for the win. Edward, too, showed that his 2017 form is the real thing, and although Jim, at 4, proved that the bowling was a lot harder to deal with than everyone had thought - it was he who clonked the ball behind square to hit the winning runs.
Xiles generally come with greater strength, but there was little they could do about their total once their higher order batters had fallen, and once Tony had the measure of the visitors' attack there was little they could do with the ball.
A comfortable win for the home side, a great debut skipmanship for Joe, and TWCC here we go!!

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and elected to field first.
Xiles innings: Hartley LBW J Simon 42; Hooper Ct Wk (T Pearce) Bld J Simon 17; Williams Bld J Simon 3; Bailey Ct Wk (T Pearce) Bld J Panther 43; Joe Ct & Bld J Simon 6; Bennett LBW J Panther 0; Hannant not out 35; Raj ct Wk (T Pearce) Bld J Panther 0; Hales not out 15. DNB Tony, Williams. Extras 8 (B1, W7) Total 169 for 7.
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 10-1-42-0; H Karvay 3-1-24-0; J Simon 12-2-24-4; J Panther 7-0-34-3; C Howes 3-0-18-0; E Bunn 2-0-12-0; M Panther 1-0-14-0.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope Bld Mick 14; T Pearce Ct, Bld Raj 97; E Bunn not out 22; J Simon not out 5. DNB O Foulger, M Gasson, J Panther, E Howes, M Panther, H Karvay, C Howes. Extras - wait for it... 36 (B10,W23, NB3) Total 173 for 2.
Xiles Bowling: Bailey 5-1-21-0; Joe 5-0-36-0; Tony 6-1-23-0; Mick 6-1-22-1; Hannant 3-0-11-0; Gareth 4-0-28-0; Raj 2.3-0-18-1.
TWCC win by 8 wickets.

Top
Parham CC v TWCC  June 4th 2017
TWCC once again convened at the distant outpost of Parham, this time to face a slightly depleted Parham CC team. Ever congenial, Parham's skipper Andy and our equally amenable skipper Richard agreed it might be best for TWCC to bat first, and also for TWCC to provide a couple of fielders and even batters for the home side should the need arise. All jolly good proper friendly Sunday cricket stuff.
James, keen to progress further into the game than he managed the previous week, did, indeed successfully weather the brunt of the excellent opening spells of Fraser and Huffer, both who got the ball to deviate from the straight and generally jump about on the quirky Parham wicket, but Reese fared less well, as, indeed, did Matt E. So in came Jim at an unnacustomed, adventurous and early No.4, and he rode his luck for a handy 21 before his inability to move at any reasonable rate between the wickets resulted in his being run out - by Honse! New to the Gazette is Tim Carthew who immediately looked the part, angling his bat down in a way Jim could only dream of. Indeed does dream of. During his time at the crease Tim looked like the proper cricketer he is; untroubled where some others struggled. In the end he was
out for a fine 41 falling to the Speigel-like bowling of Jim Mitchell, but his was a defining and platform-setting contribution indeed.
Moving on, Edward B, carrying on his fine 2017 form, was cruelly undone by a quirk of quantum physics as some dark matter spontaneously materialised outside his leg stump which caused the ball to dive through a transient worm hole and clatter onto the leg stump - it was a bemusing and unfortunate end to his innings. This brought Rob, batting at an unaccustomed No.7 position, to the crease. Parham know Rob well, and seeing him down at seven they must have either thought that we had six more potent players in the squad than Rob, or that our skipper had had a wobbly moment (regular readers may be able to work it out for themselves).
Ed Howes' innings, after Tim's self-destruction, was short and s...hort, which left Honse to share a partnership of 60 with Rob - of which Honse's contribution was a valuable six runs and lots of running. Nine 4's and six 6's later, with 4, 6, 6, 6, 1 to his name off the last over alone, at the end of TWCC's innings Rob tucked his smoking bat under his arm and made for the pavilion on 95 not out. A great knock and a joy to watch - maybe this will convince our Skip to give him a try up the order at 6. 
The Parham bowling was tight and difficult particularly at the start of TWCC's innings, with late swing and movement off the pitch from Fraser. More bowling options would have helped Parham's cause, and effective though Jim Mitchell's style of slow bowling can be, on this occasion although it did bring two wickets it was also expensive. TWCC were 192 at the end of the innings, their somewhat mediocre batting performance masked by Tim's fine 40 and Rob's excellent 95.
Tea on the Parham house lawn (how many of us are privileged to live with a cricket ground at the back of their houses...? Oh...) was the usual occasion of calories and conviviality, but TWCC were itching to make use of the bowling conditions that Parham had so clearly enjoyed. Matt opened the bowling for TWCC, and although his pace was well up, a fuller length might have brought him more rewards in the wickets column. At the other end Honse well-wibble-wobbled the ball about - in, out, slow, low, high - very difficult for the batsmen and he took out Mark Williams who was missed in the Parham bowling attack and whose edge to Edward B at first slip wasn't. Joe, stepping in to help Parham because he didn't get to bat for his own side, didn't get to bat for Parham either being bowled in short order by a jaffa from Honse. A run-out and then Parham were 30 for 4 when Matt Edwards bowled a full-length ball to get rid of Fraser, that brought… Matt Edwards to the crease; TWCC's second offer of a batter to bolster Parham's squad. Matt showed plenty of resilience, though in the end none of the remaining Parham batting line-up had an answer to Ed Howes' full and straight approach to bowling. It was a remarkable spell, with 4 (all bowled) wickets for 24 off 6.1 overs. Ed mopped up again.
Highpoints; Rob's 95, Tim's 40, Ed's four wickets and Honse's ability to move an old ball about both ways and vary his pace so well. Team Manager Brocky did a great job, though without batting or bowling perhaps he's proved his generous and unselfish nature by now and should give himself more of a game next time.

Scorecard
No tossing required
TWCC Innings: J Trollope Bld Fraser 11; R Packham Bld Fraser 0; M Edwards Ct Mitchell Bld Fraser 1; J Simon Run Out 21; T Carthew Ct Balchin Bld Mitchell 40; E Bunn Bld (well... played on around the corner) Fraser 6; R Rydon Not Out 95; E Howes Ct Huffer Bld Mitchell 0; H Karvay Not Out 6. DNB J Panther, R Brock. Extras 12 (W7, NB1, B2, LB2) Total 192 for 7.
Parham CC Bowling: P Fraser 12-2-45-4; S Huffer 13-2-57-0; S Forrest 8-0-29-0; J Mitchell 7-0-62-2.
Parham CC Innings: A Wales Bld Howes 14; M Williams ct Bunn Bld Karvay 13; J Panther Bld Karvay 0; J Balchin Run Out (?) 4; P Fraser Bld Edwards 0; M Edwards Bld Howes 8; S Forrest Bld Howes 16; S Huffer Not Out 26; J Mitchell Bld Howes 0. Extras 9 (W1, B5, LB3) Total 90 all out.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 5-1-18-1; H Karvay 7-1-19-2; E Howes 6.1-1-24-4; J Panther 4-0-21-0.
TWCC win by winning.


Top
Bolney CC v TWCC  May 28th 2017
Excellent game at Bolney.
Very good tea (although the Coronation Chicken sandwiches were missing).
James out second ball, everyone had a bat. We were all out far too early and so Bolney seemed to have ages of extra time to bat, even with a rain delay.
Joe bowled out their MCC apprentice in his first over, and then we spent some time chasing leather. It looked like we would lose by nine wickets. Then Honse pulled off a great catch and chipped in with some wickets. They only needed four an over for the last twenty overs and were cruising home until Honse’s straight deliveries bamboozled the batsmen. Boundaries, wickets, run outs all meant they needed 3 off the last over with seven wickets down and Ed steaming in. Another run out off the first ball and the No. 10 couldn’t lay a bat on the remaining five balls.
We enjoyed it so much we all had a beer in their pavilion (and then some more at the Royal Oak).

Scorecard
TWCC Batting: J Trollope Ct 0; M Edwards Bld 34;    J Rowland Bld 7; R Packham Bld 22; R Rydon Ct Wk 53; E Bunn LBW 1; T Edwards Bld 19; J Panther Bld 1; E Howes Bld 8; H Karvay not out 0. Extras 8 (B3, LB3, W2) Total  153 all out.
Bolney CC Bowling: Chaffey 12-2-55-3; Patton 9.2-2-44-5; Morris 4-1-13-0; Bowles 7-0-35-1.
Bolney CC Batting: Bushell Bld Panther 0; Morris Ct Karvay Bld R Rydon 53; Bunce Bld Karvay 68; Charside Ct Panther Bld Karvay 6; Clemesen Bld Howes 5; Briage Bld Karvay 7; Moore Run Out (?) 3; Patton Run Out (?) 0; Madden Not Out 0. DNB Chaffey. Extras 5 (B2, W3) Total 151 for 9.
TWCC Bowling: E Howes 12-3-27-1; J Panther 6-0-24-1; M Edwards 10-2-31-0; R Rydon 8-2-19-1; H Karvay 6-0-32-3; T Edwards 3-0-17-0.
Match an excellent and exciting Draw!


Top

Lindfield CC v TWCC  May 21st 2017
We were an all star cast – the type of team you would normally pay to appear at your cricket festival. Players had flown in from across the world to congregate on lucky Lindfield.  We had social media stars, rock stars (apologies for the slightly deceitful use of plurals) joining our line up – fitting in as ever they have with our merry group – personifying the old adage of not forgetting your roots.  So it was a strong looking team which descended on this pretty ground in one of Sussex’s loveliest villages.  The skipper turned up late and – with yet more apologies, this time for the confessional nature of this write up – I believe this impacted on the whole strategy.  Because by the time he’d lost his third toss in a row and faffed around getting ready, Reese and Paul had set about the opposition attack with great gusto.  Reese in particular was smacking the ball to all parts of the boundary with dismissive ease.  Paul for once was the support player.  While this mayhem was going on, the batting line up was not yet written.  But seeing the opening pair swatting away the bowling attack, the skipper rashly allowed himself to believe this was to be a walk in Lindfield’s rather pleasant park.  So the batting line up was written to reflect this and to give lower order batsmen their time in the middle.   You can never be too old or too wise to remember that this game specialises in whipping round and biting you on the backside.  And so it came to pass that with Reese’s departure for a high energy, San Miguel infused 37 Mikey strode out and showed the classic pose and elegance which have helped him not one jot acquire his celebrity.  They helped him very little on this occasion too because he scored but 3 before handing over to the next superstar in our line up, Sam Simon.  Showing the well known signs of a hangover from the TWCC’s former players reunion party (Vietnamese branch) which he had but recently enjoyed with Sam Morrison,  the young rock star missed his cue and was clean bowled for 0.  With a talent packed tail sitting impatiently in the sun, it was left to Honse and Joe to move things on.  Joe hit a few powerful and technically adept shots for his 15 but their departure, and that of Paul for a quiet 21 meant that we had gone from a roaring 52 without loss to 63-4.  So what of that tail?  Well two of those very capable of scoring 50s were Ed and Matt – but both failed to shine.  And so it was that with the score on 83-7 we were suddenly the 9th wicket partnership of Edward and Richard.  And this was a good spell.  They played sensibly against some good bowling, especially the young leg spinner who was getting a considerable amount of turn from an otherwise flat pitch.  The score crept up on the cricketometer, having passed the disastrous mark, started rowing back, even reversing through the `poor` zone as these two veterans rode their luck and even played some good shots. By the time Edward was caught for 34 the score was 150 – but with this being an 80 over match, we needed to bat for another 6/7 overs and put on another 30 runs.  Jim was the eleventh man, hampered by a muscle strain which had a curious side effect of causing him to swish madly at a ball on the middle stump but 5 balls into his innings.  We had scored 162.  It was respectable and could have ensured a close match.  Sadly it was not to be.  As soon as the opening batsman removed the bail and knocked it twice into the ground of his crease as his own personal marker, you got the impression he’d batted before.  He wasn’t showy – but he was settling for a big innings.  Matt bowling downhill had a great spell, mean and keen and regularly whistling past the edge of the bat.  Ed found the task of bowling uphill tougher and struggled to find his rhythm.  However, the team is still learning the range of talent this latest acquisition to the TWCC ranks possesses – and catching is most certainly one of them.  Fielding at deep gulley, a catch flew off the bat of the talented young opener who had been showing the sort of form that has apparently brought him to the attention of Sussex CCC.  Ed dived forward, full length and stretching out an arm managed to get his hand under the ball an inch from the ground.  As he rolled over his reward was Jim, Joe Panther, Reese and others piling on top of him. Football celebrations had arrived on a cricket pitch in Lindfield.  The presence on the boundary of Albion’s LEGENDARY former chairman Dick Knight may be thought to have had an impact on the celebrations.   Joe too could not cope with the uphill slope and so Richard brought himself on with what has become a trademark first over:  a terrible ball wide of the wicket, the batsman reaches and is caught – this time in the deep, another fine catch, this one by Joe.  This brought in another more than capable batsman, and the two pushed on towards what was already an inevitable victory.  Sam and Mikey both showed rustiness in their bowling, Edward failed to produce the magic.  But the path to defeat had a spectacular detour – another stupendous catch from Ed, this time at slip, once again full length, this time low down and one handed to his right – one of the best catches seen for years by a TWCC side – and enough to convince Mikey that as far as his bowling is concerned, he’s `not lost it`.
And so it was that we lost by 6 wickets against a good cricketing side.  No shame in that.  Our middle order collapse (8-49) cost us dear as did a couple of run out chances fluffed by the skipper.  On the plus side we took catches we rarely would and our fielding was sharp and tight.  And it was a beautiful sunny afternoon, a pleasant place to enjoy an after-match pint from Lindfield’s very own bar.  On an afternoon dripping with celebrities we may have tasted defeat but we can proudly say Twineham’s Got Talent.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and were asked to bat

TWCC Innings: P HunterLBWBld Steadman 21; R Packham Ct, Bld Green 37; M Pearce Ct, Bld Green 3; J Panther Ct, Bld Steadman 15; S Simon Bld Green 0; H Karvay Ct Wk Bld Green 1; E Bunn Ct, Bld Tanvee 34; E Howes Bld Green 0; M Edwards Bld Tanvee 12; R Brock Not Out 19; J Simon Bld Pedley 6.
TOTAL  162 all out. Fall  52-2, 63-1, 63-3, 63-5, 82-4, 83-6, 83-8, 101-9, 150-7, 162-11.
Lindfield bowling: Pedley 6.5-1-36-1; Green 9-0-30-5; Steadman 5-0-29-2; Tanvee 8-0-21-2; Storer 6-0-46-0.


Lindfield Innings: R Chaudry Ct Howes Bld M Pearce 50; T Chaudry Ct Howes Bld Edwards 25; I Jackson Ct Panther Bld Brock 11; D Frieber Ct Karvay Bld Brock 25; L Lowe Not Out 25; A Pedley Not Out 7.
Total 166-4.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 9-1-21-1; E Howes 6-0-29-0; Panther 3-0-14-0; S Simon 5-0-21-0; Brock 7-0-35-2;Bunn 4-0-15-0; M Pearce 2-0-16-1; Karvay 1-0-14-0.

Lindfield won by 6 wickets.


Top
TWCC v Greys  May 14th 2017
It was 9.22 on Sunday morning.  A beautiful blue sky, warm sunshine, the grass swaying in the breeze.  But was that a cloud on the horizon…. The phone buzzed signalling a text message - `I’m not going to be able to play today Brocky – sorry` This particular player was also bringing a friend – we were down to 9.
9.23 another buzz.  `Brocky I have gone down with man flu, I’m feeling terrible, Tony`
9.30 Oh Lord, another buzz `I told the wife about cricket at a party. She agreed then but it could change…`
To cut a long story short, it was the 9 man remnants of a once healthy TWCC team who hobbled and wheezed their way to the ground to be told the toss had been lost and they were to field for the next two and a half hours -  a situation exacerbated after two balls when Jonathan twanged his groin.  So with just 4 bowlers available and a very limited number of fielders able to run we were going to need tight bowling and wickets.  Ed bowling from the playground end got great pace and made the all important breakthrough, an edge hobbled – sorry – gobbled up by Jonathan.  At the pavilion end, Joe was bowling into the wind and bowling really well, stifling the batsmen.  Ed’s pace was causing all sorts of problems and he too was very economical.  The two of them kept going for an hour, Ed took a second wicket, Joe’s sharp throw to Jonathan led to a run out and Greys were limited to just 43 runs in that first hour, a remarkable feat with just 9 fielders.  Richard took over from Ed and perhaps undeservedly stole the headlines with a hat-trick comprised of a feathered catch to Jonathan, a caught and bowled and a shouldered snick to John Riley at slip.  Suddenly Greys were 6 down and Twineham continued to keep the pressure on.  Honse bowled a good tight spell and picked up a deserved wicket, Tony took a sharp catch at gulley to give the skipper his fourth wicket.  Mark Panther deserves a special mention because the ball seemed to be following him round the field and he did a great job scampering and retrieving.  We had put down a few catches, but this was one TWCC’s great bowling and fielding efforts with just 4 bowlers used and by the end Greys had been limited to 124-8.
Unfortunately tea was ruined because Richard had failed to check the urn was lit – so whilst the food was OK there was no tea!  By the time the urn offered hot water, tea was provided to mark the break between an hour’s batting and the final 20 overs when play was halted for a few minutes.
The batting order presented another challenge.  Jonathan ruled himself out.  James (groin) was hobbling, Tony agreed to join him as opener only so he could go home to his sick bed as soon as he was out.   And we were but 9…. But the human spirit is a remarkable thing – and James and Tony showed plenty of it.  Playing a type of walking cricket, they picked up where the bowlers had left off:  playing a sensible and responsible game, nothing wild.  Putting their ailments to one side they batted out the first hour and took us almost half way to our target before James was caught.  They’d seen off numerous bouncers, some good spin bowling and adversity.  But John and Ed both followed swiftly and at 68-3 things looked precarious.  However Tony battled on and with useful support from Richard, they put on 46 for the 4th wicket and took us to 11 runs from victory.  But this remarkable match had one more twist.  Tony was out for a magnificent 65 leaving Joe and Honse the responsibility to see us home, with only Mark still left to bat.  But see us home they did and they completed one of TWCC’s finest wins, in the context of available and fit players.  It was a victory of for great teamwork – and I should add that was the same off the pitch too – the players even cleared up and washed up for Richard while he was batting.   We may be a small club, but by jeepers, we can sometimes be quite remarkable and this was just one of those occasions.

Scorecard
Greys won the toss and elected to bat
Greys innings: Line run out (J Panther) 4; Brasher Ct WK (Rowland) Bld Howes 10; Flinn Ct WK (Rowland) Bld R Brock 38; Ashton Ct T Pearce Bld Howes 0; Burgess not out 29; Edwards Ct and Bowled R Brock 0; Dykes Ct Riley Bld Brock 0; McHugh Bld Karvay 10; Gallagher Ct T Pearce Bld R Brock 11; Newland not out 8.
TOTAL 124-8
TWCC BOWLING: Howes 11-3-31-2; Brock 12-2-34-4; Panther 8-1-15-0; Karvay 8-1-39-1.
TWCC INNINGS: J Trollope Ct, Bld McHugh 22; T Pearce Bld Ashton 65; J Riley LBW McHugh 6; E Howes Ct WK Bld McHugh 0; R Brock Bld Ashton 20; H Karvay not out 3; J Panther not out 0.
TOTAL 128 – 5 DNB M Panther, J Rowland
Fall 58-1, 68-3, 68-4, 114-5, 121-2
Greys bowling: Gallagher 7-1-22-0; Newland 8-2-17-0; Dykes 6-0-21-0; McHugh 10-0-29-3; Ashton 5.1-1-19-2.
TWCC win by 3 wickets.

Top

Streat and Westmeston v TWCC May 7th 2017
As always a TWCC season is still under construction for this most pleasurable of fixtures, held, as it is, at the iconic Streat and Westmeston ground in the first flush of early summer. Feeling confident in his youthful side, Skipper Edwards won the toss and opted to bat. In order to win TWCC would need to both put runs on the board and to take wickets.
So, to bat. James and Pete went in at 1 and 2, and it was reassuring to have James' reassuring opening presence back after he missed the first game of the season. Pete missed out on this occasion, falling to the Spiegel spell, but James and Jonathan (3) weathered both the tight and lengthy spell from Hartfield, and the continued Spiegel challenge from the Posh House End.
Progress was, necessarily, relatively slow. No devil-may-care approach here - pushes for one or even two, the occasional boundary - James and Jonathan were building a fine platform for the long batting line up to capitalise on as the innings progressed. James eventually fell to a simple catch at point that would have been impossible far Matt (substitute fielder) to fail to take. James' steadying innings, characterised by a solid defence and a maximum capitalisation on over-pitched balls included a trademark Trollope 6.
James eventually out for a fine steadying 30 brought Reese in at four, at the beginning of his own 2017 campaign, who looked to accelerate the proceedings, and the hearty smack of well-timed forceful shots began to reverberate around the landscape. Forceful and productive, yes, but also short-lived, as were George Hunter's Tom Firth's offerings.
Jonathan, meanwhile, continued to hold up his end with his usual dedication. When he did engage full power there was a boundary, but the Jonathan style is to push the ball for ones and twos, dissecting an attack rather than over-committing. Classy and cultured, he was out for 42 having ensured that TWCC were going to get enough runs.
With James and Jonathan having set the example it was time for another partnership. Step up Edward and Matt. Edward was skipping about, running quick singles and twos, defending and timing it well and regularly finding the boundary. Matt too, with his classic stance and clarity of thought, dealt with a Streat attack which wasn't varied but was consistently tight. A great partnership of 57 runs, Matt out to Stan for 30 and Edward unbeaten and untroubled for 43; top score of the day. TWCC had an impressive 198 on the board. Enough runs, yes, but now comes the other part.
Glossing over tea - Matt and Jim opened with the ball, and this time the catches stuck for Jim and not for Matt. Jonathan, the man for the gloves when he's with us, held on to a couple of sharp chances, including one off Jim's first ball. With both openers out of the way for 0, TWCC were off - as was Jim with a hamstring injury. Matt continued with no success in the wickets column, but also without much activity in the runs department either. Joe took over from Jim, and all was well with the TWCC campaign: Street and Westmeston were not going to win in spite of two notable points of resistance in the shape of Colin Marshall (44) and Simon Barrs (41). However, in order for TWCC to win, nine wickets needed to be taken by the visiting side. Enter the Eds!
Ed Howell replaced Matt and his direct approach paid off. "Why not just bowl at the stumps" thought Ed, so he did and knocked them over twice. Full yorkers, clean and clinical. Ed is a great new talent for TWCC going forward, with bat and ball.
So… To the other Ed. Hot from his run-fest Edward Bunn brought about the demise of four Street and Westmeston players; a stumping, a caught behind, an outfield catch by James and a clean bowled to finish the match with just a few balls left in which to do it.
A great fielding performance, including a run out from Tom Firth, and TWCC secured a second victory of the season. James' 30 and Jonathan's 42 together with his three catches plus a stumping deserve special mentions, but clearly, with 43 classy runs and four wickets to his name the man of the match award goes to Edward.
Certainly a contender for shot of the day was Stan's late cut to third man late in the day, but the best, most pleasantly crickety shot was, in the opinion of the Editor, Edward's straight-batted clip off his pads behind square leg for four. Proper class and a great boost both for him and for TWCC as they head into what I feel is going to be, with the players we have, a vintage TWCC season.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and batted first
TWCC Innings: J Trollope Ct M Edwards Bld Forster 30; P Matthews ct, blld S Spiegel 0; J Rowland Bld Forster 42; R Packham Bld Forster 42; G Hunter Bld Brand 12; T Firth Bld Brand 13; E Bunn not out 43; M Edwards Ct, Bld Spiegel 30; E Howes not out 0. DNB J Simon, J Panther. Extras 10 (B3, LB3, W2, NB2) Total 198 for 7.
Streat and Westmeston Bowling: Hartfield 14-1-61-0; S Spiegel 8-0-47-2; Forster 12-1-51-2; Brand 8-1-31-2.
Streat & Westmeston Innings: C Mansfield Ct Rowland (wk) Bld J Simon 0; B Mayston Ct Rowland (wk) Bld J Simon 0; C Marshall Bld E Howe 44; S Barrs not out 41; S Forster St Rowland Bld Bunn 2; Brand Bld Howe 5; B Baxter Run Out (T Firth) 4; R Griffith Ct Rowland (wk) Bld Bunn 1; S Spiegel Ct Trollope Bld Bunn 7; M Hartfield Bld Bunn 2. Extras 3 (W2, NB10 Total 107-ish all out.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 10-3-25-0; J Simon 8-0-18-2;J Panther 6.4-0-27-0; E Howe 9-4-19-2; E Bunn 6-2-16-4.
TWCC win by 3 wickets, or actually, by getting the other side out before they got as many runs as TWCC did.
Injuries: J Simon, P Matthews, J Trollope.

Top


TWCC v Wisley CC April 30th 2017
Wisley had won the toss and opted to bat first, and it was tough going. The damp hay lying around in the outfield prevented even a well-struck ball from travelling far, and, as the ball softened, it took beefier and beefier hits to even make it as far as the ring of fielders. It was to be a day of pushes for singles, snicks and chances.
However, before we get ahead of ourselves, the match opened with a new dry ball, and this did move about a bit whilst it was fresh, and Matt and Jim did their best with it. Matt found a length that troubled batsmen, keeper and slips alike, and a scuffed leg-glance from opener Richards (O) brought about a swift run out as the batsmen took on a second run when a single would have been a better idea. Matt ran and Jim trundled in for a few overs and the lively early-season wicket duly produced a few knicks some of which were safely gathered in. Matt ended his spell with three wickets to his name for only 14 runs - a great start to his season so, as always, we hope this success continues so that Skipper Brock will be forced to create some new and even more fantastical customised statistics for us to enjoy at the AGM.
Honse, replacing Jim at the Pavilion End, immediately troubled the batters and caused a false stroke that resulted in a fine running catch by Ed Howes in the covers. Not content with his catch, Ed, when he replaced Matt at the Downs End, started his TWCC career with a wicket maiden; a full length, full pace, delivery lightly swiping off the off bail - a connoisseur's wicket.
Meanwhile, from the Wisley perspective, only P. Richards and, to a lesser extent, Kerrigan, scored significant runs, and, as tea loomed, these two began to more regularly find the boundary. Joe's second ball was carted half way up the tall poplar tree at square leg by Richards - the only 6 of the match -  but Joe came back well as he found his form to end with two wickets to his name.
"The worst ball I saw the whole day!" was how wicket-keeper Pearce described Skipper Brock's first ball when Ed was replaced. However it was nonetheless a ball that took a wicket. Yes...the first ball of Brocky's  2017 campaign provoked an unwise swipe from the high-scoring Richards who gave Joe a catch to juggle with at gully. A second edge to Tony and Brocky had two wickets, Wisley were all out for 105 and we had Guinness cake for tea!! How good was that? Always nice to see the Hunter family with or without cake, but better with obviously.
Time to see what TWCC could make of the batting conditions. Wisley, of course, didn't have a nice dry shiny ball with which to bowl, but they made a good fist of the hand they were dealt, and after sixteen overs TWCC had scored but 25 runs - but neither did the newly refurbished scoreboard sport a wind-blown tin in the wickets department. Pete Matthews on his debut for the club, and Paul showed no nerves as they applied themselves to simply being patient in the task of overtaking a low Wisley total. They nudged, blocked, scampered for ones and slowly wore out the opposition which was just what was required as low totals sometimes take some getting. Neither opener was finding it easy to time the ball, whether due to the wet and windy conditions or to early-season rust, but when the first wicket fell the total was 29 and that only left 77 to go. Surely TWCC couldn't lose from here? Well, of course we could - but we didn't. Tony briefly opened his season's account with a characteristically brisk 16 which included two rare 4's, and then Ed, with a four off his fifth ball, and Paul who began to relax and open the throttle, settled the result. Ed didn't see the innings through, and neither did Edward, but Paul did as he and Matt E stayed put. Paul needed three for a season-opening 50 when the scores were tied, and so he hit a four to take TWCC home and him to 51 not out. A fifty in the day's conditions was, we decided after he'd bought a jug of Harveys, worth a hundred so we asked him if he'd buy another one. I can't remember whether or not he did.
A TWCC win, Pete and Ed settled in, we can look forward to Streat next week with some anticipation.

Scorecard
Wisley won the toss and elected to bat.
Wisley Innings: O Richards run out 1; Fletcher Ct E Bunn Bld Edwards 9; Reed Ct Howes Bld Karvay 13; Swan Ct Matthews Bld Edwards 0; Remish Ct Pearce (wk) Bld Edwards 4; P Richards Ct Panther Bld Brock 31; Domingo Bld Howe 0; Kerrigan Bld Panther 18; Snelling Ct Pearce (wk) Bld Brock 3; Frackash not out 7; J Richards Ct Brock Bld Panther 10. Extras 9 (LB1, W6, NB2) 105 all out.
TWCC Bowling: Edwards 8-3-14-3; J Simon 7-1-16-0; Karvay 5-0-23-1; Howes 5-1-16-1; Panther 5.3-1-22-2; R Brock 5-1-13-2.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter not out 51; P Matthews Bld J Richards 14; T Pearce Ct (wk) Bld Ramesh 16; E Howes Bld Mark 13; E Bunn Ct, Bld Snelling 0; M Edwards not out 3. DNB J Simon, J Panther, J Karvay, R Brock. Extras 13 (B3, LB1, W8, NB1) Total #SCOREBOOKCONTROVERSY 110 for 4.
TWCC win by 6 wickets.

TWCC 2016 Season
Top of page
Streat and Westmeston v TWCC
May 1st 2016  
Paul and James played very sensible cricket in the face of particularly excellent bowling from Hartfield at the Downs End. Any team's first game would have a tinge of rustiness in many quarters, and though no lack of competence was visible, there was a calm acceptance of the need to find one's feet about how TWCC's openers chose to deal with some tight and challenging bowling. No thrashing, no worries about "slow starts," just take some time, watch the ball and get into the game. A great start was presented to the TWCC cause by James and Paul; the platform laid down for whatever TWCC wanted to make of the day.
Paul's new bat, one of two making their debuts, appeared to be doing a great job, six 4's winging to the boundary, then he had a bit of a heave at a ball outside leg without connecting, prompting the unhelpful umpire (cough) to point out that it might be a new bat but the same old head was behind the decision-making process. The next ball and Paul thought he wouldn't hit out, that'd show 'em. So instead of playing the natural and effective Hunter game, he played a calm little push out to the leg side, missed a slow droopy delivery and was bowled middle-and- leg. Out for 35 having all but seen off the opening bolwers maybe Paul should have just whacked it and next time I think he probably will.
James meanwhile was still there, taking every advantage of Streat's short boundary by popping the ball to it and often over it, and he was joined by Reese who looked good, timed the ball well and then was out LBW. Rusty maybe, but looks good for the rest of the season.
In strode Matt E. Every inch a cricketer he hit three 4's in his quick innings of 14, eventually out LBW. There was a pattern emerging; watch the straight ones; they're stopping and not getting up on this early-season wicket.
Then to the crease to replace the Vice-Captain the Cap himself strode out. He too meant business as he pushed the ball around in a cultured and thoughtful way; pickng off bad balls and rotating the strike as he could, he accumulated as James continued to score past his 50 and onwards. James was in top form - rather worrying so early in the season - and carried on through to his century. What an innings! No nervous 90's here; ending with 4,4,6,4 he retired on 101 not out to give others a go.
Wielding the second new bat of the day Edward was soon dancing about in the middle taking quick singles, backing up over half way and offering to sprint through; this kind of energetic performance promises much for the rest of Edward's season, but in the end he swung and missed and was out for 9. Jim came in to watch Richard throwing caution to the four winds as he took his innings to 41 not out. Fine runs - well done Skip - and TWCC closed the innings with an impressive 245 for four on the board, off 43 overs.
It is, of course, of some interest to note the bowling performace of Streat and Westmeston, which did have its moments, but perhaps not quite enough of them. The opener Hartfield as mentioned above was the most effective and asked the most questions in his spell, and he was joined at the outset by Millis (younger) who was a bit erratic but on occasion bowled a most difficult ball. Anthony, first change at the House End, found it hard at first to drop into a rhythm but was soon in amongst the wickets bowling some testing off-spin on a good length. Sadly an early-season strain took its toll and he withdrew when he might well have taken more than the two wickets that appear in the analysis. Other bowling was expensive, not helped by the proximity of the boundary nearest the pavilion, and, perhaps also not by the opportunities to score that the bowling offered.
Streat and Westmeston's reply to a truly impressive 245 began well enough, though slowly, as batters Butler and Mansfield defied the best efforts of Matt Edwards and Jim with the ball. Both bowled with good control and it was Matt who, with a golden moment of quality fielding, picked up on the run and threw down the stumps to run out the impressive Mansfield for 29 and thus open the door to expose the rest of the batsmen. Matt duly followed up this excellent fielding with a wicket off his bowling (Honse at mid-on?) and TWCC were begining to move through the game. Skipper Brock had to go and earn some money so Skipper Edwards took over the reins and replaced a wicketless Jim with Kevin Scott who bowled with excellent drift and verve. Matt E also put Matt B on in his own place who was a bit wayward but feisty and good to watch - there's nothing like pace in your side - though on this occasion he was unsuccessful in hitting the stumps, though he did hit quite a lot of other things.
This was all good fun, but Streat were only two wickets down and had well over a hundred on the board and it was quite possible that TWCC's 245 was under threat...
Matt turned to the Bunn and Karvay partnership, and it won TWCC the game. Honse bowled, I think, the best spell of his career; a full ten overs of quality deception, varying his pace and making the most of the conditions. His two wickets for 38 took the middle out of the home side's line up and shifted the momentum in favour of TWCC. One must also mention Honse's fielding; energetic and effective he patrolled the very short Pavilion boundary and saved several fours as he threw himself about, and he also caught well though the scorebook's inadequacies don't tell me exactly how often.
Honse performed well, yes, but the star turn was played by Edward who, bowling from the Downs End much as James did some years ago, began to take wickets with regularity. Dropping onto an effective and troubling length he was offering balls to hit that really weren't quite there and a few catches were duly taken by himself, ??? and a skied one by Reese who took a turn with the wicket-keeping gloves. Ending with 5 for 14 off 8.1 overs it won us the game in the bowling department much as James' century set it up in the batting department. Great figures, though his impressive average was eclipsed, some might argue, by Paul's two overs, one for none!
A TWCC victory to start off the season. The game was won by two particular individual performances, and although the conditions favoured a side bowling in the dark, it was also a fine overall joint effort from a squad that gel well and willingly commit to the job. Thanks too to J Millis for making us up to a side of 11 without whom we would have been 9 after Richard ran away. 

Scorecard
Streat and Westmeston won the toss and chose to field first.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Bld Anthony 35; J Trollope Not Out (Retd) 101; R Packham LBW Anthony 8; M Edwards LBW Poynting 14; R Brock Not Out 1; E Bunn Bld Butcher 9; J Simon Not Out 12. DNB K Scott, H Karvay,J Millis, M Brock. Extras 19 (NB 5, W 8, B 6).TWCC 245 for 4 in 43 Overs.
Sreat and Westmeston Bowling: Hartfield 7-3-20-0; H Millis 6-0-39-0; I Anthony 6-0-41-2; D Poynting 100-47-1; M Butcher 9-1-54-1; S Spiegel 4-0-39-0.
Streat and Westmeston Innings: N Butler St. Packham Bld Bunn 55; C Mansfield Run Out Edwards 29; C Poynting Ct x Bld Edwards 1; A Jackson Ct x Bld Bunn 18; H Millis Bld Karvay 7; B Baxter Ct x Bld Karvay 7; D Poynting Ct & Bld Bunn 1; M Butcher LBW Hunter 16; M Hartfield Ct Packham (wkt) Bld Bunn 0; S Spiegel LBW Bunn 1; I Anthony Not Out 0. Extras 35 (NB 8, W 10, LB 3, B 14). Total 169 All Out n 44.1 Overs.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 8-1-39-1; J Simon 7-3-16-0; K Scott 6-0-16-0; M Brock 3-016-0 H Karvay 10-1-38-2; E Bunn 8.1-2-14-5; P Hunter 2-2-0-1.
TWCC win by 76 runs.

Top of page
TWCC v Greys May 8th 2016
The archive reveals an unblemished record in favour of TWCC v Greys - though the fixture itself may be older than the webbery; all TWCC wins with one draw. So there was much at stake for both sides.
Understandably, perhaps, Greys never appear to be totally entranced by TWCC's home facilities - as a glance at their own write-ups will show, but although it is a fixture with no fittings the cricket is usually competetive and played in good spirit. Skipper Brock won the toss and opted to bat first, believing in his team's batting and bowling ability.... Those were his basic mistakes.
TWCC were without Paul Hunter, but with an opening pair comprising James and Jonathan, and with Tony in at three, there was much expectation of a good start. And, indeed, there was a good start - only not one made by TWCC. The visitor's opening bowling was swinging about from both ends and the left-armer from the Downs End was decidedly swift to boot. Better batsmen were able to survive but not score much and then get out, and slightly less than better batsmen were just out. James and Jonathan being proper cricketers survived up to a point, but then they didn't. Tony briefly did more than survive - his natural talent allowing him to score at his usual pace - until he failed to come through an LBW appeal unscathed. It would have been possible to have given him not out (on leg stump and he was a little way down the wicket), but the ball would have gone on to hit the stumps so that's out really, unfortunate though it was.
Reese, at 4, hit two good lumpy fours before edging a swinging ball, Jim stayed at the crease for a long time (for him) and was distinctly unlucky to find the only fielder on the leg side when pulling a shorter ball (though some would think he had already benefitted from plenty of luck having been dropped elsewhere), and was out for nothing much, Edward's new bat is still just as unused, Malcolm looked good then was out... it was not a great looking scorecard; TWCC on 50 for 7. In came Matt Edwards, low down the order for him but he was taking his turn, and he did show some fight and no little ability. The only TWCC batter with any success on the day, he added a very valuable and possibly match-saving 44 runs to the total which ended on 103 all out with only Joe surviving with his head held high having stayed with Matt as he sorted out some runs. Very good Greys bowling; pace from Gallagher, swing and good lines from the other three bowlers and TWCC had little answer.
103 not enough? Well... after a lovely Bunn tea (cakes Julia sandwiches Edward - particularly good egg) the TWCC opening bowling made a good effort to keep the runs down and not let the Greys simply coast to an easy win. Matt and Jim bowled long spells, unusual for TWCC with so many all-rounders in the team, but it did give TWCC a chance to keep the pressure on the visitors as, when Matt finished he had two wickets, Jim one and the total was only 29 off 21 overs. However, it was clear that TWCC's 103 runs were never going to be defendable, and although Brocky generated a caught and bowled in his first over, Greys cruised through with some belligerant hitting from Ashton and Fenton seeing Greys home. Sadly the poor total of 103 didn't allow more of the side to contribute with the ball, but it'll all even out over the season.
Notable performances from Matt E, both with bat and ball, and the TWCC fielding was its usual enthusiastic excellent stuff. Jonathan once again performed excellently behind the timbers, Tony took a sharp slip catch, but the day belonged to Greys who played better than did the home side. It might have been different but it wasn't.


Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and chose to bat first.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope Bld Newlands 9; J Rowland Bld Gallagher 6; T Pearce LBW Bld Sewell 19; R Packham Ct Wkt Bld Newlands; J Simon Ct, Bld Sewell 4; E Bunn Bld Sewell 0; M Woodall Ct Wkt Bld Hoare 3; M Edwards Ct, Bld Hoare 44; R Brock Bld Sewell 4; J Panther Not Out 4; R Smith Ct Wkt Bld Hoare 0. Extras 5 (NB-2; W-3) TWCC 103 all out for 4 in 31 Overs.
Greys Bowling: Gallagher 8-4-19-1; Newlands 6-0-23-3; Sewell 9-2-18-3; Hoare 8-1-38-3.
Greys Innings: Brasher Bld Edwards 10; Line Ct Rowland (Wkt) Bld Edwards 2; Burgess Ct & Bld R Brock 3; Dykes Ct Rowland (Wkt) Bld Simon 1; Ashton Not Out 51; Fenton Not Out 26. Extras 11 (W-7; B-4) Total 105 for 4. DNB Azami, Newland, Gallagher, Hoare, Sewell.
TWCC Bowling: Edwards 11-5-15-2; Simon 10-4-14-1; R Brock 6-1-23-1; M Woodall 1-0-20-0; E Bunn 2-0-13-0; J Trollope 2.2-0-15-0.
Greys win by 7 wkts.

Top of page
Lindfield v TWCC May 15th 2016
Lindfield. New fixture - good to meet new people and a good bunch they proved to be. A thriving club set-up, clearly, with, if Sunday's Lindfield team was anything to go by, a great mix of experience and youth. Rather like TWCC in that respect! Skipper Brock won the toss and chose the more likely route to succes of bowling first. Jim bowled long with no wickets (again), Joe opened at the other end and struggled in his first bowling spell of the year (I think?) to settle, and then on came Richard. Skipper Brock. Well... early success came with his wobbly line and temping length, followed by success in the middle of his spell, and then by success as he came to the end with 6 for 51 off 11 overs. 6 wickets!!!! How good is that? Clearly he got the ball to do something apart from appear in the hands of a few catchers as several victims were clean-bowled. I would go on, but he doesn't need pumping up any more, but it was a great spell and one that he will be proud of, no doubt, for a good while if not forever. Other spells brought wickets - it was nice to see James bowl with success again - and Lindfield's Pedley brothers, together with the opener Dan Bulgin, all members of the youth side, performed well and scored good runs. Reese kept wicket very well again and fits the role well, and Joe's fielding in particular, again, was tremendous; well done lads!
Lindfield's bowling opened up against the customary P Hunter/J Trollope combo, and the TWCC batters settled in very well. There was a little movement in the air, and some variation in bounce, but in general the bowling wasn't too threatening (here speaks someone sitting 100 yds away batting down the order!) . Paul began to punish the bowling if runs were on offer, and James was more circumspect but nonetheless affective until the umpire's finger was raised in answer to an LBW appeal. Many thought the ball might have passed over the stumps, but the umpire was adamant that it was a correct decision, and he was in the best position to see.
Reese, at three, is a great prospect for TWCC, and he soon began to middle the ball. There is a certain sound of a sharply hit ball that epitomises solid fast hands and more often than not Reese hits the ball like that and the ball heads for the boundary at speed. Paul upped the rate of scoring as the bowling allowed, and soon was over the 50 mark, and then he was caught out for a fine 61, and in walked another Hunter. Reese was out for a solid 26 and Edward and George set about winning the game. George played as George plays and soon the ball was travelling a long way. A long long way.  4,4,4,6,6,6,6 with a few 1's representing the mishits, and dots representing the times he swished in vain.  Edward offered up a catch in the gully, and then Jim helped George to take TWCC to the target and to a 6 to finish the match on 31 exciting G Hunter runs.
Good performances all round, nice to welcome Ollie in to the side and we hope he can play again, but the day belongs to Paul and George Hunter for 100 runs between them and to Richard Brock for his excellent harvest of 6 wickets. Let's hope we revisit the Lindfield ground in seasons to come, and see how their crop of excellent youngsters develop as we further mature ourselves...

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and elected to bowl first.
Lindfield Innings: Dan Bulgin Ct Simon Bld Brock 36; Leon Kayfl Bld Brock 10; John Cooper Bld Brock 7; Ian Jackson Ct P Hunter Bld Brock 7; Jack Cooper Ct Simon Bld Brock 0; Mark Simpson Bld Brock 0; Ross Pedley Ct & Bld Trollope 39; Alex Pedley Ct & Bld P Hunter 21; Tim Richardson Ct x Bld Trollope 0; Ben Thacker not out 11; Rupert Green not out 0. Extras 32 (B-6; LB-4; W-22). Total 165 for 9 off 42 overs.
TWCC Bowling: J Simon 12-2-28-0; J Panther 5-0-19-0; R Brock 11-0-51-6; E Bunn 4-0-14-0; J Trollope 5-0-19-2; P Hunter 5-0-21-1.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Ct R Pedley Bld Richardson 61; J Trollope LBW R Green 14; R Packham Ct Green Bld A Pedley 26; G Hunter not out 39; E Bunn Ct A Pedley Bld Kay 1; J Simon not out 6. Extras 19 (NB-3, W-12, B-4). DNB R Brock, O Foulger, J Panther. Total 166 for 4.
TWCC win by 6 wickets, or more relevantly as Paul pointed out, by 11.4 overs.

Top of page
Bolney CC v TWCC May 22nd 2016
The pressure of running an International organisation on the scale of Twineham and Wineham Cricket Club - whilst ultimately rewarding - does bring immense stress on those who shoulder the greatest burdens.  This week Jim has handed over the editorial reins to recharge his batteries.  So an early apology for the lack of sardonic humour and dry wit: today's report is less of a flowing drive through the covers, more of a thwack towards cow corner. 
Bolney's ground has an outlook that feels unchanged for many, many years - school, church, broad leaf trees - all ageing gracefully.  One might - unkindly - include the team. It's cricket as it was a century ago: scorers, umpires and an excellent tea all part of the service.  Was that the sigh of a gentle breeze brushing the leaves of a great oak: or was it a sigh of relief emanating from the home dressing room when TWCC turned up with no Rydons for the first time in at least 8 years?  In fact, garnering a team had been a struggle, but with Reese bringing Jack and Fletch and Tom Stace - former Albourne and Sayers Common - agreeing to turn out for us, we were 10. 
The toss was lost in the merest flip of a coin and we were put in in a timed match.  Lacking a natural opening partner, James had to settle for Richard and hope he wouldn't do too much to disturb his impressive run of early season form.  He didn't.  James soon found his fluency against a bowling attack which at one end was accurate and at the other end was a little chaotic.  A young bowler, Jamie Bowles showed a very lively pace but it only occasionally coordinated with his run up - and consequently several no-balls pelted down accompanied by an infusion of wides and byes.  But he had an endearing habit of arguing with Umpire Bunn about his front foot and showed more than enough potential to make one think he'll be impressive in the years to come.  The upshot of this and some other wayward bowling was that James, Extras and Richard put on a 100 partnership: in that order of scoring.  In fact, the opening stand moved on to 140 and had the Twineham historians blowing the dust off ancient tomes for record opening partnerships.  That's when the aforementioned Jamie returned, bowling uphill. His pent up anger with Edward was released in one particularly sharp and short ball - which caught the skipper full pelt on the side of the head.  Much blood and no mirth because for once things looked serious rather than funny - he retired, taking his 33 not out safely to the averages with him.  James moved serenely on - Reese didn't.  George did as George does: 34 including 5 sixes, two of which were really quite enormous, one bouncing on the road and into the churchyard.  James retired on his second hundred of the season - in May! Jim and Tom were both out trying to push the score along - we presume, though there's a lack of evidence to back this up.  A rather handsome flurry from Jack and a less feeble offering than of late from Edward took us to a formidable 237-4. 
Bolney's tea was as irresistible as ever - unhelpful for a team about to bowl.  But Jim bowling downhill with gusto and Joe bowling uphill with guile opened up for us.  As so often, while both bowled well, only one got the rewards - and Joe it was who picked up not one, not two but the first 3 wickets to fall with a good line and a nagging length, taking Bolney to 29-3.  From there they dug in well - and while 8 bowlers were used, it took Tom Stace to break the partnership with his deliciously deceptive left arm spin.  Inspired fielding gave us a dramatic next wicket: Jim with a sharp throw over the stumps and Reese whipping off the bails that broke the partnership. At this stage Bolney were still attacking and in touch, needing around 6 runs an over. James chipped in with a wicket but a series of dropped catches set us back before we took another and that's when Bolney decided the time had come to put up the shutters.  Jim snapped up the defiant Barry Griffin with 2 overs to go and then Tom bowled the number 10 Patton with the last ball of the match.  We drew, or didn't win by one wicket, whatever your view, either way it's the same frustrating result - but we are happy to report that the seemingly serious head injury was improved by a packet of frozen peas and a (small) teaspoon of sympathy.   

SCORECARD

TWCC LOST THE TOSS AND WERE ASKED TO BAT

TWCC Innings: J TROLLOPE RETIRED 101; R BROCK RETIRED HURT 33; R PACKHAM Bld J BOWLES 2; G HUNTER Bld P BUCH 34; J SIMON LBW S BOWLES 0; E BUNN NOT OUT 9; T STACE Bld S BOWLES    0; J COOPER NOT OUT 15; DNB J PANTHER, FLETCH.
TOTAL 237 for 4.                                237-4
Fall: 161/3, 213/4, 213/5, 213/7
BOLNEY Bowling: J Bowles 8-0-45-1 (and a KO); T Paton 7-0-54-0; J Elliott 4-2-7-0; P Buch 6-1-37-1; S Bowles 7-1-33-2; M Garside 6-1-34-0; M Madden 2-0-17-0.

Bolney Innings: N BUSHELL Bld PANTHER 7; J ELLIOT CT, Bld PANTHER 11; C BUNCE CT, Bld PANTHER 0; P BUCH Run Out (SIMON) 35; J BOWLES CT, Bld B STACE 32; S BOWLES CT Simon Bld TROLLOPE 42; M GARSIDE Ct & Bld TROLLOPE 6; J MOORE Not Out 10; B GRIFFIN LBW Bld SIMON 0; T PATTON Bld T STACE 4; M MADDEN Not Out 0.
TOTAL 178 for 9.
FALL  7-1, 11-3, 29-2, 91-5, 106-4, 145-7, 157-6, 164-9, 178-9
BOWLING
J SIMON: 9-1-34-1; J PANTHER 6-1-19-3; J COOPER 5-0-43-0; T STACE 6-2-21-2; HUNTER 3-0-18-0; TROLLOPE 5-0-15-1; BUNN 5-0-25-0; BROCK 3-3-0-0.
Match Drawn.


Top of page
West Chiltington v TWCC June 5th 2016
Last year’s match with West Chiltington is already the stuff of legend.  400+ runs, 15 off 1 ball, scorebookgate.  Some parts of the previous year were to be replicated:  the silly yellow hat highlighting cancer research, 400+ runs – and a little taste of controversy.  Of which more later.  The skipper was told that they were playing a number of youngsters, a few old gits – and 2 `overseas` players.  Bruce, their skipper described them as `outstanding`.  The skipper won the toss but acquiesced to their polite hint that they’d like to bat first – in hindsight, this was presumably to give their thoroughbreds a run out.  At that stage, we didn’t know.  Matt got off to a great start, fast and accurate, his good line soon clipped the bails of both openers with barely 30 on the board. The afternoon sun was very warm, but that didn’t matter because the game was under control, runs were hard to come by and all was good with the world.  Joe – from whom we now expect a weekly handful of wickets, was struggling with his line, length and luck – and was replaced after 5 wicketless overs.  Kev came on and by his 3rd over, was looking really very good – decent pace, great line and length – setting up a catch for Jack -  but with two balls left of his 4th over, his hamstring twanged and he had to limp off.  Richard stepped in and without wanting to be wasteful, used one of the 2 remaining balls to get a wicket.  That was OK:  the skipper’s next wicket was not.  Not only was it a  ridiculously wide ball, it also encouraged the batsman to swing and clip it to Jack at backward point.  And the result of that....was to bring Mr Overseas 1 to the crease.  Fortunately, Rob had just begun his spell so a clash of the titans was in prospect: Rob’s pace and accuracy vs Mr Muscles of Farfaraway.  As it turned out, it was rather one sided – and this is not a line I have ever had to write before – Rob got marmelized.   The big lad seemed to enjoy his pace and all the balls were nicely in the off stump slot – so he deposited them regularly and very impressively over long off.   This was OK for a while, as we waited for him to mishit one or another.  But it was clear this chap was quite well out of our league – or would have been had we played a league – any league.  In the end, we were reduced to batting fodder and ball fetchers, and the enjoyment of fielding on a lovely afternoon seeped away with each overhead missile.  When he retired after half or three quarters of an hour, he had 82.  And he was replaced with Overseas no 2.  He was equally impressive, clipping away anyone unfortunate enough to bowl at him.  I don’t know if you’ve seen the film Kes – where the sportsmaster is taking football with a bunch of small boys who don’t want to play.  He picks the ball up on the halfway line, barges through the bemused team, leaving them on the floor injured and defeated – refuses to pass and races into the penalty area and smashes the ball into the net past the hapless keeper Billy before celebrating wildly.  Anyway, West Chiltington reached 246-7 in 36 overs but at least tea was very pleasant, thanks to the Cancer Ladies. Sunshine soothed the soul and in strode James and Matt Edwards to play sensible straight bats and win if they could.  Well James didn’t last the first over before he knicked it behind, Matt and Jonathan also fell as West Chiltington showed the depth of talent of their young players.  But Reese and Rob didn’t just steady the ship – from 31-3 they took the name by the scruff of the neck.  Rob’s classical hitting came with added flight as the sixes flowed and he clawed back his pride which had so savagely been dumped on the wrong side of the boundary.  6 sixes and 7 fours in a fantastic knock – with the more careful Reese, whose pre-batting preparation had been a couple of slugs of cheap wine he won in the raffle.  Finally on 144 Reese was caught – but we were back in the game.  Edward kept the momentum up but the truth is that once Rob holed out for 83, we withered away, finishing on 172 – with Kev unable to bat.    Overseas 1 had bowled - but not outstandingly – and took only 3 wickets.  West Chiltington were pleasant - but an uneasy feeling remained that by slipping in not one but two players so far above Sunday afternoon standards, the game lost a touch of spirit. 

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and elected to bowl first
West Chiltington Innings: Fryer Bld Edwards 20; Lucking Bld  Edwards 0; Tatchell Ct R Rydon Bld Brock 31; Farnes Ct J Cooper Bld Scott 9; Reeves Ct Cooper Bld Brock 11; Nick rtd 82; Atkins LBW Bld Brock 2; Kay Bld Karvay 0; Sanchit Not out 67; Tatchell Not out 1.
Total: 246-7. DNB; Gee.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 9-1-34-2; J Panther 5-0-27-0; K Scott 3.4-0-22-1; R Rydon 5-0-47-0; R Brock 8.2-2-41-3; Karvay 4-0-28-1.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope Ct WK Bld Farnes 0; M Edwards Ct Tatchell Bld Farnes 11; J Rowland Ct Farnes Bld Gee 8; R Packham Ct Lucking Bld Nick 33; R Rydon Ct Tatchell Bld Nick 83; E Bunn Ct WK Bld Atkins 14; J Cooper Bld Nick 0; R Brock run out 4; Panther Ct WK Bld Lucking 0; H Karvay Not out 2.
Total: 172 all out. DNB: K Scott.
FALL: 5-1, 20-3, 31-2, 144-3, 152-5, 152-7, 161-8, 169-6, 172-9.     
West Chiltington Bowling: Farnes 5-1-15-2; Gee 5-1-21-1; Reeves 4-0-32-0; Lucking 4.2-0-9-1; Tatchell 1-0-17-0; Atkins 4-0-18-0; Nick 2-0-7-3.
West Chiltington won by 84 runs

Top of Page
TWCC v Rottingdean July 12th 2016
London Unity no game, but Rottingdean stepped in. There's no report because no one could bring themselves to write it as Joe took 5 wickets and we've never heard the end of it, though Rob's 87 would be worth expanding upon.

Scorecard
Not sure who won the toss, but TWCC batted first in an 80 overs fiddle about game.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope ct Kenny Bld G Harris 20; J Rowland Bld S Shepherd 23; T Pearce Ct Shepherd Bld G Harris 16; R Packham St, Bld K Rogers; R Rydon Ct & Bld K Rogers 87; M Edwards St, Bld S Bettsworth; E Bunn Ct & Bld Rogers 6;J Panther Bld Rogers8; T Rydon LBW Rogers 0 (Golden Duck!); J Simon ct, Bld Betsworth 1; R Brock not out 0.
Extras 19 (NB-1, W-3, B-15). Total 207 all out off 40.1 overs.
Rottingdean Bowling: J Blanchard 5-0-24-0; S Shepherd 7-1-29-1; G Harris 6-0-34-2; A Grantham 8-1-42-0; K Rogers 9-0-47-5; C Bettsworth 4.1-0-14-2.
Rottingdean Innings: D Bettsworth Bld Edwards 10; E Swin-Ward Ct Simon Bld T Rydon 38; B Larder Ct Rowland (Wk) Bld Panther 7; K Rogers Ct Bunn Bld Panther 4; S Shepherd Bld R Rydon 27; C Bettsworth Bld R Rydon 5; S Grantham Ct Pearce Bld Panther 0; T Grantham Ct & Bld Panther 0; J Blanchard Bld Panther 4; A Grantham not out 0; G Harris Ct Packham Bld Brock 3. Extras 25 (NB-8, W-7, LB-2, B-8) Total 125 for 10 all out off 31.5 overs.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 8-0-24-1; J Simon 6-0-31-0; J Panther 9-2-23-5; T Rydon 4-0-31-1; R Rydon 4-3-1-2; R Brock 0.5-0-3-1.
TWCC win by 84 runs.

Top of page
TWCCV Malayalee June 19th 2016
Brighton Malaylee was a new fixture – a nice bunch of chaps arrived having fought their way through the clusters of cyclists clogging up the roads in their lycra clad quest to annoy motorists.  Anyway....the skipper lost the toss again and Malaylee opted to bat in a 35 over match.  Tom opened the bowling fast and furious from the far end – so fast in fact that the openers could barely lay a bat on the ball.  And with a good opening spell from Honse at the pavilion end, Malaylee got off to a slow and struggling start.  But despite restricting them to a painfully slow start – under 2 an over it took a change of bowling with Edward replacing Tom to get the wickets falling.  First Edward confounded Sreeban to lob up a catch to Richard – and 9 balls later he took a fine caught and bowled. Malaylee were in trouble – still in their 20s in the 13th over of a limited over match.  The slow pace encouraged the skipper to use all resources at his command – so the next two bowlers were to be James and – for his once a season cameo – Tony.  James was sadly deprived of a wicket in his first over by the unanimous verdict of the team that a stumping was in fact a run out courtesy of fast hands Rowland behind the stumps.   But James did get a legitimate wicket caught by Tony and indeed Mr Pearce also picked up his onefer – on this occasion, onefer 24 runs in 4 overs.  By this time Malaylee’s number 6 Shaji had dug in and was starting to hit the ball well.  A decision to give Reese a try didn’t pay off – and the just as the runs were starting to stack up rather too steadily came the news that rather than 4 over remaining there were in fact still 7 to go.  The skipper brought himself on, only to get a stumped off a poor first ball. Rob took one at the other end and the skipper finished them off next over by bowling the excellent Sharji – all out for 148 – slightly more challenging than had seemed likely at the halfway point.  Tea was – and there is no way around this – poor in the extreme.  The slices of bread with some filling – they don’t deserve the name sandwiches – were almost gone by the time Malaylee went through.  But James wouldn’t know that because he was off buying milk he’d forgotten to bring. Two cakes were OK – topped up by a few cheap chocolate rolls.  Perhaps it was this poor preparation which was to determine that the batsmen peformed merely adequately.  James himself has been having a great season and he held the early innings together with 28 as Jonathan was caught for 7 and then Tony – our revered number 3, he of the golden bat and golden balls – came in and was CLEAN BOWLED FOR A GOLDEN DUCK.  It should be said at this stage that Malaylee had some excellent bowlers – quick, accurate, getting some swing out of the pitch.  Honse looked good before being caught for 8 but Tom meanwhile was building an excellent and aggressive innings of 25.  Reese was caught for 12 leaving us on 107-6 – squeaky bum time as we were just 10 and Loz – next in – was a professed non-batter.  But praise be because Rob was there to guide us home with sensible yet forceful batting and he was partnered by Edward who looked good and solid.  Between them they took us home with 2 wickets and 3 overs to spare.   Malaylee were a pleasure to host, a nice group with a good spirit.  It was a good TWCC victory.

Scorecard
Malayalee won the toss and elected to bat
Malayalee Innigns:
Jey Ct&Bld Pearce 28; Sreeban Ct R Brock Bld Bunn 6; Tipin Ct T Pearce Bld Bunn 3; Joble St Rowland Bld Scott 18; Praveen Ct Pearce Bld Trollope 7; Shaji Bld R Brock 42; Swarup Ct J Rowland (WK) Bld T Rydon 1; Ganga Bld T Rydon 0; Vinu St J Rowland Bld R Brock 16; Boney Ct E Bunn Bld R Rydon 3; Jose Not out 1; Total 148 all out 32.3 overs.
TWCC Bowling: T Rydon 7-3-16-2; H Karvay 7-2-11-0; E Bunn 6-0-28-2; Trollope 3-0-17-1; T Pearce 4-0-24-1; R Packham 3-0-15-0; R Brock 1.3-0-7-2; R Rydon 1-0-54-1.
TWCC Innings:
J Trollope Bld Boney 28; J Rowland Ct x Bld Boney 7; T Pearce Bld Boney 0 GOLDEN DUCK; H Karvay    Ct x Bld Vinu 8; T Rydon Bld Sharup 25; R Packham Ct x Bld Shaji 12; R Rydon Not Out 24; E Bunn Not out 13; Total : 149 31 overs.
Fall: 30-2, 30-3, 55-4, 57-1, 100-6, 107-5.     
Malayalee Bowling: Sharup 6-0-17-1; Jose 6-0-31-0; Boney 5-1-13-3; Ganga 4-0-14-0; Vinu 2-0-12-1; Jobie 3-0-20-0; Jey 2-0-11-0; Sheeran 1-0-3-0.
TWCC won by 2 wickets.

Top of Page
TWCC Tour July 1st to 3rd
Report to follow when someone makes it up.


Top of page
TWCC v Wisley CC July 17th 2016
A few weeks away and it was a joy to return to the game of games for the Gazette staff. Skipper Brock was not with us on this occasion, and so the coin was tossed by TWCC's capable Vice-Captain, Matt E. Both teams were missing players who had heavily influenced last season's fixture, Rupert for Wisley and George for TWCC, but the two teams nonetheless faced up to the heat of the day with high expectation of a competetive game in their hearts. The Gazette research team have so far failed to find out who won the toss (surely a toss completed in a record time before the first ball was bowled as both skippers were early arrivers - unlike many of the other players from both teams...) but the result of the ensuing discussion was that TWCC bowled first in a game of 40 overs per side, no draws allowed.
Jim and Tom opened up the TWCC bowling, Jim with an early wicket from a mediocre ball met with a mediocre off-drive which Joe caught at mid off, and Tom with his usual fiery excellent spell. Tom bowled out his eight overs, and Jim just six in order to have a couple for later. Very early on, it is sad to report, there occurred an injury to our Skip, a quad pull for Matt Edwards suffered when making a quick turn in the field, the result of which was that he was unable to bowl which was obviously a big loss to the home side. No Matt, no Richard, a max of 8 overs for an individual bowler... Times might be going to be tough, especially as a youthful and energetic Wisley side looked as if they had a strong batting performance in mind.
The rest of the Wisley innings is characterised by lots of runs being scored, lots of catches falling just safe, a few catches being plain dropped... It didn't add up to a great exhibition of fielding prowess but it did add up to a lot of Wisley runs, particularly for the opener McIntosh with a wonderful 121, and Snelling at 3 with 61, who, after the early wicket, stuck around for a great second wicket partnership capitalising on, it must be said, a slightly stretched bowling attack.
Of note were a number of dropped catches; indeed Jack "Bucket" Cooper - so called because of his ability to hold on to anything, is now re-christened "Liza" in recognition of the holes in his buckets... In defense of his prowess he did hang on to the hardest of his catches, down low between his feet. Catch of the day, however, was truly the most remarkable one I have seen in recent times. Towards the end of the innings the batters were swinging away, and the field was spread. Edward bowling from the Pavilion End was teasing the swingers with his slow pace, and James was hanging about in Cow Corner exhibiting a sort of Sergeant Wilson demeanour - keeping an eye on events with an aloof air and quite glad not to be too involved in the mayhem. Suddenly the ball was hoisted towards him and he had to work out where it was going to fall. Happily it fell exactly where he was standing, but unhappily he calculated that it would land some way to his right. He moved across, away from the catch-site, emitted the obligatory "OOH!" as he missed the ball, but stuck out a left hand at the last moment in a forlorn swipe, and when we all looked the ball was in his hand. Neither side, including James, could work out quite what had happened, but there it was on the replay, in his hand. Extraordinary and brilliant (lucky).
Kevin, Joe, Edward, Honse and James (2 for 17 off 4 overs - very good in the circumstances), and Jim for his last two overs, saw out the 40 overs, and there Wisly were on 250 for 5. Difficult.
Tea, Jim's, lots of filling right to the edges of the bread, with gratefully received help from Kay and Tom. 3 loaves + cakes is enough.
So; the TWCC innings. Look who's doing well again? James it was, who with Matt E as his competent opening partner, saw TWCC through the early overs in an excellent first wicket partnership facing some dangerous bowling. Swing and pace from Domingo and turn and guile from Ramesh were, in turn, hard to get away and hard to read. Tight tight tight. They finished their spells and, as often happens, slightly less tight bowling brings about success as batters see more balls to hit. Matt was caught for 24 after doing a great job, Tony looked fine in a most productive partnership with James until he was out for 24, James (another fine 50) was eventually bowled by a good ball, Reese connected very well with some shorter balls but was then out for 24, Jim did nothing much at 5 as he's better, curiously, when the bowling's less good, and then a wonderful cameo from Tom. Big hits, leg glances, placement, singles - it was all good stuff, ably assisted by Edward who really is heading back to his form of old as he runs twos with alacrity and calls for quick singles not even at the ends of overs. Tom and Edward did add a sparkle towards the end of the day, but the total was always going to be too much for TWCC given the absence of poor bowling from the visitors. Edward chipped one back to the bowler, and Jack looked good for the brief remaining time finishing the innigns with Tom still in command.
A draw, normally an interesting and honourable option for games such as this, was, given the format, not a possibility though it would have led to an exciting finish. As it was the game was over with 20 overs to go, Wisley the deserved vistors.

Scorecard
Wisley Innings: McIntosh Ct T Rydon Bld Trollope 121; TJ Ct Panther Bld Simon 0; Snelling Ct & Bld Kev Scott; T Richards Ct Trollope Bld Bunn 32; Kerigan Not Out 17; Ashwin Ct Buckets Bld Trollope 4; Ramesh Not out 0. Extras 16 (W-5, NB-1, B-7, LB-3)Total 250 for 5. DNB O Richards and some more that didn't get recorded.
TWCC Bowling: Simon 8-0-29-1; T Rydon 8-0-32-0; K Scott 8-0-42-1; Panther 5-0-44-0; Karvay 3-0-33-0; E Bunn 4-0-34-1; Trollope 4-0-17-2.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope Bld TJ 52; M Edwards Ct, Bld T Richards 24; T Pearce Ct, Bld T Richards 16; R Packham Ct, Bld O Richards 16; J Simon Bld O Richards 5; T Rydon Not Out 39; E Bunn Ct&Bld Domingo 26; J Cooper Not Out 10. Extras  14 (W-6, NB-6, B-1, LB-1). Total 202 for 6. DNB J Panther, K Scott, H Karvay.
Wisley Bowloing: Domingo 7-1-25-1; Ramesh 8-1-28-0; O Richards 8-0-46-2; TJ 8-1-35-1; T Richards 6-0-38-2; J Richards 3-0-23-0.
Wisley win (40 overs per side limited over game).

Top of page

Warninglid CC v TWCC August 21st 2016
With the return of Skipper Brock from the experimental Bulgarian School of Cricketing Excellence and something approximating sufficient players to engage, TWCC assembled for duty on the windswept heights of Warninglid with gladness in their hearts; cricket was back after rather a lull. Glancing around the ranks of the opposition was a little unnerving however - where was the mix of grandsons and the over 60's? These were young men with girlfriends and everything! Warninglid CC appeared to have an average age some thirty years south that of their visitors - but age isn't everything in sport even if it helps. TWCC were ready to take on all comers.
Jim and Paul opened up the bowling and set the tone for the first part of the Warninlid innings. There was a bit of swing, the wicket was slightly unpredictable and the ball wasn't really coming on to the batters with any great reliability, but in the face of these factors the Warninlid opening pair saw through the early phase well and resolutely kept themselves in play. Switching Jim out of the attack for later Honse took over from the East End and, with similar reasoning, Paul was replaced by President Jones from the Pavilion End. The batters, now well in, began to take the Warninglid total along with more momentum, and so it came to pass that Richard began his excellent spell of bowling. There are times, we all know, when poor bowling realises wickets for which tighter preceding bowling has created the appetite, but in this spell Richard wasn't having any of that. Rejuvinated by his recent sojourn in Eastern Europe, Richard bowled with a tightness and attention to line and length that we rarely see in any of our bowling attack. Rewarded in his first over by clean-bowling one of the well-rooted Warninglid openers, he followed this up by removing the other with the help of a truly excellent stumping from Jonathan behind the timbers. Warninglid were on the slide, and Richard swiftly, in this his first spell, took out two more, one being removed first ball and thus putting the side on the first of three hat-trick alerts. A great spell from our Captain, the individual analysis of which is not possible at this remove because the ball-by-ball scorecard is not available at the Gazette office, but the first four wickets were down to Richard and Warninglid were an unsettled side from this point on. James and Edward plied their trade from the Pavilion End, though on this occasion unsuccessfully, and Jim came back from the East End to finish off what he'd started by taking two wickets in his last over, the first of which was a lovely smart catch by Jonathan standing up and the second of which - the next ball - brought about the second hat-trick alert of the game. Paul provided both a couple of late wickets, the first of which was a slap-it-back-catch-it-if-you-can-because-it-was-hit-quite-hard caught and bowled, and another golden-ducker, thus putting TWCC on their third hat-trick alert of the day! Sadly, reminiscent of Jim's final spell on tour in Dorset, rather than enjoying further success Paul was Mongoosed over his head for two enourmous sixes to finish the innings off with Warninlid posting a creditable 208 total to spoil the taste of TWCC's sandwiches.
208 was plenty to chase, and, as with the Warninglid Innings, the batting conditions took some mastering. However, Paul and James didn't succumb, and, seeing off the opening bowling attack, they settled down to getting out to the second wave - James not having ever, today, truly been as one with the conditions, and Paul having some creditable boundaries to his name. Tony was struggling with a hamstring injury, and hadn't been able to field with his usual flair. Warninglid kindly waived the no-runner rule, and we were treated to a fine dislplay of triangular batting as Richard became Tony's legs. Happily Tony's bat was still operating and somehow he managed to time the ball tremendously well considering he couldn't move his weight through the shot - even managing a six amongst the six fours. Jonathan, rather like James, found the conditions hard to get on top of, and wan't his usual fluent self with the bat and he fell with an atypical 7 runs to his name. In came Edward to sort it out. In spite of having to face the sort of bowling he usually dislikes, Edward smote the ball. He cracked and crushed the ball off his bat. Bludgeoned and blasted; pulls to where the fielders weren't on the mid-wicket and long-on boundary. Eight fours and, yes, two twos amongst the quick singles. A fine innings of 45 in the face of some difficult wet conditions that moved in from the squally West. Jim kept the hope alive for a while until, as usual, he was bowled by an unplayable delivery, but, truly by the thirtieth over the game was run and TWCC were suffering from having allowed too many runs to slide Warninglid's way in their innings. Honse increased the value of his batting capital, and Malcolm made a fine sight walking out to bat without his... er... bat, only to be stumped off his first ball and fail to notice he was out until Dave came out to join him at the crease for the last rites.
Although at the start of their bowling effort the ball was as good as it had been at the end of their own innings, Warninglid's bowlers did have to work with a progressivley wet and slimy ball. The humidity had become light drizzle and then turned into what had to be called rain, and in this regard Warninglid, nonetheless playing with an eye to good form fully in keeping with the finest traditions of the Sunday game, definitely had the worst of the conditions and were the best side on the day.
Warninglid, a fine bunch of happy youth and jolly oponents deserved their victory leaving the visitors the crumb of comfort that is the knowledge that the Royal Oak is our home pub and it is still there serving beer with no strings attached.


Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and bowled first. Match 40 overs limited, max 8 overs/bowler
Warninglid Innings: R Swinscoe St Rowland, Bld Brock 30; M Nasty Bld Brock 26; D Tingley Ct Rowland (wk) Bld Simon 60; C Mackie Bld Brock 2; C Vaughan Bld Brock 0; A Parsons Ct & Bld Hunter 42; D Mackie Bld Simon 0; B Nesbit not out 22; R Hollingham(?) Bld Hunter 0; J Acton not out 12. DNB R Clarke. Extras 14, Total 208 for 9 from 40 overs.
TWCC Bowling: J Simon 8-2-22-2; P Hunter 8-1-39-2; H Karvay 6-0-39-0; D Jones 4-0-25-0; R Brock 8-2-32-4; J Trollope 3-0-22-0; E Bunn 3-0-24-0.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter ct, Bld Acton 26; J Trollope Ct, Bld Vaughan 8; T Pearce LBW Nesbit 40; J Rowland St, Bld Clarke 7; E Bunn LBW Clarke 45; J Simon Bld C Mackie 12; H Karvay not out 14; R Brock Bld C Mackie 3; M Gasson St, Bld Clarke 0; D Jones not out 0. Extras 19 (NB-4, W-12, B-3) Total 175 for 9 from 40 overs.
Warninglid Bowling: R Hollingham(?) 5-0-13-0; Vaughan 5-0-26-0; Acton 6-3-11-1; Nesbit 0-0-31-1; D Mackie 3-0-40-0; Clarke 7-0-17-3; C Mackie 6-0-22-2.
Warninglid win by 33 runs.

Top of page
Crescent CC v TWCC August 28th 2016
Another struggle for TWCC's newly appointed Match Manager to raise a team, but 10 good men and true duly reported for duty at the Horsdean ground on a squally and intermittently wet August bank holiday Sunday.
TWCC's newly appointed Head of the Coin Response Unit emerged from his summit with the news that his negotiations had gone well and that TWCC would bowl first. Tom Rydon and Jim opened up with their usual dash and trundle respectively, and both settled into trying to understand what mood the Horsdean wicket was in this time. The answer to this was that it was broadly dull with the occasional low bounce on offer. But the capricious nature of the surface had nothing to do with the wickets Tom took in his third over; a double-wicket maiden, both bowled. The rest of his spell was one in which the ball certainly dominated the bat, and he finished his seven over spell with only 12 runs against his name. Jim bowled the occasional good ball, though was more economical than threatening, but with plenty of bowling around for the newly appointed TWCC Bowling Resource Manager to deploy many bowling options remained. Sam Simon, back from his wilderness years, took one ball to learn how to bowl again, and then clean-bowled Crescent's threatening opener with his second. Plenty of pace, the line of left arm over is never easy for batters to cope with, and Sam settled into a lengthy spell. TWCC's newly appointed Fielding Coach can only take the credit for placing TWCC's newly appointed Manager of Recruitment's pick in the shape of Tom Firth at mid-off, who took a catch to give Sam his second wicket as Crescent's left-handed No. 5 pushed at an awkward length ball that lobbed forwards in the air. Crescent were on the wobble as this was clearly another one of their better players.
Tom Firth took over from Jim and struggled to find his length, but he persevered and sure enough got things under control, but with such a bowling battery at his disposal it was soon time for Honse to weave his inter-continental magic and, sure enough, Crescent's No 6 wafted around a straight one and the hosts were another wicket down. They could ill afford to lose another wicket, least of all that of Will who was dogged in defense albeit not that demonstrative in attack, but, when called through for a quick single, he was not quite as quick as James T who oooh'd down to the ball at short fine leg, and ahh'd a throw to the bowler who had plenty of time to convince the umpire at the bowler's end that when the batsman wasn't in his ground and the bails were off this means that a run out has taken place.
TWCC's Match Manager decided it was time for Richard to be brought into the attack, and he proceeded to bowl a very tight line and length. Every Brock ball produced an uncertainty in the batsman about whether or not to use his bat, and several knicks were the result. These fell in gaps around Alex behind the stumps until one, finally, did go to hand which Alex snapped up with his usual casual keeper competence. That left a mere three wickets with Rob's name on them. Given the nod, Rob pulled off his jumper, snicked his Rolls Royce action into "Drive" and treated all comers to another fine display of fast and accurate bowling. TWCC's own Whispering Death plundered the late-order wickets and in just 4.3 overs, two of which were maidens, he had his three wickets for just 5 runs. A treat to watch, and, with Richard's own excellence never letting up TWCC closed the bowling off in great style.
None of the Crescent batters got going, held in check by some good bowling and also by some committed and effective eager fielding from all. Proper cricket.
Proper cricket backed up by a proper tea! What a treat! Needless to say the Gazette editorial staff laid off all but a few micro-sandwiches, but those were juicy and fully up to Hunter-Spec. Moist cakes, scones and jam, even some heated thingies from a hot-plate. A Bolney rival and even, dare I say it, something to get James worried when it's his turn.
132 to win. Surely TWCC, albeit hamstrung by Tony's absence, could manage that? Was TWCC confidence troubled when Paul, capable as ever, was undone by a non-bouncing straight grubber that went underground and then re-emerged to clout the stumps? Not a bit of it. A shame for Paul, of course, but we had plenty in the tank, not least in the shape of JT who kept the ball out from the skiddy Townley et al for long enough to ensure that only a collapse of TWCC proportions could result in a home win for Crescent. But many TWCC players can't help but recall just how well TWCC can make any target look difficult, and a shudder ran through the ranks as Brocky shovelled a simple catch to point and TWCC were 5 for 2. The start of a spiral out of control?
But - we have Rydons!!! Rydon A walked out and proceeded to share a great stand with James that set up the result the TWCC fan was looking for. From 5 for 2 TWCC were in the 90's before Alex failed to survive hitting the ball into the air once to often, having offered up a few chances during his innings, and was out for 46, just four runs short of a parental jug. (Well, maybe I'm casting nasturtiums, but in the Gazette's experience this is one area of progeny-independence that youth seem to be able to ignore.) Sad for Rydon R not to bat with Rydon A, but there was always Rydon T to come. It did at first seem unlikley that Rydon T would be needed, or any other batters at all such was the magnificence of the forward-defensive that bounded solidly up to mid-off all along the ground from Sam's first ball faced. TWCC were safe. Sam the batter had showed up at the same time as Sam the bowler and fielder. The sense of relief in the dug out was palpable. Rob and Sam would see us through. But Sam, presumably now fully warmed up and his eye well and truly in, watched a straight ball with his 20:20 vision pass his cross-bat and hit middle stump. A short innings, but that forward-defensive stroke was truly worth the journey from Londonland.
However TWCC were nearly home, and all Simon J had to do was to run up and down a bit whilst Rydon R sorted out the victory with plenty of 4's and one huge straight well-timed smooth 6 that clattered into the scenery with a fine resounding clack. All that was missing was the sound of breaking glass.
With around ten overs to spare TWCC secured the win that had been made possible not only by James' and Alex's 87 joint runs, but also by a fine bowling performance that ensured the hosts never had enough runs to defend.
Thanks to Crescent for the loan of a fielder in the opening overs, and for sharing in an afternoon's fun, and we look forward to next year. Well we look forward to this year too, of course.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and chose to bat first. 80 overs format, draw a possible result.
Crescent CC Innings: J Morris Bld S Simon 20; L Geary Bld T Rydon 2; M Wood Bld T Rydon 0; J Will run out (Trollope) 26; M Lawson Ct T Firth Bld S Simon 10; B Townley Bld H Karvay 3; D Osborne Bld R Rydon 37; D Morgan Bld R Rydon 1; A Bousfield Ct A Rydon (Wk) Bld R Brock 1; S Wood not out 2; M Brown Bld R Rydon 0. Extras 29 (NB-5, W-11, LB-4, B-9) Total 131 all out off 38.3 overs.
TWCC Bowling: T Rydon 7-1-12-2; J Simon 8-2-20-0; S Simon 8-1-22-2; T Firth 3-0-19-0; H Karvay 4-0-19-1; R Brock 4-1-13-1; R Rydon 4.3-2-5-3.
TWCC Innings: P HunterBld Townley 2; J Trollope Ct, Bld Lawson 41; R Brock Ct, Bld Townley 0; A Rydon Ct, Bld Will 46; R Rydon not out 28; S Simon Bld Lawson 0; J Simon not out 4. DNB T Rydon, T Firth, H Karvay. Extras 11 (W-5, LB-1, B-5) Total 132 for 5 off 33 overs.
Crescent CC Bowling: Brown 9-018; Townley 6-2-8-2; Osborne 8-0-36-0; Morgan 4-0-28-0; Will 4-0-30-0; Lawson 2-0-6-2.
TWCC win by 5 wickets.

Top of page
Ashurst v TWCC September 4th 2016
Another great effort by the TWCC press gang saw an eleven-strong team take to the field to play their part in this, the latest battle of their 2016 campaign. Ashurst, as mercurial a unit as TWCC's own can be, had laid waste to us last season in the reciprocal engagement, so it was with particular anticipation that TWCC readied themselves for the difficult match-up that they were facing. Skipper Edwards, with us again after an AWOL episode that has yet to be fully explained, won the toss and chose to field first, giving a strong bowling attack the first use of another lovely new ball. TWCC opened the bowling with the big guns; Matt E himself and Tom R, loaded with armour-piercing shells and grape shot respectively. Unsurprisingly, and controversially, it was the grape shot that brought about the first wicket as Tom's, on this occasion, unpredictability surprised Ashurst's No. 2 by asking him to keep out a straight one on a good length, which he failed to do and the edge went through to Alex's gloves where, naturally, it stuck. Tom struggled with... his...natural variation? and became somewhat hazardous. The pitch, in itself a minefield and prone to causing sharp lift off full-length deliveries, had little to do with the reason Tom's spell was brought to a premature end as there was no ground involved with some of his more dangerous balls, unless we refer to the place where the batters sometimes found they'd ended up. However, Tom had a good wicket to his name, and, in spite of the headline no-balls, he had also served up plenty of thoroughly decent delivieries before Jim took over from the Road End. Meanwhile, at the...Other End, Matt was suffering from Good Bowling Syndrome. This is a condition only known to affect the very best bowlers, and sufferers may well be bowling with great effect, but with no luck. "Luck" is sometimes mentioned in this context in that it is often really bad luck that many TWCC players have forgotten how to catch, but here it was more that false shots went to open ground and difficult chances, with little blame attached to the fielders, fell to earth. Fast bowling often makes for hard chances (just ask Rob) and Matt finished his commanding spell without any wickets to his name, though he could have had two or three.
Jim replaced the high-revving Rydon T and settled into presenting his usual lovely half-volleys outside the off stump for the batters to climb into. Jim's opening offers were two such balls and they suffered their inevitable fate as hefty drives ensued; one a screaming four, the next dropped (stopped, Ed) by the bowler, but which served to make a surprise of the third ball which, when it turned up, was on a good length on middle and off and moving away a touch. An edge! Oh no! Another drop in the slips no doubt... But...hang on! It's Rob at second slip!! A  Rob compromised, certainly, by seeing through his new and unusual eve-of-match preparations ... but it was still Rob and, aided by his inclination to fall over anyway, he sagged forward and lay down for a bit having held on to a good low catch in front of his ankles, a position in which he stayed for a well earned breather just a bit longer than he otherwise normally might.
TWCC were, as has often been the case in 2016, pleased to welcome a newcomer to the side; Sam Warren. Sam, an émigrée from the North East, was clearly a bit of a cricketer and under 30 by some margin too! So what does the debut-meister produce but, well, an unbelievable spell of bowling! Sam settled on a good length straight away, having played almost no cricket for years, and wiggled the ball about mostly on and around the stumps - the ones at the far end that is. Notwithstanding that this sort of proper bowling goes rather against the best of TWCC tradition, it is with great pleasure that the Gazette presents to its readers Sam's extraordinary analysis of 6.3 overs, 1 maiden, 5 for 9! Jim and Honse mopped up the other three wickets, but the Samsation restricted an admitedly somewhat different Ashurst side from that of 2015, to a mere 82 all out in just 26.3 overs. And we hadn't even seen TWCC's own Whispering Death, nor, come to that, more than five TWCC bowlers such was the precipitate nature of the, what might have to be called, Ashurst collapse.
In spite of the early end of the innings, the good burghers of Ashurst rustled up an early tea, and before they knew it TWCC were batting to see what sort of a fist they could make of the conditions and of the Ashurst bowling attack. Poyser ran in hard and immediately caused trouble with his pace. Bowling from wide on the crease he hit James on the mid-step in front of middle and leg, but the ball was going down with the line and James survived on a benefit of the doubt decision. Paul, taking the umpire out of it, characteristically walked for an uncharacteristic 0 having gloved a ball off his hips to the keeper, a gesture much appreciated by Ashurst as all, including the umpire, thought it impossible to say if the ball had hit the gloves or the body. One down, no real runs on the board, the pitch throwing up all sorts of bounce off good length deliveries; it was tricky out there. But are TWCC the kind of side to crumble in the face of a low target? Of course they are! Proven many times...
The report could go one of two ways from here on. It would be possible, for instance, to mention Alex Rydon, Tom Firth, Tom Rydon, Matt Edwards and Honse in turn, and to weave some wordy magic around their struggles and successes, for example Alex's square drive off the back foot for four, or Tom Firth's compelling defense, or Tom Rydon's characteristic devil-may-care approach to batting which presented a swift 12 runs to the TWCC cause before he steered the ball slowly onto his own stumps, or our skipper's statuesque 10 with two 4's, or Honse's dogged refusal to get out at the end of proceedings, but to do so would both unnecessarily prolong the report and take the emphasis away from the single towering batting performance of James Trollope. James survived the early onslaught of the Ashurst openers and carried his bat through the innings, engaging his trebuchet-like arms in some demonstrative hitting as the pressure eased when Ashurst gamely spread their bowling around to give each player a stake in the day. A Trollope 6 into the road tied the scores and a single to win saw the game out.
A pleasure to play with a friendly side, it was on this occasion TWCC's turn to go home the victors though, as we all know, the tables can, and do, quickly turn.
This was a game featuring, in spite of his selection, oddly no majesterial performace from Rob with the bat or Rob with the ball, but let's hope he plays better next time. Maybe his mind was on next week when the food critics of Bolney assemble at TWCC's home ground to analyse what people from Wineham consider to be the perfect cricket tea, and, we all agree at the Gazette, there's much to look forward to in that.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss, Matt Edwards Captain opted to bowl first
Ashurst Innings: G Isaacs Bld Warren 29; T Chalmers Ct A Rydon (Wk) Bld T Rydon 13; B Poyser Ct R Rydon Bld J Simon 14; M Barnard Ct T Firth Bld Warren 10; D Saunders Ct Hunter Bld Warren 2; D Fishel LBW Bld J Simon 0; R Redding Bld Simon 0; Pat Middleton ST A Rydon (Wk) Bld Karvay 1; L Tarr Ct Edwards Bld Warren 2; B Saunders not out 2; T Redding Bld Warren 0. Extras must have been 9 (Unrecorded - but there were a few no balls!) Total 82 all out in 26.3 overs.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 7-1-14-0; T Rydon 5-1-38-1; J Simon 6-2-11-3; S Warren 6.3-1-9-5; H Karvay 2-0-9-1.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Ct Chalmers (Wk) Bld Poyser 0; J Trollope not out 42; A Rydon Ct Fishel Bld Tarr 7; T Firth Ct, Bld Saunders 3; T Rydon Bld Isaacs 12; M Edwards Ct, Bld Middleton 10; H Karvay not out 1. DNB S Warren, D Firth, J Simon, R Rydon. Extras 3 (NB-1, LB-1, B-1) Total 83 for 5 in 25.5 overs.
Ashurst Bowling: B Poyser 5-2-6-1; L Tarr 4-1-9-1; R Redding 4-0-20-0; D Saunders 3-0-13-1; Isaacs 5-1-12-1; Middleton 3-0-13-1; B Saunders 1.5-0-8-0.
TWCC win by 1 run and 5 wickets - or whatever it should be.

Top of page
TWCC v Bolney CC September 11th 2016
Skipper Brock won the toss and elected to field first. Tom Rydon opened from the Downs End with his usual gusto for a five over spell that produced "Oohs" and "Ahhs" in good measure, but no tangible results in the wickets column. Jim opened up from the Pavilion End with his usual mix, and even, on occasion, something a little better. The Bolney openers, clearly capable with the bat, weren't getting away unduly from TWCC's perspective, a situation which continued as Rob Rydon replaced Tom from the Downs End. Rob and Jim toiled away and then Rob caught a good high catch at mid-off off the bat of the left-hander Morris who was, rightly, trying to get some momentum into the Bolney innings. Bolney tried to press on with the overs rather running out and with not many runs on the board and made some not very good running decisions which led to three run-outs in quick succession. Honse, taking over from Jim, bowled with a great change of pace and length and took the only other wicket to fall as Rob took another good catch. Time went by, bowlers changed, and Richard had with no success on this occasion, and neither did Paul though both were bowling well.
Bolney, then, scored 165 for 5, TWCC having restricted the scoring to this below par total with some excellent bowling and tight fielding. It is worth noting that TWCC were only a nine-strong team on this occasion, and to keep the scoring down like this was, on a sunny day with a fast outfield, commendable.
How often has a cricketing side contained four members of the same family? Not often, but on this occasion there were indeed four Rydons playing for TWCC as Rob, Tom and Alex were joined by Louisa in what could be seen as a four-pronged Wineham take-over bid. Louisa, with, I assume, a whip or some other such sort of domestic equipment, had spent the morning supervising the cutting, mixing, spreading and packing of a fine tea that appeared by special delivery at the perfect time and which served to further enhance the all-is-right-with-the-world atmosphere of this sunny clear September afternoon. Being calory-deniers, the entire editorial staff of the Gazette were able to tuck in nontheless as there was much fruitiliciousness to go with the excellent sandwiches and cakes. The bar raised yet again in time for Tony next week. Let's hope he's still friends with his neighbour the headmistress of the Rottingdean School of Catering. Thank you to team Rydon and, particularly to Louisa for all the effort.
So, TWCC needed to bat a bit, which James proceeded to do. There was one cracking square cut for four - the first of many visits to the hedge to look for the ball - but that was it from James on this occasion. Alex Rydon went in to join Paul and that was it; the two of them gelled well and both were studious and selective of shot. The crowd were treated to a second wicket stand of (no exact figures to hand) around 140 calm runs, not much in the way of chances given. Alex began his account with five fours in a row and Paul hit four in a row such was their command. Paul carried his bat, forcing boundaries and pushing probing ones and twos around to rotate the strike, in a fine innings of 58 not out which included 10 fours. Alex, disappointed no doubt to have been out for 96 a few days ago, went better on this occasion but, sadly for all who rather like beer, fell to an uncharacteristically soft shot as, needing just two for his first ever century, he gave short third man a bit of simple catching practice. What a shame, but to have a goal in life is no bad thing.
Rob Rydon, once again not being able to enjoy batting with any of his children, helped Paul to get TWCC over the not very distant line with some overs to spare.
Bolney, short of runs by some margin, bowled well enough, with Dave Chaffey in particular once again being the pick. Bolney chose to share the bowling around their side, a policy which, though commendable, made TWCC's chase all the easier. But the runs still had to be scored, and Paul and Alex did that with aplomb.
TWCC send their thanks to Bolney for sharing such a nice afternoon, and for providing two umpires for the entire game.

Scorecard
Richard Brock won the toss and TWCC elected to field and bowl.
Bolney Innings:  P Buch run out (Karvay) 23; K Morris Ct R Rydon Bld J Simon 34; S Bowles run out (P Hunter) 25; M Garside run out R Rydon) 20; S Adby ct R Rydon Bld Karvay 5; B Clementson not out 10; M Graziand not out 3. Extras 11 (thought there'd be more...) DNB J Moore, P Meader, M Madden, D Chaffey.
Bolney 165 for 5 after 42 overs.
TWCC Bowling: T Rydon 5-0-16-0; J Simon 11-2-28-1; R Rydon 10-0-36-0; H Karvay 7-1-26-1; R Brock 6-0-26-0; P Hunter 3-0-11-0.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter not out 58; J Trollope Ct Clementson Bld Madden 5; A Rydon Ct J Moore Bld Buch 98; R Rydon not out 1. Extras 6 (w-6). DNB E Bunn, T Rydon, J Simon, H Karvay, R Brock.
TWCC 167 for 2 (off 26 overs).
Bolney Bowling: Madden 4-0-25-1; Chaffey 4-2-6-0; Meader 4-0-29-0; Morris 4-1-14-0; Bowles 4-0-31-0; Adby 4-0-47-0; Buch 1-1-0-1; Clementson 1-0-14-0.
TWCC win by winning.

Top of page
TWCC v Bolney CC September 11th 2016
There’s little so annoying in life to write a full and contemporaneous cricket report only to discover a fortnight later that your ageing laptop has deleted it:  like a good innings, it is a crafted and artistic piece of work – impossible to replicate.  So to those who need words of adulation for their performance in this match my apologies – I can only say that your performance, whilst masterful at the time, may not stand the test of time.
Streat won the toss on a cloudy but mild Sunday:  we were playing the 80 overs combination – and Streat chose to bat against a strong looking TWCC side – indeed so strong that in this weirdest of all seasons, we chose from a squad of 17 available players.  Tom opened up from the far end – speedy but failing to test the batsman often enough.  Jim bowled well from the pavilion end but to no avail.  But when Matt Edwards replaced Tom, we had two quick wickets – real cricket, both caught by Jonathan behind the stumps.  Unfortunately this brought N Green to the wicket – an annoyingly pleasant sort of chap, just the sort of person you don’t want to make lots of runs, because you can’t generate the dislike you can against arrogant or mouthy batters.  So Mr Green settled into his task of gentle destruction of the TWCC bowling.  Whilst Matt – who bowled a really excellent spell and thoroughly deserved his 3 wickets - and skipper Brock chipped away at the other end, he kept going becoming ever more explosive.  It was only when he reached 90 that Honse – who was in the midst of one of his really excellent spells of bowling – finally got him caught by Tony.  Honse went on to take 3 more wickets but the damage had been done:  what looked to be a match where we were in control ended with Streat just 3 short of 200.  Boy were we in need of a good tea.  And in many ways, this is where the story really begins.  Tony Pearce, who the previous year had supplied a glorious tea thanks to contracting out to the next-door pensioner, was denied the opportunity to follow the same route because James had been somewhat critical – which the old lady picked up on Facebook or some such thing.  So Tony (and he claims Jan – which I find hard to believe)  put together a tea lacking in two main areas:  quality and quantity.  Poorly filled sandwiches which actually ran out before both teams had gone through -–perhaps because there were no nibbles to help.  A few packets of crisps and two cakes between two cricket teams!  It was roundly condemned as one of the poorest teas in TWCC history, certainly the first which actually ran out before the first pass.  The openers went out – clearly upset by the experience – and James was caught for just 3, Paul for 12.  It was left to Tony himself to try to make amends and in fairness it was a good innings, a series of fours and a six until he fell caught behind on 41.  By that time we were 81-3 and the game was in the balance.  Jonathan dug in for 22, Matt looked good for his 11 and Jim deserved more back up as he handsomely deposited the ball into the gang of `Simons` who were picnicking on the boundary edge.  But TWCC fell away badly and faced with the option of  the now infamous `ball-tapping` of two years previous against Streat, the team played to win… and lost.   Still, the pub was great – a near full turnout - and it was really good to see Steve and Dave come along at tea - it would have been nice to reward their attendance with either a decent tea or a decent innings but we managed neither.

Scorecard
TWCC lost the toss and were asked to field
Streat Batting: D Christmas Ct Rowland (wk) Bld Edwards    27; M Porter Ct Rowland Bld Edwards 10;N Green Ct Pearce Bld Karvay 90; D Jackson Ct Rowland Bld Edwards 10; D Porter Ct Edwards Bld Brock 5;J Funnell Ct Hunter Bld Brock 12; B Baxter Ct Brock Bld Karvay 3; H Freeman Ct Simon Bld Karvay 0; C Pick Bld Karvay 6;M Hartfield not out 1; S Speigal not out 4. TOTAL 197-9 42 overs.
TWCC BOWLING: T Rydon 5-1-30-0; J Simon 7-1-23-0; M Edwards 11-2-39-3; E Bunn 4-0-22-0; R Brock 7-1-29-2; H Karvay 5-0-27-4; T Firth 3-0-18-0.  
TWCC Batting: P Hunter Ct wk Bld Funnell 12; J Trollope Ct, Bld Harfield 3; T Pearce Ct wk Bld Pick 41; J Rowland Bld Pick 22; H Karvay DNB; M Edwards Ct, Bld Freeman 11; E Bunn Ct wk Bld Freeman 3; J Simon Not out 21; T Rydon Bld Freeman 0; T Firth Bld Freeman 0; R Brock Ct, Bld Spiegal 2. TOTAL 127 all out (29.2 OVERS).
Streat Bowling: M Hartfield 8-1-57-1; Funnell 7-0-44-1; Pick 6-0-19-2; Freeman 7-0-18-4; Spiegal 1.2-0-6-1.
TWCC LOST BY 70 RUNS


Top of page
TWWCC v Brighton Beamers September 25th 2016
And so the final match of a testing season arrived and we had 10 players available for the visit of Brighton Beamers.  Beamers limbered up and – speaking as one who knows one – it was clear they were a team who had been together a lot of years.  They don’t play much cricket these days – I believe this was their 4th match of the season – and they happily agreed with our experimental match variant of 35 overs with the chasing team able to claim a draw only if they score at least 2/3 of the score.  We were delighted to have Rob available for this his record turnout in one season as he gradually realises where his future lies – and he went out and made hay in the late season sunshine.  Oh yes, James was the other opener.  Rob’s innings was full of fine shots, one ball deposited in a garden, another in the field.  It was a batting masterclass.  The 50 partnership came up Rob 48, James 1, extras 1.  And the merriment continued past 100 to a mighty first wicket stand of 127 when Rob – by this time on 90, was caught and left the field to hearty applause.  James departed on the same  score for 28 – and Tom Carthew, a useful looking cricketer and friend of Reese made a useful 28.  But it was the return of the prodigal – Reese himself – after a few weeks of childminding and it’s alleged, sulking, that invigorated the end of the innings.  He was in imperious form and hit a fine and rather large six into the field as he powered his way to 50, accompanied at the end by Tony who hit a succession of fine fours.  The score of 241-4 from 35 overs looked more than enough.  We enjoyed a fine tea – for a team still shell shocked from the previous week’s effort.  It was courtesy of a wives’ collective – notably Liz and Fenella - plus friends and it was a triumph, everything a real cricket tea should be and plentiful.  We opened up with Tom and Honse – based on their bowling the previous week.  Neither were able to break through as Beamers started strongly.  Edward was brought on and broke through, though was expensive.  At this stage, Beamers were on course not just to draw but even to overhaul the TWCC score.  But Rob and Richard both bowled tightly and the match swung back our way, though it was clear that a win was unlikely bar a late flurry of wickets.  So the bowling floodgates opened and in the closing overs, every outfield player turned their arm.  But full credit to Beamers they batted well, kept us out and made 199-3.  Match drawn, everyone happy, pub – and a shout once again to Liz and Fenella for a super tea.  On now to the season’s figures….

TWCC WON THE TOSS AND BATTED
TWCC Innings: R Rydon ct Benfield B Siddens 90; J Trollope ct Rigby, Bld Esson 28; H Karvay Stumped B Eaton 1; T Carthew Ct Rigby B Siddens 28; R Packham not out 52; T Pearce not out 29. TOTAL 241-4 (35 OVERS)
Fall: 127/1,127/2, 156/3, 166/4.
Brighton Beamers Bowling
Renshaw 6-2-31-0; Smith 7-2-37-0; Esson 6-3-36-1, Benfield 3-0-21-0; Siddens 5-0-47-2; Eaton 4-0-25-0; Rigby 2-0-30-0; Chafey 2-0-7-0.
Brighton Beamers Innings: N Chafey LBW Bunn 43; R Rigby Bld R Rydon 59; T Hutchison St Rowland (wk) Bld T Pearce 52; R Wolf Pieterson not out 11. TOTAL 199-3 (35 OVERS)
Fall: 66, 112, 177
TWCC Bowling: T Rydon 7-0-32-0; H Karvay 4-0-21-0; Bunn 4-0-38-1; R Rydon 6-0-21-1; Brock 7-1-28-0; J Trollope 3-0-25-0; T Pearce 2-0-13-1; Packham 1-0-5-0; T Carthew 1-0-10-0.
Match Drawn



Top of page
TWCC 2015 Season
Brunswick Village v TWCC April 26th 2015
Following a marked absence during most of March and April, the clouds, naturally, gathered over West Sussex in anticipation of the start of the 2015 season, but, happily, they kept their contents largely to themselves as a small force of TWCC players convened beneath the Downs in the salubrious setting that is the ground of St James' Montefiore CC. Depleted in numbers, yes, but not in spirit our TWCC team of 9 rallied around Skipper Pearce and turned in a fine afternoon's work.
Tony agreed to Brunswick Village's suggestion of a limited overs match (35/side, 7 overs max/bowler) and set about losing the toss. TWCC were, happily, put in to bat.
James succumbed early in the cold and damp conditions, during which the Brunswick opening bowlers, Blackman and Wickremesinghe, turned in some good performances with a swinging ball, and I think although they had the new ball the damp conditions soon made this less of a factor than it otherwise might have been. The early departure of James brought Tony to the middle to join Paul H in what proved to be the partnership of the match. Both scored their half centuries (neither of which were duly punished post-match...) and these runs formed the backbone of our offer to the day's play. Tony was out towards the end of our allotted 35 overs, hitting out, for a wonderful 59 (2x6's, 8x4's) and Paul wasn't out at all (1x6, 7x4's) for an unbeaten 69. It wasn't an easy pitch on which to bat as the ball was stopping and sitting up on a variety of lengths, but the outfield was running reasonably well so a well struck ball often ran over the boundary, if, indeed, the outfield was involved at all.
Edward, Jim and Paul C made further small batting contributions in that order, and TWCC ended on a total of 176 for 4. Mention must be made of the third-highest scorer for TWCC, which was the extras column, managing an impressive 30 runs; 1 x no ball, 14 x wides, 5 x leg byes, 10 x byes. These runs proved critical as we shall see, and this early-season rustiness on the part of the bowling side can be said to have significantly affected the match.
Tea was... We had tea. And Brunswick Village very generously gave us a rotating fielder (think Whirling Dervish) to bring our fielding side up to 10 men, which was very kind of them.
So; a good total to bowl to, inroads into which were quickly made by Edward who took the gloves but failed to use them much. Matt E opened from the South Downs End and never looked like anything other than the real thing delivering up impressive pace which the Brunswick batsmen never really dealt with. James, in a smart move from Skipper Pearce, provided the opening batsmen with a challenge of a different sort from the Pavilion End, which broadly went well. Paul H took over from James and Jim from Matt, and the game rolled on in a workmanlike way with the Brunswick openers being a little reluctant to take on quick singles which, together with TWCC's tight(ish - Ed) bowling and sharp fielding, helped TWCC to gain an early upper hand on the run rate.
The opening batting pair for Brunswick of D Blackman and S Pengelly were, nonetheless, sticking around, producing a useful foundation of 42 and 27 runs respectively before the game evolved. After all a low run rate may not have meant much whilst Brunswick still had wickets in hand, and this they did until Paul Chatfield came on to bowl, and, though runs were scored off his bowling, wickets were also taken. He found some movement in the air and clean bowled two batsmen and caught another of his own bowling in a fine 3-wicket 7-over spell. His first wicket brought Arosh Fernandopulle - whose name I relish re-visiting every year - to the crease. We know well Arosh's powers with the bat, and thus began a game of cat and mouse with the strike that, ultimately, bore fruit. Skipper Pearce marshalled his field so as to deny Arosh any real opportunity to score more than a single at a time, and, as the required run-rate rose to above 7/over, Arosh felt the need to push on, moved out of his crease to Edward's bowling, the ball turned away from his lunging bat (so Edwards says) and Paul, now keeping, took off the bails. A real cricket moment.
Brunswick still had wickets in hand, of course, and they did hit out more and more as the required rate rose. Honse came on after his two-year loan to some of the best sides in the U.S. and the Czech Republic, and took a wicket as Jim (oh yes!) ran round the boundary denying a six, and, instead, somehow hanging on to a catch, and the run rate crept up and up to nearer 8 and then 9 per over.
Skipper Pearce had kept some overs back from Matt, and in a masterly piece of strategic thinking, bowled him out first thus ensuring that, by the time Jim and Edward came on to bowl the last three overs, the game was more or less lost to the home side. The batsmen duly hit out, with creditable success, but they ended up 6 runs short in a game that was TWCC's to lose, which we didn't.
A good opener for the season, marked by some good performances, not least that of James who more or less carried his coat through the entire TWCC innings in a marathon stint of  laissez-faire umpiring, and, although we are aware that our side is currently missing some key players to whom our thoughts and good wishes frequently turn, we look forward to the next game.

Scorecard
Brunswick Village won the toss and chose to field.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter not out 69; J Trollope ct Penney bld M Blackman 3; T Pearce bld D Blackman 59; E Bunn bld Burton 3; J Simon ct Burton bld A Wickremesinghe 12; P Chatfield not out 1. DNB: J Panther, M Edwards, H Karvay. Extras 30 (1-nb 14-w 5-lb 10-b). Total 176 for 4.
Brunswick Village Bowling: M Blackman 6-0-18-1; A Wickremesinghe 6-1-29-1; D Green 2-0-23-0; Pengelly 4-0-17-0; Burton 7-0-29-1; A Fernandopulle 4-0-23-0; Barrs 3-0-18-0; D Blackman 3-0-14-1.
Brunswick Village Innings: D Blackman bld Bunn 42; S Pengelly bld Chatfield 27; A Fernandopulle st Hunter bld Bunn 20; A Moroney ct & bld Chatfield 4; P Styles bld Chatfield 0; M Blackman ct Hunter (wk) bld Edwards 14; N Penney not out 18; D Green ct Simon bld Karvay 14; A Wickremesinghe run out 14. DNB: C Burton, K Barrs. Extras 16 (3-nb 10-w 3-b). Total 170 for 7.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 7-1-15-1; J Trollope 3-0-13-0; P Hunter 5-0-32-0; J Simon 5-0-23-0; P Chatfield 7-0-40-3; E Bunn 6-0-27-2; H Karvay 2-0-16-1.
TWCC win by 6 runs.

Top of page
Streat and Westmeston v TWCC May 3rd
A long rainy morning spent waiting for the phone to ring to call the whole thing off was finally over and a miscellany of TWCC players eventually found themselves wandering about in the fog in Streat. With Skipper Brock still recuperating it was, once again, Skipper Pearce who lost the toss and so led his troops into the field.                              
Stan chose to bat first, thus allowing his Streat players unfair access to cups of tea, whilst TWCC set about giving Streat an unassailable total. Jim and Paul Chatfield started it all off, and so began an afternoon of bowlers trying not to fall over in the mud. The general bowling and fielding effort was well-intentioned in the face of inclement conditions, and a number of TWCC players variously distinguised themselves in isolated acts of dedication, but in the end the 101 not out from a powerful and capable Ian Harvey, who, thankfully, retired after securing his century, proved to be the difference between the two sides. With Matt Porter (25) and Pete Davies (37) also contributing to the Streat cause as the overs meandered towards the end of the agreed allocation of 35, the home side eventually finished on 215 for 7. It was a pleasure sharing the field with Dave Jones who bowled a short spell between travels, and similarly good to have Joe Panther turning over his arm and taking a couple of wickets.
So... onto the TWCC innings...
Well... batters were in short supply. James (22, 4 x 4's) and Tony (14, 3 x 4's) opened, because they can bat, and then the rest of us did our best for just about long enough for the pub to open. With TWCC never getting close to the required run rate (sorry - Ed.), Stan didn't make us struggle too much, but, even so, TWCC only managed to score 93 before being all out (9 wickets).
So, Streat comprehensively beat TWCC, and the traditional to-ing and fro-ing of results continue; games, and then seasons, come and go and we get older and no wiser and long may it continue.
Scorecard
Streat and Westmeston won the toss and chose to bat. (35 overs/side, max 7/bowler)
Streat and Westmeston Innings: Ian Harvey not out (retired to be nice) 101; Simon Lea ct Trollope bld J Simon 6; Pat Wise ct & bld E Bunn 8; Matt Porter ct Pearce (wkt) bld J Panther 25; James Porter bld J Panther 5; Pete Davies LBW bld J Simon 37; Carter C-P bld J Simon 3; Danny C-P not out 15; Harry Freeman ct & bld J Simon 1; Mark Hartfield not out 1. DNB Stan Spiegel. Extras 13 (3-b, 2 lb, 5-w, 3-nb) Total 215 for 7.
TWCC Bowling: J Simon 7-1-28-4; P Chatfield 3-0-24-0; E Bunn 5-0-28-1; P Steinke 7-1-41-0; D Jones 3-0-30-0; J Panther 4-0-22-2; J Trollope 3-0-16-0; H Karvay 3-0-21-0.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope ct M Porter bld H Freeman 22; Tony Pearce LBW bld M Hartfield 14; J Simon ct P Davies bld C Poynting 17; J Panther ct M Porter bld J Porter 18; E Bunn bld S Spiegel 6; P Chatfield ct D Poynting bld C Poynting 5; D Jones run out (P Wise) 2; T Simon bld S Spiegel 2; H Karvay LBW bld S SPiegel 0; P Steinke not out 0. Extras 7 (1-b, 5-w, 1nb). Total 93 all out (9wkts).
Streat and Westmeston Bowling: H Freeman 7-1-24-1; M Hartfield 7-1-30-1; J Porter 4-0-18-1; C Carey-Poyning 6-2-12-2; S Spiegel 2.2-0-7-3.
Streat and Westmeston win by 122 runs.

Top of page
TWCC v Greys May 10th 2015
The balmier end of the weather spectrum arrived in time for TWCC's first home game of the season, versus Greys. Skipper Brock lost the toss, and then, still slightly wobbly following a nasty incident abroad, retired from the rest of the game - bar a brief spell of washing up undertaken only after Julia and Kay had done the man's share. Thus, with good sense prevailing, though it was clearly and understandably tough on Richard to sit out a real live game of cricket, Edward stepped into the skipper's shoes and took matters in hand from there.
So; to the game.
TWCC were put into bat and Paul and James started the ball rolling. It didn't look as if the bowling was easy to get away on a slow outfield, particularly bowling of the slower wobbly variety, and the start was a slow one. Paul didn't really get going ... and, actually, looking at the book, it 's apparent that with two exceptions, no-one else did either. The exceptions were a match-winning innings of 75 from James, and a hustling and forceful push at the end from Paul Chatfield. James started slowly, which is no bad thing because he didn't get out, and then, both as his confidence in putting bat to ball grew, and time and partners were running out, he unleased some fierce well-timed blows, many of which ended up in the Green Toilet Complex behind the pavilion. In the end he was out for 75, (6 x 4's, 4 x 6's).
Steve tried, in his characterisitcally ebullient fashion, to get things moving, with some short-lived success, and Matt Edwards looked every inch a batsman as he calmed the pavilion pundits with some classy stroke-play but, in the end, he too was out when he tried to pick up the pace. Jim didn't do much at all, and although Edward's new bat did sound much more solid than it did on debut, he, too, was out, caught, pushing on as we had to do with time running out and thoughts turning to lemon drizzle cake.
Which brought in Paul Chatfield whose bat certainly had no sonic deficiences at all and who hustled about the wicket, pushing runs and generally unsettling the oppostion. Joe and newcomer Twineham resident Barry joined in the frolic and, as wickets fell and the total grew, and Honse and Matt B played their parts, we got to tea in the last available over with Paul C out for an entertaining and important 16 and an encouraging final TWCC total of 143 all out.
Jim's fortunes at the Pavilion end were broadly successful, helped by a fine Trollope catch at point, but it only took Matt Edwards one ball, upon replacing Jim, to line up his sights before taking a wicket with his second. Well, to be honest, the sights were still set a little high, but bowled is bowled in anyone's book. Matt's next four overs were unproductive both in terms of wickets for TWCC and runs for Greys, but his last two overs saw two more wickets fall, one clean bowled and another sharply caught behind by Steve - also playing his first match of the season having recently returned from playing in the West Indies.
The Greys batsmen never really got a stand going and, missing their Aussie star, the writing was on the wall, but what did it say? Did it say "Twineham and Wineham often struggle to take 10 wickets" or was it "look out Greys, we're mad for it?"
Paul H took over from Matt B and kept the pressure on, begining and ending his spell with maidens and taking a wicket in between, and Honse and Joe finished up the match under the careful eye of Skipper Bunn who rather expertly marshalled his forces with aplomb and a firm hand. Honse took a wicket and Joe two, and we never got around to Paul C's bowling but that happens sometimes and that was that - a win for TWCC under Captain Bunn. Pub pub pub. Pub.

Scorecard:
Match played at Twinehem. Greys won the toss and chose to field.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter ct, bld Southon 8; J Trollope bld Newlands 75; S Rogers ct, bld Southon 3; M Edwards ct, bld Sewell 8; J Simon bld sewell 4; E Bunn ct, bld Newlands 4; P Chatfield ct, bld Malyon 16; J Panther ct, bld Malyon 6; B Adley ct, bld Azami 3; H Karvay ct, bld Malyon 0; M Brock not out 1. Extras 15 (2-b, 11-w, 2-nb) Total 143 all out.
Greys Bowling: Gallagher 8-2-21-0; Southon 7-0-16-2; Sewell 8-0-29-2; B Newlands10-1-22-2; Azami 5-0-43-1; Malyon 2.4-0-11-3.
Greys Innings: Brasher bld Edwards 12; Line ct Trollope bld Simon 3; Malyon bld M Brock 18; Burgess ct Rogers (wkt) bld Edwards 3; Dykes bld M Brock 2; Fenton bld Edwards 13; Newland ct Edwards bld Hunter 5; Sewell ct Hunter bld Panther 3; Gallagher bld Karvay 7; Azami ct M Brock bld Panther 4; Southon not out 6. Extras 34 (12-b, 3-lb, 17-w, 2nb). Total 113 all out.
TWCC Bowling: M Brock 11-1-30-2; Simon 7-2-18-1; Edwards 7-0-12-3; Hunter 5-2-13-1; Karvay 4-0-15-1; Panther 2.1-0-11-2.
TWCC win by 30 runs.

Top of page
Stanmer Swans (Hadlow Down and Moulsecoomb Wanderers v TWCC May 17th 2015
TWCC have become accustomed to the annual trek to the vestigial tail of the A272, but, although the humps and marshy hollows of the Hadlow Down pitch now come as no surprise, they still deserve respect and are often the cause of a tight and interesting low-scoring match.
The Gazette finds itself slightly at a loss regarding how to refer to the team always known as Moulsecoomb Wanderers, for their website now calls them "Stanmer Swans (incorporating Hadlow Down and Moulsecoomb Wanderers) Cricket Club". The Gazette assumes that there has been a name change and the Gazette will therefore, in true tabloid sporty reporty style, and at some saving of e-ink and possible RSI lawsuits, henceforth refer to TWCC's opponents of the 17th May as the "Swans".
The Swans won the toss and chose to bat first, no doubt putting runs on the board having proved on many occasions to be a sound policy at their home ground. On this occasion, however, it wasn't until some way into their innings that the Swans' scoring rate picked up. Opening with the ball for TWCC Matt Edwards and Honse soon had the Swans slightly behind the game and Honse, though still finding his way so early in the season, tempted Kevin Cooke down the track once too often with the resultant stumping being the first indication of the busy and impressive day Jonathan was about to have behind the timbers. Matt Edwards, as his eight over spell developed, progessively found his range with the ball alternately sticking in the wicket or skidding through (Jonathan again proving to be a natural with the gloves) and homed in on the stumps to bowl the Swans' free-hitting No. 2.
Joe replaced Honse with no tangible success though the batsmen were occasionally troubled, and Matt E was replaced by Matt B. What a trump card! Imagine seeing off the opening bowler, breathing a sigh of relief if you're still there, only to find another opening bowler steaming in at you, and Matt Brock certainly made it count as his second and seventh balls clattered into the stumps. This run of wickets brought the Swans' No. 6 to the crease, who hit the ball hard with bat and head, and the total began to climb. What does Skipper Brock have up his sleeve? Another opening bowler! Tom Rydon ran in hard and bowled very well at a time the Swans were trying to hit out, and his 5-over spell, though wicketless, only went for 11 runs at just the time the Swans' most belligerent hitter was at the crease.
There then began a rather painful series of events, and there is now a need to go and make a nice cup of strong coffee before anything more can be written about it...

Right...

Richard bowled a 3.5 over spell, and took 5 for 6. There; it is written. There shall be no comment on the nature of some of the deliveries involved, the facts are that in his first over he was on a hat-trick, and in his fourth over he had three for no runs in five balls and closed out the innings - the Swans all out for 112. It would be churlish not to congratulate Richard on this spell which is what it was and it will forever be there in the TWCC scorebook. Those present on the day will be only too happy to talk about Richard's success, but the Gazette suggests asking someone other than Richard himself about it as his natural modesty might prevent him from describing events with any degree of accuracy.
A lovely tea, thank you to the Swans' tea monitor, and then to business; 113 to win.
Paul and James began the run chase, and James finished it. Continuing on with his good 2015 form, James, understandably specualtive at first on the unpredictable wicket, opened out as the win was assured, including a lovely high six over the trees, and carried his bat through to the end of play. Paul (17) and Tony (14) also scored well on a dificult pitch, and Jonathan did get in to hit a four, but it was James who won the day ending up on 61 not out.
To the pub! The rather dour New Inn, with something of the more remote sections of Pennine Way about it, was transformed by a cheery TWCC side, Harveys IPA and Mild on tap, though neither was tried in favour of Best. With youth in the side there was also a worrying consumption of "lager" (which bears no relation to anything brewed in Germany or Denmark) but, whether fuelled by real beer or chemical contrivance, a general spell of tour-like camaraderie ensued and soon Richard's spell was but a distant memory.

Scorecard

Match played at Hadlow Down. Swans
won the toss and chose to bat. 
Swans Innings: K Cooke st Rowland bld Karvay 5; D McGowan bld Edwards 22; S Rogers LBW Edwards 7; N Dunn bld M Brock 11; G Smith bld M Brock 2; M Huiton/Hinton/Hunton(?) st Rowland bld R Brock 34; A Fowler ct Edwards bld R Brock 6; S Hilliard st Rowland bld R Brock 0; I Sherlock not out 5; J Mac LBW bld R Brock 0; W Roberts bld R Brock 0; Extras 20 (1-b, 2-lb, 15-w, 2-nb) Total 112 all out.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 8-2-14-2; H Karvay 5-0-28-1; J Panther 4-0-18-0; M Brock 6-1-25-2; T Rydon 5-1-11-0; J Simon 4-2-5-0; R Brock 4.5-0-6-5.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter bld 17; J Trollope not out 61; T Pearce ct? bld? 14; J Rowland not out 4. DNB H Karvay, T Rydon, J Simon, M Edwards, J Panther, M Brock, R Brock.
Swans Bowling: S Rogers 8.1-0-34-0; McGowan 5-0-22-0; N Dunn 3-0-18-0; Roberts 1-0-13-0; Not Sure 1-0-21-0; Sherlock 1-0-4-1. Extras 14 (3-nb, 8-w, 3-b). Total 114 for 2.
TWCC win by 8 wickets.

Top of page
Bolney CC v TWCC May 24th 2015
Skipper Brock, fielding an, on paper, strong TWCC side, won the toss and chose to bat first, thinking, rightly as it turned out, that if we couldn't get 10 wickets with the bowling attack we had, we wouldn't deserve to win. Runs on the board the first order of the day and in went Steve and James to see what they could do. Bolney opened with young pace from the Scoreboard End, but it was the sticky, slower and generally get-yourself-out bowling from J Elliott that proved Steve's undoing. James continued his fine form of 2015, and as long as the nippiness of J Bowles was negotiated, there were plenty of scoring opportunites. Tony, Richard and Rob ensured, with James, that plenty of runs would be on the board by the time tea arrived, so a certain amount of abandon was encouraged in the batting which resulted in both a good final total and a regular fall of wickets. Notable events; James' 43, Tony and Rob scoring freely, Matt's excellent and assured 39, Tom's big six, and 

At this point the Gazette received a visit from  the ASP (Attention Span Police) hit squad, and they pointed at the above opening paragraph as just the sort of thing they were intsructed to eliminate. So we find we are now under a distinct obligation to make the text "more immediate," and anyone with an interest in how different characters meandered through the ebbs and flows of village cricket on a sunny Sunday afternoon now need to make their own inferences from the scorecard below. That's the Big Society for you.
Here's the rest of the write up:

Joe run out ha ha everyone batted tea good bowling drops near misses no scoring no wickets draw.

As an excercise, the ASP insisted I show some of the words that, on reflection, we could all do without; Edward, quick, single, Joe, slow, straight, bat, scone, scoreboard, Matt, Tom, wide, speed, Rob, snick, doh!, unlucky, dogged, dull, drift, snub, Royal Oak.


Scorecard:
Match played at Bolney. TWCC
won the toss and chose to bat. 
TWCC Innings: S Rogers bld J Elliott 2; J Trollope ct Entwhistle bld J Elliott 43; T Pearce ct Entwhistle bld J Elliott 20; R Brock ct B Griffin bld E Entwhistle 9; R Rydon ct J Elliott bld P Meader 27; M Edwards ct Entwhistle bld P Meader 39; J Simon ct J Elliott bld P Meader 16; E Bunn not out 11; J Panther run out 0; T Rydon bld P Meader 12; H Karvay not out 1; Extras 32 (9-b, 4-lb, 14-w, 5-nb) Total 212 for 9.
Bolney Bowling: J Bowles 6-1-32-0; J Elliott 12-2-41-3; E Entwhistle 12-2-58-1; P Meader 9-0-55-4; O Atkins 4-0-13-0.
Bolney Innings: J Moore LBW Panther 52; J Bowles ct S Roger (wk) bld E Bunn 49; G Bignell bld J Simon 12; J Elliott not out 18; R Atkins ct S Rogers (wk) bld Panther 0; S Bowles not out 8. DNB: E Entwhistle, P Meader, B Griffin, O Atkins, M Green.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 5-1-14-0; T Rydon 4-0-26-0; J Trollope 4-0-13-0; R Rydon 7-0-29-0; E Bunn 6-0-23-1; J Simon 7-0-22-1; R Brock 5-0-17-0; H Karvay 2-0-7-0; J Panther 2-0-9-2. Extras 25 (3-nb, 18-w, 4-b). Total 164 for 4.
Match Drawn.

Top of page
West Chiltington v TWCC June 7th 2015
To the West! A new fixture for TWCC at West Chiltington, courtesy, we understand, of contact via the Rydons. A wonderful new clubhouse, appointed with every facility - even toilets! Our entire clubhouse would fit in the Away dressing room. This isn't to say that there isn't a touch of Dallas in the overall sweeping vision, but the design matches, no doubt, the scale of operations as the thriving club runs several young sides and who knows how many senior sides, some almost senior enough to take us on in a fair fight. On the day of our visit the whole clubhouse and surrounding territory were a-throng with what we like to think of as spectators, though, as the day was also one in which the village were engaged upon raising money for Marie Curie Cancer Care and were using the pavilion as the centre of operations, the numbers of TWCC fans may have been slightly less than we imagined. As part of our day with our new hosts TWCC were pleased to enter into the mood of the day with both the charitable nature of our bowling and by giving £110 for our tea - proceeds to Marie Curie Cancer Care.
At some point we had to come down to Earth and play some of what we like to call cricket. Skipper Brock lost the toss, and the host side said they'd like to bat first, which led to Matt Edwards steaming down the hill with a new Reader in his hands, pushing the ball through with some pace and lift. A great spell, his only wicket coming from a high glove through to Steve who took a sharp catch up round his ear 'oles. With no bad balls and three consecutive maidens it was a fine way to start the game and impress on the batting side that they had a real match on their hands. Tom Rydon, bowling up the hill, took a wicket in his first over and continued to trouble the batsmen with his pace for the rest of his, slightly expensive, spell. Jim replaced Tom and managed to put a plodding brake on the rate of scoring from that end until he didn't when 16 runs came off the last of his allotted eight overs. In the midst of this passage of play Paul Chatfield took a great low tumbling catch running to his right at long-on, which added a welcome gloss to Jim's spell which might otherwise have passed un-noticed.
Matt was taken off after seven overs, thus retaining a useful single over for later, and was replaced by Rob who, visibly fired up by the classy surroundings, ran in hard and bowled as heartily and fast as we've seen from him. Sadly, though, Rob hadn't travelled with his usual matching entourage of elite snick-fielders and several lovely edges were put down. Rob, ever cheerful, smiled his way through this abundance of moral victories and concentrated his good humour fiercely onto the stumps.
The West Chiltington batters were now, at this stage of the innings, begining to really find their range, using their feet to get down the wicket and strike hard for boundaries. Paul Chatfield's bowling, though initally troubling for the batsmen, coincided with this period of scoring abandon, as did all bowlers plying their trade through to the end of the innings. Edward took a well-engineered caught and bowled wicket at the end of his three overs, though much run-scoring was being indulged in by the host side. Matt Edwards' last remaining over, though, only went for 2, and Rob's final bowling effort gave him at least some of the 5-for he should have had (if not 6 - I lost count!) yielding 3 for just 16 in this  second spell of 4 overs. Richard bowled very well to contain the scoring and to take the important wicket of the clearly capable hard-hitting home skipper as Steve, standing up, stuck out a glove to a fine edge. Joe, always worth a try, only went for 15 off his one over, and at the end of the 40 overs, West Chiltington had 222 on the board with 8 wickets down. With bowling excellence from Matt and Rob, and Paul's fine catch being the highlights of the fielding performance, the cricketers went to tea with a mix of emotions; West Chiltington happy in the knowledge that they had scored well, with three key contributions from Taylor, Wyatt and Haggart totalling 163 runs between them (oh Rob... why didn't you get them out?), TWCC excited at the prospect of taking on a proper batting challenge, and Joe pleased at being allowed to sort out his refreshments.
So; on with the game! James and Steve opened the batting, with neither looking to be in any great difficulty. James, having had a look, hit his second scoring stroke for a straight 6, thus setting the tone of the innings, and once again it was James' runs that formed the backbone of the TWCC effort. Steve chose to end his participation early by setting off for a risky second run, risky because hitting the stumps direct from the deep seems to be normal in West Chiltington. This brought Tony to the crease who has the prize for the best sounds of the day as his only 6 wreaked some sort of havoc behind a tall hedge. There were certainly tiles involved. Tony, out too soon, played at a wide delivery and nicked a very thin edge to the keeper for an entertaining 23. James' second or third wind was required when Rob joined him after Tony's exit, and these two continued the chase in a very enertaining way. For much of their innings TWCC were behind in the game, but the outfield was quick and we did bat deep.
James, out in the end for a magnificent 82, once again formed the backbone of the TWCC chase - his runs this year have been invaluable and have allowed a freedom of strokeplay all the way down the order, but he was out, caught, fully opening the throttle as the chase built to a climax. Edward's 2015 form continues to build, and as he added 24 quick runs it became clear that TWCC might get near the 223 required for victory. Paul, Jim and Joe didn't much further the cause; Paul succumbing to a run out and Jim and Joe to the resurgent Monday bowling very well out of the direct Sun; but Tom and Richard did, indeed, get us close enough for some distinct excitement to circulate. In the end, following an extraordinary young man's 6 from Tom as he swatted a high no ball into the trees at backwards square, we needed just 7 off the last over with 9 wickets down. The first and third balls each yielded a single, then the fourth a scrambled 2 which returned Tom to face. 3 to win off 2 balls. Tom swung through the line of the penultimate ball - hard to see anything much at all looking hard into the sun - and he didn't connect as well as he can and the ball lobbed into the hands of grateful Skipper Armstrong at mid-wicket. A West Chiltington victory, albeit a narrow one. Did anyone mind? Not really - a great day at a great venue against a welcoming side, with some personal successes and good captaincy all round that engineered an exciting finish for the abundant crowd who had all gone home.

Scorecard:
Match played at West Chiltington. 40 overs limited over format. West Chiltington won the toss and chose to bat first.
West Chiltington Innings: L Rickman ct S Rogers (wkt) bld Edwards 2; T Wilkinson bld T Rydon 4; R Taylor ct & bld Bunn 72; C Wyatt ct Chatfield bld Simon 32; I Haggart LBW R Rydon 59; M Armstrong ct S Rogers bld R Brock 6; C Room bld R Rydon 4; A Kay bld R Rydon 0; J Trees (Jnr) not out 5; T Monday not out 19. DNB S Hodgson. Extras 13 (w-6, nb-7). Total 222 for 8.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 8-3-21-1; T Rydon 5-0-42-1; J Simon 8-0-50-1; R Rydon 8-0-28-3; P Chatfield 3-0-23-0; E Bunn 3-0-25-1; R Brock 4-0-25-1; J Panther 1-0-15-0.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope ct, bld Richman 82; S Rogers run out 7; T Pearce ct wkt, bld Armstrong 23; R Rydon ct, bld Hodgson 27; M Edwards bld Hodgson 0; E Bunn bld Monday 24; P Chatfield run out 0; J Simon bld Monday 4; J Panther bld Monday 0; T Rydon ct Armstrong bld Monday 13; R Brock not out 6. Extras 33 (2-nb, 15-w, lb-5, b-11). Total 219 all out.
West Chiltington Bowling: R Taylor 5-2-6-0; T Monday 7.5-1-19-4; J Trees 4-0-23-0; M Armstrong 8-0-34-1; S Hodgson 8-0-44-2; Jim G 4-0-0-24; L Rickman 2-0-15-1; Wyatt 1-0-19-0.
(The West Chiltington bowling analysis may be incorrect in certain details concerning T Monday and Jim G - but it's a "GGG" (Good Gazette Guess!))
West Chiltington won by 3 runs.

Top of Page
TWCC v London Unity June 14th 2015
London Unity... We seem not to do so well against them. A look back through the online TWCC archive shows that in the last 7 games we've drawn twice and lost three times (plus 2 rained off) with no wins! How do Unity do this? When you consider that TWCC are such a serious and competent team how come the Unity side has the wood over us?
So it was with all this, from a TWCC point of view, unsatisfactory history behind him that Brocky strode to the middle and decided to at least win the toss. Having done so, and choosing to field first, the Skipper had ensured TWCC of the best chance of controlling the match.
So it was with happiness in his heart that Skipper Brock revelled, nay, basked, in the excellence of the two Matts' opening spells. Charging in hard and bowling with some pace, the batsmen never really stood a chance. Matt E took two wickets and Matt B another and thus it was that the Unity's No's 4 and 5 got in early. They then set about putting some runs on the board.  Messrs Driver (J) and A Gane began to score more freely and thus it fell to Jim and Phil to stem the flow - a feat magniificently achieved by one of them. Jim, on the other hand, saw his first over go for 14, though he did then start to bowl at the feet of the free-swinging Gane and order was restored. Phil's spell, bowled during a critical period of hitting out, of 11 overs 0 for just 19, was a  remarkable return from injury. What a valuable player he is; having someone who is simply so difficult to get away is a great asset to his side. Jim, after a final bad over (there were some good ones in there too - Ed) , was replaced by the skpper with... the skipper, and Richard and Phil now bowling together took us on towards tea. Gane was out to Richard and, with the Unity total only standing at around 100, the time was right for the Captain to introduce other bowlers and to spread the game around. On this occasion this cost a lot of runs, but it was nonetheless the right thing to do, and it often brings wickets too as the batters see boundaries in their eyes and play poor shots (see TWCC innings below...) and the final few overs saw the total reach 172 at tea with Joe Driver falling in the end for a fine 73 to a stumping by Steve off Honse, and Gane, possibly the more destructive of the two on the day, having been out to a dolly catch to Matt E at mid-off (still needs catching!!! - Ed.) off the bowling off Richard for 57. It would have been easy for Richard to bring back the Matts before the final run-fest, but this is a Sunday game and all players need to play, and, besides, the final Unity score shouldn't be beyond us. Should it?
On with the game, for those that could move, which, surprisngly, considering the nature of all the imbibifications, included the Unity catching staff. The Unity also play in full Sunday fun mode, and they were not blind to the fact that their score was somewhat generously enhanced, so the TWCC openers were not asked to face the Messrs Drivers from the off, and, indeed, neither Mark nor Joe bowled a ball during the game.
The scorebook tells the story; all out for 122, all but the final two wickets caught! Hitting on the up to get-yourself-out bowling we got ourselves out. If there is any excuse it might be that this is only the second game we've played on our artificial wicket this season, and the last one was some time ago early on in May, and TWCC batters may have been surprised by the slightly high bounce of the ball off the wicket which does tend a stricken ball to rise up somewhat, but, in all truth, we probably have relied on James too much this season, and on this occasion he failed us so the eventual defeat clearly has to be laid at his door.
Some batting highlights there were; Matt E again looking very good with a 35, Edward's continuing rise of form, and Matt Brock who simply let fly and cheered the crowd with a four and two sixes, one of which may have disturbed the stash in one of the dressing rooms. But it has to be recorded that TWCC lost again to the Unity, all out for 122, 50-odd runs short of the Unity's 172. Some of this is possibly due to the fact that the TWCC team on the day had one opener and ten middle order batsmen, but the conditions were good, the bowling not difficult and we failed we failed we failed... Beer required, which was, on this occasion, particularly fine! Hooray for the restorative that is Harveys!!!

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and Richard Brock elected to field first.
London Unity Innings: J Burke ct Rogers (wkt) bld Edwards 10; M Cockburn bld Edwards 1; A Pitcher bld M Brock 5; J Driver st Rogers bld Karvay 73; A Gane ct Edwards bld R Brock 57; M Driver not out 10. No names for the DNB's. Extras 16 (nb-3, w-9, LB-2,b-2) Total 172 for 5.
TWCC Bowling: Edwards 8-1-20-2; M Brock 8-1-19-1; J Simon 6-2-29-0; P Steinke 11-2-19-0; R Brock 4-0-18-1; P Chatfield 3-0-33-0; H Karvay 2-0-30-1.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope ct, bld Nutall 5; S Rogers ct, bld Nutall 2; R Brock ct wkt bld Garfield 5; M Edwards ct wkt bld Williams 35; J Simon ct, bld Nutall 14; E Bunn ct, bld Williams 16; P Chatfield ct, bld Williams 1; J Panther ct, bld Williams 7; M Brock ct, bld Clarke 20; H Karvay not out 1; P Steinke bld Clarke 0. Extras 11 (nb-4, w-7) Total 122 all out
London Unity Bowling: J Garfield 8-0-29-1; A Nutall 7-0-40-3; J Williams 8-0-27-4; J Clarke 8-0-24-2.
London Unity won by 5 wickets.

Top of page
TWCC v Headliners June 21st 2015
"Total cricket" - that's what we were promised by an ebullient captain when he finally put down Brendon McCullum's autobiography. A wind of change was sweeping through the home dressing room, most noticeable, curiously, just after the match.
The Headliners won the toss and decided to bat first, and TWCC's energised skipper chose to open the his side's bowling attack with Matt Edwards and Joe Panther. Matt didn't settle straight away into his usual smooth and effective rhythm, but he soon came good, of course, and Joe was also producing some tantalisingly good balls that asked the question of the Headliners' opening batsmen (that question being "will this ball be down the leg side again?"). First change was to get Matt Brock on, and he came on with a bang. Committed to bowling as fast as he could he certainly put the wind up the Headliners as much with the deliveries on a full length as with a few accidental no-ball beamers. Matt Edwards, now firing well, took a wicket and was, of course, immediately taken off by Brendon Brock, to be replaced with Jim who bowled very tightly for his four overs, with two maidens for just 2 runs. Matt Brock, a fine four-fer being his reward for a great spell, was removed from the attack as the capabilities of the batters began to falter, and Matt was naturally happy to forgo the opportunity for a five-for and make way for others in the team. But was this individual denial a good thing for the Headliners? No it wasn't! for this change brought the resurgent Phil Steinke into the attack, and he certainly delivered. In two spells, for Brendan Brock was mixing it up well, Phil - back to his best - was repeatedly finding his length and line and causing the ball to rise just on and outside the off-stump. Phil, with the second four-fer in the match, ended with figures of 6-3-6-4 and, as James' tea loomed, the Headliners never recovered their mojo and they ended up all out for 106 in 36.3 overs. Harwood and Proctor scored the majority of the Headliners' runs, neither giving many chnaces before the need for some runs rather forced their hands.
The Gazette would like to excuse its departure from the normally well organised and considered analysis, but a chronological listing of the on-off deployment of the bowling talent by Skipper Brock would make for dull and repetetive reading (and writing) and we don't want too much of that, though clearly some is desirable. Honse, James and Richard himself (ever searching for cheap wickets) also bowled with some effect, a wicket falling to Honse, and, all in all, it was a most effective and miserly TWCC bowling performance, with Matt B and Phil the outstanding pair.
James' tea, often, for some reason, the source of some japery, was, in the opinion of the Gazette's Fine Dining Correspondent, a great relief. Elegant in its simplicity - a few nicely filled sandwiches here and there topped off with some moist cakes - what was there not to like? The egg sandwiches, often offered, sometimes over-fussy, were on this occasion best described as sandwiches with egg in them. Perfect.
The only problem with it being James' tea was that he still had his pinny on when it was time to start the 107 run chase, and so Jim, at last elevated up the batting order as he so richly deserves, manfully stepped in to open with Paul H for just long enough to allow James to get his pads on. Paul, studious in defense and comprehensive in attack, watched Jim's cover drive for 4 with disbelief, and then set about batting with his usual opening partner when Jim was cleaned bowled by a ball that dived in six-iches off a good length and took out his middle stump. James, in spite of being in top form this season, faired little better - the small amount of washing up still to do no doubt preying on his mind - which brought Honse to the crease. Some pundits might be surprised to learn that, just as Norman Wisdom is big in Albania, so is Geoffrey Boycott esteemed in the Czech Republic. Honse, ever the eager student in his blocking classes at school, brought all his resistance to the fore in this, his personal tribute to his national hero. Thus it was that Honse, by protecting Paul from the excellent left arm over bowling of Proctor, kept both his end up and the powder of the rest of the TWCC batting line-up dry.
And it came to pass that Proctor and Foster were both seen off by Honse and Paul. With his job done Honse duly got out to allow Edward in to encourage Paul to run some quick singles and the odd two. As the finishing post approached Paul finally allowed himself to hit out, and, with a match-winning 65 not out (11 fours, 1 six), he saw TWCC home with seven wickets to spare. A great return for Paul - straight in with some serious runs and a good job too.
Total cricket, everyone got some sort of a game with the possible exception of the skipper himself, and the team look forward to Tony winning the single wicket next weekend.

Scorecard
Headliners won the toss and elected to bat first. 40 overs match, max 8 overs per bowler.
Headliners Innings: Barnett bld M Brock 8; F Foster ct Rogers (wkt) bld Steinke 12; Hollis Ct Rogers (wkt) bld Steinke 2; Harwood bld M Brock 35; Palmer ct Bunn bld Steinke 0; Smith ct Rogers (wkt) bld Karvay 0; Proctor ct Panther bld M Brock 26; Reid not out 4; G Foster ct R Brock bld Steinke 0; Talbot bld Edwards 0. Extras 15 (nb-3, w-7, lb-4, b-1). Total 106 all out.
TWCC Bowling: Edwards 6.3-2-18-1; Panther 5-0-23-0; M Brock 7-1-21-4; Simon 4-2-2-0; Karvay 4-0-18-1; P Steinke 6-3-6-4; Trollope 3-0-12-0; R Brock 1-0-2-0.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter nout out 65; J Simon bld F Foster 4; J Trollope ct, bld F Foster 2; H Karvay ct, bld Penfold 4; E Bunn nout out 10. DNB S Rogers, M Edwards,R Brock, J Panther, M Brock, P Steinke. Extras 24 (w-13, b-11). Total 109 for 3.
Headliners Bowling: F Foster 8-0-39-1; Proctor 8-5-7-0; Penfold 5-0-31-1; G Foster 4-0-15-0; Talbot 0.1-0-4-0.
TWCC win by 7 wickets.

Top of page
TWCC Tour to Bournemouth July 3rd - 5th 2015
This was a much anticipated tour: the first for two years, and one in which we were in the happy position of being awash with young testosterone-driven stallions keen to show off their talents in cricket and night clubs alike. Two of the aforementioned, Joe and Matt E, set off early on the Friday, opting to take in a country pub in the New Forest. Edward, Paul, Phil, Jim, Richard, Matt B and Honse set out from Twineham at lunchtime, Dave and Steve from Brighton. It was a lovely warm day and a pleasant two hour trip along the coast brought us to our destination:  Bournemouth’s West Cliff hotel, in the heart of the town’s vibrant kebab district. The rooms were a tribute to the deceptive powers of wide angle photography, but this was a cricket tour and we didn’t need to swing any cats. 
Within minutes of arrival, we gathered on the patio in warm sunshine and in the manner of a 1970s swingers party, the skipper threw the captaincy into a pot, inviting offers for that evening’s action. Three put their names forward: Matt Brock’s name was first out – but the smile left his face when he was told the winner was the last one to be drawn. Joe, too, was disappointed but Matt Edwards` face flushed with delight as the power surge took hold. Seconds later he dismissed the option of pulling the batting order out of a hat as per the last tour. No, skipper Edwards would do things his way and much credit to him for that. 
We departed for the village of Puddletown in good time for a 6pm start for our 20/20 fixture. It was a pretty ground deep in Dorset’s most historical region, with an artificial pitch similar to our own.  It was a beautiful summer’s evening. Matt lost his first toss as Skip and we were put into bat, an exciting-looking combination of Steve and Jim opening up. Well, when we say opening up, we mean opening – because, after 4 overs, we were on 6 - including 4 extras. Our WASP was 30. However Jim then started a remarkable series of fours which pushed the score on considerably. Steve was caught hitting out to mid-wicket for 1 which brought in our new skipper. His first ball was a wide. His next ball was also a wide. However his next ball – and his first legal one – he politely returned to the bowler for a caught-and-bowled and the tour’s first golden duck. At least Edward faced a legal ball as well as two wides before he swept it round into the arms of a grateful backward square leg for 0.  We were 31-3 from 8 overs. However, Jim just kept on swatting the fours, the backbone of the innings, and celebrated an excellent and crucial 50. Dave was run out for 3 and a short time later Jim was caught for 60. 87-5. But the team rallied and from there on, all the batsmen added a few to keep the score ticking over and we finished on a creditable, and defendable, 128-9. 
Leading his team onto the field, the skipper listened carefully to advice from various sources – principally Phil and Edward - and opened with...Phil and Edward.  An inspired choice: both bowled accurately and tightly and they took 3 wickets in the first 5 overs with the score still not on 20- 2 good catches by the skipper and one from Jim. Edward snapped up his third wicket clean bowled and Jim and Joe took over and continued in similarly miserly vein. Puddletown dug in and started to rebuild, slowly but steadily. The next bowling change was to turn the match decisively TWCC’s way. Two wickets from Paul Chatfield’s first excellent over, clean bowling their top scorer A Knight, the other caught by Jim who was having a great match. Matt Brock picked up a wicket courtesy of a good catch - the skipper’s third – and then Chatters got another wicket first ball of his second over, a catch by his bowling partner. The next batsman, C Ascott, punched a catch to Dave Rogers at square leg – but it pinged off his pecs.  Paul’s response was to clean bowl him with his last ball for a fantastic four wicket haul. The skipper and Honse bowled out the remaining overs and Puddletown fell well short on 94-9. A win for TWCC in their first match on tour and for Matt Edwards in his first match as skipper. 

Scorecard
TWCC VS PUDDLETOWN 3rd July 2015 20:20 format
PUDDLETOWN WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL
TWCC Innings: S Rogers Ct, Bld A Knight 1; J Simon Ct, Bld L Allen 60; M Edwards Ct & Bld Y Knight 0; E Bunn Ct, Bld Y Knight    0; D Rogers Run Out 3; J Panther Ct Wkt, Bld Clark 7; P Chatfield Ct, Bld L Stevens 8; M Brock Bld Clark 1; H Karvay Bld Clark 1; P Steinke Not Out 7; R Brock Not Out 7. TOTAL 128-9 20 OVERS.
Fall: 19-1, 29-3, 31-4, 78-5, 87-2, 101-7, 113-6, 114-8, 116-9.
Puddletown Bowling - not available.
Puddletown Innings: L Allen Ct M Edwards, Bld E Bunn 5; A Stevens Ct J Simon Bld E Bunn 1; A Barrett Ct M Edwards Bld P Steinke    9; A Fairman Ct M Edwards Bld M Brock 21; J Barrett Bld E Bunn 11; A Knight Bld P Chatfield 27; L Stevens Ct J Simon Bld P Chatfield 5; A Weir Ct M Brock Bld P Chatfield 1; C Ascott Bld P Chatfield 1; Y Knight Not Out 1; C Clarke Not Out 1. TOTAL 94-9 20 OVERS.
TWCC Bowling: P Steinke 4-0-14-2; E Bunn 4-0-9-3; J Simon 4-0-32-0; J Panther 3-0-15-0; M Brock 2-0-4-1; P Chatfield 2-0-17-4; Karvay 1-0-5-0; M Edwards 1-0-4-0.
TWCC WON BY 34 RUNS

The home side took us a mile down the road to the epicentre of history: Tolpuddle, where we drank in The Martyrs pub. For those who had discussed the events, here is a brief history: 6 Tolpuddle men formed a friendly society which was judged illegal and in 1834 they were tried, found guilty and transported to Australia. The country rallied: literally – one of England’s first successful political marches and a petition of 800,000 was raised in protest. Four of the six were returned to England in 1836, one more in 1837. It was seen as the birth of the trade union movement and is celebrated worldwide. And here we were assembling – mostly legally – in a Tolpuddle pub.
Puddletown presented us with a commemorative plaque as we sampled the delicious local ale – and the boys drank lager! Fines were duly handed out: Dave Rogers was fined for dropping a catch which deprived Chatters of a possible five-fer – and Paul was fined for failing to get his five-fer. Matt Edwards was invited to take a pound from the pot for his successful captaincy – but then fined £2 for his golden duck. It’s a cruel but necessary tour tradition and few escape the sadistic reaches of the tour committee (of one... Ed.). Only Honse, Phil and the sidelined skipper were judged to have done little enough to merit any kind of mention – glorious or otherwise.
As the evening continued chatting away with the opposition, lightning flashes marked the end of a long humid day. Within minutes, great drops of rain had us scurrying inside the pub and shortly afterwards to the cars. Our thanks to our hosts who made us very welcome and ensured a great evening.
The rain got harder as we headed towards Bournemouth, and, by the time we pulled in to the hotel car park, it was torrential. A good time to stay inside in the bar. The cards came out and Steve won chase the ace as time ticked on past the midnight hour. Outside, the rain was now pouring in rivers down the road and gushing down the hotel steps, flooding the bar patio and threatening to spill over the threshold of the hotel’s reception and flood the whole place. The owner, Manz, leapt fully clothed, full-length, into the 8-inch deep flood with a long screwdriver and proceeded to unblock the drain, getting to his feet with a wide triumphant grin on his face, soaked through from head to toe. At the same time, the rain lessened and the hotel was safe. And a couple of hours later, when a few of the tourists felt the need to feed, the flood had subsided. The visit to Bournemouth’s finest kebab house – some 10 minutes away – gave an insight into the town’s visitor population: mostly young, drunk and on stag or hen weekends. Inevitably there was a queue at the kebab shop but most of us hadn’t eaten since we left Sussex so we waited, we ordered and we ate. By 3.30am we were back at the hotel and needed a long sleep on our 4-foot 6-inch long beds.
The following day we rejected our hotel’s offer of £8 for breakfast, because we saw a poster of what it included. Instead we made our way to a nearby cafe and had a meal of similar standard for £1.50 less. We headed to the golf course at Canford Magna – the River Course – destined to meet Tony and Mikey on the first tee. Buggies were booked – and it turns out these were faster than Tony’s supercharged Range Rover which hit traffic on the M3 so despite leaving at 8.30am, they were not to make it til noon. They announced their arrival with a high-fiving buggython round all the other players before Tony set about trying to convince everyone he should play off 36. Golf was a delightful course alongside the River Stour:  Edward was the true shark, shiny new clubs – unusual for someone who claims not to have played for two years – and the majority of shots pinging pleasantly straight and long. However, Steve, playing with Dave in the fourth grouping, took the honours, though because of Tony’s lateness, betting was minimal and for the most part we ended up still in pocket. After a quick après-golf beer, we made our way back to the hotel.
Now, country pubs are in short supply on Bournemouth seafront. Especially country pubs which ban tattooed youths, don’t require bouncers, have a full range of real ales, flowers round the door and folk music – all of which are required on cricket tour. The boys had mentioned that there was a Wetherspoons just round from Kebab Alley so we made our way there, much to the disgust of the older tourists. The beer was cheap and reasonable, the floor was a little sticky and smelly and the clientele equally so. We stayed for just a short while, happy to see 8pm when we could go back up the hill for our curry. 
We walked in to the restaurant find ourselves seated next to a stag party all dressed in Hawaiian shirts - identical to the one Phil was wearing! Phil proudly took his place at the head of their table to a round of applause from all. The staff were good fun, the poppadoms a little soft but the curry was very good and it was great to be a full tour of 13 all together watching the boys swiping their chosen night’s prey online. Even more fun when Joe connected Mikey’s profile to the local Gaydar network – the offers flooded in to relieve him of his `boy cherry`. Anyway, when we eventually worked our way through the vast numbers of Cobras ordered by Matt Brock, some headed back to the hotel – including Dave and Steve who were to take off at some frightful hour to head for the British Grand Prix - whilst the boys and a few granddad hangers-on went to a town bar: where the boys were let in and the granddads were turned away!!!  We headed back to the hotel to let the boys have their fun – and in traditional WGOTSOT style – we draw the curtain on the night.
The following morning, Wetherspoons was the chosen venue for breakfast – and the planned tennis, beach cricket and beach football were all cancelled in favour of leaving early for a nice country pub in Langton Green. The pub was close to our match destination – a pretty thatched establishment in the heart of a thatched village, reached via a thatched ford. We had slipped back around 200 years. A mostly non-alcoholic lunch for an hour, and off we headed to Pimperne CC. It was reached through a modern housing estate: houses backed on to the pitch, at what looked like a safe distance. Hmm....
Skipper Brock back in charge, he agreed to the home-team’s captain Brian’s suggestion of a 40 overs match, dutifully lost the toss and Pimperne opted to bat. Their opening left-hander was a very good bat and he set about it as he meant to go on, scoring 10 from the first over from Matt E. Matt and Phil rallied, Matt Brock came on with excellent pace and troubled the batsmen but still no breakthrough, as the score swept past 100 in 16 overs. Joe Panther bowled nicely but it was the introduction of Edward’s slow but accurate bowling that got the breakthrough, tempting the left hander to come down the pitch leaving Tony to sweep off the bails. In his second over he took another, LBW; both openers gone. It has to be said some of the TWCC fielding was traditionally `tour Sunday` - overthrows slipped through, boundary pick-ups missed and occasional truculence as fielders were changed regularly to try to both stem the runs but also be in position to pick up wickets. Jim opened his spell well, a maiden and tucking up the batsmen nicely. Pimperne’s numbers 4 and 6 were striking out and putting loose balls away, taking the score past 200. Matt Edwards got his reward in his second spell with a caught and bowled, the skipper took a good catch from Edward, and Matt Brock clean bowled one and had another caught by Jim (not sure about that - Ed.). Paul and Honse had short spells but when Jim came back, changing ends to come from the pavilion end, against the wind, the tour’s champagne moment arrived. A great catch from Paul Chatfield in the deep from the penultimate ball of Jim’s penultimate over was followed by a catch behind by Tony off the next ball. The field came in for the first ball of his next over - no need – Jim clean bowled their number 9 and claimed his hat-trick. It would have been a great end to the innings, but it was not to be. In strolled Pimperne’s number 11: a bearded type, making up the numbers, ambling onto the field without even any pads! Tea beckoned. What we learned during tea was that this was the opening bat for Pimperne’s Saturday team. After a sighter, he despatched Jim for a very large 6, landing on the (fortunately strengthened) conservatory roof of the `safe distance` house beyond the car park. The next went for a shorter 6 – and Jim’s final ball of this most eventful over was an even bigger 6, smashing against the back wall of the same house, inches below the upstairs window. The innings closed, we were in no doubt that score for Pimperne of 297 would take some getting. Tea was a pleasant and ample ploughman’s style selection in a pavilion that doubled up as a nursery school classroom – interrupted only by one of their senior players telling us the affronted householder had complained and urging us not to pepper his house during our batting.
Mikey took this request to heart when he opened the batting with Matt E: refusing to send the ball over the boundary he fell to a stumping after making two singles, something of a contrast to the riches he’d been promising to deliver. Tony made a responsible 19 before being clean bowled, but Matt was playing a masterful innings, sensible running and sending bad balls to the boundary. He got his debut TWCC 50 and well-deserved it was, eventually going on to 65 before he was bowled trying to force the pace. Jim continued his excellent match with a careful 17 before hitting his own wicket and whilst not up with the rate, nor were we collapsing into oblivion. We should mention that Pimperne were not bowling as they might do during a league fixture: it was mostly spin, which was very sporting of them but difficult to get away because the balls weren’t coming onto the bat. Richard came in at 5 and will long remember his 3 fours in a row on his way to 31: but the tail failed to wag and we finished our innings on a creditable 181, losing the match by 115 runs. A good game but I feel our opponents had us where they wanted us for the majority of it.
The village’s two pubs were both newly closed, and, wishing to end our tour in traditional style, we offered our apologies to our very sporting hosts and dashed off to find a pub to down a final pint gathered altogether round a garden table. All agreed it was a great tour and great that we had a full tour party, youngsters and seniors as one. Talk turned to next year and a return to country pub accommodation, close enough to a town for the boys to get a taxi for their nights out. Oxfordshire seemed a popular choice, punting mentioned, despite our notoriety for water-based activities. Our thanks go to Steve for his brilliant work in getting the tour organised -so much to do and done so well – Steve you’re the real tour hero. Well done to all the players, some great performances on the field – Jim, Matt E, Edward, Chatters - great fun off it and simply brilliant to share a tour weekend with a wonderful group of players. 

Scorecard
TWCC VS PIMPERNE  5th July 2015 40 overs match
PIMPERNE WON THE TOSS AND ELECTED TO BAT
Saul St T Pearce, Bld E Bunn 77; Greg LBW Bld E Bunn 32; Wiggers Ct P Chatfield Bld J Simon 7; Kev Ct R Brock Bld E Bunn 51; Joe Ct & Bld M Edwards 21; Fordy Ct T Pearce (wkt) Bld J Simon 50; John Bld M Brock 0; Andy Bld J Simon 0; Billy Ct J Simon (if so I don't remember it but it's possible as I don't remember much - Ed.) Bld M Brock 8; Bryan Not Out 0; Frank Not Out 18. TOTAL 297-9 40 OVERS.
Fall: 111, 120, 142, 201, 269, 270, 270, 275, 279
TWCC BOWLING: M Edwards 8-1-60-1; P Steinke 8-0-33-0; M Brock 8-0-46-2; J Panther 3-0-31-0; E Bunn 4-0-38-3; J Simon 6-1-47-3 (inc hat-trick); P Chatfield 2-0-20-0; H Karvay 1-0-13-0.
TWCC INNINGS: M Pearce     Stumped Bld Kelly 2; M Edwards Bld Franklin 65; T Pearce Bld A Kelly 19; J Simon Hit Wicket Bld Saul 17; R Brock Stumped, Bld B Kelly 31; P Chatfield Ct, Bld Saul 4; E Bunn LBW Bld Noyce 6; J Panther Bld Regan 6; H Karvay Ct, Bld Regan 6; M Brock Ct, Bld Regan 0; P Steinke Not Out 2; TOTAL 181 ALL OUT, 38.1 OVERS.
PIMPERNE WON BY 115 RUNS

Top of page
TWCC v Staplefield July 12th 2015
One of those on/off rainy Sunday mornings - the bane of all TWCC catering staff. Telephonic optimism from the Skip came through though, and soon enough there we were, gathered in the pavilion, listening to the rain on the roof of the customarily miasmic Long Room. However the rain blew through to be replaced by a friendly light drizzle, a 35 over per side format was agreed upon, Skipper Brock won the toss and elected to bowl, and there we were strutting our Twineham stuff once again on the field of dreams.
Matt Brock opened from the Downs End. Matt has two sorts of spells - one where he pitches the ball up on a full length and gets lots of batsmen out clean bowled. This wasn't one of those spells, but he did get a wicket as the opening batter fended the ball off his face to square leg where the lithe and athletic member of the Panther dynasty in the form of Mark P. ran in and calmly held on to a catch. Joe P. opened the bowling from the Pavilion End to good effect, though, with the arrival in the middle of Staplefield stalwart G Moreley (correct spelling not guaranteed), the runs began to flow. Joe did take a wicket, albeit at some expense, as he floated a delivery outside the off-stump where the ball was edged high and James, at a trot, clung on to a catch.
News hot in from one of our correspondents is that this batsman, that Joe got out for 0, scored 100 off 45 balls the week before! Thanks Joe and James!!!
The scorecard, moving on, really tells eager readers all the necessary details should they care to look, so suffice to say a lot of us bowled, a lot of the opposition were out, some good catches were held (whilst some perfectly good opportunities for catching glory were spurned by fielders sitting-on-heels-not-moving-in-as-the-bowler-bowls), and, with the exception of a rumbustious 37 from Moreley, not many runs were scored as Staplefield petered out, some overs short of their allotted 35, and an early tea was taken.
Of note in the TWCC fielding performance were a brace of excellent slip catches from Edward (who, through sheer demand, has created a vacancy on the Gazette staff for an Edward Bunn Correspondent - yet to be filled), a debut wicket for Mark Panther, and it is also good to report that James' name has appeared again in the wickets column, twice; one of his victims the hard-hitting Hutchins with big boundaries on his mind every ball.
So, to bat. Joe managed, somehow, to both open the bowling and the batting - a measure of something no doubt - but he was soon back with no runs to is name, the victim of a direct hit before he could complete a quick single. Keen to point out that James, who called the run, was not to blame he magnanamously admitted he could have run faster.
The Staplefield bowling attack was sharp and accurate and runs were almost as hard for the TWCC batters as they had been for the Staplefielders. Almost. James was out early, and in strode the impressive Honse, who doggedly set about frustrating the bowlers as only he can. Honse kept out the straight ones, and then, opening up, he hit two fours and then began to rotate the strike well on his way to a fine and important 15. Richard, sadly injured again and unable to thrill us all with his bowling and catching, was able to concentrate on his batting and hit a couple of fine fours on his way to 8, Matt B also cracked two fours off the pacy Shazad before being bowled by a 12 year old, all of which brought Tony to the crease. And thank goodness for that. Tony, never troubled by anything, glanced and powered his way to a match-winning 30 not out, ably assisted by Edward until he was out for 5, and Matt E - one of our most reliable stalwart batters even though he seems to suffer from pad-kleptomania.
A TWCC win, sufficiently early to swell the Sportsman's coffers at the expense of those of the Royal Oak, and our thanks go to a cheerful Staplefield side, short of runs on this occasion, and who couldn't stop even TWCC scoring enough runs to win - though we all know it could probably have gone another way on another day. Which is why we like cricket.
We look forward to finer weather and Richard's tea.

Scorecard
TWCC V Staplefield 12th July 2015 35 0ver per side limited over format, max 5 overs/bowler
TWCC won the toss and chose to field
Staplefield Innings: A Thilarathnaka ct M Panther bld M Brock 0; S Gull ct Trollope ble J Panther 0; G Moreley bld Karvay 37; J Garside ct Bunn bld Edwards 0; J Gaynor ct Bunn bld Steinke 4; J Ellis bld Steinke 2; D Clarke ct T Pearce (wkt) bld M Panther 6; R Hutchins bld Trollope 15; M Furber not out 2; D Dray LBW Trollope 0; R Bull ct Steinke bld T Pearce 1. 13 extras, Total 80 all out 30.3 overs.
TWCC Bowling: M Brock 3-0-3-1; J Panther 2-0-16-1; J Simon 4-2-7-0; M Edwards 5-0-10-1; H Karvay 5-1-12-1; P Steinke 3-1-5-2; M Panther 3-0-13-1; J Rollope 4-0-11-2; E Bunn 1-1-0-0; T Pearce 0.3-0-0-1.
TWCC Innings: J Panther run out 0; J Trollope ct & bld Clarke 4; H Karvay LBW Furber 15; R Brock bld Shazad 8; M Brock bld Clarke 9; T Pearce not out 30; E Bunn bld Moreley 5; M Edwards not out 3. DNB J Simon, M Panther, P Steinke. Extras 7 (w-1, lb-1, b-5) Total 82 for 6.
TWCC win by 4 wickets


Top of page
TWCC v Wisley CC July 19th 2015
Driving home from the pub, still dazed but now mildly philosophical after a half of shandy, I switched on the car radio to find Beethoven's 9th on the go. Beethoven. I like a bit of Beethoven. Now there was a bloke who had the same tools, the same palette of available instruments as everyone else, and yet he produced a new and innovative sound forcing the world to move on. Made everyone at the time stand up and think about where they were placed on the convention-spectrum. Still does. He broke boundaries.
Now you see where this is going.
Normal cricketers, who read their Mozart coaching manual at an early age, or maybe even saw Haydn go into bat in his pomp, know the bowlers have a ball to bowl with and the batters a bat to hit it with. That's cricket; bowlers can sort of trundle in on a soggy Sunday in Sussex and, if the ball is sort of on middle stump on a sort of good length, sort of rely on going for one or two an over with an occasional bounday or wicket happening to them when they stray or the batsman makes a small mistake. And batters who keep out the straight ones might be able to push the ball about a bit and end up with a few runs to take to the pub. Ahh... that's cricket - the same old sort of up and down day of jogging about to fiddle a game around and forget work with.
I am jumping ahead, but there is very little to say about the game itself. Who cares about the sunny weather, about the toss, about Wisley batting first and scoring 200 plus thanks largely to Rupert's well-paced and ultimately only semi-destructive innings? Who's interested in a few wickets here and there, Alex's great catch at short cover? What about the mildly amusing runs leaked at third man, or Jim flailing around like an old woman being attacked by bees at mid-off instead of just catching a high lob? Tom got three wickets bowling good and fast - so what? Paul discovered leg breaks. Yeah - who cares? The tea, normally reviewed at some length in our gastroenteritis pull-out centre section, was, yes, it was lovely, produced with evident attention to detail by the gifted wife of a man with a limp, but what's the point of dwelling on that? There are more fish to fry in this newspaper!
What about James' 50? Well, yes, it was another vintage Trollope masterclass of untroubled but skillful jug-evasion. Paul kept the pacy opener at bay with James, and Alex's well-groomed, eye-pleasing but short-lived 14 did help the cause. But are we bovvered? No, the only thing to take away from this match was quite shattering and of another order. Our cricketing world shifted in its orbit and a new age dawned in front of our eyes.
No one is quite sure who, or what, that was going in at number 4 for Twineham and Wineham on Sunday the 19th July 2015. It looked like George Hunter, it smelled like George Hunter, but it was, surely, a manifestation, a victim of blitzkrieg-possession.
At first the person that looked like George batted with some degree of normalcy. Indeed, inexplicably, his first four - off the first ball he faced, naturally - was on the off side! Yes, it was crunched and reached the boundary before anyone could move, but nonetheless there it was; an off drive. His second ball, it is true, was hit to the on side in the air, but it was still only a four! I mean, was this George Hunter? The third ball... Ah - there it was; a huge swing of the bat, mighty fast bat-speed, a skimming and squirming mis-hit for a single. One over negotiated, no harm done, James was still there batting well. George was about to face again. Steve was padded up.
Then it happened.

Well. We saw it, but couldn't believe it. I went to get the family to watch. Word got around. A crowd built. This was different. Extraordinary.
112 off 45 balls. His last 53 came off 17 balls. James was out there with George and soon realised that his role was to see off the last couple of balls if the end of an over was imminent, or to get off strike if he was facing a new over.
The bowlers soon realised their role was to just serve up perfectly good deliveries and to watch the results.
The rest of the TWCC side soon realised their role was to either fetch balls back from the surrounding countryside and adjacent gardens or to dig about in the pavilion for old forgotten balls that were to live again in a blaze of glory as they sailed high over the landscape. We were all witnessing a fundamental force.
Suddenly it was the last ball. I mean, we still needed a couple to win, but we only had one ball left for Wisley to bowl with. George nailed another six, high over the tree in the playground - no one bothered to try and look for it; it didn't matter - for, anyway, this was a new World, a place where time and space would never be the same again. Higg's Boson Land.
So what do we do, now that we live in this post-Armageddon world? Well, we have to return to normal. Get on with real life and pretend it didn't happen. But if Chris Gayle or Brendon McCullum phone up the Skip on a Friday one week and say they might be able to make it, we have to check with George to see if he's available first. I mean, yes, they'd be useful in the field - not playing obviously but in the field over the road - but they would be superfluous cricketing presences.
And what of Ludwig? He was last seen in the back of beat-up ancient Transit with a load of hairy do-badders, a drum kit, a bass and a load of dope. He won't be the same when he comes back.
But you wait 'til you hear Beethoven's 10th!

Scorecard
Not sure who won the toss, but TWCC bowled first but that may have had more to do with Wisley being stuck in a traffic jam or in the pub than with what happened to the coin. 40 overs per side format agreed.
Wisley Innings: M Kerrigan ct A Rydon bld T Rydon 13; R Geer nout out 116; Campbell bld T Rydon 2; Domingo bld J Simon 3; Fletcher st Rogers bld A Rydon 46; Richards bld T Rydon 7; McIntosh not out 7. 4 more Wisley DNB names not recorded. Extras 16 (nb-3,w-9, lb-2, b-2). Total 210 or 202 (the is, again, wrongly made up) for 5.
TWCC Bowling: T Rydon 8-0-35-3; J Panther 4-0-12-0; J Simon 6-1-9-1; M Edwards 7-1-43-0; P Hunter 4-0-29-1; H Karvay 3-0-23-0; A Rydon 5-0-27-1; E Bunn 3-0-20-0.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter ct wkt, bld T Richards 16; J Trollope not out 56; A Rydon ct ble T Richards 14; G Hunter not out 112. DNB S Rogers, E Bunn, J Simon, M Edwards, J Panther, T Rydon, H Karvay.
Extras 12 (nb-3, w-4, b-5). Total 211 or 214 (the book is, again, wrong!!!) for 2.
TWCC win by some runs.

Top of page
TWCC v Xiles August 9th 2015
A bright late summer day saw Xiles CC arrive to take part in a jaunty game, and at the same time TWCC welcomed another Dad to the team, this time of the Edwards variety, and rather good he looked too - er... in a cricketing sense I mean... Matt had done a great job of enticing players to join us in in the absence of several TWCC regulars, and we hope the new boys enjoyed their afternoon and would be up for further selection.
Matt Edwards, in charge again, won the toss and elected to bowl first with himself and Joe Panther pairing up for the opening attack. Matt took a few overs to find his range, and Joe the same to lose it, but it was Joe who took the valuable wicket of David Hooper, squaring him up nicely with a ball jumping up off a length which ended in the safe hands of Charlie Baldock - good to see him back again. James Grantham, another new player to the side, replaced Joe from the Downs End and, again, the ball was lifting awkwardly from just short of a good length. Matt Edwards' 7 overs were probing and mean, but he took himself off, wicketless, and threw the ball to Jim, who caught it! Jim and James took the Xiles' innings on nicely, a wicket or two here and there, though no batters were getting on with it - and so it went on. Charlie took two wickets, Honze one with his Eastern sleight-of-hand, and Mark Panther and Jonathan behind the timbers paired up to produce an excellent stumping. Jonathan, again, generally excelled with the gloves and ended his stint with a stumping (or two?) and a catch to his name.
The visitors never really got their scoring rate up, losing wickets each time they made the effort to get going, and tea was taken with Xiles having just 147 on the board - a tribute not only to the TWCC combined bowling attack but also to an all round good effort in the field.
With several regular players absent TWCC's jury-rig batting line up was nonetheless able to see Paul Hunter in at 1, which always helps, and, indeed, proved pivotal on this occasion. He never looked in any trouble, and, together with James Grantham, was able to take 14 runs off Tulley's first over. Karthik on the other hand, and from the other end, bowled with excellent pace and direction going for just 15 runs off his 7 overs. He took only one wicket, that of James G who mysteriously hoiked at a straight one after having looked to be in complete control. James had batted with aplomb up to that point, and his error of judgement was particularly costly given that Jim was due in at 3 (don't worry, Tony's back soon). Paul continued to play his natural game, as did Jim which is why he was out hitting a ball uppishly to cover point - out for 13 - but the scoreboad already showed 67 at this point and TWCC had plenty of batters to come. Indeed in strode Matt Edwards who continued the general trend of scoring runs, and by the time he was out for 21 the game was all but done and dusted. Joe with 6 and Robin with a crunching four came and went and it was to Edwards Senior, Gary, that fell the honour of hitting the winning runs with a slapped four through extra-cover. Paul carried his bat right through the innings and secured the victory with his 69 not out.
Of note, as one looks back on the game, was the fact that, as ever, the better bowlers don't get the wickets, as illustrated by Karthik only taking one wicket, whilst the extraordinary Tim took three in his three over spell, albeit at the cost of 26 runs. A case of Spiegelisation at its most effective. Matt Edwards, likewise, had bowled well without anything appearing in the wickets column.
Next week we see Brocky back in the Captain's chair, and it is to be hoped that he continues the excellent new tradition started so magnificently by Matt of buying everyone a drink after the game - thanks Matt! A big TWCC thank you to Skipper Matt for all his efforts on and off the field.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and Skipper Edwards chose to field first.
Xiles CC Innings: D Hannant bld J Simon 25; D Hooper ct C Baldock bld J Panther 11; Mick ct P Hunter bld J Grantham 25; T Campbell bld H Karvay 24; J Savatt ct M Edwards bld C Baldock 9; L Bassil ct J Rowland (wk) bld C Baldock 0; M Blakeston st J Rowland bld M Panther 24; T Graham not out 14; Karthik not out 4. DNB Tulley. Extras 15 (nb-1,w-13, b-1). Total 147  for 7 recorded. (Bowling plus extras = 150, batsman's total plus extras 151.)
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 7-1-15-0; J Panther 6-1-23-1; J Grantham 6-1-28-1; J Simon 7-2-19-1; C Baldock 5-1-14-2; H Karvay 4-0-12-1; M Panther 2-0-15-1; G Edwards 2-0-9-0.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter not out 69; J Grantham bld Karthik 19; J Simon ct, bld Luke 13; M Edwards st Hooper bld Tim 21; J Panther st Hooper bld Tim 6; Robin run out 4; G Edwards not out 4. DNB J Rowland, C Baldock, H Karvay, M Panther. Extras 11 (w-8, lb-1, b-2) Total ... 148 or 149 for 5 depending on which bit of the book one looks at.
Xiles Bowling: Tulley 7-0-41-0; Karthik 8-2-29-1; Luke 6-0-34-1; M Ford 2-0-15-0; Tim 3-0-26-3.
TWCC win.

Top of page

Warnham CC v TWCC
August 16th 2
TWCC welcomed back a much refreshed Skipper Brock who celebrated his return by winning the toss again, and, again, opting to field first. And why not? At his disposal were a lightly hung-over Matt Brock and an eager Panther. Both bowled well, Matt with good pace and intent, and Joe picked up an edge that went, unmolested on this occasion by stand-in keeper Pearce, straight to John Riley - thank you very much!
Matt and Joe were replaced by Jim and Richard respectively who took 6 wickets between them and generally helped the cause. Jim erred a little to leg, which was unfortunately bowling to a strength of the home side and Robin was, on accasion, asked to run just that little bit too far at fine leg and some excess of unfortunate runs ensued. Richard found a good length and the ball popped up and moved about nicely. Some 6 or 7 wickets
down and Warnham were not looking like they were going to post a large total, but then the pitch was interesting and the ball was moving about so even a low score might have proved to be hard to overtake. Honse and James pitched in, and neither were fodder for the wary Warnham batters, and a mixture of overs from returning Brocks and Panther J saw that Warnham's total remained modest at 150 at the end of 40 overs. TWCC are, I believe, really quite a good fielding side - plenty of catches held and runs saved.
After tea Messrs. Trollope and Brock R strode to the middle to face a brace of Warnham youthful opening bowlers, and, indeed, the quality of the deliveries made scoring really tough. But in the face of some excellent and penetrative bowling neither of TWCC's stalwarts buckled in the least, and the edge was definitely knocked off the bowling attack by a mixture of resolute defence and luck. 13 overs in and although the score was still just 26, the visiting side had lost no wickets and the opening bowlers were off.
Wickets inevitably fell, though incoming batters saw to it that the total continued to march upwards. A stand of 37 between Tony and Reese settled everyone down, and, as the overs ticked by, it seemed not unlikely that this would be a close match in spite of TWCC's slow start as these two began to pile on the runs. Tony scored the only 6 of the match on his way to a characteristically fast 26 and Reese opened out nicely as the end neared, hitting 18 off his last 6 balls before he lost his shape and missed a full toss on the stumps. With the exception of an unfortunate Mark Panther (stumped - was it first ball?), all incoming batters contributed well, in particular, later on, John Riley who ended with 25 runs to his name. Jim managed to take advantage of some slow long-hops, but was run out for 16. In strode Joe, his reverse sweep in his pocket, to join John as the game got critical.
Then suddenly it was the last over; 5 to tie, 6 to win.
A single off the first ball - not enough, and here it all becomes a bit of a blur in the book... hard to piece it together. Two more dots - Joe I think on strike? Then, 4th ball - oh no! John was run out!! TWCC still needed 5 to win.
Never fear - Robin's here! In he went. Looked about him.
Settled.
In rushed the bowler - so hard to hit - but... WHACK! a big on-drive swat from outside the off stump. Oh no - there's a deep long on. Never min...but what's this? A fumble - keep running -  fumble fumble - over the boundary! It was four!
Scores tied, one to win off the last ball.
Mid-pitch conference, Joe and Robin, Robin on strike. There was no doubt what had to happen. Everyone should run!
In comes the bowler.
Bowls.
Robin swishes and knocks the ball close by his feet. Joe is already in at the batter's end so Robin has to sprint hard to the bowler's end. A shy at the stumps - he's got to be out - no, the ball misses - he's in! A run! TWCC 151.
An exciting day's play - lots of good performances on both sides, and either side could have won and deserved to do so.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and Skipper Brock chose to field first. 40 overs limited overs format.
Warnham CC Innings: A Collins ct Riley bld J Panther 4; T Subba Row ct M Brock bld J Simon 13; M Woodhatch ct & bld R Brock; G Medlay ct Trollope bld R Brock 0; J Tarrant not out 26; M Dear bld J Simon; S Edwards LBW J Trollope 25; Murray ct J Panther bld R Brock 0; Heath ct J Trollope bld R Brock 8; Pearce run out 1; Tidy nout out 0. Extras un-recorded! Total 150  for 8.
TWCC Bowling: M Brock 8-0-28-0; J Panther 6-0-24-0; J Simon 9-0-39-3; R Brock 8-0-18-4; H Karvay 6-1-19-0; J Trollope 3-0-13-1.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope bld Tidy 12; R Brock bld Pearce 10; T Pearce ct, bld Tidy 26; R Packham bld Heath 36; M Panther st, bld Tarrant 0; J Riley run out 25; J Simon run out 16; J Panther not out 4; R Smith not out 4. DNB: H Karvay, M Brock. Extras 14 (w-7, lb-3, b-4) Total 151 for 7.
Warnham CC Bowling: Woodhatch 9-0-25-0; H Dear 8-0-17-0; Pearce 7-0-29-1; Tidy 8-3-28-2; Tarrant 5-1-26-1; Heath 3-0-26-0.
TWCC win by 1 run

Top of page
TWCC v Streat and Westmeston CC August 23rd 2015
Any match considered in retrospect reduces to a few significant events, all of which, and more, were hotly debated at TWCC HQ in Wineham long into the evening. One of the great pleasures in life is the gathering at the Royal Oak huddled around a jug of Harveys. Analysed through the bottom of a glass the most critical occurences of the day would appear to have been Tony's fault. Much was made of how old Tony is now and how much less he contributes these days. At his door were laid several dropped catches of the sort he never failed to snap up, how he failed to contribute in any meaningful way with his bat - not like the old days, and how poor his general judgement is when wearing an umpire's coat. It was also clearly Tony's fault that Richard won the toss and chose to bat first - the most signifcant of all the day's events. In order to win we would have to take 10 wickets - when was the last time that happened? But, to be fair to Tony, we did have the side to do it with good firepower in the shape of Matt E and Tom R, plus general arm-turning offerings from the rest of the team. And TWCC were fielding a particularly strong batting line up; with Paul, James and Tony our 1,2 and 3, what could possibly go wrong?
Well Paul could be out third ball for a duck. That could happen, Tony.
Then, Tony, you could come in, nurdle a single and then half-hit a shallow lob to Stan at mid-wicket. That could happen.
And, maybe Tony, Jonathan could swan in and run James out. Always a possibility.
To get away from this laboured and over-contrived Tony-bashing which is becoming as dull as it is clearly un-merited, the game could, from 15 for 3 go one of two ways. Firstly we could be all out for under 50, or, of course, Jonathan and Alex could show the oldies how to do it by putting on 132 runs together. Happily they chose the latter option.
Bowlers came and went, Stan happy to give many of his team a go, and Jonathan and Alex pushed the ball about for quick ones and twos as well as ever more frequently crashing the ball to the boundary. Jonathan's 78 not out underlined his prowess as a free-scoring and secure batter. He did hit 8 fours but of almost greater importance was his and Alex's ability to find the ones and twos and rotate the strike thus causing the scoreboard to climb and climb. Alex started carefully, facing 14 balls before scoring even a single and 26 balls before hitting his first boundary, but in not giving his wicket away he ensured he was still there when the opportunities to score became more clear. And score he did, (thirteen 4's and two 6's), before sadly being caught on 96 (it must be recorded that a jug was nonetheless provided by Team Rydon - thanks Rob). A great partnership, no doubt one of TWCC's best, notable not so much for the lost ball-ness - though Alex's latter-stage big hitting did indeed begin to upset the local wildlife - but also for the progressive and competent running exhibited by two like-minded and fit players that kept the scoreboard rolling. Tremendous stuff.

Edward, not out on 14, and Jonathan saw us through to tea.
What was it that Richard said as he digested his decision to bat first? "We need 200 - It's a 200 pitch." He was proved both right and wrong.
Whatever Tony's shortcomings on the pitch he clearly still has the wood over his favourite headmistress who provided him with one of the best teas we've had the fortune to overeat. Plump sandwiches and endless cakery - perfect before going in to field. Right: 10 wickets required.
Not so easily done. Matt and Jim opened the bowling; Matt downwind with the lively end to bowl towards, and Jim bowling into the West wind which should help with any swing. Matt duly had the ball whistling around and bowled out the Streat No. 2, and although Jim failed to find any swing with the old ball there was a miserliness to his spell that was pretty much on target (I thought so - Ed.). In order to win, however, TWCC needed 9 more wickets. Change of bowling. Richard replaced Jim and Tom Rydon came on after Matt's first spell giving the ever more confident Streat batters Porter and Flower a change to absorb. Tom bowled with good pace and got a wicket in his fourth over with Flower lifting the ball to Honse at mid-off, but there wasn't much other sign of enough wickets being taken to aid the TWCC cause. The exit of Flower brought Pat Wise to the crease and, to give Streat new problems, Skipper Brock brought on James, Honse and then Paul to see what could be done about taking the remaining Streat wickets. Unfotunately Wise and Porter decided to forget about getting out and, instead, set about bringing the required run rate down. Lots of runs... By the time - oh look, I could go on, but who reads this stuff anyway? We've all got lives to lead and things to do, not least me as I've got today to plan my motorbike trip around France Germany and Belgium. I could be doing that. You, if, indeed, there is a "you" out there, could just get on. In short, and contrary to Skipper Brocks belief that it was a 200 wicket, it proved to be a 201 wicket and Streat won with two balls to spare. That sounds rather more exciting than it was as the end was more or less inevitable with about 3 overs to go; the required run rate wasn't high and Wise and Saunders weren't having much trouble with the game. Porter and Wise set up a good Streat win, with Pat Wise ending on an excellent 78 not out.
A good match, plucked out of the blue by James and Stan, and thanks go to them. Alex and Jonathan did us proud with their excellent partnership and individual performances, we bowled well in parts and could have strangled the game I suspect had we been minded to, but in true Twineham fashion all players got a game.
Back at the pub, once we'd done with Tony, we set about sorting out the England line up, and we had about as many definitive conclusions as do the England selectors. The Gazette's own analysis is that it's all Brendan McCullum's fault for suddenly making his style of cricket the ideal, both for test and one-day stuff. A test match in this intoxicated way of thinking has become no more than four one-day innings' bolted together. Caught up in the gung-ho NZ series we thought we were fine going along with it and were emerging as a new force on the World stage batting as if we didn't mind getting out. Against the Aussies our commitment to this brand of cricket faltered, and, caught between two stools we had a side made up of batters (Lythe, Root, Stokes, Buttler, Ali) who, whilst suited to a one day game where it doesn't matter so much if you're out, were put in the position of it very much mattering if they were out and they found it impossible to play the long game. Who to pick instead? No idea - but neither am I sure that the county game provides any sort of training ground for the players we need. So, maybe, we should go with it; make a test match like 2 limited overs games? Hales, Cook, Willey, Root, Stokes, Ali, Rashid, Buttler, Wood/Plunkett, Broad, Anderson is the Gazette's offering if this is way test cricket is going, and take out Cook and put Lumb or whoever else is hitting the ball a lot in for the 50 overs/20:20 games. There are many people with more knowledge of the county scene than the Gazette's writing staff, but this is designed to provoke. Maybe our reader should submit his or her team to us and we'll run with it.
Streat won - I said that. And no mention of the weather!

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and Skipper Brock chose to bat first. Normal Sunday gentleman's cricket.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter Ct Flower (wk) bld Saunders 0; J Trollope run out 4; T Pearce ct Spiegel bld Hartfield 1; J Rowland not out 78, A Rydon ct, bld Butcher 96; E Bunn not out 14. DNB J Simon, M Edwards, T Rydon, H Karvay, R Brock. Extras 9 (nb-1,w-5, lb-2, b-1) Total 200 for 4.
Streat Bowling: Saunders 9-2-17-1; Hartfield 8-1-26-1; Tagg 5-0-35-0; Freeman 4-0-24-0; D Christmas 4-0-15-0; Butcher 4-0-40-1; Spiegel 4-0-29-0; J Porter 3-0-11-0.
Streat Innings: M Porter ct A Rydon (wk) bld Brock 43; C Mansfield bld M Edwards 16; R Flower ct H Karvay bld T Rydon 26; P Wise not out 78; D Christmas st A Rydon bld Brock 5; C Saunders not out 10. DNB M Butcher, J Porter, H Freeman, G Tagg, M Hartfield. Extras 22 (w-5, lb-3, b-7, nb-7) Total 201 for 4.
TWCC Bowling: M Edwards 11-2-44-1; J Simon 7-1-15-0; R Brock 9-0-39-2; T Rydon 7-0-33-1; J Trollope 3-0-21-0; H Karvay 2-0-25-0; P Hunter 1-0-9-0.
Streat win.

Top of page
Crescent CC v TWCC August 30th 2015
Well... Horsdean.
But before I proceed I have to redress an imbalance regarding the reporting of the recent performances of Joe Panther. He caught a great catch and hit a four in the last match. Or the one before. Or something. The Gazette apologises for this failing and promises to do better.
Crescent. The Crescent skipper won the toss, or, more accurately, our skipper lost the toss, and TWCC were asked to field first. No problem.
Tom R opened from the prosaically-named Dual-Carriageway End, and the tone of the day was set. Runs were not going to be easy to come by at the hands of TWCC's bowling attack as Tom steamed in and bowled two maidens straight not off the bat. Jim opened from the more romatically-named Not The Dual Carriageway End, and was also miserly, and these two frustrated the openers to the extent that an injudicious head-up swipe allowed a straight one through the gate to give Jim his one wicket. The ball, a lovely dark Reader, was, from the very first ball, nothing but a mud-magnet and any airy deviation was out of the question. Indeed Tom found the ball increasingly hard to hold and Jim suddenly found it increasingly hard to stop it being hit for boundaries so on came Joe and Honse. Joe, varying his attack from round to over the wicket, proved hard to get on top of, and the batters began to realise that any sort of score was, perhaps, best achieved by summing lots of singles as much as by big hitting. TWCC's fielding performance, generally reliable and excellent, suffered a little too much from not jumping on the quick singles in saving-one positions on both sides of the wicket.
Honse, concentrating on line, bowled a studied spell - one of the best in his TWCC career. He started with some good fortune as the impressive Gatford, who had taken Jim for 10 in what unsurprisingly proved to be his last over, top-edged a wide and high full-toss to Joe who took another great, or was it stunning? and match-important, catch at point. Of course the ball needed bowling and the excellent catch needed catching excellently, but ultimately Gatford got himself out and Crescent's scoring-potential was limitied from that point onwards. Honse, sizing up the conditions well, opted to concentrate on line and let the pitch provide the variations - an excellent tactic - and was rewarded with another, bowled, wicket later on in his lengthy spell.
Paul replaced Joe and proved to be a problem for both skippers. For Crescent's captain the problem was that he settled onto a line and length that saw the ball repeatedly pass the bat (slip in), and then he found the edge of a victim's bat and Tony took a fine catch behind the timbers. He was economical and threatening and this level of performance didn't falter as his spell lengthened. The problem for Richard was that he still had yet to bowl Rob or himself, and both would be excellent options, but Paul was bowling so well that it was hard to take him off. Luckily someone hit a four off his 7th over which wasn't particularly his fault, but it did provide an excuse for his removal which Richard pounced on and he duly put himself on for a bit of cheap-wicket action.
Here the Gazette must mention the uncharacteristically laboured fielding performance of Rob Rydon. Normally sprightly and energetic in the field he was on this occasion visibly lethargic and incapable throwing the ball. Or was he? The Crescent No.6 clearly thought so as he clipped the ball to the square-leg boundary where Rob was ambling about with his head in the clouds, and he set off for a run - or would that be two? Of course it should be - that chap can't throw!  Two it is..but..what's this? Why is that chap throwing with his right arm? And is that the ball whistling in at head height straight into Tony's gloves by the stumps? Yes it was! Rob's shameless and clearly only semi-transparent skullduggery had paid off which almost eclipsed his dropped catch later in the game.
Edward, curiously expensive but also succesful in wicket-taking terms, had come on for Honse and, although he initially found it hard to drop onto a good line and length, find them both he did and he was rewarded with two quick wickets in his third over. Again, he was quite capable of taking further wickets as Crescent's tail-enders were passing through, but we had yet to see Rob Rydon strut his stuff, so on he came and he predictably made short shrift of the job in hand. Geary, Crescent's No. 5, was still there, and it was he who took the home side's innings on to a total of reasonable proportions. Indeed it was he who quickly spotted a slightly overpitched ball from Rob and hit him straight for a fine six, but Richard and Tony combined well to remove him as tea approached and he began to swat and this left just a few batters to face the music. Richard rolled over Crescent's No. 9, the end was nigh and the end was Rob-shaped. Spurning the need to come in off his long run, he shimmied up in his Rolls Royce fashion, and, taking the un-responsive pitch out of the equation, speared the ball hard and fast at the base of leg stump. Two wickets in no time off consecutive balls emphatically ended the innings on the stroke of tea.
Eight bowler's used, only Reese and James of the available non-gloved side went un-bowled, and both would probably have been as effective as those that did bowl.
TWCC's reply gave James the chance to individually contribute to the game for the first time, a chance he found hard to take in the face of some excellent pace bowling from Crescent's Kidman whose lengthy spell began with six straight maidens. James continued to keep the ball out well and survive in the face of some excellent bowling, but Paul didn't as Kidman found the slightest of edges and was caught behind. This brought Tony to the middle and he and James began to crimp the edges of the crescent-shaped smiles. Tony began his campaign with some forceful shots, and James and he took the score onto 30 before James finally "ooh'd" himself once too often and was bowled by Gatford. On came Rob and thus began the decisive partnership of the match. No histrionics or close calls here. Solid sportmanship of the highest order was on display. Quick ones and twos, an ever-increasing frequency of boundaries without anything being over-hit - all in all a masterful display of cricketingness. Crescent began to lower their heads and the TWCC team thoroughly enjoyed first Rob's and then Tony's 50's. Rob, finally out with just three required to win, was caught behind for 68 (8 fours, 2 sixes), and Tony who remained not out on 51 (6 fours and 2 sixes) totally dominated the game. Reese, padded up for a long time, was eventually required to hit the winning runs which he did with a fine long four over mid-off, and everything in the TWCC garden was rosy.
TWCC skipper Brock was keen to point out that the bowling was the key to winning the game, and to restrict Crescent to 150 was indeed a fine effort and one to which everyone contributed, but in a batting innings containing two half-centuries it is clearly because of these two fine individual performances that the game was secured. Yes, TWCC have a fairly long batting line up, but it is one which has proved fragile on occasion (occasions to be honest), and not to highlight, and celebrate as we did in one of the weirdest pubs in the land, Rob and Tony's dominant performances would be remiss.
Also to make no mention of another demonstration of fine skippering would be remiss. Fine attention to detail in the field coupled with a commendably selfless approach to the game, maybe it is time to suggest that Richard ups himself in the batting order and bowls earlier, not least because he'd have to face the better bowlers and bowl at higher order batters!
Finally there is a rumour that TWCC are going to the dogs - which is no surprise to many.


Scorecard
Crescent CC won the toss and chose to bat first. Normal Sunday Gentleman's cricket with a funky 80 over twist. For more details see Richard Brock.
Crescent Innings: Eastwood bld Simon 8; E Carter bld Karvay 33; J Gatford ct J Panther bld Karvay 12; Matt Wood ct Pearce (wk) bld P Hunter 31; L Geary ct Pearce (wk) bld R Brock 27; M Kidman run out (R Rydon) 3; A Bousfield bld Bunn 0; J Brooks bld R Rydon 4; J Will bld R Brock 4; S Wood not out 0; R Hall bld R Rydon 0. Extras 15 (nb-6,w-4, lb-4, b-1) Total 150 all out.
TWCC Bowling: T Rydon 6-2-17-0; J Simon 6-1-20-1; J Panther 6-0-22-0; H Karvay 7-0-26-2; P Hunter 7-1-15-1; E Bunn 5-0-26-2; R Rydon 2.2-1-6-2; R Brock 2-0-14-2.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter ct wk bld Kidman 0; J Trollope bld Gatford 10; T Pearce not out 51; R Rydon ct wk bld R Hall 67; R Packham 4 not out 4. DNB J Simon, E Bunn, T Rydon, R Brock, J Panther, H Karvay. Extras 13 (w-6, lb-1, b-6) Total 152 for 3.
Crescent Bowling: Kidman 10-6-14-1; R Hall 5-0-28-1; Gatford 10-1-37-1; Will 3-0-33-0; Eastwood 2-0-20-0; S Wood 1.5-0-14-0.
TWCC win by 7 wickets.

Top of page
TWCC v Ashurst September 6th 2015
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times (all part of a sporting press initiative to up the literary quality and quantity of these pages...Look out for more famous first lines in 2016!) There was a time when we were, without exception, younger. Now, with the passage of time, this has changed. Personally I am not saddened by this fact - without time passing I wouldn't have been lucky enough to have met the people I have met, be semi-retired or known what it felt like to have three sixes hit off the last three balls of one of my best overs. However, if there is a tinge of a negative emotion in my breast when reviewing the youth I see in others, it is probably pure naked jealousy. Such was the case when I saw with frightening clarity the young natural talent deployed against TWCC by Ashurst's team of future stars. Many of the players appeared to be playing with the corner of county contracts sticking provacatively out of the pockets of their, no doubt, amply-filled young trousers, and all in all we were somewhat at a disadvantage throughout. Further humiliation was available for a good wallow when it became clear that the visiting team's captain had messed about with their batting order, and then, when it was our turn to bat, also chose not to give the ball to the real fast men. Boys. Young men. I'm not bitter.
We were beaten rather soundly, as will be clear to anyone with the stomach to look at the match scorecard.
However it would be wrong to say that it wasn't an enjoyable match; Ashurst were and are a pleasure to play against, and the game was played in good humour throughout, indeed, from their point of view, apart from the high nettles in the toilet complex, what was there not to like?
As far as mentioning honourable performances in dispatches goes one must report on the lustful fluency of some of the Ashurst batters, who came in clearly having heard of George Hunter's approach to the game. Many of the TWCC bowlers have no reason to be downhearted (apart from Joe, obviously) as good balls as well as bad went the distance. Even the combined Rydon powerhouse failed to make any indents in the wickets column (though often this is down to the support fielding...). Mention, unfortunately, has to be made of Skipper Brock's 2 wickets, but he deserves full credit for persevering with his admirable policy of inclusive captaincy which never wavered.
The home side's batting was also far from an embarassment, especially in the shape of a fine but rather unsupported innings from James. A 50 in the circumstances is even more valuable than if TWCC had found themselves in a run-fest, though observers at the Oak might not have noticed this fine innings celebrated in the usual fashion. Of further note is the not out from Honse - who better is there to deny opposition's bowlers in tight circumstances - and the active presence of our laser-eyed President who made a most welcome appearance before swanning off to Iberia.
So, with apologies for the late appearance of this report, and for the fact that it was somewhat cobbled together from no more than a few distant painful memories and a couple of photos of the scorecard, it's time to look forward to the last game of the season.

Scorecard
TWCC won the toss and chose to field. Limited 40 overs format.
Ashurst Batting: I Tidley ct Karvay, Bld Simon 18; T Chalmers Bld R Brock 62; S Chimfamhima Bld R Brock 25; B Poyser Not Out 40; J Cassells ct Rowland (wkt) Bld Karvay 12; G Isaacs Not Out 40. Extras 13 (1-nb, 6-w, 6-b). Total 218 for 4 off 40 overs.
TWCC Bowling: T Rydon 6-0-34-0; J Panther 1-0-13-0; M Edwards 6-0-40-0; J Simon 4-0-25-1; R Rydon 5-0-20-0; R Brock 6-1-20-2; H Karvay 4-0-14-1; K Scott 5-0-25-0; D Jones 3-0-19-0.
TWCC Innings: J Trollope Bld Poyser 51; J Rowland Ct Chimfamhima Bld Middleton 10; J Simon Ct, Bld Isaacs 12; M Edwards Ct & Bld J Lee 8; R Rydon Ct Cassells Bld J Lee 19; T Rydon Ct Chimfamhima Bld Tidley 6; J Panther Ct Poyser Bld J Lee 2; K Scott Ct, Bld J Lee 1; D Jones Hit Wkt Bld J Lee 1; H Karvay Not Out 0; R Brock Bld J Lee 2. Extras 25 (4-nb, 12-w, 2-lb, 7-b) Total 137 all out.
Ashurst win by 81 runs.

Top of page
TWCC v Brighton Beamers September 27th 2015
Arriving home after the final drink of the season at the Royal Oak, I began the ritual cleansing ceremony of my cricket bag: 3 pairs of whites, 2 jumpers, 3 shirts, one white trainer (if anyone has the right hand foot, I’d be grateful - it went missing this Sunday), any number of boxes, two tubes of sun tan lotion circa 1998, approximately £3.76, the smell of hard graft and soft green grass – and there, tucked away at the bottom, the TWCC scorebook 1982-4. It was a gift from Edward some time ago, sadly swallowed and forgotten by the insatiable cricket bag. Now history can be a soulful master, but as I turned over the yellowing pages of TWCC’s past, there was much of interest. For example, in the whole scorebook, there are but 2 scores of 50 or more: which I suspect says more about the state of the Twineham grass wicket of the time than the batsmen. The first page shows our opponents, The White Horse of Storrington, recording 7 zeros in their innings of 66. A huge victory for TWCC who made it with 1 wicket to spare! Among the opponents were Canbashers, Thomas Teasers and Hove Nondescripts. Only 2 of our current opponents feature: and one of them, Albourne and Sayers Common, are presently in a state of suspended animation. The other, arguably therefore our worthiest opponents – by dint of longevity – was Moulsecoomb. Opening up for them were Kevin Cook and the Vicar – still! Our scorecard featured none of the present day squad until suddenly, emerging from among the Sutcliffe-Smiths, the Peacocks, the Manleys, the Richardsons – came a young lad quite possibly making his debut on July 3rd 1983 vs Brastead Invicta. The scorebook reads `Eddie Bunn` Bowled for 13 (inc one 6). Interestingly, just a couple of pages earlier, one P Steinke played for Albourne and Sayers Common vs TWCC and finished with figures of 11.4-3-32-7.
Both men were on show for the final match of the season vs Brighton Beamers. One unfit to play, unable to run, stricken by stomach problems – the other waiting for a hernia operation. Tony took over the role of losing the toss with the skipper sleeping in – and soon we were pulling on our batting pads and Paul and James trekked their way through the ankle length grass out to the middle. James’ tenure was short, Paul’s much, much longer. Indeed while Tony came and went for an LBW on the top of the pad, halfway down the wicket, Paul kept swatting the ball to backward square leg with  practised regularity built up from 25 years of practice. Jonathan reminded us of his prowess with a fine 40. When Paul holed out for 70 we were well on the way to a good solid total: but it was an excellent stand of 52 between Edward and Jonathan which powered us towards our total of 180-7.
It was a Hunter tea of old: flags, large cakes, icing and coronation chicken – and the ground was vibrant with chattering wives, visiting players and talk of TWCC going to the dogs. Which normally leads us back onto the field of play: but not this time. The not increasingly regular partnership of Edwards/Panther struck up once again and their openers found runs difficult to come by. More so when Matt claimed an LBW. Reese, our newest member, dared let on that he’d once bowled – so he was brought on to be savaged until he pleaded to be taken off after 3 run-saturated overs. But there was promise..... Jim bowled with his usual elegance: neat, tidy, trimmed round the edges – but it was gradually becoming clear that we couldn’t give away runs to keep them in the game and they wouldn’t give away enough wickets to keep us in it. As they struggled needing 6, then 7, then 8 then 9 an over, it was left to Tony to provide the talking point. He was due to leave early, he clearly had his mind on the champagne and the flat bed of the Dreamliner waiting to sweep him off to Singapore – so that when the ball looped gently towards him at backward square leg,  a ball that was screaming from every stitch of its seam `catch me, catch me` - he opted to take avoiding action and turned and ran. The ball fell on the spot he’d occupied but a few seconds earlier. His excuse was a low sun, but it didn’t seem to get in his eyes as he watched the clock and eagerly made his getaway before the nerve jangling climax. Which there wasn’t. Jonathan showed exceptional glovework in a stumping and a run out, Matt came back on and took a couple of wickets – but really we had batted simply too well. 180 in the long grass was too tough a target and Beamers, who, to their credit, vigorously pursued the total all the way, came up 42 runs short with 3 wickets in hand. A proper cricket result: a draw on a day of warm sunshine as Twineham basked in an Indian summer. And so to the pub: just about bearable on the TWCC table, Harveys beer and laughter providing the necessary warmth. Another season gone, but a night at the dogs and of course the AGM with accompanying season’s figures to look forward to. Bliss indeed....

Scorecard
TWCC lost the toss and were asked to bat.
TWCC Innings: P Hunter ct, Bld G Young 70; J Trollope ct Young Bld M Renshaw 1; T Pearce LBW Bld N Chafy 25; J Rowland Bld R Benfield 40; R Packham Ct Eaton Bld G Young 0; E Bunn Ct, Bld Nicholls 22; M Edwards St, Bld Rigby 4; J Simon Not Out 6; J Panther    Not Out 4. TOTAL: 180-7. DNB: R Brock.
Fall: 7-2, 63-3, 102-1, 104-5, 156-6, 166-4, 170-7.